赣江流域吉安段浮游植物群落结构特征及其关键驱动因子

孙铭雪, 张文敏, 汪登强, 周瑞航, 马宝珊, 魏念, 吴凡

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 49-58.

PDF(1655 KB)
PDF(1655 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11) : 49-58. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250942
水环境与水生态

赣江流域吉安段浮游植物群落结构特征及其关键驱动因子

作者信息 +

Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Phytoplankton Community Structure and Its Driving Environmental Factors in the Ganjiang River at Ji’an Section

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为探究赣江流域吉安段浮游植物群落结构特征及关键驱动影响因子,于2023年7月份(丰水期)和11月份(枯水期)对该江段13个采样点开展定量调查。结果表明,两次调查共鉴定出浮游植物8门222属/种,7月份种类数(176属/种)多于11月份(150属/种),均以硅藻门和绿藻门为主,其中硅藻门的小环藻(Cyclotella sp.)是该江段的主要优势属/种。7月份浮游植物细胞密度高于11月份,而Margalef丰富度指数d、Shannon-Wiener多样性指数H'和Pielou均匀度指数J则低于11月份(P>0.05)。季节变化是驱动浮游植物群落差异的主要因素,空间效应不明显;距离衰减模式效应在11月份更为显著。导致两个季节差异的主要贡献物种为蓝隐藻和小球藻等6种。浮游植物群落结构受pH值、TN浓度、TP浓度和CODMn浓度的显著影响;WT、TN浓度、CODMn浓度和DO浓度为影响优势种分布的关键环境因子。研究结果可为水生态保护提供科学依据。

Abstract

[Objective] Phytoplankton community structure and its responses to environmental factors are key indicators for assessing riverine ecological health and formulating effective water management strategies. This study aims to elucidate the spatiotemporal dynamics of phytoplankton communities and their environmental drivers in the Ji’an section of the Ganjiang River. [Methods] A total of 13 sampling sites were surveyed in July (wet season) and November (dry season) in 2023. Phytoplankton samples were collected using plankton nets and water samplers, and species identification and enumeration were conducted through microscopic analysis following standard ecological protocols. Environmental parameters, including water temperature (WT), pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), total nitrogen(TN), total phosphorus(TP), ammonium nitrogen(NH4+-N), and permanganate index (CODMn), were measured according to national standard methodologies. Multivariate analyses, including principal coordinates analysis(PCoA), Spearman correlation analysis, and redundancy analysis(RDA), were performed to characterize the phytoplankton community composition and identify key environmental drivers. [Results] 1) The investigation identified a total of 222 phytoplankton genus/ species belonging to 8 phyla. Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta were the most abundant groups, collectively constituting a typical diatom-green algae assemblage indicative of moderate ecological conditions. Cyclotella sp. was the consistently dominant species across both seasons, underscoring its wide ecological adaptability in the river ecosystem. 2) Seasonal variations markedly influenced community structure; phytoplankton cell densities were significantly higher in July compared to November, whereas diversity indices, including Margalef(d), Shannon-Wiener(H'), and Pielou(J), were substantially lower in July, reflecting decreased community stability during the wet season. 3) Spatial differences in community composition among sampling sites were not statistically significant, indicating the dominance of seasonal rather than spatial effects. Nevertheless, a significant distance-decay relationship was detected, which was notably stronger during the dry season (November), likely due to reduced hydrological connectivity limiting phytoplankton dispersal. SIMPER analysis further confirmed significant compositional differences between seasons, highlighting genus/ species such as Chroomonas sp., Chlorella sp., Merismopedia minima, Chlamydomonas sp., Cryptomonas sp., and Scenedesmus quadricauda as primary contributors to seasonal community variation. 4) Correlation analyses revealed that phytoplankton community characteristics were significantly associated with environmental factors, including pH, TN, TP, and CODMn. RDA results specifically identified WT, TN, CODMn, and DO as the principal environmental factors driving the distribution and abundance of dominant phytoplankton species. Higher water temperatures significantly promoted the proliferation of cyanobacteria and green algae, whereas lower temperatures favored diatoms and cryptophytes. These findings underscore the critical role of seasonal variations and nutrient dynamics in structuring phytoplankton communities within the Ganjiang River. [Conclusions] Consequently, this study recommends enhancing season-specific water quality monitoring and adopting integrated management approaches, such as reducing nutrient loading from agricultural and industrial sources, implementing ecological buffer zones along riparian areas, and applying artificial aeration strategies, to mitigate eutrophication risks and ensure the sustainable ecological health of the river ecosystem.

