PDF(1977 KB)
基于多源数据的成渝城市群洪涝脆弱性时空特征分析
李海潮, 景佩婷, 朱振铎, 魏妍琪, 周黄莉, 黎云云, 胡靖瑶, 杨大文
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 41-50.
PDF(1977 KB)
PDF(1977 KB)
基于多源数据的成渝城市群洪涝脆弱性时空特征分析
Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Flood Vulnerability in the Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration Based on Multi-source Data
成渝城市群作为长江上游重要的国家级城市群,地形差异显著、城市扩张迅速且极端降雨事件频发,洪涝影响呈现出复杂化、多源化特征。融合被动微波遥感降水数据、多源降雨资料、土地利用数据、夜间灯光及人口数据,构建“降雨-积水-不透水率-发展水平”的综合指标体系,从致灾因子、暴雨触发机制、地表水积聚过程和城市扩张模式等方面分析1995—2020年成渝城市群洪涝脆弱性的时空演变特征。结果表明:①1995—2020年成渝城市群洪涝脆弱性整体呈阶段性增强趋势,2000年和2020年为显著高值年份;②近30 a城市建设用地快速扩张(新增4 232 km2),以耕地转化为主,显著改变下垫面特性并加剧径流汇集;③极端降雨与地表积水强度在2000年和2020年明显增强,空间上形成“西南山地强触发-东部低洼易积涝”的分异格局;④洪涝脆弱性与城市发展水平呈非线性关系,重庆受益于地形条件及防洪工程建设,洪涝脆弱性有所降低,而成都及周边平原城市因快速扩张与不透水面增加脆弱性上升;⑤2020年新增城市建设区中约42%区域发生不同程度积水,部分平原城市新区受影响比例超过80%,表明快速扩张区域洪涝韧性不足。研究结果可为成渝城市群洪涝灾害防控及韧性城市建设提供科学依据。
[Objective] As a key national urban agglomeration in the upper Yangtze River Basin,the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration features pronounced topographic contrasts,rapid urban expansion,and increasingly frequent extreme rainfall events,resulting in highly complex and multi-source flood impacts. [Methods] This study integrates passive microwave remote sensing precipitation data,multi-source rainfall datasets,land-use data,nighttime light imagery,and population data to construct a comprehensive indicator system comprising precipitation,waterlogging,impervious surface ratio,and development level. From the perspectives of hazard factors,rainfall triggering mechanisms,surface water accumulation processes,and urban expansion patterns,the spatiotemporal evolution of flood vulnerability in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration from 1995 to 2020 is systematically analyzed. [Results] (1) Flood vulnerability exhibited a staged increasing trend during 1995-2020,with significant peak years in 2000 and 2020;(2) urban construction land expanded rapidly over the past three decades (an increase of 4,232 km2),mainly through the conversion of cropland,which significantly altered surface characteristics and intensified runoff concentration;(3) extreme rainfall and surface waterlogging intensity increased markedly in 2000 and 2020,forming a spatial pattern of “strong triggering in southwestern mountainous areas and easy waterlogging in eastern lowlands”;(4) flood vulnerability shows a non-linear relationship with urban development level—vulnerability decreased in Chongqing due to favorable terrain and enhanced flood control infrastructure,whereas it increased in Chengdu and surrounding plain cities due to rapid expansion and increased impervious surfaces;(5) approximately 42% of newly developed urban construction areas experienced waterlogging in 2020,with some plain cities exceeding 80%,indicating insufficient resilience in rapidly expanding areas. [Conclusions] Urban flood vulnerability is not solely determined by the level of development; rather,it is jointly influenced by topographical conditions,patterns of urban expansion,and engineering regulation capabilities. The Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration faces compound flood processes involving both basin-wide floods and urban waterlogging. Therefore,measures should be taken to improve flood control and drainage standards,optimize urban spatial structures,strengthen sponge city initiatives,and enhance coordinated regulation between upstream and downstream areas within the urban agglomeration.These findings provide scientific support for flood disaster mitigation,vulnerability reduction,and resilient urban development in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration.
