长江科学院院报 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 74-79.DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20211078

• 水灾害 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同二变量重现期在水利工程防洪设计中的应用对比——以桂平航运枢纽为例

甘富万1,2, 刘旻1, 张华国3   

  1. 1.广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,南宁 530000;
    2.广西大学 广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点实验室, 南宁 530000;
    3.海南省水利水电勘测设计院有限公司,海口 570100
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-13 修回日期:2022-01-05 出版日期:2023-03-01 发布日期:2023-03-28
  • 作者简介:甘富万(1981-),男,广西北流人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为水文学及水资源。E-mail:gxugfw@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41807197)

Comparison of Different Bivariate Return Periods in Flood Control Design of Hydraulic Structure: A Case Study on Guiping Shipping Hub

GAN Fu-wan1,2, LIU Min1, ZHANG Hua-guo3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530000, China;
    2. Guangxi Key Laboratory ofDisaster Prevention and Mitigation and Engineering Safety, Guangxi University, Nanning 530000, China;
    3. Hainan Province Water Conservancy & Hydropower Survey, Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd.,Haikou 570100, China
  • Received:2021-10-13 Revised:2022-01-05 Published:2023-03-01 Online:2023-03-28

摘要: 针对多变量洪水共同作用下的水利工程,已有的多变量重现期计算所得的防洪参数仍存在防洪能力不一致导致的风险,多变量重现期的定义与计算也成为洪水频率分析中的重难点。介绍了一种新的多变量重现期定义——防洪重现期,并与传统二变量重现期在定义及危险域划分方面进行对比,再以桂平航运枢纽为例,利用Copula函数构造干支流洪水的联合分布,计算分析防洪重现期与传统二变量重现期在防洪设计中的差异,验证防洪重现期在洪水风险分析中的合理性与可靠性。研究表明,防洪重现期考虑了洪水组合与调洪耦合的关系,利用防洪重现期计算得到的防洪设计参数,防洪能力与防洪标准一致,能避免高估洪水风险,增加工程费用或低估洪水风险,增加工程防洪破坏风险的问题。

关键词: 多变量洪水, 二变量重现期, 防洪重现期, Copula函数, 危险域, 设计组合值

Abstract: Under the combined action of multiple variables of flood, hydraulic projects are subjected to risks of inconsistent flood control capaciy caused by flood control parameters calculated from existing multivariate return periods. Hence, the definition and calculation of multivariate return period has become a difficulty in flood frequency analysis. In view of this, a new definition for multivariate return period is proposed in this paper, that is, flood control return period. Flood control return period is defined as the average time between two successive events (event is defined as the flood control design parameter being exceeded). The coupling relationship between flood combinations and flood regulation are taken into consideration. The proposed return period is compared with traditional bivariate return periods in terms of definition and risk area delimitation. With Guiping shipping hub as a case study, the differences between the proposed flood control return period and the traditional bivariate return periods in flood control design are calculated and examined by constructing the joint distribution of floods in the mainstream and tributary using the Copula function. The rationality and reliability of flood control return period are verified. The results manifest that flood control capacity can be consistent with flood control standard by using the proposed return period. Overestimating flood risks and increasing of engineering cost, or underestimating flood risks and increasing of flood damage can both be avoided.

Key words: multivariate flood, bivariate return period, flood control return period, Copula function, risk area, design combination value

中图分类号: