基于深度学习模型的蓄滞洪区运用对干流水位影响预测

罗成鑫, 刘佳明, 卢程伟, 马强

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 26-33.

PDF(1649 KB)
PDF(1649 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 26-33. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20251119
水资源

基于深度学习模型的蓄滞洪区运用对干流水位影响预测

作者信息 +

Predicting the Impact of Flood Detention Basin Operation on Main Stream Water Level Based on Deep Learning Model

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

准确预测蓄滞洪区运用对干流水位降低作用是蓄滞洪区实时调度的基础。针对水动力学机理模型计算耗时长、难以用于实时优化调度,而数据驱动模型因预测数据缺乏难以构建问题,依据代理建模思想,基于深度学习方法,提出了蓄滞洪区运用对干流水位影响预测方法。利用经率定、验证的水动力学模型,在不同水情、工情条件下,模拟生成大量蓄滞洪区运用样本,再基于深度学习模型构建预测模型,并优选深度学习模型及预测因子组合。将所提方法运用于洪湖东分块启用对汉口站水位降幅的预测,结果表明,相较于门控循环单元、卷积神经网络,长短期记忆网络预测精度最高、计算结果稳定,为最佳预测模型。洪湖东分块分洪流量、分洪持续时间、分洪前3 d城陵矶水位过程、汉口站水位过程、螺山流量过程及汉江流量过程为预测分洪后7 d汉口水位降幅变化过程最佳因子组合,预测纳什效率系数为0.983 9、均方根误差0.024 cm,预测精度高。且所提模型相较于水动力学模型,计算时间由1.5 min降低到1 s内、输入因子数量更少,有效提升了模型的实用性,可为流域管理机构提升蓄滞洪区实时运用水平提供有力支撑。

Abstract

[Objective] In China, flood detention basins serve as the “last line of defense” for flood control. In major flood events, if the incoming flood volume still exceeds the discharge capacity of river channels already with reasonable reservoir operation, flood detention basins will be activated to store and detain floodwater and prevent catastrophic levee breaches. During other periods, limited production activities are permitted within these areas. Currently, flood detention basins in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River accommodate a large residential population, and flood diversion would cause substantial inundation losses. This imposes higher demands on scientific operation. Effectively predicting the water level reduction effect of flood detention basin operation is fundamental for real-time operation. While process-based hydrodynamic models are challenged by a heavy computational burden and does not meet real-time computational requirement, data-driven models are lack of real data. This paper proposes a deep learning-based surrogate modeling framework to forecast the influence of flood detention basin operations on mainstream water level. [Methods] Using calibrated and validated hydrodynamic models coupled with the Monte-Carlo simulation method, a large number of operational scenarios under varying hydrological and engineering conditions were simulated to generate training samples. Based on the generated samples, prediction models are constructed. Deep learning models with outstanding performance in time series prediction, including Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), are selected. The prediction accuracies of these models are compared to identify the deep learning model most suitable for predicting the impact of flood detention basin operation. Various combinations of factors related to the operation strategy of the flood detention basin, upstream inflow, downstream backwater effects, and flood rise and recession conditions are considered. [Results] In the case study of the Honghudong Detention Basin (HDB) operation on water level reduction at Hankou station, the Long Short-Term Memory network demonstrated the highest prediction accuracy and stability compared to GRU and CNN. The best combination of predictive factors includes the flood diversion discharge, diversion duration, pre-diversion water level process at Chenglingji Station, water level process at Hankou Station, flow process at Luoshan Station, and flow process of the Han River over three days. Considering the gain in prediction accuracy brought by adding input factors, a predictive model can also be constructed using the flood diversion discharge, diversion duration, and the water level process at Hankou Station for the three days prior to the diversion, under data-scarce conditions. Using the selected combination of optimal predictors, a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient of 0.983 9 and a root mean square error of 0.024 cm in predicting the water level reduction process at Hankou Station over seven days following diversion are achieved. Meanwhile, the computation time was reduced from 1.5 minutes to less than 1 second compared to the one-dimensional hydrodynamic model. [Conclusion] The method not only provides high predictive accuracy with fewer computation times but also requires fewer input factors compared to hydrodynamic models, significantly enhancing practical applicability. The proposed method is well-suited for coupling with an operation model, enabling more informed and timely real-time operation decisions. The proposed method helps basin authorities to improve detention basin real-time operation.

