Water resources play an irreplaceable role in maintaining ecological environment as well as economic and social development. Quantified research and assessment on the value of water resources, on one hand, offers theoretical support for governments in formulating policies, and on the other, promotes the stable and healthy development of regional social economy. The water resources value in Mianyang City was assessed comprehensively as a case study based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). An index system involving 14 indicators covering water quality, water quantity, social economy, population, and ecological environment was constructed; weights of the indicators were calculated using both subjective and objective weighting methods. Among criterion layer factors that affect the water resources value in Mianyang, water quantity boasts the largest weight, followed by ecological environment, social economy, population, and water quality in sequence; among index layer factors, total water supply has the largest weight, followed by water resources per capita and reuse rate of industrial water in sequence. The fuzzy comprehensive index of water resource value in Mianyang is 2.37, implying that the water resources value in Mianyang ranks above middle. The price of water resources assets had been on the rise in general from 2014 to 2018, reaching 4.97 yuan/m3, which is 2.6 times the current water price for residents (1.91 yuan/m3). And water cost occupies 0.74% of residents’ income, far below the affordable water cost index, which is 1.19%, accounting for the rationality of raising the price of water resources properly. Nevertheless, the overall water resources value in Mianyang had shown a downward trend year by year during 2014-2018, mainly due to the decrease of water resources amount surpassing the growth of unit water resources value. Government should pay attention to the causes of water resources decline, and put forward future control measures to maintain the sustainable development of local water resources.
Key words
water resources /
value assessment /
fuzzy analytic hierarchy process /
price of water resources /
water resources amount /
Mianyang City
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 刘芳芳, 连 华, 王建兵, 等. 基于模糊数学模型的张掖市水资源价值计算研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(2):87-91.
[2] WARD F A, MICHELSEN A. The Economic Value of Water in Agriculture:Concepts and Policy Applications[J]. Water Policy, 2002, 4(5): 423-446.
[3] MONTGINOUL M, RINAUDO J D. Analyzing the Impactof Drinking Water Pricing on Household Water Supply and Consumption Strategies[J]. Houille Blanche Revue International Deleau, 2003(3):107-111.
[4] SCHOOLMASTER F A.Water Marketing and Water Rights Transfers in the Lower Rio Grands Valley,Texas[J]. Professional Geographer, 1991, 43(3): 292-304.
[5] BISWAS A K. Water for Sustainable Developmentin the 21st Century[J]. Geojournal, 1991, 24(4): 341-345.
[6] 何 刚. 基于水资源资产价值的水价制定研究[D].南京:河海大学,2006.
[7] 黄 薇,陈 进.跨流域调水水权分配与水市场运行机制初步探讨[J].长江科学院院报,2006,23(1):50-52.
[8] 张 蕾, 陈晓宏. 水资源价值及与水价关系的研究[J]. 中山大学研究生学刊(自然科学版), 2001(3): 80-84.
[9] 韦林均,包家强,伏小勇.模糊数学模型在水资源价值评价中的应用[J].兰州交通大学学报,2006(3):73-76.
[10] 沈菊琴, 任光照, 郭孟卓,等. 水资源资产量评估方法研究[J]. 人民黄河, 1999, 21(2):5-7.
[11] 蒋水心. 水资源价值量的实用计算方法[J]. 水利经济, 2001, 19(3):43-49.
[12] 贾亦真, 沈菊琴, 王 晗, 等. 兰州市水资源价值模糊评价研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2018, 40(9):72-77.
[13] 姜文来, 武 霞, 林桐枫,等. 水资源价值模型评价研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 1998, 13(2): 178-183.
[14] 简富缋, 宋晓谕, 虞文宝. 水资源资产价格模糊数学综合评价指标体系构建:以黑河中游张掖市为例[J]. 冰川冻土, 2016(2):567-572.
[15] 于春平,覃光华,周泽江.基于FAHP的成都市水资源承载能力模糊综合评价[J].四川水利,2013(2):44-47.
[16] 郑德凤,臧 正,孙才志,等.基于水资源耦合价值的绿色水价模型及其应用:以下辽河平原为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014,29(7):1235-1245.
[17] 高玉杉, 方国华, 黄显峰, 等. 基于模糊层次分析与可变模糊集的徐州市水资源管理现代化评价[J]. 水电能源科学, 2014, 32(4):155-158.
[18] 王海亮,杨永红,张 颖.基于模糊层次分析法的水资源承载力研究[J].水科学与工程技术,2014(3):16-20.
[19] 曹剑峰, 钦丽娟, 平建华, 等. 灰色理论在水资源价值评价中的应用[J]. 人民黄河, 2005, 27(7): 20-22.
[20] SATTY T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York: Mc Grawhill, Inc., 1980.
[21] 郑哲敏. 基于直觉模糊层次分析法的邯郸市水资源承载力评价研究[D]. 邯郸:河北工程大学, 2015.
[22] 王根霞, 王祖和, 段德宏, 等. 基于区间数层次分析法的民用建筑太阳能热水系统评价[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 28(5):897-903.
[23] GRIGG N S. Closure of “Systemic Analysis of Urban Water Supply and Growth Management”[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 1998, 124(3):137-138.
[24] BATINA R G, GALINATO G I. The Spillover Effects of Good Governance on a Tax Competition Framework with a Negative Environmental Externality[J]. Environmental & Resource Economics, 2017, 67(4): 701-724.
[25] MOLINOS-SENANTE M,HERNANDEZ-SANCHO F,SALA-GARRIDO R,et al. Economic Feasibility Study for Wastewater Treatment:A Cost-Benefit Analysis[J].Science of the Total Environment,2010,408(20):4396-4402.
[26] 绵阳市统计局. 绵阳市统计年鉴[R]. 绵阳:绵阳市统计局,2014—2018.
[27] 绵阳市水利局. 绵阳市水资源公报[R]. 绵阳:绵阳市水利局,2014—2018.
[28] 朱永彬, 史雅娟. 中国主要城市水资源价值评价与定价研究[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(5):1040-1050.
[29] 姜文来. 水资源价值模型研究[J]. 资源科学, 1998, 13(1):35-43.
[30] 周臻峰. 水资源价值研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2007.
PDF(1157 KB)
