Coupling and Coordinated Development of Water Resources-Food-Energy-Ecosystem in Shiyang River Basin

HOU Hui-min, MA Hai-hua, WANG Peng-quan, WANG Wan-zhen

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 16-22.

PDF(6035 KB)
PDF(6035 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 16-22. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20231216
COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT OF RIVER BASIN

Coupling and Coordinated Development of Water Resources-Food-Energy-Ecosystem in Shiyang River Basin

Author information +
History +

Abstract

To investigate the coordinated and sustainable development of the water resources-food-energy-ecosystem (WFEE) in the Shiyang River Basin and mitigate the negative impacts from the development of a single resource sector on other resource domains, we established a coupling and coordination evaluation index system for the WFEE system of the northwest inland Shiyang River Basin as a case study. The CRITIC method was employed for the weighting of subsystem indicators, and the coupling coordination degree model was adopted to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and the coordination degree of Shiyang River Basin’s WFEE from 2020 to 2030. Results demonstrate that the comprehensive development index of the Shiyang River Basin’s WFEE system from 2000 to 2020 was at a moderate level, with the energy subsystem showing a negative growth trend. The WFEE system of Shiyang River Basin has undergone six stages, from mildly disordered to well coordinated, displaying an upward trend. The prediction results suggest that the basin will remain a well-coordinated growth trend during the forecast period from 2020 to 2030. These findings provide a scientific basis for the sustainable management and efficient development and utilization of the Shiyang River Basin.

Key words

water-food-energy-ecosystem / CRITIC weighting method / comprehensive development index / coupling coordination degree / Shiyang River basin

Cite this article

Download Citations
HOU Hui-min , MA Hai-hua , WANG Peng-quan , et al. Coupling and Coordinated Development of Water Resources-Food-Energy-Ecosystem in Shiyang River Basin[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(2): 16-22 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20231216

