With the tunnel segment of Xi'an Metro Line 5 as engineering background, we examined and compared the ground settlement, soil deformation around the tunnel, and mechanics effect of water-rich loess tunnel reinforced by different methods (dewatering reinforcement and grouting reinforcement) via a seepage-stress coupling numerical model. We further validated the numerical result according to site monitoring data. Results demonstrated that the maximum ground settlement of the tunnel strengthened by dewatering reinforcement was 13.7 times that by grouting reinforcement. The laws of soil deformation around the tunnel under these two reinforcement schemes were consistent, and the deformation value of surrounding rock in ten days of excavation reached about 70%-80% of the stable value. Soil around the tunnel suffered from compressive stress under grouting reinforcement, while tensile stress appeared in the soil layer of the middle wall and the middle plate during the excavation under dewatering reinforcement. The stress of the lining under grouting reinforcement was larger than that under dewatering reinforcement. The extreme value of plastic zone under dewatering reinforcement was 11.3 times that of grouting reinforcement, mainly distributing at the shoulders, waists and feet of the arch on both sides. The simulated values of ground settlement and soil deformation around the tunnel under the two reinforcement schemes were similar and basically consistent with the change law of the monitored value.
Key words
water-rich tunnel /
strata deformation control /
dewatering reinforcement /
grouting reinforcement /
numerical simulation /
on-site monitoring
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 王雪妮,韩国锋.地铁车站深基坑的变形预测及稳定性研究[J].长江科学院院报,2018,35(10):77-81,87.
[2] PECK R B.Deep Excavations and Tunnelling in Soft Ground[C]∥Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of SMFE. State of the Art Volume. Mexico City : Sociedad Mexicana de Mecanica, 1969: 225-290.
[3] MINDLIN R D. Stress Distribution Around a Tunnel[J]. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1940, 195: 1117-1140.
[4] 朱才辉,李 宁.地铁施工诱发地表最大沉降量估算及规律分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(增刊1):3543-3560.
[5] 王三星,周志恒.浅埋黄土隧道应用井点排水的尝试[J].铁道工程学报,1988,5(1):55-63.
[6] 王 帅,孙少锐,舒 杨,等.双线浅埋隧道远近距离界定及地表沉降机理研究[J].长江科学院院报,2017,34(9):115-121.
[7] 刘 芸,周玉兵.软岩小净距隧道中夹岩柱分区及加固方法研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2013,9(2):373-379.
[8] 王秀英,郑维翰,张建国.软岩隧道玻纤锚杆预加固掌子面的稳定性分析[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(增刊1):53-58.
[9] 曹 振,雷 斌,张丰功.地铁湿陷性黄土暗挖隧道的施工风险及控制措施 [J].城市轨道交通研究,2013(3):97-99.
[10]来弘鹏,康 佐,谢永利,等.地铁区间隧道黄土地层注浆预加固技术研究[J].中国铁道科学,2014,35(1):47-54.
[11]李永宽,张顶立,房 倩.浅埋暗挖隧道下穿地表建筑物安全控制技术研究[J].土木工程学报,2015,48(增刊1):266-269.
[12]逄铁铮.全程注浆在隧道穿越既有建筑物中的试验研究[J].岩土力学,2008,29(12):3451-3458.
[13]薛晓辉,张 军,宿钟鸣.富水黄土隧道注浆加固机制及效果评价[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2015,34(4):34-38.