PDF(75375 KB)
Variation Trend and Causes of Stage-Discharge Relationship at Luoshan Station in Typical Years
CHEN Zhi-yuan, MEI Han-lin, JIN Guang-qiu, GUO Chao, JIN Zhong-wu
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12) : 29-39.
PDF(75375 KB)
PDF(75375 KB)
Variation Trend and Causes of Stage-Discharge Relationship at Luoshan Station in Typical Years
Luoshan hydrological station serves as a crucial flood control base in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River as it is located at the confluence of mainstream Yangtze River and the outflow of Dongting Lake with complex stage-discharge relationship. We analyzed the trends and influencing factors of stage-discharge relationship at Luoshan Station under erosion conditions by employing the M-K test method, Theil-Sen Median method, and a comprehensive correction approach for stage-discharge relationship based on measured water level and discharge data from 1990 to 2021 and typical river section data for selected years. Our key findings are as follows: 1) The water levels at Luoshan Station for low and medium discharges significantly decreased, which was consistent with the decline of the centroid elevation of low water-level channel and basic channel. Conversely, the water level at flood discharges exhibited large fluctuation range, yet with a non-significant upward trend. 2) The operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir has narrowed the fluctuation range of water level differences between Luoshan Station and Hankou Station, leading to an overall increase in the average water level difference. However, after 2013, the water level difference within flood flow intervals reduced, potentially exacerbating topwater conditions at Luoshan station during the flood season. During continuous flooding events in 2016 and 2020, contributions from topwater elevation, fluctuation rate, and other influencing factors at Luoshan Station averaged 34.8%, 23.8%, 41.4% and 31.4%, 50.6%, and 18.0% respectively; indicating that topwater elevation and fluctuation rate are primary influencing factors on water levels while other contributing factors may have larger proportions in certain years.
stage-discharge relationship / downstream jacking / rate of fluctuation / channel geometry adjustment / Luoshan station
| [1] |
李玉荣, 葛松华, 储蓓. 三峡水库建库前后荆江低水水位流量关系分析[J]. 人民长江, 2011, 42(6): 75-79.
(
|
| [2] |
秦智伟, 陈玺. 三峡水库蓄水后坝下游干流枯水期水位变化研究[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(23): 10-15.
(
|
| [3] |
郭小虎, 渠庚, 朱勇辉. 三峡工程蓄水运用以来荆江水位流量关系变化分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2011, 28(7): 82-86.
(
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
In this study, data measured from 1955-2016 were analysed to study the relationship between the water level and river channel geometry adjustment in the downstream of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) after the impoundment of the dam. The results highlight the following facts: (1) for the same flow, the low water level decreased, flood water level changed little, lowest water level increased, and highest water level decreased at the hydrological stations in the downstream of the dam; (2) the distribution of erosion and deposition along the river channel changed from “erosion at channels and deposition at bankfulls” to “erosion at both channels and bankfulls;” the ratio of low-water channel erosion to bankfull channel erosion was 95.5% from October 2002 to October 2015, with variations between different impoundment stages; (3) the low water level decrease slowed down during the channel erosion in the Upper Jingjiang reach and reaches upstream but sped up in the Lower Jingjiang reach and reaches downstream; measures should be taken to prevent the decrease in the channel water level; (4) erosion was the basis for channel dimension upscaling in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River; the low water level decrease was smaller than the thalweg decline; both channel water depth and width increased under the combined effects of channel and waterway regulations; and (5) the geometry of the channels above bankfulls did not significantly change; however, the comprehensive channel resistance increased under the combined effects of riverbed coarsening, beach vegetation, and human activities; as a result, the flood water level increased markedly and moderate flood to high water level phenomena occurred, which should be considered. The Three Gorges Reservoir effectively enhances the flood defense capacity of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River; however, the superposition effect of tributary floods cannot be ruled out. |
| [8] |
张曼, 周建军, 黄国鲜. 长江中游防洪问题与对策[J]. 水资源保护, 2016, 32(4): 1-10.
(
|
| [9] |
吴琼, 张莉, 曾雅立, 等. 长江中下游河段低枯水水位流量关系变化规律分析[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(2): 55-62.
(
|
| [10] |
柴元方, 李义天, 许炜阳, 等. 螺山站水位变化特征及其影响因素贡献率分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017, 35(7): 43-46, 29.
(
|
| [11] |
李琼, 张幼成, 王洪心, 等. 洪水涨落水位-流量分布规律及应用[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(6): 507-513.
(
|
| [12] |
戴明龙, 王立海, 李立平, 等. 2020年长江螺山站水位流量关系分析[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(5):118-122,142.
(
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
丁佩, 罗小峰, 刘星璐, 等. 受回水变动与洪水涨落综合影响的水位流量关系研究[J]. 水文, 2022, 42(6):7-12.
(
|
| [15] |
程银才, 李明华, 王军. 洪水涨落影响下水位流量关系单值化新方法[J]. 水电能源科学, 2009, 27(1):66-68.
(
|
| [16] |
孙孝波. 对受洪水涨落影响的水位流量关系单值化的探讨[J]. 水文, 2001, 21(2): 41-44.
(
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
李明, 胡春宏, 方春明. 三峡水库坝下游河道断面形态调整模式与机理研究[J]. 水利学报, 2018, 49(12):1439-1450.
(
|
| [23] |
李少希, 杨云平, 张华庆, 等. 三峡工程运行前后的长江中游河段冲淤变化(1975—2017年)[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(5): 1520-1531.
(
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
许全喜, 董炳江, 袁晶, 等. 三峡工程运用后长江中下游河道冲刷特征及其影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023, 35(2):650-661.
(
|
| [28] |
李义天, 薛居理, 孙昭华, 等. 三峡水库下游河床冲刷与水位变化[J]. 水力发电学报, 2021, 40(4): 1-13.
(
|
| [29] |
许全喜. 三峡工程蓄水运用前后长江中下游干流河道冲淤规律研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2013, 32(2): 146-154.
(
|
| [30] |
许全喜, 袁晶, 伍文俊, 等. 三峡工程蓄水运用后长江中游河道演变初步研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 2011, 36(2):38-46.
(
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
姚仕明, 郭小虎, 陈栋, 等. 2020年汛期长江中下游河道洪水过程及特性分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2021, 31(2): 5-10.
(
|
| [33] |
王佳妮, 罗倩. 长江中游武汉河段2020年特大暴雨洪水特性分析[J]. 水利水电快报, 2021, 42(5): 1-5.
(
|
| [34] |
程海云, 香天元, 唐聪. 长江中游城陵矶河段2016—2020年汛期水位非正常波动:影响因子及滤波修正[J]. 湖泊科学, 2022, 34(1):286-295.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |