Anti-scourability of Soils and Its Influencing Factors under Typical Ecological Restoration Models in Dry-Hot Valley Regions

YAN Jian-mei, LU Yang, WANG Yi-feng, YANG Xiao-lan, JIN Ke, WAN Dan, HU Yue

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10) : 80-87.

PDF(7245 KB)
PDF(7245 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10) : 80-87. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240738
Soil And Water Conservation And Ecological Restoration

Anti-scourability of Soils and Its Influencing Factors under Typical Ecological Restoration Models in Dry-Hot Valley Regions

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objective] Dry-hot valley regions are characterized by fragile ecological environment and severe soil erosion. Clarifying the differences in soil anti-scourability and the influencing factors under different ecological restoration models is crucial for revealing the soil anti-scourability mechanism and optimizing ecological restoration measures in this region. [Methods] The drawdown zone of Wudongde Hydropower Station in the dry-hot valley of the Jinsha River was selected as the study area. Three typical ecological restoration models were designed, namely tree forest land, slope-to-terrace + farmland, and shrub-grassland. Undisturbed soil samples were collected from three soil layers (0-20 cm, 20-40 cm, and 40-60 cm), and anti-scourability tests were conducted. The anti-scourability indices and runoff sediment amounts of each soil layer under different models at different scouring times were measured. Physicochemical indicators such as soil bulk density, water content, and particle composition were determined through laboratory experiments, and the influencing factors of soil anti-scourability were identified through correlation analysis. [Results] (1) Different ecological restoration models and soil layer depths significantly affected soil anti-scourability. The anti-scourability indice of tree forest land was the largest (0.566 L/g), followed by slope-to-terrace+farmland (0.501 L/g) and shrub-grassland (0.428 L/g). The total runoff sediment yield exhibited an opposite trend, with the shrub-grassland showing the highest value, 28.03% higher than that of the tree forest land. As soil depth increased, the anti-scourability indices of all three ecological restoration models demonstrated significant declining trend. For all three models, the runoff sediment concentration dropped rapidly during the initial scouring period (0-6 min) and stabilized after 6-10 minutes, while the anti-scourability indices exhibited regular temporal patterns that could be fitted by either quadratic or power functions(R2> 0.92 in all cases).(2) Significant differences in soil particle composition and particle fractal dimension were observed among the three models, reflecting variations in soil structural stability. Coarse silt (35.82%-46.10%, mean 41.85%) dominated the particle composition, while coarse sand (0-1.93%, mean 0.42%) was the least abundant fraction. The contents of clay, coarse clay, and fine silt followed the order of shrub-grassland > slope-to-terrace + farmland > tree forest land, whereas fine sand and coarse sand showed the opposite trend, with the highest values in the tree forest land and the lowest in the shrub-grassland. The soil particle fractal dimension ranged from 2.540 to 2.648, with the shrub-grassland exhibiting the highest values, followed by slope-to-terrace + farmland and then tree forest land (all differences significant), indicating that the tree forest land’s soil structure is more stable, which is favorable for soil anti-scourability. (3) Anti-scourability index exhibited significant correlations with multiple physicochemical indicators. Negative correlations were observed between anti-scourability index and soil bulk density, fine clay, coarse clay, fine silt, coarse silt, cumulative eroded soil mass, and fractal dimension, whereas positive correlations were found with fine sand and coarse sand contents. Water content showed a positive correlation with anti-scourability index during the early scouring stage (1-6 min) but turned negative in the later stage (7-10 min). Among these factors, fine clay content and particle fractal dimension demonstrated the most pronounced influences on the anti-scourability index. [Conclusions] Among the three typical ecological restoration models in dry-hot valley regions, tree forest model effectively enhances soil anti-scourability, followed by slope-to-terrace + farmland model. Soil particle composition and structural characteristics significantly affect anti-scourability performance, with fine clay content and particle fractal dimension being the dominant factors. For future ecological restoration measures in drawdown zones, it is recommended to prioritize tree-dominated and tree-shrub-grass composite configuration, tailored to regional topography and soil structural features, to improve soil anti-scourability.

