PDF(1197 KB)
PDF(1197 KB)
PDF(1197 KB)
基于冲刷-结构耦合的堤防抗冲敏感性分析
Anti-scour Sensitivity of Levees Based on Scour-Structure Coupling
长江三角洲前缘的典型平原感潮河网地区,河道水系密布、通航频繁,堤防工程的安全受航道运行、泥面冲刷影响较大。为研究通航感潮河道堤防结构抗冲敏感性及其变化规律,选取黄浦江上游某通航支流堤防实际运行条件计算出理论冲刷深度,并以该值为参考,通过有限元模型分析重力式堤防、桩基式堤防在不同结构尺度与冲刷深度耦合下的位移响应,得到不同堤防结构型式的抗冲敏感性及变化趋势。研究结果表明:重力式堤防的抗冲敏感性主要受底板宽度和埋置深度影响,当底板宽度<4.0 m或埋置深度<2.0 m时,墙前冲刷0.5~1.0 m即出现墙顶位移速率陡增;当底板宽度>5.0 m或埋置深度>2.0 m后,继续增大尺度对抗冲性能的增益显著降低。桩基式堤防的抗冲敏感性主要受桩基长度控制,当桩基长度<15.0 m时,冲刷1.0~1.5 m后位移增长速率明显加快;桩基长度>15.0 m后,增加桩基长度对提高抗冲性能的效果减弱。根据研究结果提出堤防结构抗冲经济尺度,并确定不同冲刷条件下的结构适应性,为通航感潮河道堤防结构设计和管理提供科学依据。
[Objective] In typical plain tidal river networks at the Yangtze River Delta front, dense waterways and frequent navigation significantly impact levee safety through channel operations and bed scour. Focusing on two typical levee structural types along the Huangpu River and its main tributaries, this study investigates the scour response under the coupling of structural dimensions and scour depth. The findings aim to provide a scientific basis for accurately identifying high-risk bank sections, optimizing bank protection structures, and enhancing the targeted management of levee engineering in tidal navigable rivers. [Methods] To examine the scour resistance sensitivity and its variation of levee structures in tidal navigable rivers, the theoretical scour depth was calculated based on the actual operating conditions of a navigable tributary in the upper Huangpu River. Using these calculated values as a reference, finite element models were developed to analyze the displacement responses of gravity-type and pile-founded levees under coupled conditions of varying structural dimensions and scour depths. This approach allowed for the determination of the scour resistance sensitivity and evolutionary trends for different levee structural types. [Results] The scour resistance sensitivity of gravity-type levees is primarily influenced by the base slab width and embedment depth. When the base slab width is <4 m or the embedment depth is <2 m, a toe scour 0.5-1.0 m triggers a sharp increase in the displacement rate at the wall top. Conversely, when the base slab width exceeds 5 m or the embedment depth exceeds 2 m, further increasing the dimensions yields significantly diminishing returns in scour resistance. The scour resistance sensitivity of pile-founded levees is mainly governed by the pile length. When the pile length is <15 m, the displacement growth rate accelerates markedly once the scour depth 1.0-1.5 m. Beyond a pile length of 15 m, the effectiveness of increasing pile length to enhance scour resistance weakens. [Conclusion] (1)The sensitivity of different structural types to toe scour must be fully considered during the selection and sizing of levee structures in tidal navigable rivers. Under the given typical boundary conditions, the scour resistance sensitivity increases with the base slab width, embedment depth, and pile length. However, beyond certain thresholds, the marginal gain in sensitivity decreases, making it economically inefficient to further improve scour resistance solely by enlarging structural dimensions. Instead, altering the structural type or controlling the scour depth is recommended to enhance levee safety. (2)For the design of gravity-type levees, it is advisable to maintain a base slab width of ≥4 m and an embedment depth of ≥3 m. If the anticipated scour depth exceeds 1 m, gravity-type structures are not recommended. For existing gravity levees, the impact of scour should be mitigated through strengthened vessel traffic management and the installation of protective structures. (3)For the design of pile-founded levees, the pile length should be controlled at ≥15 m. When the anticipated scour depth reaches 1 m, measures such as enhanced vessel traffic management and protective structures should be implemented to reduce scour impacts. The proposed structural dimensions and structural adaptability under varying scour conditions provide a scientific basis for the design and management of levees in tidal navigable rivers.
embankment engineering / navigable tidal rivers / scour depth / scour resistance sensitivity
| [1] |
陈虹, 吴少霖. 上海内河船行波研究[J]. 水运工程, 2017(11):124-128.
(
|
| [2] |
黄木根, 吴丽婷, 刘士溧, 等. 堤防工程基础冲刷深度计算评价[J]. 人民珠江, 2024, 45(增刊1): 125-130.
(
|
| [3] |
刘磊, 苗润泽, 钟德钰. 细沙河床丁坝局部冲刷深度计算公式的验证[J]. 水力发电学报, 2014, 33(2):122-130.
(
|
| [4] |
广东省航道勘测设计科学研究所. 珠江三角洲快速客船内河航道边坡冲刷及保护研究[R]. 广州: 广东省航道勘测设计科学研究所, 2002.
(Guangdong Provincial Waterway Survey and Design Science Research Institute. Research on Slope Scour and Protection for Inland Waterways of High-Speed Passenger Ships in the Pearl River Delta[R]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Waterway Survey, Design and Research Institute, 2002.(in Chinese))
|
| [5] |
黄成国, 胡士兵. 某航道岸坡防冲刷分析及护岸对策[J]. 科技信息, 2012(18):424-425.
(
|
| [6] |
赵丽. 上海市内河开敞航道冲淤情况及成因分析[J]. 港工技术, 2023, 60(3): 1-4.
(
|
| [7] |
王炜正, 徐鑫. 内河航道直立式护岸前趾防冲刷研究[J]. 现代交通技术, 2011, 8(增刊1):94-99.
(
|
| [8] |
陶桂兰, 谭彬政, 束梁. 基于坡面冲刷的荆江典型岸坡稳定性分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(8): 30-35.
(
|
| [9] |
史斌, 陆芳春, 包中进. 感潮河口闸下软基冲刷模拟与实践[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2005, 22(4):19-21.
(
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
栗铭阳, 张宝森, 方国华, 等. 基于Flow-3D的东安工程桩坝冲刷数值模拟研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2022, 44(4): 122-127.
(
|
| [12] |
GB50286—2013,堤防工程设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2013.
(GB50286—2013,CodeforDesignofLeveeProject[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2013.(in Chinese))
|
| [13] |
DG/TJ 08-2116—2020,内河航道工程设计标准[S]. 上海: 同济大学出版社, 2021.
(DG/TJ 08-2116—2020,Design Code for Inland Waterway Engineering[S]. Shanghai: Tongji University Press, 2021.(in Chinese))
|
| [14] |
寇海磊, 周超, 闫正余, 等. 基于小应变硬化土模型的黏性土本构参数研究及其工程应用[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2023, 45(4):16-22.
(
|
| [15] |
于文华, 司鹏飞, 田利勇, 等. 软土地区高桩承台结构桩基内力及变形分析[J]. 水道港口, 2021, 42(6):770-774,782.
(
|
| [16] |
李昶, 姚仕明, 朱玲玲, 等. 长江-鄱阳湖汇流河段近期河道演变特征[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(11):199-206,216.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |