基于机器学习的堆石料单颗粒破坏模式识别与强度预测

邱珍锋, 王佳慧, 雷蕊忆, 曹婷

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 128-136.

PDF(2867 KB)
PDF(2867 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 128-136. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250822
岩土工程

基于机器学习的堆石料单颗粒破坏模式识别与强度预测

作者信息 +

Recognition of Single Particle Failure Pattern and Prediction of Rockfill Material Strength Based on Machine Learning

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为解决多点接触状态和颗粒形状对堆石坝颗粒破碎影响机制不明确的问题,对480个不同粒径(d)、纵横比(AR)和加载角度(α)的石膏颗粒开展单轴压缩试验,结合数字图像相关技术(DIC)获取位移场;构建特征数据库,采用网格搜索和5折交叉验证,对比SVM、MLP、RF和XGB的破坏模式分类及强度预测性能。结果表明:①颗粒出现劈裂、压碎和剪切3类破坏,剪切破坏仅发生于3点及以上接触。②极端梯度提升(XGB)模型表现最优:测试集宏平均AUC为0.96,RMSE和MAE分别为0.9 MPa和0.8 MPa;粒径为20 mm,XGB模型预测误差仅为0.06 MPa,优于Hertz理论。研究成果揭示了形状与接触状态对破碎特性具有显著非线性影响,所建模型可为堆石料力学分析与离散元参数确定提供参考。

Abstract

[Objective] To address the unclear influence mechanisms of multi-point contact states and irregular particle shapes on particle breakage modes and crushing strength in rockfill dams, and to fill the research gap in systematically integrating meso-scale mechanical features with data-driven machine learning algorithms, this study establishes a robust framework for failure mode classification and crushing strength prediction of single rockfill particles. The framework is intended to overcome the inherent limitations of traditional empirical formulas that rely on idealized spherical geometries and fixed two-point elastic contact modes. [Methods] Uniaxial compression tests were conducted on artificial gypsum particles with varying particle sizes, aspect ratios, and loading angles. Digital image correlation (DIC) technique was employed to acquire full-field surface displacement data and capture crack evolution characteristics during compression. A grid search strategy combined with stratified 5-fold cross-validation was applied to optimize hyperparameters and mitigate overfitting. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB)—were systematically evaluated and compared for both failure mode classification and crushing strength regression tasks. [Results] Three distinct failure modes were identified: splitting, crushing, and shear. Shear failure occurred exclusively under three-point or higher contact conditions, while two-point compression produced only splitting or crushing. Crushing strength exhibited a pronounced size effect and shape dependency: strength decreased as particle size increased, aspect ratio increased, or loading angle increased. Among the four algorithms, XGB demonstrated the best overall performance. In the classification task, XGB achieved a macro-average AUC of 0.96 on the independent test set, with a macro-average precision of 0.90 and an F1-score of 0.88. In the regression task, XGB yielded the lowest RMSE and MAE of 0.9 MPa and 0.8 MPa, respectively, with R2 of 0.92. Compared with four traditional strength criteria (splitting, crushing, shear failure theories, and Hertz contact theory), the XGB model demonstrated superior prediction accuracy across all particle sizes. Under the 20 mm particle size condition, the absolute deviation between the XGB-predicted value and the experimental value was only 0.06 MPa, compared with 0.09 MPa for the Hertz contact theory. [Conclusions] Particle shape and contact state exert significant nonlinear regulatory effects on the crushing characteristics of granular materials. The XGB-based machine learning model effectively overcomes the oversimplified assumptions of traditional theories regarding idealized spherical geometries and fixed contact modes. By autonomously learning from high-dimensional meso-mechanical features, the model exhibits superior generalization ability and prediction accuracy under complex conditions involving irregular particle shapes and multi-point contacts.

关键词

机器学习 / 颗粒破碎 / 多点接触 / 数字图像相关技术 / 破坏机理

Key words

machine learning / crushing of particles / multi-point contact / digital image correlation method / failure mechanism

引用本文

导出引用
邱珍锋, 王佳慧, 雷蕊忆, 等. 基于机器学习的堆石料单颗粒破坏模式识别与强度预测[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(10): 128-136 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250822
QIU Zhen-feng, WANG Jia-hui, LEI Rui-yi, et al. Recognition of Single Particle Failure Pattern and Prediction of Rockfill Material Strength Based on Machine Learning[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(10): 128-136 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250822
中图分类号: TV41 (水工材料试验)   

参考文献

[1]
Ma H, Chi F. Major technologies for safe construction of high earth-rockfill dams[J]. Engineering, 2016, 2(4): 498-509.
[2]
傅华, 凌华, 蔡正银. 粗颗粒土颗粒破碎影响因素试验研究[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(1): 75-79.
(Fu Hua, Ling Hua, Cai Zhengyin. Influencing factors for particle breakage of coarse grained soil[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2009, 37(1): 75-79. (in Chinese))
[3]
邹德高, 田继荣, 刘京茂, 等. 堆石料三维形状量化及其对颗粒破碎的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(10):3525-3530.
(Zou Degao, Tian Jirong, Liu Jingmao, et al. Three-dimensional shape of rockfill material and its influence on particle breakage[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(10): 3525-3530. (in Chinese))
[4]
Kawamoto R, Andrade J, Matsushima T. A 3-D mechanics-based particle shape index for granular materials[J]. Mechanics Research Communications, 2018, 92: 67-73.
[5]
Turner A K, Sharma A, Penumadu D, et al. Finite element analyses of single particle crushing tests incorporating computed tomography imaging and damage mechanics[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2019, 115: 103158.
[6]
赵阳, 周辉, 冯夏庭, 等. 不同因素影响下层间错动带颗粒破碎和剪切强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(1): 13-22.
(Zhao Yang, Zhou Hui, Feng Xiating, et al. Particle crushing and shear behaviour of an infilled joint soil under different conditions[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(1): 13-22. (in Chinese))
[7]
郭宇, 迟世春, 米晓飞. 粗粒土颗粒强度和弹性力学参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(9): 1675-1681.
(Guo Yu, Chi Shichun, Mi Xiaofei. Experimental study on particle strength and elastic mechanical parameters of coarse-grained soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(9): 1675-1681. (in Chinese))
[8]
闫世豪, 迟世春, 王晋伟, 等. 考虑微裂纹随机分布的堆石颗粒准静态强度统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1378-1387.
(Yan Shihao, Chi Shichun, Wang Jinwei, et al. Statistical model for quasi-static strength of rockfill particles considering random distribution of microcracks[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1378-1387. (in Chinese))
[9]
Xiao Y, Meng M. Effects of particle size on crushing and deformation behaviors of rockfill materials[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2020, 11(2): 375-388.
[10]
周梦佳, 温彦锋, 邓刚, 等. 堆石料单颗粒劈裂试验破碎强度随机性与尺寸效应的三维离散元模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019(增刊1):503-510.
(Zhou Mengjia, Wen Yanfeng, Deng Gang, et al. Three-Dimensional Discrete Element Simulation of Random Breaking Strength and Size Effect in Single Particle Splitting Test of Rockfill[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019(S1):503-510. (in Chinese))
[11]
Chuhan F A, Kjeldstad A, Bjørlykke K, et al. Experimental compression of loose sands: relevance to porosity reduction during burial in sedimentary basins[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(5): 995-1011.
\n This study examines the one-dimensional stress\u0096strain behaviour of sand at effective stresses as high as 50 MPa. Experiments were performed on 22 sands (approx. 