Currently recognized as the best form of oil storage, underground oil storage in rock cavern is supported only by bolt-shotcrete without lining. Bond strength plays an important role in transmitting stress to ensure the collaborative work between shotcrete and surrounding rock; as a result, bond strength is an important indicator for analyzing and evaluating the structural stability and construction quality in underground oil storage in rock cavern.In this research, several kinds of methods were adopted to test the bond strength between shotcrete and surrounding rock in a underground oil storage in rock cavern in south China. Results suggest that in-situ tensile method by drilling shotcrete specimen with a diameter of 50 mm is not suitable for underground oil storage in rock cavern. When the diameter of test specimen is increased to 100 mm, the success rate of specimen production for in-situ tensile test has greatly improved, and the tensile test results are reliable as the lower limiting value of bond strength. Meanwhile, result of laboratory tensile test by cutting panel-formed shotcrete with rock block is adopted as the upper limiting value of bond strength. In summary, the aforementioned two methods, namely, in-situ tensile method by drilling shotcrete specimen with a diameter of 100 mm, and tensile test by cutting panel-formed shotcrete with rock block, are recommended to evaluate the bond strength comprehensively. In other words, the results of the former could be referenced as the lower limiting value of bond strength and the results of the latter as the upper one. The research findings offer important application reference for the structural stability and construction quality in underground oil storage in rock cavern.
Key words
underground oil storage in rock cavern /
shotcrete /
bond strength /
in-situ tensile test by drilling /
laboratory tensile test by cutting panel-formed shotcrete with rock block
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 洪开荣. 地下水封能源洞库修建技术的发展与应用. 隧道建设,2014,34(3):188-197.
[2] 张奇华. 关于黄岛国家石油储备库水封效果评价和控制的几点认识. 长江科学院院报,2014,31(8): 112-116.
[3] GB 50455—2008, 地下水封石洞油库设计规范. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2009.
[4] GB 50086—2015, 岩土锚杆与喷射混凝土支护工程技术规范. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2015.
[5] 张可诚,谢换明,汪伏祥,等. 秦岭隧道钢纤维喷混凝土衬砌质量控制. 现代隧道技术,2004,41(2): 68-75.
[6] 马兴明,代绍华. 浅谈三峡右岸地下电站喷射混凝土粘结强度检测分析. 混凝土,2007,29(1): 89-91.
[7] 黄国兴,刘燕波,柳华英,等. 对喷射混凝土与围岩粘结强度检测方法的评价. 水利学报,2010,41(11): 1382-1386.
[8] 黄国兴,陈文耀,尹俊宏. 喷射混凝土与围岩粘结强度合理指标的探讨. 水力发电,2007,33(2): 78-80.
[9] 宿 辉,李向辉,汪 健. 高地温隧洞喷射混凝土粘结强度及其有限元分析. 水利水电技术,2016,47(1): 54-57.
[10] 唐 阳,宿 辉,李向辉,等. 高地温引水隧洞喷混凝土-围岩粘结强度试验研究. 水电能源科学,2015,33(3): 108-110.
[11] 汪在芹,石 妍,李家正,等. 喷射混凝土的室内检测方法及性能试验研究. 长江科学院院报,2012,29(3): 59-61.
[12] 石 妍,李家正,龙娈珍,等. 喷射混凝土施工性能的室内试验研究. 水力发电,2011,37(12): 90-92.
[13] 王 钧. 大型地下水封原油洞库高性能喷射混凝土研究与应用. 济南:山东大学,2014.
[14] 杨红艳. 热害隧道喷射混凝土性能研究及结构行为分析. 成都:西南交通大学,2013.
[15] 祝云华. 钢纤维喷射混凝土力学特性及其在隧道单层衬砌中的应用研究. 重庆:重庆大学,2009.
[16] 周仁战. 钢纤维混凝土喷层的力学性能试验研究. 淮南:安徽理工大学,2008.
[17] 石广银. 钢纤维喷射混凝土单层衬砌的工程特性研究及应用. 西安:西安建筑科技大学,2008.
[18] GB 50086—2001, 锚杆喷射混凝土支护技术规范. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2001.
[19] DL/T 5181—2003, 水电水利工程锚喷支护施工规范. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2003.
[20] DL/T 5181—2017, 水电水利工程锚喷支护施工规范. 北京:中国电力出版社, 2018.