关键词

蓄滞洪区 / 代理建模 / 深度学习 / 长短期记忆神经网络 / 卷积神经网络 / 门控单元神经网络

Key words

flood detention basin / surrogate model / deep learning / long short-term memory / convolutional neural network / gated recurrent unit

引用本文

导出引用
罗成鑫, 刘佳明, 卢程伟, 等. 基于深度学习模型的蓄滞洪区运用对干流水位影响预测[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(11): 26-33 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20251119
LUO Cheng-xin, LIU Jia-ming, LU Cheng-wei, et al. Predicting the Impact of Flood Detention Basin Operation on Main Stream Water Level Based on Deep Learning Model[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(11): 26-33 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20251119
中图分类号: TV122 (洪水)   

参考文献

[1]
宋豫秦, 张晓蕾. 中国蓄滞洪区洪水管理与可持续发展途径[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(6): 888-896.
(Song Yuqin, Zhang Xiaolei. Optimal approaches of integrated flood management and sustainable development in China’s flood retention areas[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014, 25(6): 888-896. (in Chinese))
[2]
Wang K, Wang Z, Liu K, et al. Optimizing flood diversion siting and its control strategy of detention basins: a case study of the Yangtze River, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 597: 126201.
[3]
徐兴亚, 徐照明, 要威, 等. 长江1870年特大洪水防御推演与对策研究[J]. 人民长江, 2024, 55(10):15-23.
(Xu Xingya, Xu Zhaoming, Yao Wei, et al. Study on flood control deduction and countermeasures in case of catastrophic flood in 1870 in Changjiang River Basin[J]. Yangtze River, 2024, 55(10): 15-23. (in Chinese))
[4]
马强, 刘佳明, 卢程伟. 2020年鄱阳湖区单退圩堤运用效果分析及湖区防洪治理思考[J]. 水利水电快报, 2021, 42(1):39-42,72.
(Ma Qiang, Liu Jiaming, Lu Chengwei. Analysis of effect of resident moved-out polder in the Poyang Lake Area in 2020 and some thoughts on flood control[J]. Express Water Resources & Hydropower Information, 2021, 42(1): 39-42, 72.(in Chinese))
[5]
廖耀星, 高玮志, 张轩, 等. 基于深度学习和水动力模型的洪水演进快速模拟方法[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2024, 34(2):16-22.
(Liao Yaoxing, Gao Weizhi, Zhang Xuan, et al. Rapid simulation of flood routing using deep learning and hydrodynamic model[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2024, 34(2):16-22. (in Chinese))
[6]
高学平, 朱洪涛, 闫晨丹, 等. 基于RBF代理模型的调水过程优化研究[J]. 水利学报, 2019, 50(4):439-447.
(Gao Xueping, Zhu Hongtao, Yan Chendan, et al. Study on optimization of water transfer process based on RBF surrogate model[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2019, 50(4): 439-447. (in Chinese))
[7]
Qin Z, Jiang A, Faulder D, et al. Efficient optimization of energy recovery from geothermal reservoirs with recurrent neural network predictive models[J]. Water Resources Research, 2023, 59(3): e2022WR032653.
[8]
Wang L, Xu B, Zhang C, et al. Surface water temperature prediction in large-deep reservoirs using a long short-term memory model[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 134:108491.
[9]
欧阳文宇, 叶磊, 顾学志, 等. 深度学习水文预报研究进展综述Ⅱ:研究进展及展望[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2022, 20(5):862-875.
(Ouyang Wenyu, Ye Lei, Gu Xuezhi, et al. Review of deep learning for hydrological forecasting Ⅱ: Research progress and prospect[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2022, 20(5): 862-875. (in Chinese))
[10]
刘昱辰, 刘佳, 刘录三, 等. 基于LSTM实时校正的WRF/WRF-Hydro耦合径流预报[J]. 水利学报, 2023, 54(11): 1334-1346.
(Liu Yuchen, Liu Jia, Liu Lusan, et al. WRF/WRF-Hydro coupled streamflow forecasting based on real-time updating using LSTM[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2023, 54(11): 1334-1346. (in Chinese))
[11]
许月萍, 周欣磊, 王若桐, 等. 基于集成学习与深度学习的洪水径流预报研究[J]. 人民长江, 2024, 55(9): 18-25.
(Xu Yueping, Zhou Xinlei, Wang Ruotong, et al. Research on flood runoff forecasting based on ensemble learning and deep learning[J]. Yangtze River, 2024, 55(9): 18-25. (in Chinese))
[12]
Razavi S, Tolson B A, Burn D H. Review of surrogate modeling in water resources[J]. Water Resources Research, 2012, 48(7): 2011WR011527.
[13]
García-Alba J, Bárcena J F, Ugarteburu C, et al. Artificial neural networks as emulators of process-based models to analyse bathing water quality in estuaries[J]. Water Research, 2019, 150: 283-295.
