Quantifying the Process of Karst Collapse by a Physical Model

WU Qing-hua, ZHANG Wei, LIU Yu, CUI Hao-dong

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 52-58.

PDF(5169 KB)
PDF(5169 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 52-58. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20171079
TESTS AND THEORIES OF ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS

Quantifying the Process of Karst Collapse by a Physical Model

  • WU Qing-hua1, ZHANG Wei1, LIU Yu2, CUI Hao-dong1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

At present, there is no unified, systematic cognition regarding the mechanism of karst collapse as research achievements are mainly concentrated on the causes and influential factors of karst collapse in qualitative sense rather than quantitative approach. In this paper, the process of karst collapse covered with sand layer was investigated quantitatively, and the barrier effect of clay layer covering the karst was studied by sampling (keeping the pressure head unchanged during the process of sampling) and pressure monitoring on a physical model. Results showed that: 1) in the structure of rock covered with sand, three times of karst collapse happened during the steady decline of groundwater level, with the critical seepage-breakage gradients rcaching 0.525, 2.500 and 3.400, respectively; the maximum collapse rate gradually decreased, yet the durations and degrees of collapse gradually increased; moreover, the process of the first karst collapse was more complicated than that of the second and the third collapse; 2) the seepage theory of liquefaction has been verified by the results of karst collapse of rock covered with sand layer; 3) groundwater level fluctuation exacerbates the formation of karst collapse; 4) the seepage-breakage gradient increased from 0.525 to 48.300 in the presence of clay layer, indicating that clay layer could significantly improve the safety of karst overburden layer and effectively inhibit karst collapse. The results of this study could improve the understanding of karst collapse mechanism in a quantitative sense.

Key words

karst collapse / physical model test / hourglass / seepage theory of liquefaction / seepage-breakage gradient / quantitative research

Cite this article

Download Citations
WU Qing-hua, ZHANG Wei, LIU Yu, CUI Hao-dong. Quantifying the Process of Karst Collapse by a Physical Model[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(3): 52-58 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20171079

References

[1] 杨 涛,涂 婧,殷 美,等.武汉市岩溶塌陷分类及防治对策[J].资源环境与工程,2013,27(5):661-664.
[2] 范士凯.武汉(湖北)地区岩溶地面塌陷[J].资源环境与工程,2006,20(增):608-616.
[3] 赵博超,朱 蓓,王弘元,等.浅谈岩溶塌陷的影响因素与模型研究[J].中国岩溶,2015,34(5):515-521.
[4] 王柳宁,高武振.桂林市西城区地下水活动与岩溶塌陷的关系[J].桂林工学院学报,2000,20(2):106-111.
[5] 彭小沾,崔希民,吕 玲,等.含水层失水与岩溶塌陷引起的采动损害分析[J].河北建筑科技学院学报,2006,23(4):62-64.
[6] 王建秀,杨立中,何 静.岩溶塌陷演化过程中的水-土-岩相互作用分析[J].西南交通大学学报,2001,36(3):314-317.
[7] 李颜贵,刘子龙,于孝民,等.唐山黄庄岩溶塌陷形成条件和机理分析[J].中国岩溶,2014,33(3):299-307.
[8] 李海涛,陈邦松,杨 雪,等.岩溶塌陷监测内容及方法概述[J].工程地质学报,2015,23(1):126-134.
[9] 刘秀敏,陈从新,沈 强,等.覆盖型岩溶塌陷的空间预测与评价[J].岩土力学,2011,32(9):2785-2790.
[10]罗小杰.武汉地区浅层岩溶发育特征与岩溶塌陷灾害防治[J].中国岩溶,2013,32(4):419-432.
[11]李青来.与真空吸蚀论商榷塌陷的成因[J].化工矿山技术,1980,(5): 65-72.
[12]杜正民,吴光明,洪 亮.潜蚀作用导致岩溶塌陷地质灾害的实例分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2007,34(3):89-92.
[13]金晓文,陈植华,曾 斌,等.岩溶塌陷机理定量研究的初步思考[J].中国岩溶,2013,32(4):437-446.
[14]孙金辉.覆盖型岩溶塌陷临界参数模型试验与数值模拟研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2011.
[15]雷明堂,蒋小珍,李 瑜.岩溶塌陷模型试验——以武昌为例[J].地质灾害与环境保护,1993,4(2):39-44.
[16]张 鑫,崔可锐,査甫生.覆盖型岩溶塌陷临界水位降幅模型试验研究[J].科学技术与工程,2016,16(12):195-199.
PDF(5169 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/