水电工程边坡炮孔近区岩体爆破损伤特性

梁瑞, 包娟, 周文海

长江科学院院报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8) : 71-76.

PDF(3056 KB)
PDF(3056 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2022, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8) : 71-76. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20210269
岩土工程

水电工程边坡炮孔近区岩体爆破损伤特性

  • 梁瑞1, 包娟1, 周文海1,2
作者信息 +

Blasting Damage Characteristics of Rock Mass Near Blast Hole of Hydropower Engineering Slope

  • LIANG Rui1, BAO Juan1, ZHOU Wen-hai1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为研究水电工程边坡炮孔近区不同损伤模型下岩体爆破时的动力响应,选用HJC模型和RHT模型分别建立岩石单孔爆破损伤模型。基于岩体损伤模拟结果和计算分析,探究了两种损伤模型对岩石爆破损伤分布、地震波能量特性及损伤质点峰值振动速度(PPV)阈值变化规律的影响,结果表明同种工况下RHT模型最终爆破开裂面积近似为HJC模型的一倍;损伤范围越小,炸药冲击波转化为弹性振动波的比例越大;通过拟合损伤度和PPV之间的关系,HJC模型和RHT模型的损伤PPV阈值分别为13.09 cm/s和27.29 cm/s。RHT模型能够更加准确地反映实际边坡近区岩体爆破损伤效应。

Abstract

Single-hole blasting damage models were established by using HJC (Holmquist-Johnson-Cook) model and RHT (Randomized Hough Transform) model respectively for comparison to study the dynamic response of rock mass blasting in the vicinity of the blast hole of hydropower engineering slope under different damage models.The blasting damage distribution,the seismic wave energy characteristics,and the threshold of damage particle peak vibration velocity (PPV) of rock mass under the two models were investigated based on the simulation result and calculation analysis.The results demonstrated that the blasting cracked area in the RHT model is approximately twice that of the HJC model under the same working condition.The smaller the damage range,the greater the proportion of explosive shock wave transformed to elastic vibration wave.The damage PPV thresholds of HJC model and RHT model were obtained by fitting the relationship between damage degree and PPV as 13.09 cm/s and 27.29 cm/s,respectively.In conclusion,the RHT model reflects more accurately the blasting damage effect of rock mass in the vicinity of actual slope.

关键词

边坡炮孔 / 数值模拟 / 损伤模型 / 动力响应 / 损伤特性

Key words

blast hole of slope / numerical simulation / damage model / dynamic response / damage characteristics

引用本文

导出引用
梁瑞, 包娟, 周文海. 水电工程边坡炮孔近区岩体爆破损伤特性[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2022, 39(8): 71-76 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20210269
LIANG Rui, BAO Juan, ZHOU Wen-hai. Blasting Damage Characteristics of Rock Mass Near Blast Hole of Hydropower Engineering Slope[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2022, 39(8): 71-76 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20210269
中图分类号: X935    TU452   

参考文献

[1] 潘 强,张继春,石洪超,等.单孔不耦合装药爆破的岩体损伤分布特征研究[J].振动与冲击,2019,38(18):264-269.
[2] 唐礼忠,陈英毅,刘 昌,等.基于应变率损伤本构模型的围岩分区破裂化现象数值模拟[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(7):82-87.
[3] 陈俊桦,张家生,李新平.大型地下洞室开挖爆破破坏影响范围[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,47(11):3808-3817.
[4] HUO X,SHI X,QIU X,et al.Rock Damage Control for Large-diameter-hole Lateral Blasting Excavation Based on Charge Structure Optimization[J].Tunneling and Underground Space Technology,2020,106:103569.
[5] 章 诚,杨建华,姚 池,等.深埋隧洞连续爆破开挖围岩应力演化规律[J].长江科学院院报,2018,35(12):108-112.
[6] 杨建华,代金豪,姚 池,等.岩石高边坡爆破开挖损伤区岩体力学参数弱化规律研究[J].岩土工程学报,2020,42(5):968-975.
[7] 刘 亮,卢文波,陈 明,等.钻爆开挖条件下岩体临界破碎状态的损伤阈值统计研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(6):1133-1140.
[8] 赵小华,王高辉,卢文波,等.混凝土重力坝含孔口坝段在水下爆炸荷载作用下的毁伤特性[J].振动与冲击,2016,35(22):101-107.
[9] 叶海旺,汪柳俊,冉 成,等.分层装药爆破间隔填塞长度优化研究[J].爆破,2017,34(2):26-33.
[10] 张小勇,龚顺风.隧道内爆炸作用下衬砌结构损伤机理及抗爆性能研究[J].振动与冲击,2013,32(22):193-199.
[11] 张若棋,丁育青,汤文辉,等.混凝土HJC、RHT本构模型的失效强度参数[J].高压物理学报,2011,25(1):15-22.
[12] 张社荣,宋 冉,王 超,等.碾压混凝土HJC动态本构模型修正及数值验证[J].振动与冲击,2019,38(12):25-31.
[13] 凌天龙,王宇涛,刘殿书,等.修正RHT模型在岩体爆破响应数值模拟中的应用[J].煤炭学报,2018,43(增刊2):434-442.
[14] 梁 瑞,王树江,周文海,等.基于应力与速度时程分析的边坡开挖爆破裂纹扩展研究[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(12):71-77.
[15] ESEN S,ONEDERRA I,BILGIN H A.Modelling the Size of the Crushed Zone around a Blasthole[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2003,40(4):485-495.
[16] SANCHIDRI N J A,SEGARRA P,PEZ L M.Energy Components in Rock Blasting[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2007,44(1):130-147.
[17] SL 47—94,水工建筑物岩石基础开挖工程施工技术规范[S].北京:水利电力出版社,1995.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(51566010);甘肃省自然基金项目(B061709)

PDF(3056 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/