In recent years, the ecological flow in the three outlets rivers of the middle Yangtze River into Dongting Lake area is in severe shortage due to the construction and operation of large hydropower projects, the continuous reduction of diversion discharge of the three major outlets rivers, and the unreasonable utilization of water resources. We propose a method to determine the ecological basic flow by comprehensively considering the calculated results of different hydrological methods based on daily discharge data of main hydrological stations from 2003 to 2018 and monthly average discharge from 1973 to 2002 in the three major outlets rivers. We further obtain the recommended values of annual and monthly ecological basic discharge and analyze the guarantee rate and influence factors. Results demonstrate that the annual ecological base flow at Xinjiangkou, Shadaoguan, Mituosi, Kangjiagang and Guanjiapu hydrological stations is 208.18 m3/s, 49.44 m3/s, 75.39 m3/s, 2.52 m3/s and 93.94 m3/s, respectively, and their corrsponding guarantee rate of ecological base flow is 84.83%, 37.52%, 51.88%, 21.84% and 42.60%, respectively. The highest monthly ecological base flow of all hydrological station appears in July, and decreases in August, September, and June in turn. The ecological base flow and its guarantee rate in flood seasons are significantly higher than those in non-flood seasons. The proposed method and calculated results could be taken as reference for aquatic ecological restoration in the Dongting Lake area.
Key words
Dongting Lake area /
three major outlets river /
ecological basic flow /
hydrologic method /
guarantee rate
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 徐宗学,武 玮,于松延.生态基流研究:进展与挑战[J].水力发电学报,2016,35(4):1-11.
[2] 陈 昂,隋 欣,廖文根,等.我国河流生态基流理论研究回顾[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2016,14(6):401-411.
[3] 吴喜军,李怀恩,董 颖,等.基于基流比例法的渭河生态基流计算[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(10):154-159.
[4] THARME R E. A Global Perspective on Environmental Flow Assessment: Emerging Trends in The Development and Application of Environmental Flow Methodologies for Rivers[J]. River Research and Application, 2003, 19(5/6): 397-441.
[5] 黄 康,李怀恩,成 波,等.基于Tennant方法的河流生态基流应用现状及改进思路[J].水资源与水工程学报,2019,30(5):103-110.
[6] 于鲁冀,陈慧敏,王 莉,等.基于改进湿周法的贾鲁河河道内生态需水量计算[J].水利水电科技进展,2016,36(3):5-9,94.
[7] 钟华平,刘 恒,耿雷华,等.河道内生态需水估算方法及其评述[J].水科学进展,2006,17(3):430-434.
[8] 史方方,黄 薇.用改进湿周法计算河道内最小生态流量[J].长江科学院院报,2009,26(4):9-12.
[9] 胡光伟,毛德华,李正最,等.三峡工程运行对洞庭湖与荆江三口关系的影响分析[J].海洋与湖沼,2014,45(3):453-461.
[10]赵秋湘,付 湘,孙昭华.三峡水库运行对荆江三口分流的影响评估[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(2):7-14.
[11]甘明辉,刘卡波,施 勇,等.洞庭湖四口河系水安全及综合调控[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[12]朱玲玲,许全喜,戴明龙.荆江三口分流变化及三峡水库蓄水影响[J].水科学进展,2016,27(6):822-831.
[13]TENNANT D L. Instream Flow Regimens for Fish, Wildlife, Recreation and Related Environmental Resources[J]. Fisheries, 1976,1(4):6.
[14]于松延,徐宗学,武 玮.基于多种水文学方法估算渭河关中段生态基流[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,49(增刊1):175-179.
[15]韦雨婷,逄 勇,罗 缙.清河干流生态基流计算分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2014,25(6):151-155.
[16]MATHEWS R C, BAO Y. The Texas Method of Preliminary Instream Flow Assessment[J]. Rivers, 1991, 2(4):295-310.
[17]王 冬,方娟娟,李义天,等.三峡水库调度方式对洞庭湖入流的影响研究[J].长江科学院院报,2016,33(12):10-16.
[18]李景保,何 霞,杨 波,等.长江中游荆南三口断流时间演变特征及其影响机制[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(10):1713-1725.