成渝城市群 / 洪涝脆弱性 / 遥感监测 / 城市扩张 / 时空特征
Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration / flood vulnerability / remote sensing monitoring / urban expansion / spatiotemporal characteristics
| [1] |
陈文龙, 徐宗学, 宋利祥, 等. 基于流域系统整体观的城市洪涝治理研究[J]. 水利学报, 2021, 52(6): 659-672.
(
|
| [2] |
王凯丰, 张洪斌, 力刚, 等. 城市洪涝韧性的研究进展及关键支撑技术综述[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2023, 54(11): 77-88.
(
|
| [3] |
徐宗学, 陈浩, 任梅芳, 等. 中国城市洪涝致灾机理与风险评估研究进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(5):713-724.
(
|
| [4] |
宋晓猛, 徐楠涛, 张建云, 等. 中国城市洪涝问题:现状、成因与挑战[J]. 水科学进展, 2024, 35(3):357-373.
(
|
| [5] |
赵瑞东, 方创琳, 刘海猛. 城市韧性研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(10):1717-1731.
(
|
| [6] |
刘家宏, 梅超, 刘宏伟, 等. 特大城市外洪内涝灾害链联防联控关键科学技术问题[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(2):172-181.
(
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
黄国如, 罗海婉, 卢鑫祥, 等. 城市洪涝灾害风险分析与区划方法综述[J]. 水资源保护, 2020, 36(6): 1-6, 17.
(
|
| [9] |
史培军, 吕丽莉, 汪明, 等. 灾害系统: 灾害群、灾害链、灾害遭遇[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2014, 23(6): 1-12.
(
|
| [10] |
汪辉, 李俊奇, 王文海, 等. 城市道路洪涝条件下足尺车辆失稳风险阈值试验研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(9): 76-94.
(
|
| [11] |
王晶, 薛联青, 张敏, 等. 不同降水频率下淮河流域洪涝灾害风险评估[J]. 水电能源科学, 2019, 37(9):1-5.
(
|
| [12] |
王金虎, 张东晖, 王钰尧. 城市洪涝风险的组合赋重方法研究与应用: 以淮安市为例[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(8): 91-104.
(
|
| [13] |
刘智勇, 陈晓宏, 林凯荣, 等. 极端降水影响下粤港澳大湾区城市洪涝人口暴露度预估[J]. 中国水利, 2024(13): 34-38.
(
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
张冬冬, 严登华, 王义成, 等. 城市内涝灾害风险评估及综合应对研究进展[J]. 灾害学, 2014, 29(1): 144-149.
(
|
| [17] |
张云康, 刘懿, 肖婉, 等. 基于Segformer模型的洪水淹没范围提取与对比[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(10): 165-173, 182.
(
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
陈丽慧, 陈洁, 高郭平. 滨海城市洪涝风险评估:以上海临港新城为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(8):84-93.
(
|
| [20] |
严登华, 张建云, 王浩, 等. 水旱灾害防御范式重构与关键问题[J]. 水科学进展, 2026, 37(3):409-420.
(
|
| [21] |
夏军, 陈进, 王纲胜, 等. 从2020年长江上游洪水看流域防洪对策[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 1-8.
(
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
李昌文, 师义杰, 刘佳明, 等. 成渝城市群洪涝灾害协同应对模式研究[J]. 中国水利, 2023(9):13-17.
(
|
| [24] |
夏军, 张世彦, 张永勇, 等. 城市水系统综合治理关键技术及其在长江经济带的示范应用[J]. 地理学报, 2024, 79(9): 2163-2175.
(
|
| [25] |
宋晓猛, 徐楠涛, 董子然. 变化环境下城市洪涝风险评估与调控策略[J]. 水利发展研究, 2025, 25(1):56-64,85.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |