PDF(2417 KB)
PDF(2417 KB)
PDF(2417 KB)
基于复合情景分析的小流域沿河村落山洪灾害风险评估
Risk Assessment of Flash Flood Disaster for Riverside Villages in Small Watersheds Based on Composite Scenario Analysis
山丘区小流域山洪灾害频发,现有研究多集中于区域尺度或常规情景,对村落尺度、桥涵堵塞与下游顶托等复合工况下的山洪风险量化仍显不足。以日照市北陈家沟村为研究对象,依据降雨—洪水冲淹—灾害发生的链式机制,构建了一套基于情景分析的山洪灾害风险综合评估框架。首先设定不同重现期(5 a、10 a、20 a、50 a、100 a)、不同工况(桥涵堵塞50%、下游顶托)等复合情景,并运用Copula函数量化情景发生概率;然后构建水文-水动力耦合及损失计算模型,模拟不同复合情景下的洪水淹没过程及损失情况;在此基础上计算损失期望对风险进行度量。结果表明:在不同重现期条件下,洪水造成的直接经济损失呈阶梯式增长。在一般情景下,5 a、10 a、20 a、50 a、100 a一遇洪水直接经济损失分别为17.81万、89.53万、347.90万、449.84万、998.83万元;复合情景则显著加剧了灾害损失,在100 a一遇情景下,桥涵堵塞、下游顶托及两者叠加复合情景的直接经济损失分别达1 026.29万、1 024.01万与1 129.23万元。山洪灾害期望损失为50.16万元。研究成果可为山丘区沿河村落的洪涝灾害防控与风险管理提供科学依据。
[Objective] Flash floods in hilly small watersheds occur frequently, posing severe threats to the lives and property of residents in riverside villages. Existing research lacks sufficient understanding of disaster mechanisms at the village scale and under compound conditions, making it difficult to accurately reflect real risks. This study develops a comprehensive risk assessment framework based on multiple scenarios to provide scientific support for the governance planning and risk management of riverside villages. [Methods] Based on the disaster chain from rainfall to flood inundation and to disaster formation, we constructed a complete risk assessment framework. First, we collected the basic geographic, hydrometeorological, and socioeconomic data of the study area, and designed different compound scenarios considering field conditions, and then calculated the joint occurrence probabilities of these scenarios using the Copula function. Subsequently, a coupled hydrological hydrodynamic model was built to simulate the flood evolution processes under various scenarios. On this basis, a loss calculation model for affected entities was applied to estimate direct economic losses. Finally, risk probabilities and loss values were integrated to derive a risk index that comprehensively reflects the long-term risk level of the region. [Results] The inundation area expanded significantly with increasing return periods, from 37 980.81 m2 under a 5-year return period to 272 788.74 m2 under a 100-year return period, with particularly noticeable growth between 20- and 100-year return periods. Compound scenarios markedly aggravated disaster losses. Under a 100-year rainfall condition, compared to the scenario without bridge blockage or downstream backwater (direct economic loss of 9.988 3 million CNY), the direct economic losses under the scenarios of 50% bridge blockage, downstream backwater, and both combined increased to 10.262 9 million, 10.240 1 million, and 11.292 3 million CNY, respectively. The loss under the combined scenario was notably higher than that under any single-factor scenario, highlighting the amplification effect of compound disaster factors. Additionally, the Copula function indicated that bridge blockage and downstream backwater exhibit significant joint occurrence probabilities under the same return-period rainfall, confirming the objective basis for the compound disaster scenarios involving dual conditions. The expected loss from flash floods in Beichenjiagou Village, Rizhao City, was calculated as 501 600 CNY using the risk degree model. [Conclusion] This study successfully constructed and applied a flash flood risk assessment framework integrating compound scenario analysis incorporating the entire disaster chain process. It comprehensively reflects the entire process of flash flood formation, disaster triggering, and loss generation in small watersheds. By introducing compound scenario analysis, the study enhances the characterization of chain disaster mechanisms, quantifies the amplification effect of bridge blockage and downstream backwater on disaster losses, and underscores the critical role of key hydraulic engineering nodes in risk prevention and control. Furthermore, the study quantifies disaster risk as the expected loss value of the study area, offering a quantitative basis for determining economic inputs in disaster prevention and mitigation, as well as for formulating insurance and risk management strategies.
山洪灾害 / 风险评估 / HEC-HMS模型 / HEC-RAS模型 / 降雨频率 / 下游顶托 / 桥涵堵塞 / 洪水模拟
flash flood disaster / risk assessment / HEC-HMS model / HEC-RAS model / rainfall frequency / downstream backwater / bridge blockage / flood simulation
| [1] |
王协康. 极端降雨与强人类活动复合作用下山洪灾害研究构想和成果展望[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2024, 56(4): 1-9.
(
|
| [2] |
韩培, 任洪玉, 王思腾, 等. 小尺度山洪灾害区下垫面特征分析: 以官山河流域为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(7): 68-74.
(
|
| [3] |
许文涛, 董林垚, 刘纪根, 等. 山洪灾害全链条防控技术与防灾减灾模式探究[J/OL]. 长江科学院院报, 2026: 1-11.(2026-02-12). Doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250874.
(
|
| [4] |
郝林钢, 江恩慧, 屈博, 等. 可持续发展理论及其在流域系统中应用研究综述[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(2): 173-183.
