长江科学院院报

长江科学院院报 >

2013 , Vol. 30 >Issue 12: 14 - 19

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2013.12.003

水土保持与生态建设

重庆三峡库区生态经济区县域生态系统健康评价

  • 秦趣 ,
  • 张美竹 ,
  • 杨琴 ,
  • 张绪清
展开
  • 六盘水师范学院a.环境与资源科学系；b.乌蒙山区发展研究院；c.政治与法律科学系,贵州六盘水553004
秦趣(1978-),男,贵州毕节人,副教授,硕士,主要从事城市规划、旅游规划及人居环境研究,(电话)18685819878(电子信箱)qinqu2008@163.com。

收稿日期: 2012-11-02

  修回日期: 2013-12-10

  网络出版日期: 2013-12-10

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目(12XJL013);贵州省哲学社会科学规划课题(13GZYB27);贵州省科学技术基金项目(黔科合J字[2012]2308号);六盘水师范学院科研计划项目(lpssy201109)

收起

Health Assessment of Countywide Ecosystem in the Three GorgesEco-economic Region in Chongqing

  • QIN Qu ,
  • ZHANG Mei-zhu ,
  • YANG Qin ,
  • ZHANG Xu-qing
Expand
  • 1.School of Environmental and Resource Science,Liupanshui Normal University,Liupanshui 553004,China;
    2.Research Institute of Development of Wumengshan Region,Liupanshui Normal University,Liupanshui 553004,China;
    3.Department of Political Education and Law,Liupanshui Normal University,
    Liupanshui 553004,China

Received date: 2012-11-02

  Revised date: 2013-12-10

  Online published: 2013-12-10

Fold

摘要

从县域生态系统健康的概念和内涵出发,以自然生态子系统、社会生态子系统和经济生态子系统构建城市生态系统健康评价指标体系,采用层次分析法和模糊数学法构建评价模型,并以重庆三峡库区生态经济区19个区县为研究对象,对其县域生态系统健康状况进行了实例研究。结果表明:奉节、巫山、巫溪和城口的生态系统健康属于“不健康”等级;万州、忠县、丰都、武隆、石柱、垫江、梁平、开县和云阳处于“亚健康”等级;秀山、酉阳、黔江和彭水处于健康等级。通过分析,明确了生态经济区的生态系统健康状况,为生态经济区的可持续发展提供了参考和借鉴意义。

关键词： 县域生态系统健康; 评价指标; 评价模型; 三峡库区; 生态经济区

本文引用格式

秦趣 , 张美竹 , 杨琴 , 张绪清 . 重庆三峡库区生态经济区县域生态系统健康评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2013 , 30(12) : 14 -19 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2013.12.003

Abstract

The index system for urban ecosystem health assessment was established in terms of natural ecosystem,social ecosystem and economic ecosystem on the basis of the conception and connotation of urban ecosystem health. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Mathematics were applied to establish the assessment model. Nineteen districts and counties in the Three-Gorges Eco-economic Region in Chongqing were taken as a case study. Results reveal that the ecosystems in Fengjie,Wushan,Wuxi,and Chengkou were assessed to be unhealthy. The ecosystems in Wanzhou,Zhongxian,Fengdu,Wulong,Shizhu,Dianjiang,Liangping,Kaixian,and Yunyan were sub-healthy,and those in Xiushan,Youyang,Qianjiang,and Pengshui belong to healthy grade. The countywide ecosystem health in the region was obtained,which provides scientific basis for its sustainable development.

Key words： countywide ecosystem health; assessment index; assessment model; Three Gorges Reservoir area; eco-economic region

