PDF(1769 KB)
PDF(1769 KB)
PDF(1769 KB)
基于雨洪管理模型的低影响开发设施量化布局
Optimization of Low-Impact Development Facilities Based on Stormwater Management Model
由于气候变化和城市化加剧,近年来我国洪涝灾害频发,雨季内涝问题十分严重。通过布设低影响开发(LID)设施能够有效应对这类城市内涝问题。目前,进行低影响开发设施量化布局的研究较少。通过对年径流总量控制率的分解提出了系统的LID规模量化布局的方法,以太原市迎泽街道为例,运用雨洪管理模型(SWMM)开展系统性分析。以太原市年径流总量控制率80%为目标,选用透水铺装、雨水花园和绿色屋顶3种LID设施进行布局。经计算,LID总调蓄容积设计满足年径流总量控制率目标。在 1 、5 、10 a 一遇短历时设计降雨情景下,排放口径流量显著降低,排放口O1、O2、O3 和O4 的最大径流量控制率分别达到了82.30%、84.93%、81.43%和87.55%;该地区最大峰值径流量分别降低了66.73%、65.5%和43.7%,且有效延迟了峰值出现时间;此外,LID设施提高了场地对雨水的渗透、滞蓄和控制能力,降低了管网充满度,减少了溢流节点个数,减轻了管网排水压力,减少了溢流污染的风险。研究成果为迎泽街道及类似城区的海绵城市建设提供了科学的理论依据与实践参考,同时也为未来城市雨洪管理工作的持续优化指明了方向。
[Objective] Due to climate change and accelerated urbanization, flood disasters have occurred frequently in China in recent years, and urban waterlogging during the rainy season has become a severe problem. The deployment of Low Impact Development (LID) facilities can effectively address such urban waterlogging issues. At present, there are relatively few studies on the quantitative layout of low-impact development facilities. [Methods] This paper proposes a systematic method for the quantitative layout of LID facilities by decomposing the annual runoff volume capture ratio. Taking Yingze Subdistrict of Taiyuan as an example, a systematic analysis is carried out using the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). With the annual runoff volume capture ratio of 80% in Taiyuan as the target, three types of LID facilities—permeable pavement, rain gardens, and green roofs—are selected for the layout. [Results] According to the calculations, the designed total storage volume of LID facilities meets the target of the annual runoff volume capture ratio. Under the design rainfall scenarios of 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year return periods with short durations, the runoff at the outfalls is significantly reduced. The maximum runoff capture ratios of outfalls O1, O2, O3, and O4 reach 82.30%, 84.93%, 81.43%, and 87.55%, respectively. The maximum peak runoff in the area is reduced by 66.73%, 65.5%, and 43.7%, respectively, and the peak occurrence time is effectively delayed. In addition, LID facilities improve the site’s ability to infiltrate, retain, and control rainwater, reduce the pipe network fullness ratio, decrease the number of overflow nodes, alleviate the drainage pressure of the pipe network, and lower the risk of overflow pollution. [Conclusions] The LID facility layout scheme proposed in this study has a significant effect on alleviating the rainwater and flooding problems in the study area, and can provide a scientific theoretical basis and practical reference for the construction of sponge cities in regions with local low-lying terrain, high building density and a large proportion of impervious area.
SWMM / LID组合设施 / 容积法 / 地表径流 / 海绵城市
SWMM / LID combination facilities / volume method / surface runoff / sponge city
| [1] |
宋嘉. 中国特色海绵城市及低影响开发措施发展研究[J]. 智能建筑与智慧城市, 2023(1):154-156.
(
|
| [2] |
车伍, 赵杨, 李俊奇, 等. 海绵城市建设指南解读之基本概念与综合目标[J]. 中国给水排水, 2015, 31(8): 1-5.
(
|
| [3] |
徐宗学, 李鹏. 城市化水文效应研究进展: 机理、方法与应对措施[J]. 水资源保护, 2022, 38(1): 7-17.
(
|
| [4] |
刘波, 戎贵文, 陈情情, 等. 基于SWMM的LID设施分区布局及减排效益[J]. 南水北调与水利科技(中英文), 2023, 21(5): 930-939.
(
|
| [5] |
韩璐遥, 叶兴成, 王飞, 等. 基于不同排水片区的低影响开发措施优化方案选取[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2018, 29(1): 160-165.
(
|
| [6] |
訾妍, 钟炜. 面向可持续雨洪管理的低影响开发措施综合效益评估[J]. 天津理工大学学报, 2025, 41(1): 126-133.
(
|
| [7] |
姚明辰, 崔建国, 张峰. 基于组合赋权和TOPSIS的LID设施多目标优化布局[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(9):136-140,146.
(
|
| [8] |
林辰松, 邵明, 葛韵宇, 等. 基于SWMM情境模拟的外源雨水型公园绿地雨洪调控效果研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2016, 38(12): 92-103.
(
|
| [9] |
住房和城乡建设部. 海绵城市建设技术指南——低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2014.
(Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Technical Guide for Sponge City Construction: development of Low-Impact Development Stormwater Systems (Trial)[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2014.) (in Chinese)
|
| [10] |
侯精明, 李东来, 王小军, 等. 建筑小区尺度下LID措施前期条件对径流调控效果影响模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2019, 30(1):45-55.
(
|
| [11] |
黄金良, 林杰, 杜鹏飞. 城市降雨径流模拟的参数不确定性分析[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(7): 2224-2234.
(
|
| [12] |
蒋元勇, 丰锴斌, 刘学文, 等. 城市雨洪SWMM模型的敏感参数研究综述[J]. 生态科学, 2015, 34(2): 194-200.
(
|
| [13] |
刘兴坡. 基于径流系数的城市降雨径流模型参数校准方法[J]. 给水排水, 2009, 35(11): 213-217.
(
|
| [14] |
周琦琦, 李振全. 基于PCSWMM模型的海绵城市控规指标制定: 以苏州某新建城区为例[J]. 给水排水, 2021, 57(增刊1): 189-195.
(
|
| [15] |
张高嫄, 高斌, 王新亮. 海绵城市年径流总量控制率在控规中的深化与落实[J]. 中国给水排水, 2018, 34(6): 1-5.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |