PDF(2552 KB)
PDF(2552 KB)
PDF(2552 KB)
典型城市蓄滞洪区洪水演进模拟与风险评估
Flood Routing Simulation and Risk Assessment in a Typical Urban Flood Detention Basin
城市蓄滞洪区面临着经济社会发展与防洪功能之间的突出矛盾。东西湖蓄滞洪区作为武汉市唯一的蓄滞洪保留区,在长江流域防洪体系中具有不可替代的战略地位。在快速城镇化背景下,为科学评估其分洪运用风险,利用MIKE系列模型构建干流河道一维与蓄滞洪区局部二维洪水演进水动力学耦合模型,实现了洪水过程的精细化模拟。以1954年型300 a一遇洪水为典型场景,系统分析了东西湖蓄滞洪区分洪后的淹没特征、防洪效益及社会经济风险。结果表明:东西湖蓄滞洪区分洪运用后,区域内最大淹没面积达391.77 km2,平均淹没水深3.82 m,淹没范围主要集中于中西部及北部街道,东部及中部街道虽淹没面积相对较小,但人口与财产暴露度极高;整个分洪过程共分蓄长江干流洪水23.74亿m3,有效降低汉口水位0.33 m。分洪后将导致169.05 km2耕地淹没,95.5万人口转移避险,直接经济损失1 052.54亿元,间接经济损失也将达到千亿元规模。研究成果可为蓄滞洪区风险管控及防洪调度决策提供定量依据,对提升流域防灾减灾能力具有参考价值。但受基础数据获取与模型概化等限制,动态风险表征有待深化。
[Objective] This study aims to scientifically assess the risk of flood diversion operation in the Dongxihu flood detention basin, the only remaining flood detention basin around Wuhan. The study systematically analyzes the inundation characteristics, flood-control benefits, and socioeconomic risks associated with flood diversion, ultimately enhancing flood prevention and disaster mitigation capacity in the Yangtze River Basin. [Methods] This study employs MIKE series models to develop a coupled hydrodynamic model combining 1-D simulation for the main channel of the Yangtze River and 2-D local simulation for the Dongxihu flood detention basin, enabling refined simulation of flood propagation and inundation processes. The 1-D hydrodynamic model covers the Yangtze River reach from Yichang to Datong, encompassing the entire middle and lower Yangtze River basin including Dongting Lake and Poyang Lake. The computational domain of the 2-D model includes the Hanjiang River reach from Hanchuan station to Jianghan bridge, as well as the Dongxihu flood detention basin. The 1954-type 300-year return period flood, an over-standard flood in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, is selected as the hydraulic boundary condition. Simulations were performed to analyze the inundation extent, water depth distribution, flood storage volume, water level variation at Hankou, together with the exposure and losses of population, properties, enterprises and other socio-economic assets after flood diversion in the Dongxihu flood detention basin. [Results] After flood diversion operation in the Dongxihu flood detention basin, the final flood storage volume in the area reaches 2.374 billion m3. The maximum inundation area reaches 391.77 km2, with a maximum inundation depth of 7.46 m and an average inundation depth of 3.82 m. During the entire flood diversion process, a total of 2.374 billion m3 of floodwater from the main stream of the Yangtze River is diverted, effectively lowering the water level at Hankou by 0.33 m, while the maximum water level reduction at Hankou during the whole flood process reaches 0.41 m. The inundated area is mainly concentrated in subdistricts in the central-western and northern parts. Although the eastern and central subdistricts have relatively smaller inundated areas, their population and property exposure is extremely high, indicating that flood risk is not simply proportional to inundation extent but is strongly influenced by the spatial distribution of socioeconomic assets. Areas such as the Duoluokou port area of Wuhan port, Wuhuan sports center, and Baiquan subdistrict are not affected by inundation after flood diversion because of their higher terrain. Since numerous buildings are distributed near the flood diversion entrance, relatively high flow velocities occur near some buildings after diversion, exerting considerable impact forces on these structures. Flood diversion would inundate 169.05 km2 of cultivated land, necessitate the evacuation of 955 000 people for risk avoidance, cause direct economic losses of 105.254 billion, and lead to indirect economic losses also reach the hundreds of billion scale. These indirect losses, resulting from large-scale enterprise shutdowns and supply chain disruptions, may exceed direct losses and therefore deserve particular attention in risk assessment, compensation policy design, and resilience planning. [Conclusions] The Dongxihu flood detention basin performs a critical flood impoundment function, yet flood diversion entails heavy costs and marked spatial variability in risks. Future planning should coordinate flood diversion requirements with territorial spatial development layout, optimize the allocation of population and industries, and minimize losses induced by flood diversion operation. Future studies should incorporate more detailed and time-varying socioeconomic data, improve model generalization and uncertainty analysis, and strengthen the coupling of hydrodynamic simulation with dynamic risk assessment so as to support more adaptive and resilient flood risk governance.
东西湖蓄滞洪区 / 洪水演进 / MIKE一二维耦合模型 / 风险评估 / 防洪效益
Dongxihu flood detention basin / flood routing / MIKE 1D/2D coupled model / risk assessment / flood control benefits
| [1] |
张建云, 贺瑞敏, 金君良, 等. 变化环境下中国洪涝灾害新特征及科技需求[J]. 水科学进展, 2026, 37(2): 197-206.