Key words

dry-hot valley / ecological restoration model / soil anti-scourability / particle composition / influencing factor

Cite this article

Download Citations
YAN Jian-mei , LU Yang , WANG Yi-feng , et al . Anti-scourability of Soils and Its Influencing Factors under Typical Ecological Restoration Models in Dry-Hot Valley Regions[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(10): 80-87 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240738

References

[1]
万丹, 周火明, 卢阳, 等. 金沙江干热河谷库区消落带植被恢复研究: 进展与展望[J]. 三峡生态环境监测, 2021, 6(3): 9-21.
(WAN Dan, ZHOU Huo-ming, LU Yang, et al. Progress and Perspective of Vegetation Restoration in Water-level-fluctuating Zone of Dry-hot Valley Reservoirs in Jinsha River[J]. Ecology and Environmental Monitoring of Three Gorges, 2021, 6(3): 9-21. (in Chinese))
[2]
王勇, 李鹏, 穆军, 等. 金沙江干热河谷水电站库区消落带生态修复对策研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(5): 141-144, 148.
(WANG Yong, LI Peng, MU Jun, et al. Ecological Restoration in Level-fluctuating Zone Countermeasures of Dry-hot Valleys Reservoirs in the Jinsha River[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 16(5): 141-144, 148. (in Chinese))
[3]
卢阳, 周火明, 万丹, 等. 金沙江下游干热河谷消落带植被修复试验探讨[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(2): 5-11.
(LU Yang, ZHOU Huo-ming, WAN Dan, et al. Study on Vegetation Restoration in Water-level-fluctuating Zone of Dry-hot Valleys in Lower Jinsha River[J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 41(2): 5-11. (in Chinese))
[4]
DE BAETS S, POESEN J, KNAPEN A, et al. Impact of Root Architecture on the Erosion-reducing Potential of Roots during Concentrated Flow[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2007, 32(9): 1323-1345.
[5]
胡建忠, 周心澄, 李文忠, 等. 退耕地青海云杉人工林土壤抗冲性试验研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2004, 18(6):6-10.
(HU Jian-zhong, ZHOU Xin-cheng, LI Wen-zhong, et al. Experiment on Soil Anti-scourability of Artificial Picea Crassifolia Forest in Rehabilitation Lands[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2004, 18(6):6-10. (in Chinese))
[6]
资如毅, 赵龙山, 钱晓鹤, 等. 喀斯特高原山地土壤抗冲性与土壤物理性质的关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(3): 23-29.
(ZI Ru-yi, ZHAO Long-shan, QIAN Xiao-he, et al. Relationship between Soil Anti-scourability and Soil Physical Properties in Karst Mountain Areas[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(3): 23-29. (in Chinese))
[7]
韦小茶, 龙小梅, 唐欣, 等. 基于人工模拟降雨和原状土冲刷试验的喀斯特区土壤抗冲性研究[J]. 人民珠江, 2020, 41(2): 67-73.
(WEI Xiao-cha, LONG Xiao-mei, TANG Xin, et al. Research on Soil Anti-scourability in Karst Area Based on Artificial Simulated Rainfall and Undisturbed Soil Scouring Experiment[J]. Pearl River, 2020, 41(2): 67-73. (in Chinese))
[8]
沙小燕, 李魁, 王文龙, 等. 黄土高塬沟壑区草地沟头立壁土壤抗冲性特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 133-140.
Abstract
黄土高原植被恢复使沟头立璧土壤侵蚀过程发生显著变化。为明确黄土高塬沟壑区草地沟头立壁土壤抗冲性特征及其影响因素,以裸地为对照,利用室内原状土槽冲刷试验研究了草地沟头立壁0~1 m不同土层(0~10、10~20、20~40、40~60、60~80、80~100 cm)土壤理化性质和抗冲性特征。结果表明: 草地和裸地沟头土壤水稳性团聚体含量和粘聚力随土层加深均呈减小趋势。裸地沟头土壤有机质含量、土壤抗冲系数随土层深度的增加呈减小趋势,而草地沟头土壤有机质含量、土壤抗冲系数随土层加深先增加后减小,且均在10~20 cm土层达到最大值(24.30 g·kg<sup>-1</sup>和58.86 L·g<sup>-1</sup>),草地各土层土壤抗冲系数是裸地的1.7~9.3倍。沟头土壤抗冲性与土壤有机质含量、水稳性团聚体含量、黏聚力和植物根长密度呈极显著相关,其中与土壤有机质含量(r=0.98)的关系最密切。该研究可为黄土高塬沟壑区沟头溯源侵蚀机理的研究提供基础数据,并为有效防治该区域水土流失提供科学依据。
(SHA Xiao-yan, LI Kui, WANG Wen-long, et al. Characteristics of Soil Anti-scouribility in Gully Head Wall of Grass-covering on the Gullied Loess Plateau, Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1): 133-140. (in Chinese))
Vegetation restoration in the Chinese Loess Plateau has significantly changed soil erosion process of gully head wall. In order to investigate the characteristics and controlling factors of soil anti-scour properties of gully head covered by grasses, we carried out indoor undamaged soil trench scouring tests. By using barren gully head as the control, the physical and chemical properties and anti-scouring characteristics of soil in different soil layers (0-10, 10-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-80, 80-100 cm) of the vertical wall of gully with grass cover were analyzed. The results showed that water-stable aggregate content and cohesion in barren and grass-covering gully head decreased with soil depth. Soil organic matter content and soil anti-scouribility coefficient in barren gully head decreased with soil depth, while the two indicators for gully head covered by grass increased firstly and then decreased with soil depth, with the maximum value (24.30 g·kg<sup>-1</sup> and 58.86 L·g<sup>-1</sup>) in 10-20 cm soil layer. Meanwhile, the soil anti-scouring coefficient in each soil layer of grass-covering gully head was 1.7-9.3 times of that in soil layer of barren gully head. Soil organic matter content, water-stable aggregate content, cohesion and root length density all presented significantly positive correlation with soil anti-scouribility, among which soil organic matter content had the highest coefficient (<i>r</i>=0.98). Results of this study might provide basic data for the study of headcut erosion mechanism in Loess Plateau gully region, and scientific basis for effective control of soil and water loss in this region.
[9]
郭明明, 王文龙, 康宏亮, 等. 黄土高塬沟壑区植被自然恢复年限对坡面土壤抗冲性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(22): 138-146.
(GUO Ming-ming, WANG Wen-long, KANG Hong-liang, et al. Effect of Natural Vegetation Restoration Age on Slope Soil Anti-scourability in Gully Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(22): 138-146. (in Chinese))
[10]
侯春镁, 王克勤, 李玲, 等. 不同土地利用类型土壤大团聚体与抗冲性关系[J]. 人民长江, 2017, 48(11):46-50.
(HOU Chun-mei, WANG Ke-qin, LI Ling, et al. Relation between Large Soil Aggregate and Anti-scourablity of Different Land Use Types[J]. Yangtze River, 2017, 48(11): 46-50. (in Chinese))
[11]
李菊艳, 缪成波, 于萌, 等. 不同放牧制度对天山北坡草地抗冲性的影响[J]. 中国水土保持, 2022(5): 52-56, 7.
(LI Ju-yan, MIAO Cheng-bo, YU Meng, et al. Effects of Different Grazing Systems on Anti-Scourability of Grassland on the Northern Slope of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2022(5): 52-56, 7. (in Chinese))
[12]
屈东旭, 吕刚, 翟景轩, 等. 科尔沁沙地南缘不同林草措施根系对土壤抗冲性的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 21-25.
(QU Dong-xu, Gang, ZHAI Jing-xuan, et al. Effects of Root System of Different Forest and Grass Measures on Soil Anti-scouring in Southern Margin of Horqin Sandy Land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(1): 21-25. (in Chinese))
[13]
王雅琼, 张建军, 李梁, 等. 祁连山区典型草地生态系统土壤抗冲性影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(1):122-131.
(WANG Ya-qiong, ZHANG Jian-jun, LI Liang, et al. Analysis of Factors Impacting Soil Anti-scourability of Typical Grassland Ecosystems on the Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(1):122-131. (in Chinese))
[14]
徐文秀, 鲍玉海, 韦杰, 等. 水库消落带典型草本植物根系对土壤抗冲性能的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4): 65-71, 109.
(XU Wen-xiu, BAO Yu-hai, WEI Jie, et al. Impacts of the Typical Herbaceous Plant Roots on Soil Scour Resistance in the Reservoir Riparian Zone[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(4): 65-71, 109. (in Chinese))
[15]
王国梁, 周生路, 赵其国. 土壤颗粒的体积分形维数及其在土地利用中的应用[J]. 土壤学报, 2005, 42(4): 545-550.
(WANG Guo-liang, ZHOU Sheng-lu, ZHAO Qi-guo. Volume Fractal Dimension of Soil Particles and Its Applications to Land Use[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2005, 42(4): 545-550. (in Chinese))
[16]
蒋定生. 黄土区不同利用类型土壤抗冲刷能力的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 1979, 10(4): 20-23.
(JIANG Ding-sheng. Response of Soil Shear Strength to Heavy Rainfall under Different Land Use Types on Loess Tableland[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1979, 10(4):20-23. (in Chinese))
[17]
张建军, 朱金兆, 查同刚, 等. 晋西黄土区水土保持林地抗冲性研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1998, 20(6): 20-24.
(ZHANG Jian-jun, ZHU Jin-zhao, ZHA Tong-gang, et al. Soil Anti Scouribility of Soil and Water Conservation Forest in the Loess Plateau of Western Shanxi Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1998, 20(6): 20-24.)
[18]
谌芸, 何丙辉, 练彩霞, 等. 三峡库区陡坡根-土复合体抗冲性能[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(16): 5173-5181.
(CHEN Yun, HE Bing-hui, LIAN Cai-xia, et al. Root-soil System Anti-scourability on Steep Slopes in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(16): 5173-5181. (in Chinese))
[19]
马金龙, 王兵. 1962—2022年土壤抗冲性研究进展[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(17):19-28.
(MA Jin-long, WANG Bing. Research Progress of Soil Anti-scourability from 1962 to 2022[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(17):19-28. (in Chinese))
[20]
薛萐, 刘国彬, 张超, 等. 黄土高原丘陵区坡改梯后的土壤质量效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(4): 310-316.
(XUE Sha, LIU Guo-bin, ZHANG Chao, et al. Effects of Terracing Slope Cropland on Soil Quality in Hilly Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(4): 310-316. (in Chinese))
[21]
佟帆, 魏琳, 刘绪军, 等. 东北黑土区植被配置的土壤抗冲性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(2): 44-51.
Abstract
对东北黑土区不同植被配置下的土壤抗冲性及其影响因素进行研究,为水土保持植物选择和配置提供一定理论依据。采用野外采样与原状土冲刷试验相结合的方法。结果表明:坡位对土壤抗冲性具有一定影响,胡枝子与紫穗槐在不同坡位上的土壤抗冲性不同,且在土层上层(0~10 cm)存在差异,下层(10~20 cm)的变化规律相近;不同植被配置的土壤抗冲性随冲刷时间延长而不断增强;影响因素与土壤抗冲性的相关性排序为:砂粒含量>土壤含水量>WSA<sub>0.25 mm</sub>>根表面积密度>土壤容重>土壤有机质。胡枝子+杨树的模式最优,说明胡枝子更适合在杨树林下生长,可作为水土保持的优良树种用于杨树林的植被配置。
(TONG Fan, WEI Lin, LIU Xu-jun, et al. Soil Anti-scourability of Vegetation Configurations in Black Soil Region of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(2): 44-51. (in Chinese))

