PDF(1191 KB)
PDF(1191 KB)
融合BNN与LSTM的大坝渗压预测模型与不确定性分析
A dam seepage prediction model combining BNN and LSTM with uncertainty analysis
针对传统大坝渗压预测模型在复杂非线性时序建模与不确定性量化方面存在的不足,本文提出一种融合贝叶斯神经网络与长短期记忆网络的大坝渗压预测模型。该模型利用双层长短期记忆网络提取渗压监测数据中的长期时序依赖特征;引入注意力机制增强模型对重要时序信息与结构特征的表达能力;在输出阶段引入变分贝叶斯神经网络全连接层进行参数概率化建模。本文以新疆提孜那莆河莫莫克水利枢纽工程小时级监测数据集为实验数据,结果表明,所提出模型与基线模型LSTM模型相比,平均绝对误差MAE和均方根误差RMSE分别降低了74.1%和71.9%,R2提高了19.1%,误差显著降低,预测精度与稳定性方面均有所提高;贝叶斯推断输出的后验概率分布与置信区间能够较好覆盖真实观测值,实现预测结果的不确定性量化,为大坝安全风险评估提供了可靠的数据支撑。
[Objective] In order to address the shortcomings of traditional dam seepage pressure prediction models in modeling complex nonlinear time series and quantifying uncertainty, this paper proposes a dam seepage pressure prediction model that integrates Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. [Methods] The model employs a two-layer Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to extract long-term temporal dependency features from seepage pressure monitoring data. It introduces an Attention mechanism to enhance the model's ability to express important temporal information and structural characteristics. And it incorporates a variational Bayesian neural network fully connected layer at the output stage for probabilistic parameter modeling. Taking the hourly monitoring dataset of the Momoke Water Control Project on the Tizinafu River in Xinjiang as experimental data, model training and comparative experiments are conducted. [Results] The results show that, compared with the baseline LSTM model, the proposed model reduces MAE and RMSE by 74.1% and 71.9%, respectively, while increasing R2 by 19.1%. The errors are significantly reduced, and both prediction accuracy and stability are improved. The posterior probability distribution and confidence intervals output by Bayesian inference can effectively cover the true observed values, achieving uncertainty quantification of the prediction results, thereby providing reliable data support for dam safety risk assessment. [Conclusions] The model was evaluated using one project's hourly monitoring data; its applicability to other projects or sampling intervals requires further validation.
渗压预测 / 贝叶斯神经网络 / 长短期记忆网络 / 注意力机制 / 不确定性
seepage pressure prediction / Bayesian Neural Network / Long Short-Term Memory network / attention mechanism / uncertainty
| [1] |
李双平, 张斌, 郑俊星, 刘祖强, 叶果, 张辛, 汤寒. 水库大坝安全“千手”大模型构建及应用研究[J/OL]. 水利水电科技进展, 2026.
(
|
| [2] |
张建伟, 李毅男, 张龑, 刘兰勤, 张多新, 王子健. 基于数字孪生的水库大坝安全监测:关键技术与应用[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 46(3): 1-9.
|
| [3] |
王晓玲, 王成, 王佳俊, 余佳, 余红玲. 大坝渗压混合预测的STL分解-集成学习模型[J]. 水力发电学报, 2024, 43 (9) :106-123.
(
|
| [4] |
吴少锋. 基于改进BP神经网络的海堤渗压监测方法[J]. 水利科学与寒区工程, 2023, 6(3):40-42.
(
|
| [5] |
倪沙沙, 迟世春. 基于粒子群支持向量机的高心墙堆石坝渗透系数反演[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(4):727-734.
(
|
| [6] |
王香帅, 黄铭. RF机器学习算法在边坡渗压预测中的应用研究[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2020, 26(5):17-22.
(
|
| [7] |
岑威钧, 王肖鑫, 蒋明欢. 基于EEMD-LSTM-ARIMA的土石坝渗压预测模型研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2023, 34(2):180-185.
(
|
| [8] |
王晓玲, 李克, 张宗亮, 余红玲, 孔令学, 陈文龙. 耦合ALO-LSTM和特征注意力机制的土石坝渗压预测模型[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(4):403-412.
(
|
| [9] |
李心如, 宋景焘, 杨杰, 许增光. 基于概率性预测的抽水蓄能电站大坝渗流安全监控模型[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2025, 45(4):76-84.
(
|
| [10] |
李大洋, 姚轶, 梁忠民, 周艳, 李彬权. 基于变分贝叶斯深度学习的水文概率预报方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(1):33-41.
(
|
| [11] |
何玉洁. 土石坝渗流参数智能预测模型及安全预警指标研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2024.
(
|
| [12] |
吴中如. 混凝土坝安全监控的确定性模型及混合模型[J]. 水利学报, 1989,(5):64-70.
(
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |