基于TELEMAC-2D模型的上海市主城区内涝模拟及危险性评价

马芳芳, 邵薇薇, 李国一, 杨志勇

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 72-79.

PDF(2279 KB)
PDF(2279 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 72-79. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20260127
致灾机理与风险评估

基于TELEMAC-2D模型的上海市主城区内涝模拟及危险性评价

作者信息 +

Urban Waterlogging Simulation and Hazard Assessment in Shanghai Central District Based on TELEMAC-2D

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为揭示不同设计暴雨条件下城市内涝演化特征及危险性分布规律,以上海市浦西七区为研究对象,基于TELEMAC-2D二维水动力模型构建内涝仿真框架,在20、50、100 a一遇设计暴雨情景下对区域内涝过程进行数值模拟,分析最大淹没水深、洪水流速分布、淹没面积及积水量特征,并基于洪水危险性开展内涝危险性分区。结果显示,研究区内涝整体由浅水、低洪水流速和低危险占主导,随降雨重现期由20 a增加至100 a,深水区(淹没水深>0.5 m)面积占比由1.63%升至4.06%,高洪水流速区(>0.4 m/s)由0.66%增至1.30%,最大淹没面积与积水量增幅分别达15.8%与33.8%;中、高及以上危险区面积占比由17.35%提高至30.77%,高、超高危险区呈斑块零散分布,集中于低洼、排水受限区域。研究结果可为上海中心城区内涝风险识别与精细化防治提供科学依据。

Abstract

[Objective] Urban waterlogging has become an increasingly critical issue in highly urbanized coastal megacities,where flat terrain,high imperviousness,and limited drainage capacity amplify flood hazards under extreme rainfall. Quantitative comparisons of hazard evolution under multiple design rainfall scenarios remain limited. This study focuses on the central districts of Shanghai,a representative coastal megacity,and aims to (1) analyze the evolution characteristics of urban waterlogging under different rainfall return periods,and (2) identify the spatial distribution patterns of flood hazard based on hydrodynamic simulation results,providing a quantitative reference for urban flood risk management. [Methods] A two-dimensional hydrodynamic model based on TELEMAC-2D was applied to simulate urban waterlogging processes in the central districts of Shanghai,covering seven densely built districts with nearly 100% impervious surfaces. Design rainfall events corresponding to 20-,50-,and 100-year return periods were constructed according to local standards. Surface runoff generation was represented using the Horton infiltration model,while drainage processes were approximated through an equivalent parameterization approach due to the lack of detailed pipe network data. Model outputs included time-series water depth and flow velocity fields. Based on these,maximum inundation depth,peak flow velocity,inundation extent,and total water volume were derived. Flood hazard was evaluated using the Flood Hazard Rate (HR),which integrates water depth,flow velocity,and a depth-dependent adjustment factor. Hazard levels were further classified to enable spatial comparison across scenarios. Model performance was evaluated by comparing simulated inundation areas with historical waterlogging points and by assessing simulated water depths against observed data from a typical rainfall event. [Results] (1) Model performance: The comparison with historical waterlogging records shows that the model effectively captures the spatial distribution of inundation-prone areas. Simulated water depths are in good agreement with observed values for typical rainfall events,indicating that the model can well reproduce the main characteristics of urban waterlogging processes. (2) Hydrodynamic characteristics: Urban waterlogging in the study area is predominantly characterized by shallow water depths (<0.15 m),low flow velocities,and overall low hazard levels across all scenarios,reflecting the flat terrain and existing drainage capacity. (3) Response to rainfall intensity: As the rainfall return period increases from 20 to 100 years,the proportion of deep inundation areas (>0.5 m) increases from 1.63% to 4.06%,while high-velocity areas (>0.4 m/s) increase from 0.66% to 1.30%. The maximum inundation area expands by 15.8%,and total water volume increases by 33.8%,indicating that flood intensification is mainly reflected in increased water depth and accumulation rather than spatial expansion.(4) Hazard distribution: The proportion of medium,high,and above hazard zones increases from 17.35% to 30.77% with increasing rainfall intensity. High and very high hazard areas exhibit fragmented and patchy spatial patterns and are mainly concentrated in low-lying areas and regions with limited drainage capacity. (5) Spatial heterogeneity: Hazard escalation is highly heterogeneous. Instead of uniform expansion,localized amplification dominates,where minor topographic depressions and drainage constraints lead to disproportionately high hazard levels. [Conclusions] Urban waterlogging in central Shanghai is generally dominated by shallow depth and low hazard under typical rainfall conditions; however,increasing rainfall intensity leads to a clear amplification of high-hazard areas. This intensification is primarily driven by increased water depth and localized accumulation rather than uniform spatial expansion.The results highlight that flood hazard distribution is strongly influenced by local terrain and drainage conditions,and mitigation efforts should prioritize low-lying and drainage-limited areas. The TELEMAC-2D model can well reproduce both the spatial pattern and magnitude of urban waterlogging,supporting its applicability for scenario-based flood analysis in highly urbanized areas.

关键词

城市内涝 / 数值模拟 / TELEMAC-2D模型 / 危险性评价 / 淹没水深 / 洪水流速

Key words

urban waterlogging / numerical simulation / TELEMAC-2D model / hazard assessment / inundation depth / flow velocity

引用本文

导出引用
马芳芳, 邵薇薇, 李国一, . 基于TELEMAC-2D模型的上海市主城区内涝模拟及危险性评价[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(6): 72-79 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20260127
MA Fang-fang, SHAO Wei-wei, LI Guo-yi, et al. Urban Waterlogging Simulation and Hazard Assessment in Shanghai Central District Based on TELEMAC-2D[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(6): 72-79 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20260127
中图分类号: TV122 (洪水)   

参考文献

[1]
廖永丰, 聂承静, 杨林生, 等. 洪涝灾害风险监测预警评估综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(3): 361-367.
(Liao Yong-feng, Nie Cheng-jing, Yang Lin-sheng, et al. An Overview of the Risk Assessment of Flood Disaster[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(3): 361-367.) (in Chinese)
[2]
应急管理部-教育部减灾与应急管理研究院, 北京师范大学国家安全与应急管理学院, 应急管理部-国家减灾中心, 等. 2024年全球自然灾害评估报告[R]. 北京: 中国灾害防御协会,2025:33-34.
(Institute of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management, School of National Security and Emergency Management of Beijing Normal University, and National Disaster Reduction Center, et al. Global Natural Disaster Assessment Report 2024[R]. Beijing: China Association for Disaster Prevention, 2025: 33-34.) (in Chinese)
[3]
方佳毅, 史培军. 全球气候变化背景下海岸洪水灾害风险评估研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 625-636.
(Fang Jia-yi, Shi Pei-jun. A Review of Coastal Flood Risk Research under Global Climate Change[J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(5): 625-636.) (in Chinese)
[4]
陈丽慧, 陈洁, 高郭平. 滨海城市洪涝风险评估:以上海临港新城为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(8):84-93.
(Chen Li-hui, Chen Jie, Gao Guo-ping. Flood Risk Assessment in Coastal Cities: a Case Study of Lingang New City, Shanghai[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(8): 84-93.) (in Chinese)
[5]
黄国如, 李梅萍. 基于微观交通仿真的城市内涝对道路交通的影响评估研究进展[J]. 水资源保护, 2023, 39(5):69-78.
(Huang Guo-ru, Li Mei-ping. Research Progress on Impact Assessment of Urban Waterlogging on Road Traffic Based on Micro Traffic Simulation[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2023, 39(5):69-78.) (in Chinese)
[6]
施加福, 王昊, 周晋军, 等. 城市内涝灾害对应急救援服务可达性的影响评估[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2024, 55(2): 27-38.
(Shi Jia-fu, Wang Hao, Zhou Jin-jun, et al. Assessment of the Impact of Urban Waterlogging Disasters on the Accessibility of Emergency Rescue Services[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2024, 55(2): 27-38.) (in Chinese)
[7]
晋良海, 彭爽, 杨应柳, 等. 内涝积水对城市交通路网邻域拓扑势的影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(3): 68-73.
(Jin Liang-hai, Peng Shuang, Yang Ying-liu, et al. Influence of Waterlogging on Topological Potential of Urban Traffic Network Neighborhood[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2023, 40(3): 68-73.) (in Chinese)
[8]