References

[1]
HOFF H. Understanding the Nexus:Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference[C]//Proceedings of the Bonn2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany. November 16-18, 2011.
[2]
张宗勇, 刘俊国, 王凯, 等. 水-粮食-能源关联系统述评:文献计量及解析[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(16):1569-1581.
ZHANG Zong-yong, LIU Jun-guo, WANG Kai, et al. A Review and Discussion on the Water-food-energy Nexus: Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(16): 1569-1581. (in Chinese))
[3]
张超, 刘蓓蓓, 李楠, 等. 面向可持续发展的资源关联研究:现状与展望[J]. 科学通报, 2021, 66(26):3426-3440.
ZHANG Chao, LIU Bei-bei, LI Nan, et al. Research on Resource Linkage for Sustainable Development: Current Situation and Prospects[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(26): 3426-3440. (in Chinese))
[4]
王奕佳, 刘焱序, 宋爽, 等. 水-粮食-能源-生态系统关联研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7):684-693.
Abstract
传统的水—粮食—能源关联对生态系统的支持与反馈能力考虑不足,增加了协同保障区域水—粮食—能源安全的难度。综述了近年来国际上水—粮食—能源—生态系统关联框架的搭建,发现有必要从生态系统服务的角度统筹水、粮食、能源等资源部门的社会治理过程。基于生态系统类型,可分为农业、河流、森林、草地和城市生态系统的5种常见关联结构,但目前针对森林和草原生态系统的研究相对不足。量化评估中子系统边界的确定,关联预测中多主体对关联的影响,整合优化中结合资源管理和生态修复是难点所在。未来可以从把握区域特征、扩充指标体系、整合模型需求和优化国土空间4个方向入手优化水—粮食—能源—生态系统关联结构,为区域可持续发展提供整体决策依据。
WANG Yi-jia, LIU Yan-xu, SONG Shuang, et al. Research Progress on Water-Food-Energy-Ecosystem Linkages[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2021, 36(7):684-693. (in Chinese))
[5]
米红, 周伟. 未来30年我国粮食、淡水、能源需求的系统仿真[J]. 人口与经济, 2010(1): 1-7.
MI Hong, ZHOU Wei. The System Simulation of China’s Grain, Fresh Water and Energy Demand in the Next 30 Years[J]. Population & Economics, 2010(1): 1-7. (in Chinese))
[6]
邓鹏, 陈菁, 陈丹, 等. 区域水-能源-粮食耦合协调演化特征研究: 以江苏省为例[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2017, 28(6): 232-238.
DENG Peng, CHEN Jing, CHEN Dan, et al. The Evolutionary Characteristics Analysis of the Coupling and Coordination among Water, Energy and Food: Take Jiangsu Province as an Example[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2017, 28(6): 232-238. (in Chinese))
[7]
彭少明, 郑小康, 王煜, 等. 黄河流域水资源-能源-粮食的协同优化[J]. 水科学进展, 2017, 28(5):681-690.
PENG Shao-ming, ZHENG Xiao-kang, WANG Yu, et al. Study on Water-energy-food Collaborative Optimization for Yellow River Basin[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2017, 28(5): 681-690. (in Chinese))
[8]
周露明. 水资源管理中的水-能源-粮食纽带关系研究[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2019.
( ZHOU Lu-ming. Research on the Relationship between Water-Energy-Food in Water Resources Management[D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2019. (in Chinese))
[9]
施海洋, 罗格平, 郑宏伟, 等. 基于“水—能源—食物—生态”纽带因果关系和贝叶斯网络的锡尔河流域用水分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(5):1036-1052.
Abstract
跨界流域水资源利用系统因受气候变化、人口增长、政治博弈、生态反馈等许多因素的互馈影响,包含复杂的“水—能源—食物—生态”纽带因果关系,形成具有高度不确定性的复杂非线性系统。传统水资源规划方法中缺少对这种复杂纽带关系的约束,而目前研究这类纽带关系多基于耦合多个模型、集成建模的方法,数据需求大、对复杂因果关系的不确定性模拟能力不足。而贝叶斯网络能以概率分布代替参数确定值来模拟系统中因果关系的不确定性、同时减少数据需求。本文利用贝叶斯概率网络,选取锡尔河流域为研究对象,量化这一因不合理用水而导致咸海生态危机的跨界内陆河流域“水—能源—食物—生态”纽带中的因果关系。结果表明贝叶斯网络能有效地模拟纽带中因果关系的强弱与不确定性,分析1970—2015年间不同时期影响咸海入湖水量的主要因素。为用水预测与流域水资源利用管理提供了系统性认知的基础,并展现出在较低模型复杂度和成本下建模的潜力。苏联时期,咸海入湖水量对农业开发增长的灌溉用水、上游水库建设的蓄水过程和径流量等较敏感;苏联解体后,咸海入湖水量对下游国家不合理使用的灌溉用水及上游水库蓄水量等节点高度敏感。短期内,需提高洗盐与灌溉用水效率,改良种植结构、增加粮食作物占比,并预防干旱危害;长期而言,通过普及先进滴灌技术,能大幅节约农业用水,在50%和80%的滴灌普及率下,新增咸海入湖水量将达到6.4 km <sup>3</sup>和9.6 km <sup>3</sup>以上,有望逐步缓解咸海生态危机。
SHI Hai-yang, LUO Ge-ping, ZHENG Hong-wei, et al. Water Use Analysis of Syr Darya River Basin: Based on “Water-energy-food-Ecology” Nexus and Bayesian Network[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(5): 1036-1052. (in Chinese))
[10]
孙才志, 阎晓东. 中国水资源-能源-粮食耦合系统安全评价及空间关联分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2018, 34(5):1-8.
SUN Cai-zhi, YAN Xiao-dong. Security Evaluation and Spatial Correlation Pattern Analysis of Water Resources-energy-food Nexus Coupling System in China[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2018, 34(5): 1-8. (in Chinese))
[11]
林志慧, 刘宪锋, 陈瑛, 等. 水-粮食-能源纽带关系研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(7): 1591-1604.
Abstract
水&#x02014;粮食&#x02014;能源纽带关系是实现社会经济可持续发展的重要支撑与关键途径。本文系统梳理了纽带关系的概念内涵,回顾了纽带关系的近今进展,发现当前学界对纽带关系的概念内涵和研究框架尚未达成较为一致的认识。在评估方法上,可归纳为基于关键过程视角的评估、基于系统整体视角的评估以及耦合纽带系统内外部要素的综合评估,呈现出由传统部门研究范式到自然科学和社会科学交叉的人地系统耦合研究范式的转变。文献计量分析表明,2000&#x02014;2019年纽带关系研究发文量呈指数增长,且2015年之后增加尤为显著。在学科分布上,环境科学、食品科学和营养学是研究纽带关系的主要学科,未来应加强地理学的综合性和系统性思维在纽带关系研究中的应用。通过文献回顾发现,当前研究对纽带系统的互馈关系及其演化特征缺乏定量化理解,建议未来应重点关注以下五个前沿议题,即建立纽带关系多源信息数据库、揭示纽带关系耦合系统互馈机理、发展纽带关系耦合系统过程模型、搭建纽带关系耦合系统决策平台以及促进纽带关系多部门协同合作,旨在通过系统治理和科学管控,实现纽带关系系统协同可持续发展。
LIN Zhi-hui, LIU Xian-feng, CHEN Ying, et al. Research Progress and Prospect of Water-grain-energy Bond Relationship[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(7): 1591-1604. (in Chinese))
[12]
常奂宇, 赵勇, 桑学锋, 等. 京津冀水资源-粮食-能源-生态协同调控研究Ⅰ:方法与模型[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(6):655-665.
CHANG Huan-yu, ZHAO Yong, SANG Xue-feng, et al. Research on the Coordinated Regulation of Water Resources-food-energy-ecology in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region Ⅰ: Methods and Model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(6): 655-665. (in Chinese))
[13]
赵勇, 常奂宇, 桑学锋, 等. 京津冀水资源-粮食-能源-生态协同调控研究Ⅱ: 应用[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(10): 1251-1261.
ZHAO Yong, CHANG Huan-yu, SANG Xue-feng, et al. Research on the Coordinated Regulation of Water Resources-food-energy-ecology in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region Ⅱ: Application[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(10): 1251-1261. (in Chinese))
[14]
牛莉霞, 胡天龙. 基于可拓云模型的辽宁省水资源承载力评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(10): 22-29.
Abstract
为实现区域水资源可持续发展,维护社会经济健康。构建了基于可拓云模型的水资源承载力综合评价模型。从水资源、社会、经济和生态环境4个维度建立水资源承载力评价指标体系,运用层次分析法与CRITIC法进行线性组合确定综合权重,对辽宁省2012—2019 年辽宁省水资源承载力状况进行综合评价,并引入障碍度模型探究辽宁省水资源承载力的主要影响因素。结果表明:辽宁省水资源承载力在2012—2015年处于临界状态,2016—2019年水资源承载力水平变化复杂但整体表现下降趋势。通过障碍因子诊断,人均水资源量、供水模数逐渐成为主要影响因素。整体来看辽宁省水资源承载力有所下降,为进一步提高水资源承载能力,必须加强对水资源的综合管理。
NIU Li-xia, HU Tian-long. Evaluation of Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Liaoning Province Based on Extension Cloud Model[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(10): 22-29. (in Chinese))
[15]
钱凤魁, 王卫雯, 王秋兵. 基于耦合协调度模型量化耕地自然质量与立地条件协同关系[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(18):284-291.
QIAN Feng-kui, WANG Wei-wen, WANG Qiu-bing. Quantification of Synergetic Relationship between Natural Quality and Site Conditions of Cultivated Land Based on Coupling Coordination Degree Model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(18):284-291. (in Chinese))
PDF(6035 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/