Fish Diversity Patterns in Rivers Receiving Ecological Water Supplement Driven by Riparian Land Use

LIU Han, LI Lu-dan, GUO Wei-jie, QIAO Qiang-long, GONG Dan-dan, DU Qi, LI Hang, ZHAO Wei-hua

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 198-207.

PDF(14590 KB)
PDF(14590 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 198-207. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240686
Basic Theories And Key Technologies For Major Water Diversion Projects

Fish Diversity Patterns in Rivers Receiving Ecological Water Supplement Driven by Riparian Land Use

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objectives] This study aims to: (1) elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of fish communities and multi-dimensional diversity (species, functional, taxonomic) in ecological water supplement rivers of North China; and (2) determine the mechanistic effects of riparian land use across varying buffer sizes (0.5 km, 1 km, 2 km, 5 km) on these diversity patterns. The research focused on two major water-supplemented systems—the Ziya River Basin and Baiyangdian Lake Basin—during the ecological water supplement period from 2020 to 2022. [Methods] Field surveys were conducted annually during the water supplement period. Fishes were collected using standardized multi-mesh gillnets and traps, identified to species level, and quantified for abundance and biomass. Species functional traits (feeding, locomotion, predator avoidance, trophic level, reproduction) were compiled following Villéger et al., primarily sourced from FishBase and literature. Taxonomic diversity metrics were calculated based on Linnaean hierarchies (species to class). Riparian land use types (built area, wetland, trees, crop, water, bare ground, and rangeland) within four buffer zones (0.5 km, 1 km, 2 km, 5 km) were extracted from ESRI’s global 10-m resolution land cover data. Statistical analyses included: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) to test interannual differences; Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) to visualize community structure; Pearson correlation analysis to examine relationships among diversity indices; and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) models to quantify the driving effects of riparian land use on fish diversity. [Results] A total of 2,720 fish individuals, belonging to 40 species, 12 families across 6 orders, were recorded during the three-year field survey. Species richness (26 species in 2020, 27 in 2021, 26 in 2022; ANOVA, p>0.05) and diversity indices (Shannon, Margalef, Pielou) showed no significant interannual changes. However, significant shifts in species composition were observed: rheophilic, clean-water indicator species (e.g., Opsariichthys bidens, Zacco platypus) increased in relative abundance from 7.3% (2020) to 12.6% (2022), while pollution-tolerant generalists (e.g., Carassius auratus) remained dominant but declined from 22.38% to 17.14%. NMDS and PERMANOVA confirmed no significant interannual differences in overall community structure. Multi-dimensional diversity indices (functional:FRic,FDiv,FDis,FEve;taxonomic: Delta, Delta*, Delta+, Lambda+) also exhibited no significant temporal trends. Pearson correlations revealed strong positive relationships among species diversity indices (e.g., Richness vs. Shannon: r=0.91) and showed that functional dispersion (FDis) was significantly positively correlated with all diversity dimensions (r=0.32-0.64). Built area exerted significant negative effects on most diversity indices. Wetland, rangeland, and water positively correlated with diversity. Buffer size significantly influenced explanatory rate: Riparian land use explained 7.3% to 28.3% of the variation in diversity indices. Effects were strongest on functional and species diversity within smaller buffers (0.5-1 km; e.g., 28.3% explanation for Shannon within 0.5 km buffer), >2 km buffers, cropland and bare ground significantly reduced functional diversity (FRic and FDiv; p<0.05), while larger buffers (5 km) showed higher explanatory power for taxonomic diversity metrics (11.9% explanation for Delta). Functional dispersion (FDis) and taxonomic diversity (Delta) correlating significantly with all diversity dimensions (r=0.36-0.90; p<0.05) and outperforming species richness in detecting environmental responses. [Conclusions] Although overall diversity metrics showed no significant changes, the increase in sensitive rheophilic fish species indicates improved water quality following ecological water supplementation. Riparian land use, particularly built area expansion, significantly reduced multi-dimensional fish diversity, whereas wetlands, rangeland, and water enhanced it. Land use impacts exhibited scale dependence: near-shore buffers (0.5-1 km) dominated functional and species diversity changes, while larger-scale land use (5 km) primarily influenced taxonomic diversity. This underscores the need for scale-targeted management measures. Furthermore, functional dispersion (FDis) and taxonomic diversity (Delta) proved more sensitive indicators of community changes than species richness alone, recommending their integration into future monitoring frameworks. These findings provide a scientific basis for prioritizing conservation targets and formulating management strategies in water-supplemented river restoration.

Key words

riparian land use / fish community / multi-dimensional diversity / spatiotemporal patterns / ecological water supplement

Cite this article

Download Citations
LIU Han , LI Lu-dan , GUO Wei-jie , et al . Fish Diversity Patterns in Rivers Receiving Ecological Water Supplement Driven by Riparian Land Use[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(8): 198-207 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240686

References

[1]
张鸿星, 李鲁丹, 赵伟华, 等. 华北地下水超采区河湖地下水回补水生态效果评估[J]. 地下水, 2021, 43(2):1-4,10.
(ZHANG Hong-xing, LI Lu-dan, ZHAO Wei-hua, et al. Evaluation of the Ecological Effects of the River and Lake in Groundwater Over-exploitation Area in North China[J]. Ground Water, 2021, 43(2):1-4,10.(in Chinese))
[2]
陈飞, 丁跃元, 唐世南, 等. 华北地区河湖生态补水与地下水回补的实践及效果分析[J]. 中国水利, 2021(7): 36-39.
(CHEN Fei, DING Yue-yuan, TANG Shi-nan, et al. Practice and Effect Analysis of River-lake Ecological Water Supplement and Groundwater Recharge in the North China Region[J]. China Water Resources, 2021(7): 36-39. ) (in Chinese)
[3]
杨得瑞. 华北地下水超采综合治理河湖地下水回补试点探索与效果评估[J]. 中国水利, 2020(13): 15-16.
(YANG De-rui. Pilot and Result Assessment for River and Lake Groundwater Recharge in over Exploited Areas of North China[J]. China Water Resources, 2020(13): 15-16. ) (in Chinese)
[4]
孙然好, 魏琳沅, 张海萍, 等. 河流生态系统健康研究现状与展望: 基于文献计量研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3526-3536.
(SUN Ran-hao, WEI Lin-yuan, ZHANG Hai-ping, et al. Present Situation and Prospect of River Ecosystem Health Research-based on Bibliometric Research[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 3526-3536.(in Chinese))
[5]
LANGE K, TOWNSEND C R, GABRIELSSON R, et al. Responses of Stream Fish Populations to Farming Intensity and Water Abstraction in an Agricultural Catchment[J]. Freshwater Biology, 2014, 59(2): 286-299.
[6]
XIONG F, OLDEN J D, LU Y, et al. Riparian Land Use and In-channel Stressors Drive Fish Community Structure in the Yangtze River[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2021, 36(10): 3079-3095.
[7]
LIU H, QU X, XIA W, et al. Taxonomic, Functional, and Phylogenetic Diversity Patterns Reveal Different Processes Shaping River Fish Assemblages in the Eastern Huai River Basin, China[J]. Water Biology and Security, 2023, 2(1): 100078.
[8]
DE CARVALHO D R, LEAL C G, JUNQUEIRA N T, et al. A Fish-based Multimetric Index for Brazilian Savanna Streams[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,77:386-396.
[9]
KARR J R. Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities[J]. Fisheries, 1981, 6(6): 21-27.
[10]
倪勇, 伍汉霖. 江苏鱼类志[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
(NI Yong, WU Han-lin. Fishes of Jiangsu Province[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006.(in Chinese))
[11]
FROESE R, PAULY D. FishBase[EB/OL].(2024-02-01) [2024-07-02].
[12]
VILLÉGER S, BROSSE S, MOUCHET M, et al. Functional Ecology of Fish: Current Approaches and Future Challenges[J]. Aquatic Sciences, 2017, 79(4): 783-801.
[13]
CLARKE K R, WARWICK R M. A Taxonomic Distinctness Index and Its Statistical Properties[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1998, 35(4): 523-531.
[14]
SCHWEIGER O, KLOTZ S, DURKA W, et al. A Comparative Test of Phylogenetic Diversity Indices[J]. Oecologia, 2008, 157(3): 485-495.
Traditional measures of biodiversity, such as species richness, usually treat species as being equal. As this is obviously not the case, measuring diversity in terms of features accumulated over evolutionary history provides additional value to theoretical and applied ecology. Several phylogenetic diversity indices exist, but their behaviour has not yet been tested in a comparative framework. We provide a test of ten commonly used phylogenetic diversity indices based on 40 simulated phylogenies of varying topology. We restrict our analysis to a topological fully resolved tree without information on branch lengths and species lists with presence-absence data. A total of 38,000 artificial communities varying in species richness covering 5-95% of the phylogenies were created by random resampling. The indices were evaluated based on their ability to meet a priori defined requirements. No index meets all requirements, but three indices turned out to be more suitable than others under particular conditions. Average taxonomic distinctness (AvTD) and intensive quadratic entropy (J) are calculated by averaging and are, therefore, unbiased by species richness while reflecting phylogeny per se well. However, averaging leads to the violation of set monotonicity, which requires that species extinction cannot increase the index. Total taxonomic distinctness (TTD) sums up distinctiveness values for particular species across the community. It is therefore strongly linked to species richness and reflects phylogeny per se weakly but satisfies set monotonicity. We suggest that AvTD and J are best applied to studies that compare spatially or temporally rather independent communities that potentially vary strongly in their phylogenetic composition-i.e. where set monotonicity is a more negligible issue, but independence of species richness is desired. In contrast, we suggest that TTD be used in studies that compare rather interdependent communities where changes occur more gradually by species extinction or introduction. Calculating AvTD or TTD, depending on the research question, in addition to species richness is strongly recommended.
[15]
OSBORNE L L, KOVACIC D A. Riparian Vegetated Buffer Strips in Water-quality Restoration and Stream Management[J]. Freshwater Biology, 1993, 29(2):243-258.
[16]
KIFFNEY P M, RICHARDSON J S, BULL J P. Responses of Periphyton and Insects to Experimental Manipulation of Riparian Buffer Width along Forest Streams[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 40(6): 1060-1076.
[17]
KARRA K, KONTGIS C, STATMAN-WEIL Z, et al. Global Land Use / Land Cover with Sentinel 2 and Deep Learning[C]//2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS. July 11-16, 2021, Brussels, Belgium. New York: IEEE Press, 2021: 4704-4707.
[18]
VILLÉGER S, MASON N W H, MOUILLOT D. New Multidimensional Functional Diversity Indices for a Multifaceted Framework in Functional Ecology[J]. Ecology, 2008, 89(8): 2290-2301.
Functional diversity is increasingly identified as an important driver of ecosystem functioning. Various indices have been proposed to measure the functional diversity of a community, but there is still no consensus on which are most suitable. Indeed, none of the existing indices meets all the criteria required for general use. The main criteria are that they must be designed to deal with several traits, take into account abundances, and measure all the facets of functional diversity. Here we propose three indices to quantify each facet of functional diversity for a community with species distributed in a multidimensional functional space: functional richness (volume of the functional space occupied by the community), functional evenness (regularity of the distribution of abundance in this volume), and functional divergence (divergence in the distribution of abundance in this volume). Functional richness is estimated using the existing convex hull volume index. The new functional evenness index is based on the minimum spanning tree which links all the species in the multidimensional functional space. Then this new index quantifies the regularity with which species abundances are distributed along the spanning tree. Functional divergence is measured using a novel index which quantifies how species diverge in their distances (weighted by their abundance) from the center of gravity in the functional space. We show that none of the indices meets all the criteria required for a functional diversity index, but instead we show that the set of three complementary indices meets these criteria. Through simulations of artificial data sets, we demonstrate that functional divergence and functional evenness are independent of species richness and that the three functional diversity indices are independent of each other. Overall, our study suggests that decomposition of functional diversity into its three primary components provides a meaningful framework for its quantification and for the classification of existing functional diversity indices. This decomposition has the potential to shed light on the role of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning and on the influence of biotic and abiotic filters on the structure of species communities. Finally, we propose a general framework for applying these three functional diversity indices.
[19]
LALIBERTÉ E, LEGENDRE P. A Distance-based Framework for Measuring Functional Diversity from Multiple Traits[J]. Ecology, 2010, 91(1): 299-305.
A new framework for measuring functional diversity (FD) from multiple traits has recently been proposed. This framework was mostly limited to quantitative traits without missing values and to situations in which there are more species than traits, although the authors had suggested a way to extend their framework to other trait types. The main purpose of this note is to further develop this suggestion. We describe a highly flexible distance-based framework to measure different facets of FD in multidimensional trait space from any distance or dissimilarity measure, any number of traits, and from different trait types (i.e., quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative). This new approach allows for missing trait values and the weighting of individual traits. We also present a new multidimensional FD index, called functional dispersion (FDis), which is closely related to Rao's quadratic entropy. FDis is the multivariate analogue of the weighted mean absolute deviation (MAD), in which the weights are species relative abundances. For unweighted presence-absence data, FDis can be used for a formal statistical test of differences in FD. We provide the "FD" R language package to easily implement our distance-based FD framework.
[20]
张浩, 丁森, 张远, 等. 西辽河流域鱼类生物完整性指数评价及与环境因子的关系[J]. 湖泊科学, 2015, 27(5): 829-839.
(ZHANG Hao, DING Sen, ZHANG Yuan, et al. Assessment of the Fish Index of Biotic Integrity and Its Relationship with Environmental Factors in the Xiliao River Basin[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2015, 27(5): 829-839.(in Chinese))
[21]
JOHNSON R K, HERING D. Response of Taxonomic Groups in Streams to Gradients in Resource and Habitat Characteristics[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 46(1): 175-186.
[22]
HEINO J, SOININEN J, LAPPALAINEN J, et al. The Relationship between Species Richness and Taxonomic Distinctness in Freshwater Organisms[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2005, 50(3): 978-986.
[23]
PETCHEY O L, GASTON K J. Functional Diversity (FD),Species Richness and Community Composition[J]. Ecology Letters, 2002, 5(3):402-411.
[24]
TAKEHIRO SASAKI S O. Two-phase Functional Redundancy in Plant Communities along a Grazing Gradient in Mongolian Rangelands[J]. Ecology, 2009, 90(9):2598-2608.
The concept of functional redundancy is at the core of theory relating changes in ecosystem functioning to species loss. However, few empirical studies have investigated the strength and form of the relationship between species and functional diversity (i.e., the presence of functional redundancy in ecological communities) in this context. In particular, we know little about how local extinctions in real communities might impact functional diversity. Here, we examined the relationship between species and functional diversity in plant communities along a grazing gradient across Mongolian rangeland ecosystems. We applied a recently described measure of functional diversity that incorporates species' dissimilarities defined from plant functional traits and tested several hypothesized forms of the relationship between species and functional diversity using linear and nonlinear modeling techniques. We found a significant sigmoid logistic relationship between species richness and functional diversity in relatively benign environmental conditions. This indicates high functional redundancy at low levels of species richness followed by a rapid increase at intermediate levels, until functional diversity reaches an asymptote at high levels (i.e., two-phase functional redundancy). In contrast, we generally observed a positive linear relationship between these parameters in relatively harsh environmental conditions, indicating low functional redundancy. Observed functional redundancy probably resulted from two factors, intrinsic redundancy in species' functional traits and extrinsic redundancy caused by nonrandom compositional change that is nonrandom with respect to functional traits. Lack of either intrinsic or extrinsic redundancy may result in low functional redundancy. Two-phase functional redundancy suggests that functional traits are abruptly lost from a community below a certain level of species richness, and a community then shifts into a contrasting state that has a few limited functional groups characterized by disturbance-resistant traits, as a consequence of disturbances such as livestock grazing. This study represents a major step forward in predicting the consequences of livestock grazing on the functioning of Mongolian rangeland ecosystems.
[25]
CADOTTE M W, CARSCADDEN K, MIROTCHNICK N. Beyond Species: Functional Diversity and the Maintenance of Ecological Processes and Services[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 48(5): 1079-1087.
[26]
李鲁丹, 周智伟, 刘晗, 等. 浮游植物群落结构对生态补水的响应机制[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(10):63-68,100.
Abstract
为强化华北地下水超采及地面沉降综合治理,水利部2018年以滹沱河、滏阳河、南拒马河的部分河段作为河湖地下水生态补水试点,启动生态补水工作。为评估生态补水对河流生态环境的改善效果,探索浮游植物群落结构对生态补水的响应机制,选取连续5 a(2018—2022年)进行生态补水的滹沱河和南拒马河开展连续监测(2019—2022年),对浮游植物的群落结构及水环境因子变化展开分析。研究结果表明,生态补水使得受水水体的水质由劣Ⅴ类逐渐向Ⅱ类转变,至补水第3 a基本达到最佳水质状态;受水环境因子的影响浮游植物群落结构发生较大变化,浮游植物密度、生物量、蓝藻门种类数、密度百分比及优势种优势度均总体呈现降低趋势;硅藻门种类数和密度百分比、Margalef 丰富度指数、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数和Pielou均匀度指数则总体呈升高趋势;浮游植物优势种逐渐由蓝藻门种类向硅藻门、绿藻门种类转变。冗余分析结果表明,总氮和pH值是影响补水河流浮游植物群落结构的主要环境因子。
(LI Lu-dan, ZHOU Zhi-wei, LIU Han, et al. Response Mechanism of Phytoplankton Community to Ecological Water Replenishment[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(10): 63-68, 100.(in Chinese))
[27]
HEITKE J D, PIERCE C L, GELWICKS G T, et al. Habitat, Land Use, and Fish Assemblage Relationships in Lowa Streams: Preliminary Assessment in an Agricultural Landscape[J]. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 2006, 48:287-303.
[28]
DALA-CORTE R B, GIAM X, OLDEN J D, et al. Revealing the Pathways by which Agricultural Land-use Affects Stream Fish Communities in South Brazilian Grasslands[J]. Freshwater Biology, 2016, 61(11): 1921-1934.
[29]
TANAKA M O, DE SOUZA A L T, MOSCHINI L E, et al. Influence of Watershed Land Use and Riparian Characteristics on Biological Indicators of Stream Water Quality in Southeastern Brazil[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2016, 216: 333-339.
[30]
WU W, XU Z, KENNARD M J, et al. Do Human Disturbance Variables Influence More on Fish Community Structure and Function than Natural Variables in the Wei River Basin, China?[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 61: 438-446.
[31]
CHEN K, OLDEN J D. Threshold Responses of Riverine Fish Communities to Land Use Conversion across Regions of the World[J]. Global Change Biology, 2020, 26(9): 4952-4965.
PDF(14590 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/