This study aims to provide a method for developing artificial neural networks in estuaries as emulators of process-based models to analyse bathing water quality and its variability over time and space. The methodology forecasts the concentration of faecal indicator organisms, integrating the accuracy and reliability of field measurements, the spatial and temporal resolution of process-based modelling, and the decrease in computational costs by artificial neural networks whilst preserving the accuracy of results. Thus, the overall approach integrates a coupled hydrodynamic-bacteriological model previously calibrated with field data at the bathing sites into a low-order emulator by using artificial neural networks, which are trained by the process-based model outputs. The application of the method to the Eo Estuary, located on the northwestern coast of Spain, demonstrated that artificial neural networks are viable surrogates of highly nonlinear process-based models and highly variable forcings. The results showed that the process-based model and the neural networks conveniently reproduced the measurements of Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentrations, indicating a slightly better fit for the process-based model (R = 0.87) than for the neural networks (R = 0.83). This application also highlighted that during the model setup of both predictive tools, the computational time of the process-based approach was 0.78 times lower than that of the artificial neural networks (ANNs) approach due to the additional time spent on ANN development. Conversely, the computational costs of forecasting are considerably reduced by the neural networks compared with the process-based model, with a decrease in hours of 25, 600, 3900, and 31633 times for forecasting 1 h, 1 day, 1 month, and 1 bathing season, respectively. Therefore, the longer the forecasting period, the greater the reduction in computational time by artificial neural networks.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[14]
周飞燕, 金林鹏, 董军. 卷积神经网络研究综述[J]. 计算机学报, 2017, 40(6): 1229-1251.
(Zhou Feiyan, Jin Linpeng, Dong Jun. Review of convolutional neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2017, 40(6): 1229-1251. (in Chinese))
[15]
廖胜利, 王在能, 程春田, 等. 耦合气象信息和可解释深度学习方法的日径流预报[J]. 水利学报, 2025, 56(7):831-843.
(Liao Shengli, Wang Zaineng, Cheng Chuntian, et al. Coupling meteorological information and interpretable deep learning methods for daily runoff forecasting[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2025, 56(7): 831-843. (in Chinese))
[16]
李承龙, 郭生练, 梁志明, 等. 基于深度学习的长江-洞庭湖流域洪水模拟预报研究[J]. 水利学报, 2025, 56(6): 717-725.
(Li Chenglong, Guo Shenglian, Liang Zhiming, et al. Flood simulation and forecasting in the Yangtze River-Dongting Lake Basin based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2025, 56(6): 717-725. (in Chinese))
[17]
Taormina R, Galelli S, Karakaya G, et al. An information theoretic approach to select alternate subsets of predictors for data-driven hydrological models[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 542: 18-34.
[18]
黄艳. 数字孪生长江建设关键技术与试点初探[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2022, 32(2): 16-26.
(Huang Yan. Study on key technology and pilot of digital twin Yangtze River construction[J]. China Flood & Drought Management, 2022, 32(2): 16-26. (in Chinese))
[19]
胡向阳, 刘佳明, 吴家阳, 等. 长江中下游沿江泵站排涝对干流防洪的影响分析[J]. 人民长江, 2020, 51(12):172-178.
(Hu Xiangyang, Liu Jiaming, Wu Jiayang, et al. Influence of drainage of pumping stations along middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River on flood control of main stream[J]. Yangtze River, 2020, 51(12): 172-178. (in Chinese))
[20]
王涵, 刘佳明, 谭政宇, 等. 基于分洪量调控的蓄滞洪区动态风险评估——以洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2026, 43(7):135-142.
摘要
为评估蓄滞洪区运用动态风险,支撑蓄滞洪区精细化运用,利用遥感及GIS技术构建了蓄滞洪区运用风险评估系统,结合二维水动力学模型及基于分洪量的运用方案集,模拟蓄滞洪区分洪过程各阶段洪水演进情况,明晰蓄滞洪区运用动态风险特征。以洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区为典型进行风险分析,结果表明:①洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区分洪量每增加5亿m3,平均水位上升0.57 m;②受损失率及地物分布的综合影响,洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区直接经济损失在分洪20亿~45亿 m3范围内增长最快,间接经济损失及转移人口在分洪初期(分洪量<5亿 m3)增长最快。③洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区分洪20亿m3时,蓄滞洪区全域被洪水淹没,蓄滞洪区内18.37万人需全部转移;分洪超25亿m3时,经济损失从以间接经济损失为主转化为以直接经济损失为主,且第二、三产业损失稳定在9.8亿元;分洪量30亿m3以上时,蓄滞洪区内渔业产值全部损失,损失约为36亿元;洪湖东分块蓄滞洪区分洪60亿 m3时,直接经济损失约为173.6亿元,间接经济损失约65.5亿元。研究成果可为蓄滞洪区科学调度与风险管理提供技术支撑。
(Wang Han, Liu Jiaming, Tan Zhengyu, et al. Dynamic risk assessment for flood detention areas with diversion volume as the basis: a case study of the Honghu Lake East flood detention area[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2026, 43(7): 135-142. (in Chinese))

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFC3012302)

编辑: 黄玲
PDF(1649 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