Matter-element Model of Sluice Safety AssessmentBased on Connection Number

LI Jia-tian; SU Huai-zhi

doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20170417

PDF(2364 KB)

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10) : 88-91. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20170417

ENGINEERING SAFETY AND DISASTER PREVENTION

Matter-element Model of Sluice Safety AssessmentBased on Connection Number

LI Jia-tian^1,2, SU Huai-zhi^1,2

Author information +

History +

Abstract

In view of the incompatibility and relevance among indexes of safety evaluation for sluice project, four-tuple connection number is incorporated into matter-element model to comprehensively evaluate sluice safety. The basic principle and modeling method are expounded. A method for calculating the connection number of single index based on linear interpolation principle is proposed. Using the evaluation model, the safety status of a sluice structure is depicted comprehensively from three aspects including similarity, difference and inverse. The safety level is appraised and the development trend of the sluice project is evaluated based on the connection trend theory. On this basis, guiding suggestions are put forward for the operation, maintenance and management of the sluice. Computational example manifests that the evaluation model is simpler and more reliable than traditional matter-element analysis method.

Key words

sluice project / safety evaluation / four-tuple connection number / matter-element model / connection trend

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

LI Jia-tian, SU Huai-zhi. Matter-element Model of Sluice Safety AssessmentBased on Connection Number[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(10): 88-91 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20170417

References

[1] 林继镛.水工建筑物[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2009.
[2] 孙琪琦.水闸安全检测与评价[D]. 南京:河海大学, 2006.
[3] 任旭华,刘丽. 水闸病害分析及其防治加固措施[J]. 水电自动化与大坝监测, 2003, 27(6): 49-52.
[4] 韩彰,陈健, 李经纬,等. 改进物元可拓法在水闸工程安全综合评估中的应用[J]. 水力发电, 2015, 41(4): 82-85.
[5] 闫滨, 孙友良, 高真伟. 水闸安全综合评价研究综述[J]. 水电能源科学, 2013, 31(2): 171-173.
[6] SU Huai-zhi, HU Jiang, WU Zhong-ru. A Study of Safety Evaluation and Early-warning Method for Dam Global Behavior[J]. Structural Health Monitoring,2012, 11(3): 269-279.
[7] 戚国强,李凯.基于改进层次模糊综合评价的水闸工程安全评价[J].东北农业大学学报, 2013,(5): 111-114.
[8] SU Huai-zhi, LI Jin-you, CAO Ji-ping ,et al. Macro-Comprehensive Evaluation Method of High Rock Slope Stability in Hydropower Projects[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014, 28(2): 213-224.
[9] 郑茂海.水闸安全评价理论与应用研究[D].济南:山东大学, 2010.
[10]SL 214—2015,水闸安全评价导则[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2015.
[11]SL 214—1998,水闸安全鉴定规定[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 1998.
[12]SU Huai-zhi, YANG Meng, WEN Zhi-ping. Multi-layer Multi-index Comprehensive Evaluation for Dike Safety[J]. Water Resources Management, 2015, 29(13): 4683-4699.
[13]蔡文.物元模型及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学技术文献出版社, 1994.
[14]高卫东, 刘永建.熵权可拓模型在膨胀土胀缩等级判别中的应用[J]. 长江科学院院报,2012,29(11):91-94.
[15]张俊华, 杨耀红, 陈南祥. 模糊物元模型在地下水水质评价中的应用[J]. 长江科学院院报,2010,27(9): 10-13.
[16]李辉, 季惠彬, 晏鄂川,等. 地下水封洞库岩体质量可拓评价[J]. 长江科学院院报,2011,28(8):55-58.
[17]赵克勤. 集对分析及其初步应用[M]. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 2000.
[18]刘双跃, 王娟, 何发龙,等. 四元联系数对煤矿安全质量标准化的优化研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(12): 32-37.
[19]姚勇, 穆鹏.模糊四元联系数在土质边坡稳定性评价中的应用[J].水力发电,2012,38(8):22-25.
[20]周兴慧, 张吉军.基于五元联系数的风险综合评价方法及其应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(8): 2169-2176.
[21]姚文花, 姚勇.农村小城镇地质灾害灾度等级划分[J].人民长江,2010,41(8):27-29.
[22]李聪,陈建宏.联系数的物元模型在建筑安全评价及预测中的应用[J]. 安全与环境学报,2016,16(2): 71-75.
[23]苏怀智,孙小冉.混凝土坝渗流性态综合评价与趋势预估模型研究[J].人民长江,2013,44(22):95-99, 110.