(
|
| [2] |
王乐, 要威, 蒋磊, 等. 变化环境下流域蓄滞洪区布局优化研究[J]. 人民长江, 2025, 56(3): 30-38, 62.
(
|
| [3] |
王艳艳, 李娜. 我国蓄滞洪区建设管理问题及措施研究[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(4): 1-7.
(
|
| [4] |
余启辉, 刘佳明, 卢程伟. 长江流域防洪规划修编关键问题探讨[J]. 中国水利, 2024(12): 29-34.
(
|
| [5] |
王静, 李娜, 丁志雄, 等. 蓄滞洪区洪水风险区划方法及典型案例研究[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(4): 8-14.
(
|
| [6] |
杜晓鹤, 何秉顺, 徐卫红, 等. 海河“23·7”流域性特大洪水蓄滞洪区运用复盘及系统治理绿色发展的思考[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2023, 33(9): 31-38.
(
|
| [7] |
黄锋, 侯贵兵, 李媛媛. 珠江流域水工程联合调度方案实践与思考: 以2022年大洪水为例[J]. 人民珠江, 2023, 44(5): 10-17.
(
|
| [8] |
梁富仓, 汤帅, 朱晓二. 安徽省2020年淮河干流蓄滞洪区调度运用分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2021, 31(7): 51-53.
(
|
| [9] |
王涵, 刘佳明, 谭政宇, 等. 基于分洪量调控的蓄滞洪区动态风险评估: 以洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2026, 43(7): 135-142.
为评估蓄滞洪区运用动态风险,支撑蓄滞洪区精细化运用,利用遥感及GIS技术构建了蓄滞洪区运用风险评估系统,结合二维水动力学模型及基于分洪量的运用方案集,模拟蓄滞洪区分洪过程各阶段洪水演进情况,明晰蓄滞洪区运用动态风险特征。以洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区为典型进行风险分析,结果表明:①洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区分洪量每增加5亿m3,平均水位上升0.57 m;②受损失率及地物分布的综合影响,洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区直接经济损失在分洪20亿~45亿 m3范围内增长最快,间接经济损失及转移人口在分洪初期(分洪量<5亿 m3)增长最快。③洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区分洪20亿m3时,蓄滞洪区全域被洪水淹没,蓄滞洪区内18.37万人需全部转移;分洪超25亿m3时,经济损失从以间接经济损失为主转化为以直接经济损失为主,且第二、三产业损失稳定在9.8亿元;分洪量30亿m3以上时,蓄滞洪区内渔业产值全部损失,损失约为36亿元;洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区分洪60亿 m3时,直接经济损失约为173.6亿元,间接经济损失约65.5亿元。研究成果可为蓄滞洪区科学调度与风险管理提供技术支撑。
(
|
| [10] |
孙振宇, 周运浩, 张勤旭, 等. 基于二维浅水方程的胖头泡蓄滞洪区洪水演进数值模拟[J]. 人民珠江, 2024, 45(6): 82-91.
(
|
| [11] |
李鑫淼. 蓄滞洪区洪水灾害精细化分析与防洪效益研究[D]. 北京: 中国水利水电科学研究院, 2025.
(
|
| [12] |
赵亚军. 长江下游典型蓄滞洪区洪水精细模拟与优化调度研究[D]. 北京: 华北电力大学, 2024.
(
|
| [13] |
水利部长江水利委员会. 长江流域蓄滞洪区建设与管理规划报告[R]. 武汉: 水利部长江水利委员会, 2011.
(Changjiang Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources. Report on the construction and management planning of flood detention areas in the Yangtze River Basin[R]. Wuhan: Changjiang Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources, 2011.) (in Chinese)
|
| [14] |
水利部长江水利委员会. 长江流域防洪规划(2025—2035年)[R]. 2025. 武汉: 水利部长江水利委员会,
(Changjiang Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources. Flood control plan for the Yangtze River Basin (2025—2035)[R]. Wuhan: Changjiang Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources, 2025.) (in Chinese)
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
王玮琦, 林文青, 王帆, 等. 共渠西蓄滞洪区洪水演进数值模拟研究: 以海河“23·7”流域性特大洪水为例[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2023, 33(9): 45-49, 66.
(
|
| [18] |
陈小凤, 胡勇, 章启兵. 洪洼洪泛区溃堤洪水与漫溢洪水联合演进数值模拟[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(11):4401-4409.
(
|
| [19] |
衣秀勇, 关春曼, 果有娜, 等. DHI MIKE FlOOD洪水模拟技术应用与研究[R]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2014.
(
|
| [20] |
刘佳明, 马强, 王乐, 等. 长江中下游蓄滞洪区洪水控制效果研究[J]. 中国水利, 2026(6): 7-13.
(
|
| [21] |
陈胜, 柴福鑫, 刘业森, 等. 洪水风险图推演实时性提升技术研究与实践应用[J]. 中国水利, 2026(11):24-30.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |