Ecological Flow Involving Water Quantity and Water Quality: Case Study on Xinzhou Segment of Jushui River

ZHANG Yun-chao, CHAI Zhao-hui, WANG Jia-sheng, ZHU Kong-xian, MIN Feng-yang

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7) : 1-7.

PDF(6159 KB)
PDF(6159 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7) : 1-7. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20220483
River-Lake Protection and Regulation

Ecological Flow Involving Water Quantity and Water Quality: Case Study on Xinzhou Segment of Jushui River

  • ZHANG Yun-chao1,2, CHAI Zhao-hui1,2, WANG Jia-sheng1,2,, ZHU Kong-xian1,2, MIN Feng-yang1,2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The governance and protection of lake and river water environment require the consideration of both the quantity and quality of water to preserve ecological flow. In this study we examine the Xinzhou segment of the Jushui River, a tributary of the Yangtze River, using the MIKE11 software to develop a water quantity and quality model. The model was calibrated using measured data and data from pollution source investigations. The model measured the main pollutants including COD, NH3-N, TN, and TP, and established the water demand for control sections to meet water quality standards on a monthly basis with consideration of current sewage discharge levels. In addition, we utilized the Tennant method and flow frequency curve method to calculate the ecological water demand to ensure the basic stability of the river ecosystem. By comparing and analyzing the results of Tennant method, flow frequency curve method, and the proposed model, we obtained the monthly ecological water flow for the Xinzhou segment of Jushui River.

Key words

ecological flow / MIKE11 software / Tennant method / flow frequency curve method / Xinzhou segment of Jushui River

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Yun-chao, CHAI Zhao-hui, WANG Jia-sheng, ZHU Kong-xian, MIN Feng-yang. Ecological Flow Involving Water Quantity and Water Quality: Case Study on Xinzhou Segment of Jushui River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2023, 40(7): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20220483

References

[1] 杨 谦. 加强长江流域生态流量管理的建议和举措[J]. 长江技术经济, 2020, 4(1): 1-5.
[2] 杨志峰, 张 远. 河道生态环境需水研究方法比较[J]. 水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2003, 18(3): 294-301.
[3] TENNANT D L. Instream Flow Regimens for Fish, Wildlife, Recreation and Related Environmental Resources[J]. Fisheries, 1976, 1(4): 6-10.
[4] 徐 伟, 董增川, 罗晓丽, 等. 基于改进7Q10法的滦河生态流量分析[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(5): 454-457.
[5] GIPPEL C J,STEWARDSON M J.Use of Wetted Perimeter in Defining Minimum Environmental Flows[J]. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management,1998,14(1):53-67.
[6] 王西琴, 刘昌明, 杨志峰. 河道最小环境需水量确定方法及其应用研究(Ⅰ): 理论[J]. 环境科学学报, 2001, 21(5): 544-547.
[7] 王西琴, 杨志峰, 刘昌明. 河道最小环境需水量确定方法及其应用研究(Ⅱ): 应用[J]. 环境科学学报, 2001, 21(5): 548-552.
[8] 崔保山, 杨志峰. 湿地生态环境需水量研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2002, 22(2): 219-224.
[9] 张晓文, 康 瑛, 张 婷, 等. 钱塘江流域(南方丰水地区)量质统筹的生态需水动态模型研究[J]. 人民珠江, 2014, 35(6): 19-23.
[10]高晓琦, 董增川, 周 涛, 等. 基于不同生态需水计算方法的水量水质联合调度研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2018, 36(12): 25-29.
[11]马甜甜. 基于MIKE11浑河沈抚段生态需水水质水量调控方案研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳建筑大学, 2019.
[12]余真真,闫 莉,王瑞玲,等. 多目标协控下伊洛河自净需水流量研究[J]. 水资源保护,2020,36(5):38-42.
[13]韩亚萍. 基于断面水质目标的水库生态流量泄放研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2021, 39(5): 50-53.
[14]李咏红, 刘 旭, 李盼盼, 等. 基于不同保护目标的河道内生态需水量分析: 以琉璃河湿地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(12): 4393-4403.
[15]梁满意, 李 艳, 崔锡山, 等. 海城河不同生态保护目标的生态需水研究[J]. 沈阳理工大学学报, 2022, 41(2): 75-81.
[16]高 伟, 李金城, 严长安. 多水源河流生态补水优化配置模型与应用[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(7): 75-81.
[17]王义民, 李五勤, 畅建霞, 等. 乌梁素海生态补水量研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(8): 224-228, 234.
[18]胡春明, 娜仁格日乐, 尤 立. 基于水质管理目标的博斯腾湖生态水位研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2): 748-755.
[19]刘志文.武汉市新洲区举水流域水资源综合评价及主要污染物现状削减量分析[D].南京:河海大学,2004.
[20]文 淇. 举水麻城段入河污染负荷及水环境容量研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2019.
[21]哈德力别克·马吉提,黄显峰,方国华.小流域水功能区纳污能力研究[J].山西水利科技,2018(1):71-75.
[22]喻 婷, 陈晓群, 苗 滕. 举水干流水功能区纳污能力计算研究[J]. 节水灌溉, 2019(9): 62-66, 73.
[23]SL/T 712—2021,河湖生态环境需水计算规范[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2021.
[24]陈 进, 黄 薇. 长江的生态流量问题[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2007, 24(6): 1-5.
[25]黄显峰, 钟婧玮, 方国华, 等. 基于ME-Tennant法的河道生态流量过程评价模型研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(2): 20-26.
PDF(6159 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/