Yang Y, Yin J, Ye M, et al. Multi-coverage Optimal Location Model for Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Facilities under Various Disaster Scenarios: a Case Study of Urban Fluvial Floods in the Minhang District of Shanghai, China[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2020, 20(1): 181-195.
[9]
Yin J, Yu D, Liao B. A City-scale Assessment of Emergency Response Accessibility to Vulnerable Populations and Facilities under Normal and Pluvial Flood Conditions for Shanghai, China[J]. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2021, 48(8):2239-2253.
[10]
高长松, 肖洋, 许栋, 等. 暴雨雨型对城市排水管网和地表洪涝过程的联合影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(4):60-70.
(Gao Chang-song, Xiao Yang, Xu Dong, et al. Combined Impact of Rainstorm Patterns on Urban Drainage Network and Surface Flooding Process[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2025, 41(4):60-70.) (in Chinese)
[11]
李子祥, 杨帆, 范子武, 等. 基于多暴雨情景的城市洪涝模拟与风险评估[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(10): 84-96.
(Li Zi-xiang, Yang Fan, Fan Zi-wu, et al. Urban Flood Risk Simulation and Assessment in Cities Based on Multi Rainstorm Scenarios[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2025, 56(10): 84-96.) (in Chinese)
[12]
李国一, 邵薇薇, 刘家宏, 等. 基于TELEMAC-2D模型的济南市洪涝模拟及淹没分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2024, 40(5):46-52.
(Li Guo-yi, Shao Wei-wei, Liu Jia-hong, et al. Flood Simulation and Inundation Analysis in Ji’nan City Based on TELEMAC-2D Model[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2024, 40(5): 46-52.) (in Chinese)
[13]
Wang Z, Chen Y, Zeng Z, et al. A Tight Coupling Model for Urban Flood Simulation Based on SWMM and TELEMAC-2D and the Uncertainty Analysis[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 114: 105794.
[14]
邵蕊, 邵薇薇, 苏鑫, 等. 基于TELEMAC-2D模型分析不同洪涝情景对城市应急响应时间的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 62(1): 60-69.
(Shao Rui, Shao Wei-wei, Su Xin, et al. Impact of Various Flood Scenarios on Urban Emergency Responses Times Based on the TELEMAC-2D Model[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2022, 62(1): 60-69.) (in Chinese)
[15]
刘家宏, 李泽锦, 梅超, 等. 基于TELEMAC-2D的不同设计暴雨下厦门岛城市内涝特征分析[J]. 科学通报, 2019, 64(19): 2055-2066.
(Liu Jia-hong, Li Ze-jin, Mei Chao, et al. Urban Flood Analysis for Different Design Storm Hyetographs in Xiamen Island Based on TELEMAC-2D[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2019, 64(19): 2055-2066.) (in Chinese)
[16]
Zhang K, Mei C, Liu J, et al. Impact Assessment of Urban Waterlogging on Roads Trafficability and Emergency Sites Accessibility under Extreme Rainfall Events Based on Numerical Modeling[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2025, 119: 105285.
[17]
Provan M, Ferguson S, Murphy E. Storm Surge Contributions to Flood Hazards on Canada’s Atlantic Coast[J]. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2022, 15(3):e12800.
[18]
都利亚, 王兆礼, 祁旭阳, 等. 基于TELE MAC-2D模型的城区水库溃坝洪水数值模拟: 以广州市龙洞水库为例[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2022, 44(5): 850-859.
