Model Test of Intermittent Vacuum Preloading Treatment of Dredged Slurry with High Water Content

HAN Qi-yuan; XU Gui-zhong; LI Ming-dong; WENG Jia-xing

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20220272

PDF(1155 KB)

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4) : 113-118. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20220272

ROCK SOIL ENGINEERING

Model Test of Intermittent Vacuum Preloading Treatment of Dredged Slurry with High Water Content

HAN Qi-yuan¹, XU Gui-zhong², LI Ming-dong¹, WENG Jia-xing³

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The aim of this research is to make clear the influence of intermittent vacuum loading pattern on the effectiveness of vacuum preloading treatment of dredged mud with high moisture content. We conducted indoor model tests by changing the intermittence and discussed the mechanism of intermittent vacuum in treating dredged mud. Compared with traditional constant vacuum loading method, intermittent vacuum can reduce the migration of soil particles and improve the transfer efficiency of vacuum in soil, thus improving the reinforcement effect. The dredged mud used in this study is best treated by vacuum loading with intervals of 6 hours. Compared with that of traditional vacuum preloading method, the cumulative water yield of dredged mud by the present method increases by 26.8%, shear strength of cross plate increases by 36.7%, and water content of soil reduces by 18.9%. Intermittent vacuum preloading method is more effective in treating dredged slurry with high water content.

Key words

dredged slurry / intermittent vacuum preloading / model test / water yield / drainage plate clogging

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

HAN Qi-yuan, XU Gui-zhong, LI Ming-dong, WENG Jia-xing. Model Test of Intermittent Vacuum Preloading Treatment of Dredged Slurry with High Water Content[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2023, 40(4): 113-118 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20220272

References

[1] 黄华梅, 高杨, 王银霞, 等. 疏浚泥用于滨海湿地生态工程现状及在我国应用潜力. 生态学报, 2012, 32(8): 2571-2580.
[2] 马殿光, 朱晨, 姬凤玲. 疏浚淤泥废弃泡沫塑料轻质土的力学特性研究. 水道港口, 2005, 26(4): 237-240.
[3] 郭红燕. 真空预压加固新吹填土地基排水板弯折对有效加固范围的影响. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2015.
[4] 姬凤玲, 朱伟, 张春雷. 疏浚淤泥的土工材料化处理技术的试验与探讨. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(12): 1999-2002.
[5] 胡挺,武亚军,徐方.氢氧化钙与聚丙烯酰胺对高含水率泥浆固结的影响.长江科学院院报,2018,35(8):95-101.
[6] 吴松华.不同形式电渗加固吹填淤泥现场试验研究.长江科学院院报,2020,37(5):108-112.
[7] 王东星, 唐弈锴, 伍林峰. 疏浚淤泥化学絮凝-真空预压深度脱水效果评价. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3929-3938.
[8] 宋晶, 王清, 张鹏, 等. 高黏性吹填土固结过程中细颗粒迁移规律研究. 工程地质学报, 2012, 20(6): 1042-1049.
[9] 王军, 蔡袁强, 符洪涛, 等. 新型防淤堵真空预压法室内与现场试验研究. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(6): 1257-1268.
[10] 浩婷, 王曦, 周颜, 等. 真空负载方式对疏浚淤泥脱水过程中脱水规律的影响. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(11): 3187-3192.
[11] LEI H, LU H, LIU J, et al. Experimental Study of the Clogging of Dredger Fills under Vacuum Preloading. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(12): 04017117.
[12] 王柳江, 刘斯宏, 汪俊波, 等. 真空预压联合电渗法处理高含水率软土模型试验. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(6): 671-675.
[13] YUAN X Q, WANG Q, LU W X, et al. Indoor Simulation Test of Step Vacuum Preloading for High-Clay Content Dredger Fill. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2018, 36(1): 83-90.
[14] 武亚军, 杨建波, 张孟喜. 真空加载方式对吹填流泥加固效果及土颗粒移动的影响研究. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(8): 2129-2135.
[15] TAO Y L, ZHOU J, GONG X N, et al. Influence of Polarity Reversal and Current Intermittence on Electro-Osmosis//Ground Improvement and Geosynthetics. Shanghai, China. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2014: 198-208.
[16] 雷华阳, 刘英男, 冯双喜, 等. 新型无膜真空预压法加固超软吹填土模型试验及数值模拟分析. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(增刊2): 189-193.
[17] 王攀铭,杨俊杰.间歇性真空预压加固软土地基的机理分析.甘肃水利水电技术,2014,50(2):14-16, 40.
[18] XU G Z, YIN J, FENG X S, et al. An Improved Method for Dewatering Sewage Sludge Using Intermittent Vacuum Loading with Wheat Straw as Vertical Drains. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 24(7): 2017-2025.
[19] 沈杰. 高含水率疏浚泥真空预压室内模型试验研究. 南京: 东南大学, 2015.
[20] 孙立强, 闫澍旺, 李伟, 等. 超软土真空预压室内模型试验研究. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(4): 984-990.
[21] XU G Z, GAO Y F, HONG Z S, et al. Sedimentation Behavior of Four Dredged Slurries in China. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2012, 30(2): 143-156.
[22] 蔡袁强. 吹填淤泥真空预压固结机理与排水体防淤堵处理技术. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(2): 201-225.
[23] 龚晓南, 岑仰润. 真空预压加固软土地基机理探讨. 哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 2002(2): 7-10.
[24] 明经平, 孙振远. 真空预压地基卸荷变形特性试验研究. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(6): 1081-1086.
[25] 胡利文, 刘志军. 真空预压加固土体变形机制分析. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 790-799, 812.
[26] MORETTO O. An Investigation of the Effect of Certain Factors on the Strength and Compressibility of Clays. Illinois: University of Illinois, 1946.
[27] KOUTSOFTAS D C, LADD C C. Design Strengths for an Offshore Clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(3): 337-355.
[28] 梅岭, 朱杰, 王南江, 等. 堆场淤泥不排水强度特性研究. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 37(3): 58-63.
[29] 朱杰. 考虑时间效应的高含水率淤泥不排水强度试验研究. 镇江: 江苏科技大学, 2017.
[30] 冯军,刘爱民,高潮,等. 土性对真空预压加固效果影响的室内试验研究.水运工程,2010(3):50-55.
[31] 岑仰润. 真空预压加固地基的试验及理论研究. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2003.
[32] 颜永国, 董志良, 杨昌斌, 等. 颗粒级配对真空预压法处理吹填土效果影响试验研究. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(11): 1775-1779.