Effects of Different Tillage Measures and Maize Growing Seasons on Soil Aggregates' Stability in Sloping Yellow Soil Cropland

MA Rui, YANG Shuai, QIN Xin, ZHENG Zi-cheng, LI Ting-xuan

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11) : 46-51.

PDF(1215 KB)
PDF(1215 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2020, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11) : 46-51. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20191014
WATER-SOIL CONSERVATION AND ECO-CONSTRUCTION

Effects of Different Tillage Measures and Maize Growing Seasons on Soil Aggregates' Stability in Sloping Yellow Soil Cropland

  • MA Rui1, YANG Shuai1, QIN Xin2, ZHENG Zi-cheng1, LI Ting-xuan1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

The composition and stability of soil aggregates in sloping yellow soil cropland during the whole maize growing season under natural rainfall conditions were studied in an attempt to reveal the effects of tillage measures and maize growing season on soil aggregates' stability. Cross ridge slope was taken as research object, while longitudinal ridge slope as the control. The study is expected to provide theoretical basis for the study of anti-erodibility of mountain yellow soil in Sichuan Province. Results demonstrated that: 1) The composition and stability of soil aggregate were significantly affected by tillage measures. Compared with that on longitudinal ridge, more soil macro-aggregates were contained on cross ridge slope; the stability of cross ridge slope is better than that of longitudinal ridge slope according to analysis on such indicators as (10,0.25] mm water-stable aggregate (WSA>0.25), mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean diameter (GMD), percentage of aggregate disruption (PAD), fractal dimension (D) of soil water-stable aggregate, and aggregate stability index (ASI). 2) With the advancement of maize growth, the content of soil macro-aggregate and soil aggregate stability both showed a significant increasing trend and reached a maximum value at maturing stage, implying significant influence of maize growing season on soil aggregate's composition and stability. 3) Correlation analysis unveiled that soil aggregate's stability was in extremely significant positive relationships with root density, root surface area and root volume, indicating that root development played an important role on improving soil aggregate's stability. The findings demonstrated that suitable tillage measures and proper planting patterns could effectively prevent and control regional soil erosion.

Key words

sloping yellow soil cropland / soil aggregate's composition / soil aggregate's stability / tillage measures / maize growing season

Cite this article

Download Citations
MA Rui, YANG Shuai, QIN Xin, ZHENG Zi-cheng, LI Ting-xuan. Effects of Different Tillage Measures and Maize Growing Seasons on Soil Aggregates' Stability in Sloping Yellow Soil Cropland[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2020, 37(11): 46-51 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20191014

References

[1] 张丽萍, 朱钟麟, 邓良基. 四川省坡耕地资源及其治理对策[J]. 水土保持通报, 2004, 24(3):47-49.
[2] 彭世琪. 四川省坡耕地的一种聚土改土垄作栽培新形式[J]. 中国水土保持, 1990(9):32-33.
[3] 何 超, 王 磊, 郑粉莉, 等. 垄作方式对薄层黑土区坡面土壤侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5):24-28.
[4] 江仁涛, 李富程, 沈凇涛. 不同年限红柳恢复川西北高寒沙地对土壤团聚体和有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):197-203.
[5] 郑子成, 杨玉梅, 李廷轩. 不同退耕模式下土壤抗蚀性差异及其评价模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(10):199-205.
[6] 曾全超, 李娅芸, 刘 雷, 等. 黄土高原草地植被土壤团聚体特征与可蚀性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4):743-749.
[7] AYOUBI S, MOKHTARI J, MOSADDEGHI M R, et al. Erodibility of Calcareous Soils as Influenced by Land Use and Intrinsic Soil Properties in a Semiarid Region of Central Iran[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2018, 190(4):192.
[8] 杨 帅. 山地黄壤玉米季坡耕地土壤抗侵蚀能力及侵蚀产沙特征研究[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2017.
[9] 杨 帅, 尹 忠, 郑子成, 等. 四川黄壤区玉米季坡耕地自然降雨及其侵蚀产沙特征分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(4):7-12.
[10]孙家兴, 赵雨森, 辛 颖, 等. 黑土区杨树农田防护林土壤团聚体的稳定性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2018, 38(3):66-73.
[11]何淑勤, 郑子成, 宫渊波. 不同退耕模式下土壤水稳性团聚体及其有机碳分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(5):229-233.
[12]范如芹, 梁爱珍, 杨学明, 等. 耕作方式对黑土团聚体含量及特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(18):3767-3775.
[13]杨培岭,罗远培,石元春.用粒径的重量分布表征的土壤分形特征[J].科学通报,1993,38(20):1896-1899.
[14]石 辉. 转移矩阵法评价土壤团聚体的稳定性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2006, 26(3):91-95.
[15]蔡一林, 何晓阳. 玉米叶面积分布及估测[J]. 西南农业大学学报, 1994, 16(1):63-65.
[16]郑子成, 李廷轩, 张锡洲, 等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤团聚体的组成及稳定性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(5):228-231.
[17]王润泽, 谌 芸, 李 铁, 等. 紫色土区植物篱篱前淤积带土壤团聚体稳定性特征研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(2):210-216.
[18]刘晓利, 何园球, 李成亮, 等. 不同利用方式和肥力红壤中水稳性团聚体分布及物理性质特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(3):459-465.
[19]黄丹丹, 刘淑霞, 张晓平, 等. 保护性耕作下土壤团聚体组成及其有机碳分布特征[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(8):1560-1565.
[20]林 艺, 秦 凤, 郑子成, 等. 不同降雨条件下垄作坡面地表微地形及土壤侵蚀变化特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(3):32-38.
[21]KASMERCHAK C S, MASON J A, LIANG M Y.Laser Diffraction Analysis of Aggregate Stability and Disintegration in Forest and Grassland Soils of Northern Minnesota, USA[J]. Geoderma, 2019, 338: 430-444.
[22]杨如萍, 郭贤仕, 吕军峰, 等. 不同耕作和种植模式对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(1): 252-256.
[23]严冬春, 文安邦, 龚长文, 等. 紫色土陡坡耕地顺坡垄作条件下的土壤及其流失特征[J]. 山地学报, 2014, 32(3):314-319.
[24]李 娟, 韩霁昌, 陈 超, 等. 山地丘陵区不同土地利用方式对空心村整治还田土壤团聚体特征的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(4):174-181.
[25]马中浩. 南方红壤区玉米生育期坡地土壤抗侵蚀性特征[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2016.
[26]白录顺, 范茂攀, 王自林, 等. 间作模式下玉米/大豆的根系特征及其与团聚体稳定性的关系[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(1):124-129.
[27]DEMENOIS J, CARRICONDE F, BONAVENTURE P, et al. Impact of Plant Root Functional Traits and Associated Mycorrhizas on the Aggregate Stability of a Tropical Ferralsol[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 312:6-16.
[28]周晓晨, 李永梅, 王自林, 等. 坡耕地红壤农作物根系与团聚体稳定性的关系[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 37(11):818-824.
[29]WANG Z H, FANG H, CHEN M H.Effects of Root Exudates of Woody Species on the Soil Anti-erodibility in the Rhizosphere in a Karst Region, China[J]. Peer J, 2017, 5: e3029.
[30]DELELEGN Y T, PURAHONG W, BLAZEVIC A, et al. Changes in Land Use Alter Soil Quality and Aggregate Stability in the Highlands of Northern Ethiopia[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1):1-12.
PDF(1215 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/