In line with the variation characteristics of elastic parameters in the rock mass of fracture developed area, we derived a three-dimensional in-situ stress calculation model with aperture deformation method. Building upon engineering practice and theoretical analysis, we proposed three principles for screening test data to calculate the in-situ stress in fracture developed area. On this basis, we conducted actual project-based three-dimensional in-situ stress measurements. The test results were compared with the stress field characteristics, hydraulic fracturing test data, and topography of the project area, showing relatively consistent outcomes. Furthermore, we analyzed the influence of Poisson’s ratio and elastic modulus deviations on the three-dimensional in-situ stress test data using the full space stereographic projection technology. Results demonstrate that the proposed technique accounts for anisotropy characteristics, and yields reliable calculation results with high engineering practical value. In comparison to Poisson’s ratio, the deviation of elastic modulus significantly affects the magnitude, orientation, and inclination of the in-situ stress.
Key words
in-situ stress /
fracture developed area /
aperture deformation method /
elastic parameter variation /
screening principle
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 王 超, 王益腾, 韩增强, 等. 垂直孔应力解除法地应力测试技术及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1412-1421.
[2] ORESTE P. Back-Analysis Techniques for the Improvement of the Understanding of Rock in Underground Constructions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2005, 20(1): 7-21.
[3] 王成虎. 地应力主要测试和估算方法回顾与展望[J]. 地质论评, 2014, 60(5): 971-991, 996, 992.
[4] 蔡美峰. 地应力测量原理和方法的评述[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1993, 12(3): 275-283.
[5] 刘 杰, 高 进, 黎 照, 等. 基于各向异性模型的引水隧洞围岩稳定性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(1): 181-193.
[6] 曹文科, 邓金根, 蔚宝华, 等. 弹性参数各向异性对页岩井周应力的影响[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 31(5): 27-35, 42.
[7] 王空前, 焦建伟, 王衍森. 正交各向异性岩体地应力计算的误差研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(6): 1298-1303.
[8] 秦雨樵, 汤 华, 吴振君. 岩体各向异性和温度对深孔应力解除法测试的影响[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2020, 32(11): 75-78.
[9] 何江达, 范景伟, 王桂芳, 等. 横观各向同性岩体孔径变形法的三维地应力分析计算[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2000, 19(3): 299-303.
[10]田 鹤, 曾联波, 舒志国, 等. 页岩横向各向同性地应力预测模型中弹性参数的确定方法[J]. 地质力学学报, 2019, 25(2): 166-176.
[11]韩昌瑞, 白世伟, 张 波. 正交各向异性岩体孔径变形法的二维地应力分析方法改进[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(11): 2249-2253.
[12]赵云川, 李 琦, 陈 江, 等. 孔径变形法测试地应力弹性模量参数选取分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(10): 2143-2147.
[13]LJUNGGREN C, CHANG Y, JANSON T, et al. An Overview of Rock Stress Measurement Methods[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(7/8): 975-989.
[14]钟 山,江 权,冯夏庭,等.锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. 岩土力学,2018,39(1):356-366.
[15]谢富仁,崔效锋,赵建涛,等.中国大陆及邻区现代构造应力场分区[J]. 地球物理学报,2004,47(4):654-662.
[16]HAKALA M, HUDSON J A, CHRISTIANSSON R. Quality Control of Overcoring Stress Measurement Data[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(7/8): 1141-1159.
[17]卢 波, 丁秀丽, 邬爱清, 等. 地应力测试数据甄别综合分析方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(8): 1614-1626.
PDF(2549 KB)