(Du Li-ya, Wang Zhao-li, Qi Xu-yang, et al. Numerical Simulation of Dam-break Flood in Urban Area Based on TELEMAC-2D Model—A Case Study for Longdong Reservoir in Guangzhou, China[J]. Journal of Earch Sciences and Environment, 2022, 44(5): 850-859.) (in Chinese)
[19]
杨忠兴, 李文雨, 初京刚, 等. 基于TELEMAC-2D模型的浑江流域梯级水电站溃坝洪水风险分析[J]. 水电能源科学, 2025, 43(10): 14-17.
(Yang Zhong-xing, Li Wen-yu, Chu Jing-gang, et al. Flood Risk Analysis of Dam Breaks at Cascade Hydropower Stations in the Hunjiang River Basin Based on the TELEMAC-2D Model[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2025, 43(10): 14-17.) (in Chinese)
[20]
贾卫红, 李琼芳. 上海市排水标准与除涝标准衔接研究[J]. 中国给水排水, 2015, 31(15): 122-126.
(Jia Wei-hong, Li Qiong-fang. Study on Linkage between Drainage Standards and Waterlogging Control Standards in Shanghai[J]. China Water & Wastewater, 2015, 31(15): 122-126.) (in Chinese)
[21]
Li Z, He W, Cheng M, et al. SinoLC-1:The First 1 m Resolution National-scale Land-cover Map of China Created with a Deep Learning Framework and Open-access Data[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2023, 15(11):4749-4780.
[22]
苏鑫. 城市洪涝灾害损失动态评估模型及应用[D]. 北京: 中国水利水电科学研究院, 2022.
(Su Xin. Dynamic Assessment Model of Urban Flood Disaster Loss and Application[D]. Beijing: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2022.) (in Chinese)
[23]
杨东, 侯精明, 李丙尧, 等. 无资料城区管网排水过程概化模拟研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2020, 31(3):139-144.
(Yang Dong, Hou Jing-ming, Li Bing-yao, et al. Generalized Simulation of Drainage Process in Urban Networks without Data[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2020, 31(3):139-144.) (in Chinese)
[24]
DB31/T 1043—2017, 暴雨强度公式与设计雨型标准[S]. 上海: 上海市质量技术监督局, 2017.
(DB31/T 1043—2017, Standard of Rainstorm Intensity Formula and Design Rainstorm Distribution[S]. Shanghai: Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation, 2017.) (in Chinese)
[25]
王静, 李娜, 王杉. 洪水危险性评价指标与等级划分研究综述[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2019, 29(12): 21-26.
(Wang Jing, Li Na, Wang Shan. Review on Flood Hazard Assessment Index and Grade Classification[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2019, 29(12): 21-26.) (in Chinese)
[26]
李学峰, 谭琼, 钱真. 上海市城市内涝风险分析与评估[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2024, 34(6):26-32.
(Li Xue-feng, Tan Qiong, Qian Zhen. Risk Analysis and Assessment of Urban Flooding in Shanghai[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2024, 34(6):26-32.) (in Chinese)
[27]
黄清雨, 董军刚, 李梦雅, 等. 暴雨内涝危险性情景模拟方法研究:以上海中心城区为例[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(4):506-513.
(Huang Qing-yu, Dong Jun-gang, Li Meng-ya, et al. Research on the Scenario Simulation Method of Rainstorm Waterlogging Hazard: a Case Study in the Central Urban Area of Shanghai[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2016, 18(4): 506-513.) (in Chinese)

基金

流域水循环与水安全全国重点实验室人才培育自主研究项目(SKL2025RCPY02)

责任编辑: 黄玲
PDF(2279 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/