150 tests) with different grain size, uniformity coefficient, angularity, density, grain mineralogy, and clay content. The results show that minor grain corner crushing starts at stresses of 2\u00968 MPa. The point of maximum curvature (yield point) in the porosity (n) versus logarithm of vertical effective stress (σ'\n v\n ) curve defines the initiation of marked particle crushing. The stress at the yield point varies between 3 and 31 MPa depending on sand characteristics. A low yield stress is indicative of high porosity loss in the interval of intermediate stress (5\u009625 MPa). The yield stress is low when the grain size is large, grains are angular, grain strength is low, and uniformity coefficient is low. The lowest yield stress value occurs in the coarser carbonate sand, and the highest in the chert-rich sands. The sands rich in clays are highly compressible up to 25 MPa. At stresses higher than ~10 MPa, the coarser biogenic carbonate sands maintain higher porosities than the other sands. This can be explained by the fact that coarser biogenic carbonate sands have low yield stresses due to high angularity and low grain strength and initially there is local grain crushing at grain contacts. This increases the area of the grain contacts, so the coarser carbonate sands become less compressible at higher stresses. Within the high stress range (25\u009650 MPa) the porosity loss differences related to grain size, grain shape, grain mineralogy, and sand uniformity coefficient are significantly reduced. Hence the greater compressibility of lithic and carbonate sands becomes less evident in the high-stress interval as the grain size increases.Key words: sand, grain crushing, grain size, high stress, compression.\n
[12]
Ma G, Regueiro R A, Zhou W, et al. Role of particle crushing on particle kinematics and shear banding in granular materials[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2018, 13(3): 601-618.
[13]
牛奕然, 周健, 赵程, 等. 砂岩球形颗粒多点接触破碎试验[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(2):92-97.
(Niu Yiran, Zhou Jian, Zhao Cheng, et al. Experimental study on multi-point contact crushing of spherical sandstone particles[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2022, 50(2): 92-97. (in Chinese))
[14]
Salami Y, Dano C, Hicher P Y, et al. The effects of the coordination on the fragmentation of a single grain[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2015, 26(1): 012015.
[15]
Zhang B Y, Jie Y X, Kong D Z. Simulation of rockfill materials using aggregates of cement ellipsoids[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2014, 26(1):107-116.
[16]
Qiu Z, Ke D, Tang Y, et al. Gaussian noise-Enhanced prediction of particle breakage strength in rockfill[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2026, 30(5): 100487.
[17]
Aziz M, Mohammed A S, Ali U, et al. Deep learning-based prediction of particle breakage and friction angle of water-degradable geomaterials[J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 444: 120049.
[18]
Aela P, Wang J, Yousefian K, et al. Prediction of crushed numbers and sizes of ballast particles after breakage using machine learning techniques[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 337: 127469.
[19]
Gu X, Liang Y, Hu J. Unraveling particle crushing: a DEM exploration of shape effects on fracture behaviour[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2025, 187:107508.
[20]
陈进帆, 尚德磊, 赵志宏, 等. 基于机器学习的含充填裂隙岩样断裂行为预测方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2023, 42(增刊1): 3458-3472.
(Chen Jinfan, Shang Delei, Zhao Zhihong, et al. Prediction method for fracture behavior of rock samples containing filled fractures based on machine learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 42(S1):3458-3472. (in Chinese))
[21]
Lee K L, Farhoomand I. Compressibility and crushing of granular soil in anisotropic triaxial compression[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1967, 4(1): 68-86.
[22]
Cawley G C, Talbot N L C. On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2010, 11(70): 2079-2107.
[23]
Hoek E, Brown E T. Practical estimates of rock mass strength[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(8): 1165-1186.
[24]
赵鹏飞. 粗粒土颗粒多点接触下的破碎研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2022.
(Zhao Pengfei. Research on crushing of coarse aggregate particles under multi-contact[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese))
[25]
雷蕊忆. 对称球颗粒破碎强度及破碎准则研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2024.
(Lei Ruiyi. Research on crushing strength and crushing criterion of symmetric spherical particles[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2024. (in Chinese))

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFC3211203)
国家重点研发计划项目(2024YFC3211202)
水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室开放基金项目(CKWV20241180/KY)

编辑: 刘运飞
PDF(2867 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