“天-空-地”一体化洪涝监测关键技术研究进展

陈喆, 李喆, 向大享, 崔长露, 姜莹

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 149-158.

PDF(1536 KB)
PDF(1536 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 149-158. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20260166
智慧监测与预测预警技术

“天-空-地”一体化洪涝监测关键技术研究进展

作者信息 +

Research Progress on Key Technologies for Space-Air-Ground Integrated Flood Monitoring

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

洪涝灾害动态监测是流域防汛减灾与水安全保障的重要内容。传统监测方法依赖单一观测手段,在时空连续性、复杂环境适应性及实时响应能力等方面存在着明显的不足。近年来,随着对地观测技术、无人系统、物联网及人工智能的快速发展,融合天基遥感、空基平台与地基传感网络的天-空-地一体化洪涝监测体系已成为智慧水利领域的重要研究方向。系统论述了天基遥感卫星、低空无人机遥感及地基传感网络在洪涝监测中的关键技术进展,重点评述多源异构数据融合与同化、地理人工智能(GeoAI)与数字孪生驱动的实时预演等新兴技术在洪涝感知、动态模拟与辅助决策中的应用模式与研究现状。在此基础上,总结不同技术路径的适用场景、优势与不足,并对未来洪涝监测向实时化、数智化的发展趋势进行了展望。研究成果可为数字孪生水利监测感知、水雨情测报“三道防线”建设等提供技术参考。

Abstract

[Objective] Traditional monitoring methods for flood disasters primarily rely on single ground-based stations,which often suffer from limited spatial coverage,vulnerability to extreme weather,and delayed response capabilities. This research aims to address these limitations by systematically reviewing the “Space-Air-Ground” integrated monitoring framework. The primary objective is to investigate the synergistic mechanisms and key emerging technologies—such as Multi-source Data Fusion,Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI),and Digital Twins—that enable high-precision,real-time,and intelligent flood perception and decision support. [Methods] The study adopts a multi-dimensional perspective to analyze the integrated monitoring architecture consisting of three layers: Space (Satellite clusters),Air (UAVs and aviation platforms),and Ground (IoT sensors and hydrological stations). It evaluates the synergy between these layers across the Data,Transmission,and Application tiers. Specifically,the research reviews three levels of data fusion: data-level,feature-level (utilizing Cross-modal Transformers),and decision-level. Furthermore,it explores advanced data assimilation techniques,comparing traditional variational and sequential methods with modern Deep Learning-based approaches like PINN (Physics-Informed Neural Networks) and End-to-End Neural Assimilation. The study also classifies GeoAI applications in flood monitoring into four categories: inundation extraction,water level inversion,discharge estimation,and vulnerability assessment. [Results] The integrated framework significantly enhances monitoring reliability by achieving multi-layered spatio-temporal complementarity. Key results include:(1) Synergistic Perception: Ground-based sensors provide high-confidence “truth” data to calibrate satellite and UAV inversions,while satellite signals can trigger UAV swarms for targeted detailed inspections in a “discovery-tracking-verification” loop. (2) GeoAI Advancement: Modern models like Segment Anything Model (SAM) and Bitemporal Image Transformer (BIT) have improved water body segmentation accuracy under complex conditions,such as urban shadows or cloud cover,by utilizing cross-modal feature reconstruction. (3) Digital Twin Evolution: The technology has evolved from geometric visualization (L1) and physical mechanism simulation (L2) to logic-driven intelligent prediction (L3). The integration of Reduced-Order Models (ROM) and GeoAI allows for “second-level” decision feedback by shifting computational burdens to the pre-training phase. (4) Operational Efficacy: Pilot applications in the Changjiang and Pearl River basins demonstrate that digital twin systems can support the “Four Pre-s” (Forecasting,Warning,Rehearsal,and Planning),providing critical technical support during major flood events. [Conclusions] This research concludes that the “Space-Air-Ground” integrated network represents the future of intelligent flood disaster management. The study’s innovation lies in proposing a vertically integrated “Perception-Model-Intelligence” architecture that moves beyond simple multi-source observation to a hybrid synergistic mechanism driven by both physical laws and data. However,several challenges remain:(1) technical barriers in high-precision cross-modal spatio-temporal alignment;(2) the lack of physical interpretability in “black-box” GeoAI models; and (3) the need for deeper coupling between digital twin systems and actual flood control business workflows. Future research should focus on:(1) Edge Intelligence: Developing lightweight algorithms for on-orbit real-time data processing. (2) Physics-Driven Sensing: Embedding hydrological mechanisms into neural networks to ensure consistency with physical laws. (3) Standardization: Establishing unified technical standards and interface specifications for digital twin flood systems to enhance their engineering applicability and cross-regional generalization.

关键词

洪涝监测 / “天-空-地”一体化 / 多源遥感 / 数据融合 / 人工智能 / 数字孪生

Key words

flood monitoring / space-air-ground integration / multi-source remote sensing / data fusion / artificial intelligence / digital twin

引用本文

导出引用
陈喆, 李喆, 向大享, . “天-空-地”一体化洪涝监测关键技术研究进展[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(6): 149-158 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20260166
CHEN Zhe, LI Zhe, XIANG Da-xiang, et al. Research Progress on Key Technologies for Space-Air-Ground Integrated Flood Monitoring[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(6): 149-158 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20260166
中图分类号: TV87 (防洪工程)   

参考文献

[1]
Amitrano D, Di Martino G, Di Simone A, et al. Flood Detection with SAR: a Review of Techniques and Datasets[J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(4): 656.
[2]
中华人民共和国应急管理部. 国家防灾减灾救灾委员会办公室应急管理部发布2025年全国自然灾害情况[EB/OL].[2026-01-26].
(Ministry of Emergency Management of the People’s Republic of China. The Office of the National Disaster Prevention and Reduction and Relief Committee of the Ministry of Emergency Management Released the Top Ten Natural Disasters Nationwide in 2025[EB/OL].[2026-01-26].) (in Chinese)
[3]
Islam K A, Uddin M S, Kwan C, et al. Flood Detection Using Multi-modal and Multi-temporal Images: a Comparative Study[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(15):2455.
[4]
钱峰, 成建国, 夏润亮, 等. 数字孪生水利“天空地水工”一体化监测感知体系构建与应用初探[J]. 中国水利, 2024(24): 39-47.
(Qian Feng, Cheng Jian-guo, Xia Run-liang, et al. Establishment and Application of “Sky-Space-Earth-Water-Project” Integrated Monitoring and Perception System for Digital Twin Water Resources[J]. China Water Resources, 2024(24): 39-47.) (in Chinese)
[5]
黄诗峰, 马建威, 孙亚勇. 我国洪涝灾害遥感监测现状与展望[J]. 中国水利, 2021(15): 15-17.
(Huang Shi-feng, Ma Jian-wei, Sun Ya-yong. Situation and Prospect of Flood Disaster Monitoring by Remote Sensing in China[J]. China Water Resources, 2021(15): 15-17.) (in Chinese)
[6]
Xu H. Modification of Normalised Difference Water Index (NDWI) to Enhance Open Water Features in Remotely Sensed Imagery[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006, 27(14): 3025-3033.
[7]
陈喆, 向大享, 姜莹, 等. 基于国产高分三号星座的洪涝灾害应急监测模式研究:以洞庭湖区团洲垸溃口险情为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(12):189-195,201.
(Chen Zhe, Xiang Da-xiang, Jiang Ying, et al. Flood Disaster Emergency Monitoring Based on China’s Gaofen-3 Satellite: Application to Tuanzhou Embankment Breach in Dongting Lake Area[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(12): 189-195, 201.) (in Chinese)
[8]
Hossain F, Maswood M, Siddique-E-Akbor A H, et al. A Promising Radar Altimetry Satellite System for Operational Flood Forecasting in Flood-prone Bangladesh[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2014, 2(3): 27-36.
[9]
Munawar H S, Ullah F, Qayyum S, et al. Application of Deep Learning on UAV-based Aerial Images for Flood Detection[J]. Smart Cities, 2021, 4(3): 1220-1242.
[10]
Mishra A K, Coulibaly P. Developments in Hydrometric Network Design: a Review[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2009, 47(2): 2007RG000243.
[11]
Ahmed D T, Siddique M, Husain M S. Flood Monitoring and Early Warning Systems-an IoT Based Perspective[J]. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things, 2023, 9(2): 1208-1219.
[12]
Sanderson J, Mao H, Abdullah M A M, et al. Optimal Fusion of Multispectral Optical and SAR Images for Flood Inundation Mapping through Explainable Deep Learning[J]. Information, 2023, 14(12): 660.
[13]
Chaouch N, Temimi M, Hagen S, et al. A Synergetic Use of Satellite Imagery from SAR and Optical Sensors to Improve Coastal Flood Mapping in the Gulf of Mexico[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2012, 26(11): 1617-1628.
[14]
Qin Y, Yin X, Li Y, et al. High-precision Flood Mapping from Sentinel-1 Dual-polarization SAR Data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 4204315.
[15]
Renschler C S, Wang Z. Multi-source Data Fusion and Modeling to Assess and Communicate Complex Flood Dynamics to Support Decision-making for Downstream Areas of Dams: The 2011 Hurricane Irene and Schoharie Creek Floods, NY[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2017, 62: 157-173.
[16]
Getirana A, Kumar S, Bates P, et al. The SWOT Mission Will Reshape Our Understanding of the Global Terrestrial Water Cycle[J]. Nature Water, 2024, 2(12): 1139-1142.
[17]
Bonassies Q, Nguyen T H, Cassan L, et al. Assimilation of SWOT Altimetry Data for Riverine Flood Reanalysis: From Synthetic to Real Data[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2026, 19: 7024-7041.
[18]
Rodell M, Velicogna I, Famiglietti J S. Satellite-based Estimates of Groundwater Depletion in India[J]. Nature, 2009, 460(7258): 999-1002.
[19]
Donmez C, Berberoglu S, Cicekli S Y, et al. Mapping Snow Cover Using Landsat Data: Toward a Fine-resolution Water-resistant Snow Index[J]. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 2021, 133(2): 281-294.
[20]
Oubanas H, Gejadze I, Malaterre P O, et al. River Discharge Estimation from Synthetic SWOT-type Observations Using Variational Data Assimilation and the Full Saint-Venant Hydraulic Model[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 559: 638-647.
[21]
Yucel I, Onen A, Yilmaz K K, et al. Calibration and Evaluation of a Flood Forecasting System: Utility of Numerical Weather Prediction Model, Data Assimilation and Satellite-based Rainfall[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 523: 49-66.
[22]
Zhang Z, Tian W, Lu C, et al. Graph Neural Network-based Surrogate Modelling for Real-time Hydraulic Prediction of Urban Drainage Networks[J]. Water Research, 2024, 263: 122142.
[23]
Taghizadeh M, Zandsalimi Z, Nabian M A, et al. Interpretable Physics-informed Graph Neural Networks for Flood Forecasting[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2025, 40(18): 2629-2649.
[24]
Gong X, Zha Y. Physics-Informed Neural Network with Enhanced Parameter-State Coupling for Inverse Modeling of Unsaturated Flow in Heterogeneous Soils[J]. Water Resources Research, 2025, 61(9): e2025WR040040.
[25]
Fablet R, Chapron B, Drumetz L, et al. Learning Variational Data Assimilation Models and Solvers[J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2021, 13(10): e2021MS002572.
[26]
Li W, Lee H, Wang S, et al. Assessment of a New GeoAI Foundation Model for Flood Inundation Mapping[C]// Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on AI for Geographic Knowledge Discovery. Hamburg, Germany:ACM, November 13,2023: 102-109.
[27]
Seo M, Jung J, Choi D G. Improved Flood Insights: Diffusion-based SAR-to-EO Image Translation[J]. Remote Sensing, 2025, 17(13): 2260.
[28]
Chen H, Qi Z, Shi Z. Remote Sensing Image Change Detection with Transformers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5607514.
[29]
Dong Z, Liang Z, Wang G, et al. Mapping Inundation Extents in Poyang Lake Area Using Sentinel-1 Data and Transformer-based Change Detection Method[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 620: 129455.
[30]
Niño F, Coggiola C, Blumstein D, et al. Monitoring of Inland Water Levels by Satellite Altimetry and Deep Learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 4205814.
[31]
Ohara Y, Moteki D, Muramatsu S, et al. Physics-informed Neural Networks for Inversion of River Flow and Geometry with Shallow Water Model[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(10): 106633.
[32]
Forghani M, Qian Y, Lee J, et al. Application of Deep Learning to Large Scale Riverine Flow Velocity Estimation[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2021, 35(5): 1069-1088.
[33]
Osanlou K, Getirana A, Holmes T, et al. SWOT-based Simulation of River Discharge with Temporal Graph Neural Networks[C]. NeurIPS 2024 Workshop on Data-driven and Differentiable Simulations, Surrogates, and Solvers.Vancouver,Canada.December 15,2024.
[34]
Chen M, Chen H, Wu Z, et al. A Review on the Video-based River Discharge Measurement Technique[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(14): 4655.
[35]
Adriano B, Yokoya N, Xia J, et al. Learning from Multimodal and Multitemporal Earth Observation Data for Building Damage Mapping[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2021, 175: 132-143.
[36]
Agbaje T H, Abomaye-Nimenibo N, Ezeh C J, et al. Building Damage Assessment in Aftermath of Disaster Events by Leveraging Geoai (Geospatial Artificial Intelligence): Review[J]. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 23(1): 667-687.
[37]
Moumtzidou A, Giannakeris P, Andreadis S, et al. A Multimodal Approach in Estimating Road Passability Through a Flooded Area Using Social Media and Satellite Images[C].Doi:10.5281/2ENODO.2540398.
[38]
李意, 顾小林, 黄瑞, 等. 数字孪生流域建设关键技术研究与应用: 以贵州省清水江干流为例[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2023, 33(3): 42-46, 50.
(Li Yi, Gu Xiao-lin, Huang Rui, et al. Research and Application of Key Technologies for the Construction of Digital Twin Basins—A Case Study of the Qingshui River Basin[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2023, 33(3): 42-46, 50.) (in Chinese)
[39]
李强. 基于数字孪生技术的城市洪涝灾害评估与预警系统分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2022, 48(5): 476-485.
(Li Qiang. Analysis of the Evaluation and Pre-warning System of the Urban Flood Disaster Based on the Digital Twin Technology[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2022, 48(5): 476-485.) (in Chinese)
[40]
Yin W, Hu Q, Liu W, et al. Harnessing Game Engines and Digital Twins: Advancing Flood Education, Data Visualization, and Interactive Monitoring for Enhanced Hydrological Understanding[J]. Water, 2024, 16(17):2528.
[41]
Mandal D, Zou L, Wadhwa A, et al. FlowsDT: A Geospatial Digital Twin for Navigating Urban Flood Dynamics[J]. Computers,Environment and Urban Systems, 2026, 126:102414.
[42]
黄艳, 喻杉, 罗斌, 等. 面向流域水工程防灾联合智能调度的数字孪生长江探索[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(3): 253-269.
(Huang Yan, Yu Shan, Luo Bin, et al. Development of the Digital Twin Changjiang River with the Pilot System of Joint and Intelligent Regulation of Water Projects for Flood Management[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(3): 253-269.) (in Chinese)
[43]
范光伟, 王高丹, 侯贵兵, 等. 数字孪生珠江防洪“四预”先行先试建设思路[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(7):24-29.
(Fan Guang-wei, Wang Gao-dan, Hou Gui-bing, et al. The Early and Pilot Construction Exploration of Flood Management with Four Functions of FEDE within Digital Twin Pearl River[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2022, 32(7): 24-29.) (in Chinese)

基金

中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2025727/KJ)
国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFC3211201)
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC3000200)
湖南省重大水利科技计划项目(XSKJ2024064-5)

责任编辑: 王慰
PDF(1536 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/