关键词

浮游植物 / 群落结构 / 环境驱动因子 / 赣江流域吉安段

Key words

phytoplankton / community structure / environment driving factors / Ji’an section of Ganjiang River

引用本文

导出引用
孙铭雪, 张文敏, 汪登强, 等. 赣江流域吉安段浮游植物群落结构特征及其关键驱动因子[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(11): 49-58 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250942
SUN Ming-xue, ZHANG Wen-min, WANG Deng-qiang, et al. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Phytoplankton Community Structure and Its Driving Environmental Factors in the Ganjiang River at Ji’an Section[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(11): 49-58 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250942
中图分类号: X835 (生物监测、生态监测)   

参考文献

[1]
李素丽, 徐佳文, 丁翊东, 等. 赣江中游水源涵养林乔木和蕨类植物凋落物持水和失水特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(3): 170-176.
(Li Suli, Xu Jiawen, Ding Yidong, et al. Litter water-holding and water-loss characteristics of trees and ferns in the water conservation forests at the middle reaches of the Gan River[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(3): 170-176. (in Chinese))
[2]
徐秋阳, 王巍巍, 李宁, 等. 流域专项规划视角下重点物种保护与栖息地修复: 以赣江中游吉安市段为例[J]. 城市建筑, 2023, 20(12): 11-14.
(Xu Qiuyang, Wang Weiwei, Li Ning, et al. The key species conservation and habitat restoration from the perspective of watershed special plan: a case of Ji’an section of the middle reaches of Ganjiang River[J]. Urbanism and Architecture, 2023, 20(12): 11-14. (in Chinese))
[3]
Dong B, Zhou Y, Peng K, et al. Construction and assessment of an indicator system of stream conditions in a typical mountain landscape in Northeast China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31(5): 7889-7901.
[4]
Litchman E, de Tezanos Pinto P, Edwards K F, et al. Global biogeochemical impacts of phytoplankton: a trait-based perspective[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2015, 103(6): 1384-1396.
[5]
李立群, 王艳, 王彪, 等. 2009—2021 年夏季长江口海域浮游生物群落结构时空分布特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 环境科学研究, 2024, 37(2): 233-245.
(Li Liqun, Wang Yan, Wang Biao, et al. Spatiotemporal distribution of plankton community structure in the Yangtze River Estuary in the summer of 2009-2021 and its influencing factors[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2024, 37(2): 233-245. (in Chinese))
[6]
Sugianti Y Mujiyanto, Syam A R, et al. Phytoplankton community structure in Tunda Island waters, Banten Indonesia as a bioindicator to measure water quality[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2024, 209: 117147.
[7]
Chen W, Guo F, Huang W, et al. Advances in phytoplankton population ecology in the Pearl River estuary[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, 11:1084888.
Phytoplankton is an important primary producer of the estuarine ecosystem, which is essential for the biogeochemical cycle of water elements and nutrient transfer. The Pearl River estuary (PRE) is a dynamically complex estuary, and the environment of PRE is significantly impacted by anthropogenic activities, variation of phytoplankton community structure in the PRE are complex. This review aims to compare phytoplankton species, species diversity, and abundance variation characteristics from the 1980s and 2020s, evaluate the overall trend of phytoplankton in the PRE, and discuss the main environmental factors affecting phytoplankton growth in the PRE. The data from the past 40 years in PRE showed that the number of phytoplankton species significantly decreased (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the abundance of phytoplankton at the 10-year scale, however, the fluctuation range of the abundance has increased. Under the conditions of a decreasing species number and no significant difference in abundance, the species diversity of phytoplankton showed a downward trend. In addition, the dominant phytoplankton species in the nearshore waters were relatively homogenous, and the abundance of phytoplankton in the nearshore waters was higher than that in the open waters, which suggested that human activities have a great influence. This review can form the basis for facilitating health management in the PRE ecosystem. Further, relevant guidelines can be developed and implemented for promoting the ecological health of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and ensuring its sustainable development.
[8]
杨强强, 董军林, 邱小琮, 等. 宁夏清水河流域浮游植物群落结构特征及多样性变化与其影响因素[J]. 环境科学学报, 2025, 45(12): 418-429.
(Yang Qiangqiang, Dong Junlin, Qiu Xiaocong, et al. Structural characteristics of phytoplankton communities-diversity dynamics and their influencing factors in the Qingshui River Basin, Ningxia[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2025, 45(12): 418-429. (in Chinese))
[9]
郭旭东, 王雨春, 曾艳, 等. 长江干流南京段浮游生物群落结构特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 环境科学研究, 2025, 38(7): 1418-1429.
(Guo Xudong, Wang Yuchun, Zeng Yan, et al. Plankton community structure characteristics and relationship with environmental factors in the Nanjing section of the mainstream Yangtze River[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2025, 38(7): 1418-1429. (in Chinese))
[10]
谭晶, 王岚, 李玉山, 等. 昌江流域景德镇段浮游植物群落结构及其对关键环境因子的响应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2025, 31(8):1187-1200.
(Tan Jing, Wang Lan, Li Yushan, et al. Phytoplankton community structure and its response to key environmental factors in Jingdezhen section of the Changjiang River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2025, 31(8): 1187-1200. (in Chinese))
[11]
杨晓曦, 刘凯, 刘燕, 等. 淮河中游浮游植物群落结构时空格局及影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(10): 2207-2217.
(Yang Xiaoxi, Liu Kai, Liu Yan, et al. Pattern and influence factors of phytoplankton community structure in middle of Huaihe River[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022, 31(10): 2207-2217. (in Chinese))
[12]
计勇, 张洁, 樊后保, 等. 赣江中下游浮游藻类群落结构与水质评价[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2012(5):28-31.
摘要
对赣江中下游10个监测断面的水质情况及浮游藻类群落结构特征进行了调查分析。结果表明,化学需氧量、总氮的水平较高,常规污染指标呈现两端大、中间小的特点,污染最重的在赣州;重金属处上游往下游逐渐减小。赣江中下游浮游藻类共计38属102种,种类最多的为绿藻门、蓝藻门和硅藻门,分别鉴定出43种、18种和29种。优势种主要有团藻、栅藻、针杆藻、舟形藻、颤藻、螺旋藻等,均为α-中污和β-中污指示种。Margalef多样性指数与Shannon-Weaver生物多样性指标计算结果表明赣江中下游水质总体处于轻度污染至较严重污染状态,污染最重的是赣州,最轻是的新干。
(Ji Yong, Zhang Jie, Fan Houbao, et al. Space-time distribution characteristics of floating algae and water quality assessment in the middle and lower reaches of the Ganjiang River[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2012(5):28-31. (in Chinese))
<p>The community structure of Phytoplankton and water quality on 10 sampling spots of the Ganjiang River were investigated in this study. Results showed that the level of chemical oxygen demand, and the total nitrogen were generally high. The maximum of conventional pollution indicators was found on the the upstream and downstream monitoring sections, and the minimum value was shown on the middle monitoring sections. Ganzhou is the one of severity water pollution monitoring sections in Ganjiang River. Concentration of heavy metals was gradually decreasing from upstream to downstream. There were 102 species of Phytoplankton, among which Cholorophyta, Cyanophyta and Bacillariophyta were major phylum in the phytoplankton community, with 43 genera, 18 genera and 29 genera respectively. There were 12 dominant species pertaining to indicator species of &alpha;-mesosaprobic type and &beta;-mesosaprobic type. Biodiversity and water quality assessment showed that Ganjiang river were moderate polluted.</p>
[13]
杨威, 刘琪, 张婷婷, 等. 赣江中下游浮游植物群落结构及其水质生物学评价[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2020, 41(2): 68-76.
(Yang Wei, Liu Qi, Zhang Tingting, et al. Phytoplankton community structure and biological evaluation of water quality in the middle and lower Ganjiang River[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2020, 41(2): 68-76. (in Chinese))
[14]
王俊颉, 夏雨, 于新平, 等. 赣江中下游浮游藻类时空分布特征及水质评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2023, 39(8): 1031-1041.
(Wang Junjie, Xia Yu, Yu Xinping, et al. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics and water quality evaluation of planktonic algae in the middle and lower reaches of Ganjiang River[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2023, 39(8): 1031-1041. (in Chinese))
[15]
胡鸿钧, 魏印心. 中国淡水藻类: 系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.
(Hu Hongjun, Wei Yinxin. The freshwater algae of China:systenatics taxonomy and ecdogy[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006.) (in Chinese)
[16]
邓坚, 李怡庭, 林祚顶, 等. 中国内陆水域常见藻类图谱[M]. 武汉: 长江出版社, 2012.
(Deng Jian, Li Yiting, Lin Zuoding. Atlas of common algae in inland waters of China:systematics,taxonomy and ecdogy[M]. Wuhan: Changjiang Press, 2012.) (in Chinese)
[17]
魏秘, 朱爱民, 王瑞, 等. 赤水河春季浮游植物群落结构变化及其优势种生态位分析[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2022, 43(5):49-58.
(Wei Mi, Zhu Aimin, Wang Rui, et al. Spring phytoplankton community structure and niche analysis of dominant species in Chishui River[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2022, 43(5): 49-58. (in Chinese))
[18]
张萌, 邓道贵, 黄丹, 等. 赣江流域浮游硅藻功能群多样性及其水期演替的驱动特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(5):680-691.
(Zhang Meng, Deng Daogui, Huang Dan, et al. Functional group diversity of planktonic diatoms and the driving pattern of water-period guild succession in Ganjiang River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 29(5):680-691. (in Chinese))
[19]
Abirhire O, North R L, Hunter K, et al. Environmental factors influencing phytoplankton communities in Lake Diefenbaker, Saskatchewan, Canada[J]. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 2015, 41: 118-128.
[20]
董艳珍, 赵金凤, 肖克彦, 等. 邛海浮游植物群落时空变化特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 湿地科学, 2024, 22(5): 757-768.
(Dong Yanzhen, Zhao Jinfeng, Xiao Keyan, et al. Spatial-temporal variations in phytoplankton communities and their relation-ship with environmental factors in the Qionghai Lake, China[J]. Wetland Science, 2024, 22(5): 757-768. (in Chinese))
[21]
Barlow S B, Kugrens P. Cryptomonads from the Salton Sea,California[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 473(1):129-137.
[22]
Tian Y, Huang B, Yu C, et al. Dynamics of phytoplankton communities in the Jiangdong Reservoir of Jiulong River, Fujian, South China[J]. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2014, 32(2): 255-265.
[23]
吴晓辉, 李其军. 水动力条件对藻类影响的研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(7): 1732-1738.
(Wu Xiaohui, Li Qijun. Reviews of influences from hydrodynamic conditions on algae[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2010, 19(7): 1732-1738. (in Chinese))
[24]
朱为菊, 庞婉婷, 尤庆敏, 等. 淮河流域春季浮游植物群落结构特征及其水质评价[J]. 湖泊科学, 2017, 29(3):637-645.
(Zhu Weiju, Pang Wanting, You Qingmin, et al. Phytoplankton community structure and the evaluation of water quality in spring, Huaihe River Basin[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2017, 29(3): 637-645. (in Chinese))
[25]
Ye S, Wen L, Gao L, et al. Exploring intrinsic distribution of phytoplankton relative abundance and biomass in combination with continental-scale field investigation and microcosm experiment[J]. Water Research, 2024, 248:120853.
[26]
耿文华, 陈继淼, 冯剑丰, 等. 辽河浮游植物群落及生物多样性基准验证[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014, 34(1):239-245.
(Geng Wenhua, Chen Jimiao, Feng Jianfeng, et al. Phytoplankton community and validation of phytoplankton biodiversity criteria in Liaohe River[J]. China Environmental Science, 2014, 34(1): 239-245. (in Chinese))
[27]
刘洋, 安瑞志, 杨号, 等. 西藏拉鲁湿地浮游植物群落时空分布特征及其驱动因子[J]. 湖泊科学, 2024, 36(2): 403-415.
(Liu Yang, An Ruizhi, Yang Hao, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution characteristics and its driving factors of phytoplankton community in Lhalu Wetland, Xizang, China[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2024, 36(2): 403-415. (in Chinese))
[28]
周俊伟, 马殿光, 杨婷婷, 等. 长江江苏段浮游植物和着生藻类群落结构时空变化规律研究[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2023.
(Zhou Junwei, Ma Dianguang, Yang Tingting, et al. Study on spatial and temporal variation of phytoplankton and periphyton community in Jiangsu Province of Yangtze River[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2023.) (in Chinese)
[29]
Cao J, Hou Z, Li Z, et al. Succession of phytoplankton functional groups and their driving factors in a subtropical plateau lake[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 631/632: 1127-1137.
[30]
Krashchuk L S, Shimaraeva S V, Silow E A. Spatiotemporal changes in the phytoplankton in lake baikal during late summer: I. water temperature and phytoplankton abundance[J]. Inland Water Biology, 2020, 13(1):31-40.
[31]
张云, 马徐发, 郭飞飞, 等. 湖北金沙河水库浮游植物群落结构及其与水环境因子的关系[J]. 湖泊科学, 2015, 27(5): 902-910.
