PDF(3115 KB)
PDF(3115 KB)
PDF(3115 KB)
长江感潮河段通江泵闸工程水沙动力模拟
Numerical Modelling of Hydro- and Morpho-Dynamics for Tide-affected Pumping Systems in the Yangtze River
闸下淤积是长江感潮河段通江泵闸面临的突出问题之一,在通江泵闸改扩建与新建阶段,统筹解决闸下淤积是亟待突破的关键技术难点。为识别闸下淤积的主控因素与动力机制,以上海浦东北横河泵闸工程为例,基于实测资料分析和三维水沙数学模型等手段,对不同布置方案的水动力与河床演变进行模拟分析。结果表明,长江感潮河段通江泵闸工程不同的平面布置对其河道水动力特征与淤积控制效果差异显著,控制闸下淤积的核心因子为闸前水流顺直段长度与闸下较高流速区覆盖范围。根据泵闸平面布置、地形和边界条件的适配性,开展水沙动力模拟,可为长三角地区同类型通江泵闸的新建与改扩建工程提供普适性设计准则。
[Objective] Sedimentation at the downstream of sluice gates severely constraints the drainage capacity of pumping sluices in the tidal reaches of the Yangtze River,and also raises dredging costs. This study seeks to elucidate the causes and find solutions for the sedimentation of pumping sluices by optimizing their layouts to improve regional drainage capacity and river hydrodynamic condition. [Methods] The Beiheng River Pumping Station and Sluice Project in Pudong New Area,Shanghai was taken as a case study. Numerical simulations and analyses of the engineering effects under different layout schemes were conducted using measured data analysis and a three-dimensional hydrodynamic-sediment mathematical model. By comprehensively comparing the flow patterns,velocity distributions,and erosion-deposition results of each layout scheme,the planar layout of the Beiheng River project was evaluated. [Results and Conclusion] (1) Different planar layouts of pumping station and sluice projects in the tidal reaches of the Yangtze River result in significant differences in hydrodynamic characteristics and sedimentation control effectiveness. (2) The length of the straight flow section upstream of the sluice and the coverage area of the high-velocity zone downstream of the sluice are the core factors controlling sedimentation downstream of the sluice. (3) By adapting the planar layout of the pumping station and sluice to local topography and boundary conditions,hydrodynamic-sediment simulations can provide universal design guidelines for the construction and renovation of similar river-connected pumping stations and sluices in the Yangtze River Delta region. This is of great significance for enhancing the flood control resilience of coastal urban clusters and advancing the modernization of water management systems.
水沙动力模拟 / 长江口 / 通江泵闸工程 / 数学模型 / 闸下淤积 / 河床演变 / 工程效果 / 通江口门
hydrodynamic-sediment simulation / Yangtze Estuary / tide-affected pumping system / numerical model / sedimentation downstream of sluice / riverbed evolution / engineering effect / tidal inlet
| [1] |
李彤, 张二凤, 毛兴华, 等. 1970—2019年黄浦江上游年最高潮位变化及驱动因子[J]. 海洋通报, 2022, 41(5): 519-527.
(
|
| [2] |
方正杰. 近30年典型台风对黄浦江干流高潮位影响分析[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2025, 35(9): 44-48.
(
|
| [3] |
潘存鸿, 郑君, 吴修广, 等. 杭州湾年最高潮位时空变化及其抬升原因分析[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(5): 394-400, 418.
(
|
| [4] |
暴世康, 叶淑君, 严学新, 等. 上海地面沉降管控分区沉降特征及地下水采灌对比研究[J]. 上海国土资源, 2021, 42(2): 1-7.
(
|
| [5] |
林发永. 上海浦东新区防洪除涝规划方案研究[J]. 中国水利, 2022(13): 36-39.
(
|
| [6] |
王瑞锋, 张芝永, 程文龙, 等. 钱塘江河口闸站口门淤积及冲沙研究[J]. 科技通报, 2021, 37(8): 84-89.
(
|
| [7] |
王向明, 张新周, 窦希萍, 等. 入海河口闸下淤积机理及模拟技术研究进展[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2013(2):87-92.
(
|
| [8] |
钱卓蕾, 沈哲文, 左骏. 秋台风“梅花”造成浙江极端降水成因分析[J]. 海洋预报, 2024, 41(2): 104-116.
(
|
| [9] |
丁一汇. 气候变化与城市化效应对中国超大城市极端暴雨的影响[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2018, 28(2): 1-2.
(
|
| [10] |
陈莉, 张安安. 海绵城市视域下水资源与社会经济发展协同评价[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2022, 41(8): 123-131.
(
|
| [11] |
李灿灿, 周春飞, 王建, 等. 江苏苏州姑苏区防洪排涝水文水利计算[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2016, 26(6): 19-23.
(
|
| [12] |
万远扬, 孔令双, 戚定满, 等. 长江口横沙通道近期演变及水动力特性分析[J]. 水道港口, 2010, 31(5): 373-378.
(
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
万远扬, 王巍. 崇明岛4座水闸外移工程水沙数学模型[J]. 水运工程, 2021(9): 120-125, 166.
(
|
| [15] |
陆罕芳, 顾峰峰, 陈学恩, 等. 舟山群岛海域波浪对泥沙冲淤过程的影响[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 49(8): 1-9.
(
|
| [16] |
周琴, 陈映华. 浅论引排水泵闸布置型式的多样性[J]. 造船工业建设, 2005(3): 27-30.
(
|
| [17] |
梁民阳, 熊孟果. 水闸与泵站合建的一种新的布置形式[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2006(6): 82-83, 86.
(
|
| [18] |
陆倩, 崔冬, 田利勇, 等. 平原河网地区泵闸合建枢纽布置形式[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2019, 39(3): 62-67.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |