PDF(9150 KB)
PDF(9150 KB)
PDF(9150 KB)
高度城市化流域蓄泄关系变化特征及其影响因素分析
Variation Characteristics of Storage-discharge Relationship and Influencing Factors in Highly Urbanized Watersheds
随着城市化进程加快,蓄泄关系恶化导致流域极端洪涝灾害频发。为深入研究城市化流域蓄泄关系,选取秦淮河流域为研究对象,构建流域蓄泄关系曲线,并选取曲线斜率作为蓄泄特征指标,定量表征流域的蓄泄关系及其时空演变特征,进一步结合格兰杰因果检验、偏相关分析法分析流域蓄泄关系的影响因素,并揭示极端暴雨情景下蓄泄关系的响应特征。结果表明:2000年起秦淮河流域主导功能由蓄水向泄水转变,随城市化发展泄水主导更明显;流域蓄泄关系非线性特征呈“减弱-增强”趋势,且受城市化进程及极端暴雨驱动;城市化发展使流域蓄泄关系敏感性普遍降低,其中上游溧水河流域蓄泄关系敏感性最高,敏感性指数最高达0.03 mm-1。研究成果提出了针对蓄泄关系的定量化指标与方法,为城市防洪规划和流域健康发展提供参考。
[Objective] Accelerating urbanization has deteriorated the balance between water storage and discharge,leading to frequent extreme flood disasters in river basins. Currently,there is a lack of quantitative indicators to characterize the storage-discharge relationship in highly urbanized watersheds,and the underlying mechanisms driving its spatiotemporal evolution remain inadequately understood. This study analyzes the evolving characteristics and influencing mechanisms of the storage-discharge relationship in highly urbanized watersheds,aiming to reveal how extreme rainfall-runoff events impact this fundamental hydrological relationship. [Methods] Taking the Qinhuai River Basin as the study area,we constructed storage-discharge relationship curves and selected the curve slope as a characteristic indicator to quantitatively characterize the relationship and its spatiotemporal evolution. Furthermore,Granger causality tests and partial correlation analyses were employed to identify the influencing factors of the storage-discharge relationship and to reveal its response characteristics under extreme storm scenarios. [Results] (1) The dominant function of the Qinhuai River Basin shifted from water storage to drainage. While storage dominated from 1990 to 1999,the basin transitioned towards drainage after 2000,although dynamic storage volumes remained above 100 mm. Post-2010,intensified urbanization made the drainage-dominant pattern more pronounced. (2) The nonlinearity of the storage-discharge curve exhibited a “weakening-then-strengthening” trend,with urbanization and extreme storms significantly amplifying this nonlinearity. Hydrological responses differed between low- and high-flow regimes,with the latter likely influenced by anthropogenic regulations. (3) The influencing factors of the storage-discharge relationship varied dynamically with flow levels. At low flows,the relationship was primarily driven by extreme precipitation and drainage capacity. At medium flows,the midstream and upstream areas showed a pronounced response to extreme storm characteristics. At high flows,despite increased frequency and intensity of extreme storms,the interaction between the storage-discharge relationship and extreme storm indices weakened,necessitating anthropogenic regulation to ensure basin safety. (4) Urbanization significantly impacted the storage-discharge relationship,generally reducing basin sensitivity and weakening regulation capacity. The upstream Lishui River exhibited the highest sensitivity (0.005,0.013,and 0.03 mm-1 under high,medium,and low flows,respectively) and the largest variation amplitude under extreme storms,marking it as a critical area for focused management. [Conclusion] The quantitative indicators and methodologies proposed in this study for analyzing storage-discharge relationships provide a valuable scientific reference for urban flood control planning and the sustainable development of river basins.
流域蓄泄关系 / 蓄泄特征指标 / 高度城市化 / 极端暴雨洪水 / 敏感性分析
storage-discharge relationship / storage-discharge characteristic index / highly urbanized / extreme rainstorm / sensitivity analysis
| [1] |
田壮壮, 关燕宁, 郭杉, 等. 城市化背景下建成区扩展及其对河网变化的影响: 以苏州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(4): 915-924.
(
|
| [2] |
宋琛, 王强, 许有鹏, 等. 城镇化背景下太湖平原地区水文极端事件的联合频率变化特征[J]. 湖泊科学, 2025, 37(6): 2212-2223.
(
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
徐宗学, 卢兴超, 施奇妙. 城市暴雨洪涝灾害特征与风险评估研究进展[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2025, 45(1):1-9,46.
(
|
| [7] |
胡畔, 陈波, 史培军. 中国暴雨洪涝灾情时空格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(5): 1148-1162.
(
|
| [8] |
陈茂满. 洪泽湖蓄泄关系与淮河中下游防洪[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2004(2): 27-31, 47.
(
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
何子灿, 栾华龙, 姚仕明, 等. 水库调蓄对长江-鄱阳湖交汇系统顶托效应的影响分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(11):207-216.
(
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
施勇, 栾震宇, 陈炼钢, 等. 长江中下游江湖蓄泄关系实时评估数值模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(6):840-846.
(
|
| [14] |
徐照明, 徐兴亚, 李安强, 等. 长江中下游河道冲淤演变的防洪效应[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(3):366-376.
(
|
| [15] |
王子睿, 刘杰, 王丽君, 等. 太湖蓄泄关系研究[J]. 水力发电, 2025, 51(3): 28-36.
(
|
| [16] |
李扬. 流域洪水蓄泄关系空间分异特征分析及应用[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2023(12): 1-3, 8.
(
|
| [17] |
梅超, 刘家宏, 王浩, 等. 城市下垫面空间特征对地表产汇流过程的影响研究综述[J]. 水科学进展, 2021, 32(5): 791-800.
(
|
| [18] |
孙延伟, 许有鹏, 高斌, 等. 城镇化下流域不透水面扩张对洪峰的影响: 以南京秦淮河为例[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(5): 1574-1583.
(
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
任伟杰, 韩敏. 多元时间序列因果关系分析研究综述[J]. 自动化学报, 2021, 47(1): 64-78.
(
|
| [21] |
刘晓强, 李茂田, 艾威, 等. 长江三峡建坝前后流量和海平面对感潮河段潮位的影响差异[J]. 海洋通报, 2023, 42(2): 128-137.
(
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
闵克祥, 何琴, 刘建龙, 等. 秦淮河流域水利治理现状分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(12): 101-105.
(
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
苏伟忠, 杨桂山, 顾朝林. 秦淮河流域城镇用地增长格局及其演化机制: 秦淮河流域江宁段实证[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 440-445.
(
|
| [27] |
宋明明, 都金康, 郑文龙, 等. 秦淮河流域近30年不透水面景观格局时空演变研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(2): 238-247.
(
|
| [28] |
王书强. 基于模糊集理论的图像处理与控制方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2020.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |