Discussion on Monitoring Methods for the Temperature Difference Between Upper and Lower Layers of Mass Concrete

HUANG Yao-ying, FU Yu-chen, ZHUANG Wei, TU Yue-tong, HU Yu

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 153-161.

PDF(8394 KB)
PDF(8394 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 153-161. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20240661
Hydraulic Structure And Material

Discussion on Monitoring Methods for the Temperature Difference Between Upper and Lower Layers of Mass Concrete

Author information +
History +

Abstract

[Objectives] When constructing concrete hydraulic projects in cold and high-altitude regions, or when promoting interconnection of water networks through the construction of concrete-based backbone projects such as sluices, ship locks, and pumping stations, long intervals in concrete pouring are inevitable, and the temperature difference between the upper and lower layers of concrete becomes a key concern. Although the upper-lower temperature difference, the allowable foundation temperature difference, and the internal-external temperature difference are three important temperature control indicators in the thermal control and crack prevention of mass concrete, the vague or overly theoretical definition of the upper-lower temperature difference makes its calculation inconvenient and monitoring difficult to implement effectively, making it hard to apply this indicator in actual construction. Therefore, effectively addressing the calculation and monitoring of the temperature difference between the upper and lower layers of concrete is of urgent engineering significance. [Methods] Based on existing definitions of the temperature difference between the upper and lower layers and considering the operability of monitoring, this study proposed four calculation methods following the principle of matching “calculation method-monitoring index”. These methods are based respectively on the “temperature within the geometric vertical centerline range” and the “temperature within the overall influence range” of the upper and lower pouring segments. Through simulating the temperature field and creep stress field of mass concrete with different interval durations, samples of maximum tensile stress in concrete and samples of upper-lower temperature differences under different interval conditions were obtained. Subsequently, statistical tests were conducted on the above samples to derive the corresponding probability density distribution functions of the maximum tensile stress and temperature difference between upper and lower layers. Then, the failure probability of the maximum tensile stress was determined based on the allowable tensile stress of concrete. Finally, assuming that the failure probabilities of the maximum tensile stress and temperature difference between upper and lower layers were equal, the allowable temperature differences between the upper and lower layers of concrete corresponding to the four calculation methods were proposed. [Results] Based on the concrete pouring of the bottom slab-guide angle section of a large ship lock, simulation calculations of the temperature field and creep stress field of mass concrete were carried out for different seasons (spring, summer, autumn, and winter) and various interval durations (30 to 180 days). According to the proposed method for determining the allowable temperature difference between upper and lower layers, four allowable temperature differences were derived: 29.14 ℃, 19.95 ℃, 20.29 ℃, and 18.02 ℃, respectively. These values showed some deviations from the currently recommended range of 15-20 ℃ in existing standards. [Conclusions] Because the calculation methods correspond to their respective monitoring indicators, different approaches to calculating the temperature difference between the upper and lower layers result in significant differences in the allowable temperature differences. Considering the operability of on-site monitoring, it is recommended to use the calculation method based on the “temperature within the geometric vertical centerline range of the upper and lower pouring segments” and its corresponding monitoring indicator to monitor the temperature difference between upper and lower layers of mass concrete on site.

Key words

mass concrete / temperature difference between upper and lower layer / calculation method / failure probability / tensile stress

Cite this article

Download Citations
HUANG Yao-ying , FU Yu-chen , ZHUANG Wei , et al . Discussion on Monitoring Methods for the Temperature Difference Between Upper and Lower Layers of Mass Concrete[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(8): 153-161 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20240661

References

[1]
朱伯芳. 大体积混凝土温度应力与温度控制[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2012.
(ZHU Bo-fang. Temperature Stress and Temperature Control of Mass Concrete[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2012.(in Chinese))
[2]
林继镛, 张社荣. 水工建筑物[M]. 6版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2019.
(LIN Ji-yong, ZHANG She-rong. Hydraulic Structure[M]. 6th ed. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2019.(in Chinese))
[3]
安瑞楠, 林鹏, 陈道想, 等. 超大混凝土结构温度梯度监测与温度场演化[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 63(7): 1050-1059.
(AN Rui-nan, LIN Peng, CHEN Dao-xiang, et al. Temperature Gradient Monitoring and Thermal Evolution of a Super Mass Concrete Structure[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63(7): 1050-1059.(in Chinese))
[4]
叶劲松, 刘晓龙, 李雷刚. 杨房沟水电站高拱坝大体积混凝土温控措施研究[J]. 四川水力发电, 2022, 41(4): 10-14.
(YE Jin-song, LIU Xiao-long, LI Lei-gang. Temperature Control Measures of Mass Concrete in High Arch Dam in Yangfanggou HEP[J]. Sichuan Water Power, 2022, 41(4): 10-14.(in Chinese))
[5]
陶然, 李绍平, 黄睿奕. 码头胸墙大体积混凝土裂缝成因分析及防裂措施[J]. 水运工程, 2018(5):189-194.
(TAO Ran, LI Shao-ping, HUANG Rui-yi. Causes Analysis and Control Methods Study for Cracks of Mass Concrete in Fascia Beam Construction[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2018(5): 189-194.(in Chinese))
[6]
许朴, 朱岳明, 贲能慧. 倒T型混凝土薄壁结构施工期温度裂缝控制研究[J]. 水利学报, 2009, 40(8): 969-975.
(XU Pu, ZHU Yue-ming, BEN Neng-hui. Study on Thermal Cracking Control of Inverted T-shaped Concrete Structures during Construction[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 40(8): 969-975.(in Chinese))
[7]
SL 319—2018, 混凝土重力坝设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2018.
(SL 319—2018, Design Specificatian for Concrete Gravity Dams[S]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2018.(in Chinese))
[8]
SL 282—2018, 混凝土拱坝设计规范[S] 北京: 中国水利水电出版社,2018.
(SL 282—2018, Design Specification for Concrete Arch Dam[S] Beijing:China WaterPower Press, 2018. (in Chinese)
[9]
朱伯芳. 建设高质量永不裂缝拱坝的可行性及实现策略[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(10): 1155-1162.
(ZHU Bo-fang. On the Feasibility of Building High Quality Arch Dams without Cracking and the Relevant Techniques[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(10): 1155-1162.(in Chinese))
[10]
李松辉, 雒翔宇, 张国新, 等. 船闸等薄壁结构长间歇后温控防裂措施研究[J]. 水力发电, 2022, 48(4): 49-53.
(LI Song-hui, LUO Xiang-yu, ZHANG Guo-xin, et al. Study on Temperature Control and Crack Prevention Measures for Thin-walled Structures such as Ship Lock after Long Intervals[J]. Water Power, 2022, 48(4): 49-53.(in Chinese))
[11]
朱文明, 王华, 汤建宏. 船闸大体积混凝土温控技术应用[J]. 水运工程, 2022(2): 214-218.
(ZHU Wen-ming, WANG Hua, TANG Jian-hong. Application of Temperature Control Technology for Mass Concrete in Ship Lock[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2022(2): 214-218.(in Chinese))
[12]
汪琦, 程井, 李明志, 等. 福建某碾压混凝土重力坝温控仿真及温控标准研究[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(1): 14-21.
(WANG Qi, CHENG Jing, LI Ming-zhi, et al. Research on Temperature Control Simulation and Temperature Control Standard of a RCC Gravity Dam in Fujian[J]. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Natural Sciences), 2023, 45(1):14-21.(in Chinese))
[13]
蒋小健, 秦明豪, 王立成. 新疆某工程碾压混凝土坝施工期温控防裂[J]. 大坝与安全, 2020(4):57-63.
(JIANG Xiao-jian, QIN Ming-hao, WANG Li-cheng. Temperature Control and Crack Prevention of a RCC Dam during Construction in Xinjiang[J]. Dam & Safety, 2020(4):57-63. ) (in Chinese)
[14]
黄达海, 金毅勐, 张润潇. 高寒地区强约束区大体积混凝土基础容许温差的仿真计算[J]. 水电能源科学, 2013, 31(3): 103-105, 44.
(HUANG Da-hai, JIN Yi-meng, ZHANG Run-xiao. Simulation Calculation of Allowable Range of Temperature for Mass Concrete Foundation Base under Strong Constraint in Paramos[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2013, 31(3): 103-105, 44.(in Chinese))
[15]
顾佳俊, 夏世法, 李秀琳, 等. 新疆某高拱坝温度应力计算与温度控制关键技术研究[J]. 大坝与安全, 2018(1):52-55,61.
(GU Jia-jun, XIA Shi-fa, LI Xiu-lin, et al. Title: Research on Key Technologies for Thermal Stress Calculation and Temperature Control for a Higharch Dam in Xinjiang[J]. Dam & Safety, 2018(1):52-55,61.(in Chinese))
[16]
张国新, 刘毅, 李松辉, 等. “九三一” 温度控制模式的研究与实践[J]. 水力发电学报, 2014, 33(2): 179-184.
(ZHANG Guo-xin, LIU Yi, LI Song-hui, et al. Research and Practice of Nine-three-one Temperature Control Mode[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2014, 33(2): 179-184.(in Chinese))
[17]
李松辉, 张湘涛, 张国新, 等. 高混凝土重力坝关键部位温控防裂研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2013, 32(3):181-186.
(LI Song-hui, ZHANG Xiang-tao, ZHANG Guo-xin, et al. Study on Temperature Control for Key Components of High Concrete Dam[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2013, 32(3): 181-186.(in Chinese))
[18]
章景涛, 郑学瑞, 裘华锋, 等. 新老混凝土缝面应力仿真及早龄期原型试验验证[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(9):192-197.
(ZHANG Jing-tao, ZHENG Xue-rui, QIU Hua-feng, et al. Stress Simulation of New and Old Concrete Joint Face and Prototype Verification Experiment at Early Hardening Age[J]. Yangtze River, 2019, 50(9): 192-197.(in Chinese))
[19]
邓世顺, 王振红, 汪娟, 等. 大坝混凝土施工期温控措施的时间和空间优化[J]. 人民黄河, 2019, 41(8): 124-128.
(DENG Shi-shun, WANG Zhen-hong, WANG Juan, et al. Temporal-spatial Optimization of Temperature Control Measures for Dam Concrete Construction[J]. Yellow River, 2019, 41(8): 124-128.(in Chinese))
[20]
高山, 陈建康, 陈立宝, 等. 高温炎热地区碾压混凝土重力坝温控防裂研究[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(5): 154-159.
(GAO Shan, CHEN Jian-kang, CHEN Li-bao, et al. Temperature Control and Crack Prevention Study for RCC Gravity Dam in High Temperature Area[J]. Yangtze River, 2020, 51(5): 154-159.(in Chinese))
[21]
张国新, 刘有志, 刘毅, 等. 特高拱坝施工期裂缝成因分析与温控防裂措施讨论[J]. 水力发电学报, 2010, 29(5): 45-51.
(ZHANG Guo-xin, LIU You-zhi, LIU Yi, et al. Analysis on the Causes of Crack Formation and the Methods of Temperature Control and Crack Prevention during Construction of Super-high Arch Dams[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2010, 29(5): 45-51.(in Chinese))
[22]
熊国锋, 杨耀. 梅蓄电站厂房岩壁吊车梁混凝土浇筑内外温差研究[J]. 广东水利水电, 2020(10):61-65.
(XIONG Guo-feng, YANG Yao. Study on Internal and External Temperature Difference of Concrete Pouring of Crane Beam on Rock Wall in MeizhouHydropower Station[J]. Guangdong Water Resources and Hydropower, 2020(10): 61-65. ) (in Chinese)
[23]
NB/T 35092—2017,混凝土坝温度控制设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2017.
(NB/T 35092-2017,Design Code for Temperature Control of Concrete Dam[S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2017.(in Chinese))
[24]
吴中如. 水工建筑物安全监控理论及其应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
(WU Zhong-ru. Safety Monitoring Theory & Its Application of Hydraulic Structures[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003.(in Chinese))
[25]
庄维. LHG船闸不同施工间歇期上下层温差反馈分析[D] 宜昌:三峡大学,2024. (ZHUANG Wei. Feedback Analysis of Temperature Difference Between Upper and Lower Layers of LHG Ship Lock During Different Construction Intervals[D] Yichang: China Three Gorges University, 2024.(in Chinese))
[26]
谌东升, 黄耀英, 周宜红, 等. 基于组合指数式绝热温升的泄洪洞衬砌混凝土温度场仿真分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2013(6):124-127.
Abstract
针对目前常用的双曲线式绝热温升与试验资料吻合得较好,但不便于数学运算,而组合指数式绝热温升既与试验资料吻合得较好,又便于数学运算,本文分别开发了双曲线式绝热温升和组合指数式绝热温升的水管冷却等效热传导法有限元仿真分析程序,结合西南某含有冷却水管的泄洪洞衬砌混凝土工程,将常用的双曲线绝热温升转化为组合指数式,然后进行温度场仿真分析对比,分析表明,两种方法仿真计算的典型时刻的代表节点温度和中间断面温度场的吻合情况均令人满意,但相对双曲线式绝热温升的水管冷却等效热传导法,组合指数式绝热温升的水管冷却等效热传导法公式简洁,便于程序实现,且计算速度快。
(SHEN Dong-sheng, HUANG Yao-ying, ZHOU Yi-hong, et al. An Emulation Analysis of Temperature Field for Lining Concrete of Spillway Tunnels Based on the Compound Exponential Formula[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2013(6):124-127. ) (in Chinese)
The hyperbolic formula, which is frequently used for adiabatic temperature rise, is well accord with experimental results, but it is difficult to mathematical operation, whereas, the compound exponential formula is well accord with experimental results and convenient to mathematical operation. The finite element emulation programs based on cooling pipe equivalent models of the hyperbolic formula and the compound exponential formula are developed in this paper. The hyperbolic formula for adiabatic temperature rise of a tunnel lining concrete engineering with cooling pipe in southwest China is converted to the compound exponential formula. Then, a comparative analysis of the temperature field simulation proceeded between the hyperbolic formula and the compound exponential formula. Analysis shows that the temperature of representative nodes and the temperature field of intermediate section based on the two simulation calculation methods coincide satisfactory, but the finite element emulation programs based on cooling pipe equivalent models of the compound exponential formula, which is easy to attain and has faster computing speed, is more concise than the hyperbolic formula.
[27]
黄耀英, 周宜红, 周建兵. 水管冷却热传导计算模型能量分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2012(1): 78-82.
(HUANG Yao-ying, ZHOU Yi-hong, ZHOU Jian-bing. Energy Analysis of a Pipe Cooling Thermal Conduction Calculation Model[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2012(1): 78-82. ) (in Chinese)
PDF(8394 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/