参考文献

[1] GRIMM N B, FAETH S H, GOLUBIEWSKI N E, et al. Global Change and the Ecology of Cities[J]. Science, 2008, 319(5864): 756-760.
[2] 李双成,赵志强,王仰麟. 中国城市化过程及其资源与生态环境效应机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(1): 63-70.(LI Shuang-cheng, ZHAO Zhi-qiang, WANG Yang-lin. Urbanization and Effects of Natural Resource and Environment in China: Research Trends and Future Directions[J]. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(1): 63-70.(in Chinese)
[3] 王效科,欧阳志云,仁玉芬,等. 城市生态系统长期研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2009,24(8): 928-935.(WANG Xiao-ke, OUYANG Zhi-yun, REN Yu-fen, et al. Perspectives in Long-term Studies of Urban Ecosystem[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2009,24(8): 928-935.(in Chinese)
[4] 秦 趣,尹纳娜,冯维波. 重庆三峡库区生态经济区县域经济发展水平差异分析[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2012,38(1):53-55.(QIN Qu, YIN Na-na, FENG Wei-bo. Analysis on Economic Level of County-level Economy in the Three-Gorges Eco-economic Region in Chongqing[J]. Territory Natural Resources Study, 2012,38(1):53-55.(in Chinese)
[5] 陈克龙,苏茂新,李双成, 等. 西宁市城市生态系统健康评价[J]. 地理研究,2010, 29(2):214-222.(CHEN Ke-long, SU Mao-xin, LI Shuang-cheng, et al. Health Assessment of the Urban Ecosystem of Xi’ning City[J]. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(2):214-222.(in Chinese)
[6] 王治良,王国祥. 洪泽湖湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系探讨[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2007,15(6):152-156.(WANG Zhi-liang, WANG Guo-xiang. Health Assessment Index System of Hongze Lake Wetland Ecosystem[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-agriculture, 2007, 15(6): 152- 156.(in Chinese)
[7] RAPPORT D J. Ecosystem Health: An Emerging Integrative Science[C]∥Evaluating and Monitoring the Health of Large-Scale Ecosystems, NATO ASI Series Vol. 128. New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1995: 123-126.
[8] LEOPOLD A. Wilderness as a Land Laboratory[J]. Living Wilderness,1941, (6): 3.
[9] WOODWELL G W. Radiation and the Patterns of Nature[J]. Science, 1967, 156(3774): 461-470.
[10]BARET G W, VAN DYNE G M, ODUM E P. Stress ecology[J]. Bio Science, 1976, 26(3): 192-194.
[11]RAPPORT D J. What Constitutes Ecosystem Health?[J]. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1989, 33(1): 120-132.
[12]RAPPORT D J. COSTANZA R, MCMICHAEL A J. Assessing Ecosystem Health[J]. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 1998,13(10) :397-402.
[13]杨志锋,何孟常,毛显强,等. 城市生态系统健康可持续发展规划[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2004.(YANG Zhi-feng, HE Meng-chang, MAO Xian-qiang, et al. Planning for the Sustainable Development of Urban Ecosystem Health[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.(in Chinese)
[14]秦 趣,冯维波,梁振民,等. 我国四大直辖市生态基础设施品质评价研究[J]. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,38(3):471-476.(QIN Qu, FENG Wei-bo, LIANG Zhen-min, et al. Study on Evaluation Characteristics of Ecological Infrastructure in Four Municipalities Directly under the Central Government of China[J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2008, 38(3): 471-476.(in Chinese)
[15]李 强,李武艳,赵 烨, 等. 农村生态系统健康的基本内涵及评价体系探索[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(4): 1604-1608.(LI Qiang, LI Wu-yan, ZHAO Ye, et al. Exploration on the Basic Connotation and Evaluation System of Rural Ecosystem Health[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009, 18(4): 1604-1608.(in Chinese)
[16]周文华,王如松. 基于熵权的北京城市生态系统健康模糊综合评价[J]. 生态学报,2005,25 (12): 3244-3251.(ZHOU Wen-hua, WANG Ru-song. An Entropy Weight Approach on the Fuzzy Synthetic Assessment of Beijing Urban Ecosystem Health, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005, 25(12): 3244-3251.(in Chinese)
[17]张晓琴,石培基. 基于PSR模型的兰州城市生态系统健康评价研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2010, 24(3):77-82.(ZHANG Xiao-qin, SHI Pei-ji. The Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Health Based on PSR model: A Case Study of Lanzhou City[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2010, 24(3):77 -82.(in Chinese)
[18]熊 鹰,陈昊林. 基于属性理论的长株潭城市群生态系统健康评价[J]. 生态环境学报,2010, 19(6):1422-1427.(XIONG Ying, CHEN Hao-lin. Assessment of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration Ecosystem Health Based on Attribute Theory[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(6):1422-1427. (in Chinese)
[19]颜文涛,袁兴中,邢 忠. 基于属性理论的城市生态系统健康评价——以重庆市北部新区为例[J]. 生态学杂志,2007,26(10):1679-1684.(YAN Wen-tao,YUAN Xing-zhong,XING Zhong. Urban Ecosystem Health Assessment Based on Attribute Theory: A Case Study in the New District of Northern Chongqing City[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(10): 1679-1684.(in Chinese)
[20]官冬杰,苏维词. 城市生态系统评价方法及其应用研究[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(10): 1716-1721.(GUAN Dong-jie, SU Wei-ci. Study on Evaluation Method for Urban Ecosystem Health and Its Application[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2006, 26(10): 1716-1721.(in Chinese)
[21]郭秀锐,杨居荣,毛显强,等. 城市生态系统健康评价初探[J]. 中国环境科学,2002,22(6): 525-529. (GUO Xiu-rui,YANG Ju-rong, MAO Xian-qiang, et al. Primary Studies on Ecosystem Health Assessment[J]. China Environmental Sciences, 2002,22(6): 525-529.(in Chinese)
[22]陶晓燕. 我国典型资源枯竭型城市生态系统健康综合评价[J]. 地域研究与开发,2010,29 (1) :119-123.(TAO Xiao-yan. Synthetic Assessment of Ecosystem Health on Typical Resource-Exhausted Cities in China[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2010,29 (1) :119-123.(in Chinese)
[23]秦 趣,张美竹,冯维波. 山地城市生态基础设施评价研究——以重庆都市区为例[J]. 西北林学院学报,2012, 27(1):58-62.(QIN Qu, ZHANG Mei-zhu, FENG Wei-bo. Evaluation for Ecological Infrastructure in Mountainous the City: Case of Chongqing Metropolis[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2012, 27(1):58-62.(in Chinese)
[24]李建国,刘金萍,刘丽丽. 基于灰色极大原理的三峡库区(重庆段)生态系统健康评价[J]. 环境科学学报, 2010, 30(11):2344-2352.(LI Jian-guo, LIU Jin-ping, LIU Li-li, et al. Ecosystem Health Evaluation of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (Chongqing) Based on the Theory of Maximum Entropy and Grey System[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2010, 30(11):2344-2352.(in Chinese)
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

*严禁使用本系统存储、处理、传输涉密信息*
版权所有 © 《长江科学院院报》编辑部
技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司