Effects of Land-use Change on Drainage Modulus in Plain Lake AreaBased on a Coupled Hydrological and Hydrodynamic Model

LUO Wen-bing, WANG Xiu-gui, QIAO Wei, SUN Jin-wei, QIAN Long, FU Hao-long

Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 76-81.

PDF(1611 KB)
PDF(1611 KB)
Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute ›› 2018, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 76-81. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20161226
AGRICULTURAL WATER CONSERVANCY

Effects of Land-use Change on Drainage Modulus in Plain Lake AreaBased on a Coupled Hydrological and Hydrodynamic Model

  • LUO Wen-bing1,2, WANG Xiu-gui2, QIAO Wei1, SUN Jin-wei3, QIAN Long2, FU Hao-long1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

An SCS-MIKE11 coupled model was built to calculate the drainage moduli of plain lake area with different land-use patterns, and the effect of land-use change on drainage modulus was analyzed. Drainage measures in the background of land-use change were simulated and optimized by setting different combinations among proportions of paddy field to dry land area, water surface ratio, and ground hardening rate. The Luoshan drainage area in the Four-lake Drainage Basin in Hubei Province was selected as study area. Results revealed that the drainage modulus in 2011 was larger than that in 1994 under the same land-use pattern. According to the water logging control standards (10-year rainstorm for one day and draining for three days, 10-year rainstorm for three days and draining for five days), the drainage modulus increased by 159.3% and 33.6% respectively from 1994 to 2011. When water surface ratio and proportion of paddy field to dry land area kept unchanged, the drainage modulus under one-day rainstorm and three-day rainstorm increased by 0.005 m3/(s·km2) and 0.003 m3/(s·km2) respectively as ground hardening rate increased by 1%; the drainage modulus under one-day rainstorm and three-day rainstorm decreased by 0.016 m3/(s·km2) and 0.012 m3/(s·km2) as water surface ratio increased by 1% when ground hardening rate and proportion of paddy field to dry land area kept unchanged; the drainage modulus under one-day rainstorm and three-day rainstorm decreased by 0.004 m3/(s·km2) and 0.003 m3/(s·km2) as proportion of paddy field to dry land area increased by 0.1 when ground hardening rate and water surface ratio remained unchanged. Therefore, reducing the ground hardening rate by permeable pavement for example, and increasing the water surface ratio and proportion of paddy field to dry land area in addition to increasing the drainage discharge of pumping stations are effective measures of reducing waterlogging disaster loss. The research results could be used as a reference for reasonable determination of the drainage modulus and formulation of waterlogging control measures under the condition of land-use change in plain lake areas.

Key words

plain lake area / drainage modulus / land-use patterns / SCS model / MIKE11 model

Cite this article

Download Citations
LUO Wen-bing, WANG Xiu-gui, QIAO Wei, SUN Jin-wei, QIAN Long, FU Hao-long. Effects of Land-use Change on Drainage Modulus in Plain Lake AreaBased on a Coupled Hydrological and Hydrodynamic Model[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2018, 35(1): 76-81 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20161226

References

[1] 罗文兵,王修贵,罗 强,等. 四湖流域下垫面改变对排涝模数的影响[J]. 水科学进展,2014,25(2):275-281.
[2] 许 迪. 平原地区明渠排涝流量的两种计算方法[J]. 水利水电技术,1994,(11):52-55.
[3] 王 燕. 安徽省沿江圩区农田排涝模计算[J]. 水利经济,2000,(4):42-45.
[4] 左宝林. 中小圩口水利规划中排涝装机容量的计算[J]. 中国农村水利水电,2000,(9):32-33.
[5] 王国安,贺顺德,崔 鹏,等. 排涝模数法的基本原理和适用条件[J]. 人民黄河,2011,23(2):21-26.
[6] 刘 克,李同超,王 辉. 南四湖滨湖涝洼区排水模数比较分析[J]. 山东水利,2015, (7):7-8.
[7] 张建新,惠士博,谢森传. 利用降雨入渗产流分析原理和Nash单位线汇流方法进行排涝模数计算的研究[J]. 水文,2002,22(3):1-4.
[8] 周建康,朱春龙,罗国平. 太湖流域小圩区设计排涝模数计算[J]. 中国给水排水,2004,20(12):64-66.
[9] 周建康,朱春龙,罗国平. 平原圩区设计排涝流量与水面率关系研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2004,23(4):64-66.
[10]高 成,刘 俊,崔 韩,等. 城镇圩区排涝模数计算方法及其与河道调蓄库容关系研究[J]. 灾害学,2008,23(3):7-9.
[11]郭晓萌,罗 强,邵东国,等. 改进平湖法的时间步长对排涝模数的影响探讨[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2008,27(6):45-47.
[12]王国安,贺顺德,李荣容,等. 论推理公式的基本原理和适用条件[J]. 人民黄河,2010,32(12):1-4.
[13]王修贵,胡铁松,关洪林,等. 湖北省平原湖区涝渍灾害综合治理研究[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2009.
[14]卢少为,朱勇辉,魏国远,等. 平原湖区排涝模拟研究——以大通湖垸为例[J]. 长江科学院院报,2009,26(7):1-5.
[15]焦圆圆,徐向阳,徐红娟. 城市化圩区排涝模数与主要影响因素间的关系分析[J]. 中国给水排水,2008,24(4):40-43.
[16]郑雄伟,周 芬,侯云青,等. 城镇圩区排涝模数与合理水面率研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2012,43(9):90-94.
[17]段圣泼,吴玉柏,金 秋,等. 沿江圩区局部洼地排涝模数关联因子分析及应用[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2016,34(3):238-243,250.
[18]陈峰云. 湖北省土地利用/覆被变化及其对自然环境要素的影响[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2009.
[19]PONCE V M, HAWKINS R H. Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity?[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1996, 1(1):11-19.
[20]焦平金,许 迪,于颖多,等. 递推关系概化前期产流条件改进SCS模型[J]. 农业工程学报,2015,31(12):132-137.
[21]Danish Hydraulic Institute. MIKE11: A Modeling System of Rivers and Channels User Manual[K]. Denmark: Danish Hydraulic Institute, 2005.
[22]Danish Hydraulic Institute. MIKE11:A Modeling System for Rivers and Channels User-Guide Manual[K]. Denmark: Danish Hydraulic Institute, 2005.
[23]梁彬锐. MIKE11模型在沙井河片区防洪排涝工程中的应用[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2008,(7):81-83.
[24]罗文兵,王修贵,史德亮,等. 平原湖区外江水位变化对排涝流量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(15):126-132.
[25]洪 林,罗 琳,江海涛. SCS模型在流域尺度水文模拟中的应用[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版),2009,42(5):582-586.
[26]GB 50288—99,灌溉与排水工程设计规范[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,1999.
[27]高俊峰,闻余华. 太湖流域土地利用变化对流域产水量的影响[J]. 地理学报,2002,57(2):194-200.
PDF(1611 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/