The research on soil anti-scourability and its influencing factors under different vegetation configuration in the black soil region of northeast China will provide a certain theoretical basis for the selection and allocation of plants for soil and water conservation. Field sampling and runoff scouring experiment were carried out. The results showed that the slope position had a certain influence on the soil anti-scourability. The soil anti-scourability of different slope positions for Lespedeza and Amorpha was different, and the change rule was different in the upper layer (0-10 cm) of the soil, and was similar in the lower layer (10-20 cm). The soil anti-scourability of different vegetation configurations gradually increased with the scouring time. The relationship between the influencing factors and the soil anti-scourability was ranked according to the correlation: sand content > soil water content > WSA0.25 mm > root surface area density > soil bulk density > organic matter. The model of Lespedeza + poplar was the best, indicating that Lespedeza was more suitable for growing under poplar trees, and could be used as an excellent tree species for soil and water conservation in the vegetation configuration of poplar forests.

[22]
许航, 秦岭, 何淑勤, 等. 大渡河干旱河谷区不同土地利用方式下土壤抗冲性特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2023, 37(10): 102-108.
(XU Hang, QIN Ling, HE Shu-qin, et al. Soil Anti-scourability under Different Land Use Types in Arid Valley Area of Dadu River[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2023, 37(10): 102-108. (in Chinese))
[23]
董智今, 展秀丽, 丁小花. 毛乌素沙地西南缘不同土地利用类型土壤颗粒分形特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(3): 43-48, 56.
(DONG Zhi-jin, ZHAN Xiu-li, DING Xiao-hua. Fractal Features of Soil Particles under Different Land Uses in the Southwestern Edge of the Mu us Sandy Land[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(3): 43-48, 56. (in Chinese))
[24]
郑桂莲, 张月莹, 强方方, 等. 北京平原地区不同土地利用类型对土壤颗粒组成及其分形特征的影响[J]. 林业调查规划, 2024, 49(1): 172-177.
(ZHENG Gui-lian, ZHANG Yue-ying, QIANG Fang-fang, et al. Effects of Different Land Use Types on Soil Particle Distribution and Fractal Dimension in Plain Afforestation Area of Beijing[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2024, 49(1): 172-177. (in Chinese))
[25]
郑晓岚, 杨玲, 宋娇, 等. 水库消落带土壤颗粒组成分形及其空间分异特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(1): 66-71.
(ZHENG Xiao-lan, YANG Ling, SONG Jiao, et al. Fractal Characteristics and Spatial Variation of Soil Particle Composition in the Reservoir Riparian Zone[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(1): 66-71. (in Chinese))
[26]
WU Q, ZHAO H. Soil and Water Conservation Functions of Seabuckthorn and Its Role in Controlling and Exploiting Loess Plateau[J]. Forestry Studies in China, 2000, 2: 50-56.
[27]
王月玲, 许浩, 马璠, 等. 宁南黄土区典型林地土壤抗冲性及相关物理性质[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(1): 37-43.
(WANG Yue-ling, XU Hao, MA Fan, et al. Soil Anti scourability and Its Related Physical Properties on Typical Forestlands in Loess Hilly Region of Southern Ningxia[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(1): 37-43. (in Chinese))
[28]
徐加盼, 邓羽松, 陈峰云, 等. 花岗岩崩岗不同层次土壤抗冲性及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(5):9-13.
(XU Jia-pan, DENG Yu-song, CHEN Feng-yun, et al. Anti scourability on Different Soil Horizons of Granite Collapsing Gully and Its Driving Forces[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2017, 31(5):9-13. (in Chinese))
[29]
史东梅, 陈晏. 紫色丘陵区农林混作模式的土壤抗冲性影响因素[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(5):1400-1409.
(SHI Dong-mei, CHEN Yan. The Influencing Factors of Soil Anti Scouribility of Tree crop Intercropping Land in Purple Soil Hilly Region[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(5): 1400-1409. (in Chinese))
PDF(7245 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/