(Zhang Yun, Ma Xufa, Guo Feifei, et al. Community structures of phytoplankton and their relationships with environmental factors in the Jinshahe Reservoir, Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2015, 27(5): 902-910. (in Chinese))
[32]
Schabhüttl S, Hingsamer P, Weigelhofer G, et al. Temperature and species richness effects in phytoplankton communities[J]. Oecologia, 2013, 171(2): 527-536.
Phytoplankton play an important role as primary producers and thus can affect higher trophic levels. Phytoplankton growth and diversity may, besides other factors, be controlled by seasonal temperature changes and increasing water temperatures. In this study, we investigated the combined effects of temperature and diversity on phytoplankton growth. In a controlled laboratory experiment, monocultures of 15 freshwater phytoplankton taxa (green algae, cyanobacteria, and diatoms) as well as 25 mixed communities of different species richness (2-12 species) and taxa composition were exposed to constant temperatures of 12, 18, and 24 °C. Additionally, they were exposed to short-term daily temperature peaks of +4 °C. Increased species richness had a positive effect on phytoplankton growth rates and phosphorous content at all temperature levels, with maximum values occurring at 18 °C. Overyielding was observed at almost all temperature levels and could mostly be explained by complementary traits. Higher temperatures resulted in higher fractions of cyanobacteria in communities. This negative effect of temperature on phytoplankton diversity following a shift in community composition was most obvious in communities adapted to cooler temperatures, pointing to the assumption that relative temperature changes may be more important than absolute ones.
[33]
Dutta S, Dhan S A, Uddin S N, et al. Phytoplankton as an indicator of eutrophication[J]. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 2023, 29(3): 1042-1052.
[34]
Ding Y, Pan B, Zhao X, et al. Will a heavy sediment load affect responses of phytoplankton functional groups to aquatic environmental changes in different water body types[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 837: 155863.
[35]
代龚圆, 李杰, 李林, 等. 滇池北部湖区浮游植物时空格局及相关环境因子[J]. 水生生物学报, 2012, 36(5):946-956.
(Dai Gongyuan, Li Jie, Li Lin, et al. The spatio-temporal pattern of phytoplankton in the north basin of lake Dianchi and related environmental factors[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2012, 36(5):946-956. (in Chinese))
[36]
Varol M. Phytoplankton functional groups in a monomictic reservoir: seasonal succession, ecological preferences, and relationships with environmental variables[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26(20): 20439-20453.
[37]
魏念, 李云峰, 吴凡, 等. 长江流域重点水域浮游植物群落结构特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2023, 32(12): 2519-2527.
(Wei Nian, Li Yunfeng, Wu Fan, et al. Phytoplankton community structures and impact factors in key water areas of Yangtze River Basin[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2023, 32(12): 2519-2527. (in Chinese))
[38]
李博, 苏巍, 黄涛, 等. 金沙江下游浮游植物群落生态特征及与环境因子关系[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2023, 44(4):18-28.
(Li Bo, Su Wei, Huang Tao, et al. Phytoplankton community ecology and its relationship with environmental factors in the lower Jinsha River[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2023, 44(4): 18-28. (in Chinese))
[39]
Zhao H J, Wang Y, Yang L L, et al. Relationship between phytoplankton and environmental factors in landscape water supplemented with reclaimed water[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 58: 113-121.
[40]
Gogoi P, Das S K, Das Sarkar S, et al. Environmental factors driving phytoplankton assemblage pattern and diversity: insights from Sundarban eco-region, India[J]. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 2021, 21(2): 354-367.
[41]
卢悦, 胡恩, 丁一桐, 等. 西北地区延河流域浮游植物群落结构特征及影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1669-1679.
摘要
延河为黄河的重要支流之一,其对黄河中游生物多样性维持和生态保护具有重要作用。本研究以浮游植物为指示生物,于2021年春季(4—5月)和秋季(9—10月)对延河流域开展了系统的水生态调查,在延河干流、5条一级支流和蓄水水体(水库和淤地坝水体)共布设33个采样断面进行样品采集。结果表明: 两次调查共检出浮游植物7门91属253种,其中,春季(168种)以硅藻、绿藻占优,秋季(179种)以硅藻、蓝藻占优。春、秋季浮游植物密度和生物量均值分别为316.07×104、69.56×104 cells·L-1和6.41、1.59 mg·L-1。在时间尺度上,春季浮游植物丰度高于秋季;在空间尺度上,干流中游和下游河段浮游植物丰度均高于上游河段,筑坝拦截形成的蓄水水体浮游植物现存量维持在较高水平,且在秋季显著高于干支流水体。Shannon多样性指数、Margalef丰富度指数和Pielou均匀度指数均表明:春季浮游植物多样性大于秋季,干支流水体浮游植物多样性大于蓄水水体。冗余分析结果显示:影响延河流域春季浮游植物群落结构的关键因素为流速、溶解氧、亚硝酸盐氮和水深;影响秋季浮游植物群落结构的关键因素为硝酸盐氮、水深和溶解氧。
(Lu Yue, Hu En, Ding Yitong, et al. Characteristics of phytoplankton community and its influencing factors in the Yanhe River Basin, North-west China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2023, 34(6): 1669-1679. (in Chinese))
Yanhe River is one of the important tributaries of the Yellow River, with a vital role in the maintenance of biodiversity and ecological conservation in the middle reaches of the Yellow River. In this study, we conducted a systematic aquatic ecological survey of the Yanhe River Basin in spring (April-May) and autumn (September-October) of 2021, with phytoplankton as indicator organism. A total of 33 sampling sections were selected in the mainstem, five first-class tributaries, and impounded water bodies (reservoir and check dam water bodies) of the Yanhe River Basin. The results showed that a total of 253 phytoplankton species, belonging to 7 phyla and 91 genera, were detected in the two surveys. Diatoms and green algae prevailed in spring (168 species), while diatoms and cyanobacteria dominated in autumn (179 species). The mean phytoplankton density and biomass were 316.07×104 cells·L-1 and 6.41 mg·L-1 in spring, and 69.56×104 cells·L-1 and 1.59 mg·L-1 in autumn, respectively. At the temporal scale, phytoplankton abundance in spring was higher than that in autumn. At the spatial scale, the phytoplankton abundance in the middle and lower reaches of the mainstream was higher than that in the upper reaches. Phytoplankton biomass in the impounded water bodies formed by dam interception was maintained at a high level, which was significantly higher than that in the mainstem and tributary water bodies in autumn. The phytoplankton diversity, as indicated by Shannon diversity index, Margalef richness index, and Pielou evenness index, in spring was greater than that in autumn. Phytoplankton diversity was greater in the trunk and tributary waters than that in impounded waters. The results of redundancy analysis showed that the key factors driving the phytoplankton community structure in spring were flow velocity, dissolved oxygen, nitrite nitrogen, and water depth. In contrast, the key driving factors in autumn were nitrate nitrogen, water depth, and dissolved oxygen.
[42]
Wang Y, Liu Y, Guo H, et al. Long-term nutrient variation trends and their potential impact on phytoplankton in the southern Yellow Sea, China[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2022, 41(6): 54-67.
[43]
许海, 陈丹, 陈洁, 等. 氮磷形态与浓度对铜绿微囊藻和斜生栅藻生长的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(6): 2560-2567.
(Xu Hai, Chen Dan, Chen Jie, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus forms and concentrations on the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa and Scenedesmus obliquus[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019, 39(6): 2560-2567. (in Chinese))
[44]
魏志兵, 何勇凤, 龚进玲, 等. 金沙江干流浮游植物群落结构特征及其时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(6): 1356-1365.
(Wei Zhibing, He Yongfeng, Gong Jinling, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of phytoplankton community structure in the main stream of the Jinsha River[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(6): 1356-1365. (in Chinese))
[45]
于洋, 彭福利, 孙聪, 等. 典型湖泊水华特征及相关影响因素分析[J]. 中国环境监测, 2017, 33(2): 88-94.
(Yu Yang, Peng Fuli, Sun Cong, et al. Analysis on the characteristics and impact factors of water bloom in the lake[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2017, 33(2): 88-94. (in Chinese))
[46]
秦海娇, 史秋月, 支国强, 等. 螳螂川—普渡河流域浮游植物群落特征及环境影响因子[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2024, 14(3): 867-878.
(Qin Haijiao, Shi Qiuyue, Zhi Guoqiang, et al. Phytoplankton community characteristics and environmental impact factors in Tanglang River-Pudu River basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2024, 14(3): 867-878. (in Chinese))

基金

农业财政专项“长江禁捕后常态化监测专项”(CJJC)
中国水产科学研究院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(2023TD09)

编辑: 任坤杰
PDF(1655 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