(
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
朱勇辉, 周建银. 堤坝漫溃机理、模型及溃决洪水模拟技术与应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(5): 1-8.
(
|
| [7] |
娄书建, 刘世帆. 基于HEC-HMS水文模型的潼三段流域2021年秋汛洪水模拟[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(11): 63-67.
(
|
| [8] |
江春波, 周琦, 申言霞, 等. 山区流域洪涝预报水文与水动力耦合模型研究进展[J]. 水利学报, 2021, 52(10): 1137-1150.
(
|
| [9] |
佟保根, 王晓君. 基于水文水动力耦合模型的铜山城区洪水预报研究[J]. 江苏水利, 2024(9): 1-4.
(
|
| [10] |
黄慧敏. 山区小流域水文与水动力耦合模型的构建及洪水淹没风险研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2024.
(
|
| [11] |
李云良, 张奇, 姚静, 等. 鄱阳湖湖泊流域系统水文水动力联合模拟[J]. 湖泊科学, 2013, 25(2):227-235.
(
|
| [12] |
刘运珊. 信丰县山洪灾害调查评价与智慧预警系统设计[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2024.
(
|
| [13] |
郝振智. 特殊工况下山区洪水模拟与风险分析[D]. 济南: 济南大学, 2023.
(
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
赵海燕, 范志宣, 任玉欢, 等. 黄土高原山洪风险评估方法探讨: 以屈产河流域为例[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2022, 27(1): 147-156.
(
|
| [16] |
刘子霞, 王红旗, 邹毅, 等. 涉水工程影响下的寨岗河流域山洪灾害多情景模拟研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2025, 56(5):15-31.
(
|
| [17] |
匡于远, 郑成远, 朱萍. 东港区三庄河治理模式探索[J]. 山东水利, 2013(7): 33-34.
(
|
| [18] |
刘洋, 韩雯颖, 孙志贤, 等. 湖泊型流域洪涝灾害经济损失多情景模拟: 以南四湖流域为例[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(10): 4129-4141.
(
|
| [19] |
戚小龙. 甘肃省水文图集法设计暴雨洪水误差分析[J]. 地下水, 2018, 40(1): 172-174.
(
|
| [20] |
陶虎, 方自刚, 樊娜娜, 等. 基于HEC-RAS的陇南山地山洪灾害风险图优化研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2024, 33(4): 34-47.
(
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
段哲. 基于Copula函数风险组合概率的山洪灾害临界雨量研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2022.
(
|
| [24] |
兰林, 毛媛媛, 朱大伟, 等. 里下河涝区暴雨遭遇及排涝风险评估[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(1): 90-97.
(
|
| [25] |
刘万, 谢帅, 钟德钰, 等. 基于深度学习与HEC-HMS模型的小流域暴雨洪水耦合预报[J]. 水利学报, 2025, 56(3): 364-374.
(
|
| [26] |
陈薪泽, 褚若瑜, 李浩浩. 基于HEC-HMS模型的洪水模拟研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(增刊2): 37-39.
(
|
| [27] |
王雨潇, 刘波, 王文鹏, 等. 基于HEC-HMS模型的三峡区间洪水模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(6): 76-83.
(
|
| [28] |
宋世凯, 王海龙, 郎子龙, 等. 基于HEC-HMS模型的太行山小流域山洪模拟研究: 以邢台路罗川流域为例[J]. 灾害学, 2023, 38(1): 117-124.
(
|
| [29] |
马程. 基于HEC-HMS模型的山丘区小流域洪水预报应用研究[D]. 济南: 济南大学, 2024.
(
|
| [30] |
王靖雯, 邓斌, 周翀, 等. 基于HEC-RAS的典型山丘区洪水淹没分析[J]. 水利水电快报, 2025, 46(8): 9-17.
(
|
| [31] |
徐伟, 刘茂, 杨杰, 等. 基于HEC-RAS的淮河淮南段洪水漫顶风险分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2011, 28(7):13-18.
(
|
| [32] |
张浩, 蒋林杰, 付成华. 基于HEC-HMS水文模型的中小流域洪水模拟预报分析[J]. 四川水利, 2024, 45(1):55-60.
(
|
| [33] |
蔡隽韬. 基于HEC-HMS/RAS模型的小流域和社区尺度降雨径流和洪水淹没模拟研究[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2020.
(
|
| [34] |
王楠, 程维明, 张一驰, 等. 全国山洪灾害防治县房屋损毁风险评估及原因探究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2017, 19(12): 1575-1583.
(
|
| [35] |
三庄镇人民政府. 日照市征地地上附着物和青苗补偿标准[EB/OL]. [2025-04-08].
Sanzhuang Town People’s Government. Compensation Standards for Above-ground Attachments and Young Crops on Expropriated Land in Rizhao City[EB/OL]. [2025-04-08]. (in Chinese))
|
| [36] |
孟晓路, 张利, 石凤君. 基于洪灾损失率的北沙河洪水影响损失估算分析[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2016(3):33-35,43.
(
|
| [37] |
赵龙. 浔河洪水淹没分析及风险评估研究[D]. 济南: 济南大学, 2022.
(
|
| [38] |
杨明. 基于GIS和实测数据的洪水灾害评估[J]. 工程技术研究, 2024, 9(11): 214-216.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |