Safety Evaluation of High Arch Dam Based on Multi-source Information Fusion in Consideration of Valley Shrinkage Deformation

ZHOU Xin-yi; HU Lei; ZHANG Qi-ling

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20210829

PDF(1228 KB)

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 87-93. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20210829

ENGINEERING SAFETY AND DISASTER PREVENTION

Safety Evaluation of High Arch Dam Based on Multi-source Information Fusion in Consideration of Valley Shrinkage Deformation

ZHOU Xin-yi¹, HU Lei^1,2,3, ZHANG Qi-ling^1,2,3

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The valley shrinkage deformation caused by reservoir impoundment has a direct influence on the safety of high arch dam structure.The safety state of arch dam under the condition of valley shrinkage deformation is evaluated with a high arch dam in southwest China as an example.First,the monitoring model of dam deformation is established to study the relation between dam deformation and valley shrinkage deformation.On this basis,an evaluation model is constructed for dam safety based on multi-source information fusion in consideration of valley shrinkage deformation indices;the Cloud Model and D-S Model are combined to evaluate the safety of the dam.The basic probability distribution of evaluation indices is determined according to the membership degree obtained by Cloud Model of monitoring data,which overcomes the disadvantage of strong subjectivity of traditional method;furthermore,the dam safety can be evaluated comprehensively in association with basic credibility of each monitoring index acquired from the D-S Model.Results suggest that the compression load caused by valley shrinkage deformation could be the main reason of dam deformation towards the upstream;the studied dam is in a basically normal state,which is consistent with the actual situation of the high arch dam.The results demonstrate that the membership degree obtained by Cloud Model is reasonable and feasible to determine the basic credibility allocation of evaluation indices.

Key words

arch dam / valley shrinkage deformation / Cloud Model / D-S Model / safety evaluation

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

ZHOU Xin-yi, HU Lei, ZHANG Qi-ling. Safety Evaluation of High Arch Dam Based on Multi-source Information Fusion in Consideration of Valley Shrinkage Deformation[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2023, 40(1): 87-93 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20210829

References

[1] 钟大宁,刘耀儒,杨强,等.白鹤滩拱坝谷幅变形预测及不同计算方法变形机制研究[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(8):1455-1463.
[2] 杨强,潘元炜,程立,等.高拱坝谷幅变形机制及非饱和裂隙岩体有效应力原理研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(11):2258-2269.
[3] 何柱,刘耀儒,杨强,等.溪洛渡拱坝谷幅变形机制及变形反演和长期稳定性分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(增刊2):4198-4206.
[4] 刘有志,张国新,程恒.特高拱坝谷幅缩窄成因及对大坝变形和应力的影响分析[C]∥中国大坝协会2014学术年会议文集.郑州:黄河水利出版社,2014:51-60.
[5] 周志芳,李鸣威,庄超,等.溪洛渡水电站谷幅变形成因与形成条件[J].河海大学学报,2018,46(6):497-505.
[6] 杨杰,胡德修,关文海.李家峡拱坝左岸高边坡岩体变位与安全性态分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(19):3551-3560.
[7] BARLA G,ANTOLINI F,BARLA M,et al.Monitoring of the Beauregard Landslide (Aosta Valley,Italy) Using Advanced and Conventional Techniques[J].Engineering Geology,2010,116(3):218-235.
[8] FRIGERIO A,MAZZA G.The Rehabilitation of Beauregard Dam:The Contribution of the Numerical Modeling[C]∥Proceedings of ICOLD 12th International Benchmark Workshop on Numerical Analysis of Dams.Graz,Austria.October 2-4,2013:343-352.
[9] LOMBARDI G.The FES Rock Mass Model[J].Dam Engineering,1992(3):201-221.
[10]EHRBAR H.Gotthard Base Tunnel,Switzerland,Experiences with Different Tunneling Methods[C]∥Proceedings of 2° Congresso Brasileiro de Túneis e Estruturas Subterraneas.Sao Paulo:Comitê Brasileiro de Túneis,2008.
[11]LONDE P.The Malpasset Dam Failure[J].Engineering Geology,1987,24(4):295-329.
[12]LOMBARDI G.Kolnbrein Dam:An Unusual Solution for an Unusual Problem[J].International Water Power & Dam Construction,1991,43(6):31-34.
[13]高克静,赵文光,王仁坤,等.谷幅收缩对高拱坝变形及应力状态的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2018,18(16):92-100.
[14]胡江.特高拱坝运行初期变形监测预报模型及构建方法[J].水利水运工程学报,2020(5):63-71.
[15]庄超,周志芳,李鸣威,等.基于承压含水层水力响应的溪洛渡水电工程区谷幅收缩变形预测研究[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(8):1472-1480.
[16]何金平,高全,施玉群.基于云模型的大坝安全多层次综合评价方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(11):2977-2983.
[17]张帆.基于规则与人工神经网络的大坝安全监控模型研究[D].南京:东南大学,2016.
[18]张小飞,苏国韶,吴彰敦.基于层次模糊综合评价的水库大坝安全评价法[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),
2009,34(3):321-325.
[19]顾冲时,苏怀智,王少伟.高混凝土坝长期变形特性计算模型及监控方法研究进展[J].水利发电学报,2016,35(5):1-14.
[20]吴中如.水工建筑物安全监控理论及其应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
[21]姜洲,黄艳华,吴贤国,等.基于云模型和D-S证据理论的尾矿库失稳溃坝警情评价模型及应用[J].水电能源科学,2016,34(10):47-51.
[22]张秋文,章永志,钟鸣.基于云模型的水库诱发地震风险多级模糊综合评价[J].水利学报,2014,45(1):88-95.
[23]徐征捷,张友鹏,苏宏升.基于云模型的模糊综合评判法在风险评估中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2014,14(2):69-72.
[24]郭芝韵,苏怀志,刘炳锐,等.基于云模型和证据理论的大坝安全综合评估方法[J].水利水电技术,2017,48(3):99-104.
[25]梁杰,周兰庭,柳志坤.基于改进云一证据理论的混凝土坝裂缝危害性评价[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,51(3):547-552.
[26]叶伟,马福恒,周海啸.加权优化的D-S证据理论在大坝安全评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2016,34(6):96-99.
[27]何金平.大坝安全监测理论与应用[M].武汉:中国水利水电出版社,2010.