Review on Rockburst Prevention Techniques and Typical Applications in Deep Tunnels

OUYANG Lin, ZHANG Ru-jiu, LIU Yao-ru, HUANG Qi-shuai, LI Jian-he, PANG Zhi-yong

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12) : 161-170.

PDF(1769 KB)
PDF(1769 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12) : 161-170. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20221050

Review on Rockburst Prevention Techniques and Typical Applications in Deep Tunnels

  • OUYANG Lin1, ZHANG Ru-jiu2, LIU Yao-ru2, HUANG Qi-shuai3, LI Jian-he4, PANG Zhi-yong2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The classification, mechanism, evaluation, prediction methods and prevention principles of rockburst are briefly introduced first. On this basis, active and passive prevention and control techniques for rockburst during deep tunnel construction are summarized. In particular, the mechanism, application scope and prevention effects of such measures are highlighted. The differences of rockburst characteristics between drilling and blasting (D&B) method and tunnel boring machine (TBM) method are analyzed, and the applications of rockburst prevention techniques in typical projects are investigated. Such projects include the diversion tunnel of Jinping II hydropower station, the Qinling tunnel of Hanjiang-to-Weihe River Diversion Project, the diversion tunnel of Neelum-Jhelum (N-J) hydroelectric project in Pakistan and Xianglushan tunnel of the diversion project in Central Yunnan. 1) Active rockburst prevention techniques include borehole stress release, advanced stress relief blasting, pilot tunnels, high-pressure water injection, advanced anchor bolts and pre-stressed anchor bolts; passive prevention techniques include shotcrete-bolt support, steel support and reinforcement mesh (flexible steel wire mesh). 2) Timely closed support and active measures against strong-extremely-strong rockburst are the key points of preventing rockburst induced by D&B method and TBM method, respectively. 3) At present, active and passive measures are combined for the rockburst prevention of large hydraulic tunnels. For active prevention, advance stress release is the dominant measure, while for passive prevention, shotcrete-bolt-mesh combined with steel support is adopted together with the use of fast flexible support. 4) Dynamic prevention, precise quantitative prevention, and more efficient advanced stress release technology and flexible energy absorption support system are research directions in future.

Key words

deep tunnel / rockburst prevention / TBM / drilling and blasting / bolt

Cite this article

Download Citations
OUYANG Lin, ZHANG Ru-jiu, LIU Yao-ru, HUANG Qi-shuai, LI Jian-he, PANG Zhi-yong. Review on Rockburst Prevention Techniques and Typical Applications in Deep Tunnels[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2022, 39(12): 161-170 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20221050

References

[1] 蒋昱州,王瑞红,汪 斌,等.锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞围岩岩爆特性研究[J].长江科学院院报,2015,32(4):71-76.
[2] 杜小洲.引汉济渭秦岭输水隧洞关键技术问题及其研究进展[J].人民黄河,2020,42(11):138-142.
[3] YANG Jian-ping, CHEN Wei-zhong, ZHAO Wu-sheng, et al. Geohazards of Tunnel Excavation in Interbedded Layers under High In Situ Stress [J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 230: 11-22.
[4] 何满潮,谢和平,彭苏萍,等.深部开采岩体力学研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(16):2803-2813.
[5] 钱七虎.地下工程建设安全面临的挑战与对策[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(10):1945-1956.
[6] 王继敏,吴新霞,曾雄辉,等.锦屏辅助洞岩爆的爆破主动控制实践[J].长江科学院院报,2014,31(11):114-119.
[7] 胡泉光,陈方明,陈恩瑜.深埋长引水隧洞TBM施工关键技术探讨[J].人民长江,2015,46(7):19-21.
[8] HAN Xing-bo, LIANG Xiao-ming, YE Fei, et al. Statistics and Construction Methods for Deep TBM Tunnels with High Geostress: A Case Study of Qinling Tunnel in Hanjiang-Weihe River Diversion Project[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 138: 106301.
[9] HE Si-yue, LAI Jin-xing, ZHONG Yu-jian, et al. Damage Behaviors, Prediction Methods and Prevention Methods of Rockburst in 13 Deep Traffic Tunnels in China[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 121: 105078.
[10]汪 珂.深埋隧道岩爆预测及防治技术现状综述[J].隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(2):212-224.
[11]冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,明华军,等.深埋隧洞岩爆孕育规律与机制:即时型岩爆[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(3):433-444.
[12]陈炳瑞,冯夏庭,明华军,等.深埋隧洞岩爆孕育规律与机制:时滞型岩爆[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(3):561-569.
[13]钱七虎. 岩爆、冲击地压的定义、机制、分类及其定量预测模型[J]. 岩土力学,2014,35(1):1-6.
[14]周 辉,孟凡震,张传庆,等. 深埋硬岩隧洞岩爆的结构面作用机制分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(4):720-727.
[15]张春生,刘 宁,褚卫江,等.锦屏二级深埋隧洞构造型岩爆诱发机制与案例解析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(11):2242-2250.
[16]RUSSENES B F. Analysis of Rock Spallingfor Tunnels in Steep Valley Sides (in Norwegian)[D]. Trondheim: Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1974.
[17]HOEK E, BROWN E T. Practical Estimates of Rock Mass Strength[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(8): 1165-1186.
[18]徐林生,王兰生.二郎山公路隧道岩爆发生规律与岩爆预测研究[J].岩土工程学报,1999,21(5):569-572.
[19]KIDYBISKI A. Bursting Liability Indices of Coal[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1981, 18(4): 295-304.
[20]WANG J A, PARK H D. Comprehensive Prediction of Rockburst Based on Analysis of Strain Energy in Rocks[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16: 49-57.
[21]JIANG Qua, FENG Xia-ting, Xiang Tian-bing,et al. Rockburst Characteristics and Numerical Simulation Based on a New Energy Index, A Case Study of a Tunnel at 2,500 m Depth[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2010, 69(3): 381-388.
[22]ZHANG C Q, ZHOU H, FENG X T. An Index for Estimating the Stability of Brittle Surrounding Rock Mass: FAI and Its Engineering Application[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2011, 44(4): 401-414.
[23]ZHANG R J, HOU S K, LIU Y R, et al. A New Evaluation Index of Rockburst Tendency Considering Tunnel Excavation and Fracture Distribution[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 861(3): 032022.
[24]揭秉辉,赵周能,陈炳瑞,等.基于微震监测技术的深埋长大隧洞群岩爆时空分布规律分析[J].长江科学院院报,2012,29(9):69-73.
[25]张文东,马天辉,唐春安,等. 锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞岩爆特征及微震监测规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(2):339-348.
[26]徐林生,王兰生,李天斌. 国内外岩爆研究现状综述[J].长江科学院院报,1999,16(4):25-28,39.
[27]谭以安.岩爆类型及其防治[J].现代地质,1991(4):450-456.
[28]张镜剑,傅冰骏.岩爆及其判据和防治[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(10):2034-2042.
[29]LI Shao-jun, KUANG Zhi-hao, XIAO Ya-xun, et al. Rockburst Tendency Prediction Based on an Integrating Method of Combination Weighting and Matter-Element Extension Theory: A Case Study in the Bayu Tunnel of the Sichuan-Tibet Railway[J]. Engineering Geology, 2022, 308(3): 106796.
[30]徐向东.隧道岩爆防治作用机理初探[J].铁道工程学报,2008(10):36-39,44.
[31]SONG Da-zhao, WANG En-yuan, LIU Zhen-tang, et al. Numerical Simulation of Rock-burst Relief and Prevention by Water-Jet Cutting[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 70: 318-331.
[32]汪 洋,王继敏,尹健民,等.基于快速应力释放的深埋隧洞岩爆防治对策研究[J].岩土力学,2012,33(2):547-553.
[33]HE Hu, DOU Lin-ming, FAN Jun, et al. Deep-hole Directional Fracturing of Thick Hard Roof for Rockburst Prevention[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 32: 34-43.
[34]杨春宝,胡国志,李凌志,等.深埋输水隧洞硬岩岩爆防控技术研究[J].水利规划与设计,2021(4):52-56.
[35]侯 靖,张春生,单治钢.锦屏二级水电站深埋引水隧洞岩爆特征及防治措施[J].地下空间与工程学报,2011,7(6):1251-1257.
[36]赵 毅.TBM强岩爆掘进段小导洞超前应力释放施工技术[J].隧道与地下工程灾害防治,2022,4(1):78-85.
[37]ZHANG Chuan-qing, FENG Xia-ting, ZHOU Hui,et al. A Top Pilot Tunnel Preconditioning Method for the Prevention of Extremely Intense Rockbursts in Deep Tunnels Excavated by TBMs[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2011, 45(3): 289-309.
[38]吴世勇,周济芳,陈炳瑞,等.锦屏二级水电站引水隧洞TBM开挖方案对岩爆风险影响研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(4):728-734.
[39]LUO Yong. Influence of Wateron Mechanical Behavior of Surrounding Rock in Hard-rock Tunnels: An Experimental Simulation[J]. Engineering Geology, 2020, 277, doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105816.
[40]王 斌,赵伏军,尹土兵.基于饱水岩石静动力学试验的水防治屈曲型岩爆分析[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(12):1863-1869.
[41]吴忠仕,蓝 文.超前锚杆防治岩爆危害在拉平隧洞中的应用[J].隧道建设,2000(2):43-47.
[42]巩江峰,田四明,杨治刚.我国高地应力区隧道岩爆研究现状及分析[J].铁道标准设计,2022,66(5):95-99,105.
[43]刘成禹,李红军,吴 吟.卡姆奇克隧道岩爆的力学机制及主动防控技术[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(5):961-970.
[44]严 鹏,陈 拓,卢文波,等.岩爆动力学机理及其控制研究进展[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2018,51(1):1-14,26.
[45]KAISER P K, CAI M. Design of Rock Support System under Rockburst Condition[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 4(3): 215-227.
[46]刘 宁,张春生,单治钢,等.岩爆风险下深埋长大隧洞支护设计与工程实践[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(增刊1):2934-2943.
[47]陈绪文,黄 磊,邹逸伦.岩爆隧道柔性支护快速施工技术[J].隧道建设(中英文),2018,38(7):1212-1219.
[48]张德华,刘士海,任少强.高地应力软岩隧道中型钢与格栅支护适应性现场对比试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(11):2258-2266.
[49]汪 波,郭新新,何 川,等.当前我国高地应力隧道支护技术特点及发展趋势浅析[J].现代隧道技术,2018,55(5):1-10.
[50]赵周能,冯夏庭,肖亚勋,等.不同开挖方式下深埋隧洞微震特性与岩爆风险分析[J].岩土工程学报,2016,38(5):867-876.
[51]于 洋,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,等.深埋隧洞不同开挖方式下即时型岩爆微震信息特征及能量分形研究[J].岩土力学,2013,34(9):2622-2628.
[52]YAN Peng, LU Wen-bo, CHEN Ming, et al. Energy Release Process of Surrounding Rocks of Deep Tunnels with Two Excavation Methods[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 4(2): 160-167.
[53]ZHANG Heng, ZHU Yi-mo, CHEN Liang, et al. The Prevention and Control Mechanism of Rockburst Hazards and Its Application in the Construction of a Deeply Buried Tunnel [J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9173629.
[54]张照太,陈 竹,陈炳瑞,等. 大直径TBM通过深埋强岩爆洞段的岩爆防治方法[J]. 煤炭学报,2011,36(增刊2):431-435.
[55]WANG Ji-min,ZENG Xiong-hui,ZHOU Ji-fang. Practices on Rockburst Prevention and Control in Headrace Tunnels of Jinping II Hydropower Station[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering,2012,4(3):258-268.
[56]薛景沛. 敞开式TBM安全快速通过隧洞强岩爆地层施工技术:以引汉济渭工程秦岭隧洞岭南TBM施工段为例[J].隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(6):989-997.
[57]鲁永华,王水山,李 淼,等.巴基斯坦N-J水电站工程岩爆预警与防治[J].水利水电工程设计,2018,37(4):1-3,27.
[58]王家祥,周 云,李银泉,等.滇中引水工程香炉山深埋长隧洞高地应力与硬岩岩爆分析研究[J].水利规划与设计,2019(12):135-139.
[59]王旺盛,陈长生,王家祥,等.滇中引水工程香炉山深埋长隧洞主要工程地质问题[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(9):154-159.
[60]唐贵强.秦岭隧洞岩爆应力解除爆破及支护参数优化[J].人民黄河,2019,41(2):130-134.
[61]杜立杰,洪开荣,王佳兴,等.深埋隧道TBM施工岩爆特征规律与防控技术[J].隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(1):1-15.
[62]冯夏庭,张传庆,陈炳瑞,等.岩爆孕育过程的动态调控[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(10):1983-1997.
PDF(1769 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/