长江科学院院报 ›› 2013, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 72-76.

• 岩土工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

中欧岩土工程勘察分级及岩土分类对比

王小明,李勇,李刚   

  1. 中国能源建设集团 广东省电力设计研究院,广州 510663
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-15 修回日期:2013-10-16 出版日期:2013-10-15 发布日期:2013-10-16
  • 作者简介:王小明(1981-),男,安徽安庆人,工程师,硕士,主要从事电力工程岩土勘察设计工作,(电话)020-32116111(电子信箱)gediwxm@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金(S2011040005245);广东省电力设计研究院科标项目(EX01471W)

Comparison of the Grading of Geotechnical Investigation and the Classification of Rock and Soil between Europe and China

WANG Xiao-ming, LI Yong, LI Gang   

  1. WANG Xiao-ming, LI Yong, LI Gang
    (Guangdong Electric Power Design Institute, China Energy Engineering Group Co., Ltd.,
    Guangzhou 510663, China)
  • Received:2012-08-15 Revised:2013-10-16 Online:2013-10-15 Published:2013-10-16

摘要: 国外市场开拓过程中,经常遇到要求采用欧洲标准进行勘察设计,迫使参与项目建设的总承包商、勘察设计以及施工单位必须熟悉并掌握运用欧洲标准。通过对欧洲岩土标准Eurocode 7与我国岩土规范的对比,总结归纳了二者在岩土工程勘察分级和岩土分类2个方面的差异性,欧洲标准通用性和理论性较强,具有较大的灵活性,通过差异研究可为我国相关勘察设计人员进行国外项目设计提供有益的借鉴。

关键词: 岩土工程勘察, 欧标, 岩土分类, 差异性

Abstract: When exploring overseas markets, it is often required to adopt European Standards in the investigation and designing. The project participants including general contractor, surveyors and designers, and constructors have to command the use of European Standards. In this paper, we compared the Eurocode 7 and Chinese geotechnical code, and summarized their differences in the following two aspects the grading of geotechnical investigation, and the classification of rock and soil. We concluded that the Eurocode is more universal and theoretical, and is greatly flexible. The results could be used as reference for Chinese surveyors and designers in their overseas projects.

Key words: geotechnical engineering investigation, Eurocode, classification of rock and soil, difference

中图分类号: