基于现场模型试验的岩锚体锚碇变形破坏机理研究

周火明, 王中豪, 杨星宇, 郭喜峰, 樊宏伟, 王鹏宇, 李勇海

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 112-118.

PDF(1687 KB)
PDF(1687 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 112-118. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250821
岩土工程

基于现场模型试验的岩锚体锚碇变形破坏机理研究

作者信息 +

Deformation and Failure Mechanism of Rock Anchor Body Anchorage Based on Field Model Test

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为了探究岩锚体锚碇变形破坏机理,以西堠门公铁两用特大桥岩锚体锚碇为研究对象,在桥址区按1∶10比例建造4 m×6.2 m×4.84 m(长×宽×高)的岩锚体锚碇实体模型,施加载荷直至模型锚碇失稳破坏。加载过程中观测模型锚碇位移及破裂演进过程,结合数值模拟反演分析,研究超载作用下模型锚碇位移-破裂-整体失稳的变形破坏过程。载荷为1P时(P=3 243.46 kN)位移0.085 mm,后锚板上部岩体局部初始拉裂;超载至7P时位移3.63 mm,后缘拉裂面向地表扩展贯通,两侧侧裂面追踪陡倾节理面拉剪破坏贯通,底滑面受拉剪应力作用沿缓倾角节理开始剪切错动,形成整体失稳破坏的雏形;超载至9P时底滑面拉剪破裂贯通,至11P时模型锚碇整体失稳破坏。超载作用下,模型锚碇变形破坏受拉剪应力状态、岩体拉剪强度、节理产状等多因素影响和控制,概化为初始拉剪破裂阶段(0~1P)、拉剪破裂扩展贯通阶段(1P~7P)、追踪节理拉剪整体滑移失稳破坏阶段(7P~11P)的渐进破坏模式,具有明显的后缘岩体拉裂、侧裂面及底滑面追踪原生节理拉剪破裂的渐进破坏特征。

Abstract

[Objective] The aim of this study is to explore the deformation and failure mechanism of rock anchor body anchorage. [Methods] Engineering geological analysis, in-site rock anchor body anchorage entity model testing, and finite difference numerical simulation were adopted to systematically study the distribution of stress and deformation, rock mass fracture process, and failure mode of jointed rock mass rock anchor anchorage. The displacement and fracture evolution process of the model anchorage were observed during the loading process. Combined with numerical simulation inversion analysis, the deformation and failure mechanism of the model anchorage displacement-fracture-overall instability under overload was investigated. [Results] In-site entity model test results show that when the load is 1P (P=3 243.46 kN), the deformation of rear anchor plate is the largest, with a displacement of 0.085 mm, and the upper part of the rock mass of the rear anchor plate experiences local initial tensile cracking. When the overload reaches 7P, the displacement of the rear anchor plate is 3.63 mm, and the trailing edge tensile fracture surface extends and penetrates the surface. The two side fracture surfaces track the steeply inclined joint surface and undergo tensile shear failure. The deep rock mass at 5.7 m below the surface begins to undergo displacement deformation, and the bottom sliding surface is subjected to tensile shear stress and begins to shear along the gently inclined joint, forming the embryonic form of overall instability and failure. When overloaded to 9P, the displacement of the rear anchor plate is 8.73 mm, and the crack width of the trailing edge tensile fracture surface continues to increase. The crack width of the steeply inclined joint surface tensile shear failure on both sides continues to expand outward, and the bottom sliding surface tensile shear fracture penetrates. The deep rock deformation at a depth of 3.7 m below the surface reaches 0.8 mm. When overloaded to 11P, the displacement of the rear anchor plate was 22.013 mm, and the bottom sliding surface continued to expand and rupture due to tensile and shear stress. The deep rock mass below the surface of the ground had a displacement deformation of 8.5 mm, and the overall model anchorage was unstable and failed. The load displacement full process curve, tensile and shear stress distribution, and plastic zone development results revealed by numerical simulation of model anchor anchorage are in good agreement with the spatiotemporal relationship of overload rupture evolution in in-site entity model tests. [Conclusions] Under the action of overload, the deformation and failure of the model anchorage are affected and controlled by many factors including tensile shear stress state, tensile shear strength of rock mass, and joint occurrence. It is generalized into the initial tensile shear failure stage (0-1P), the tensile shear failure expansion and penetration stage (1P-7P), and the tracking joint tensile shear overall slip instability failure stage.

关键词

岩锚体锚碇 / 模型试验 / 变形破坏机理 / 拉剪破裂 / 渐进破坏

Key words

rock anchor body anchorage / entity model test / deformation and failure mechanism / tensile shear fracture / progressive destruction

引用本文

导出引用
周火明, 王中豪, 杨星宇, 等. 基于现场模型试验的岩锚体锚碇变形破坏机理研究[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(10): 112-118 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250821
ZHOU Huo-ming, WANG Zhong-hao, YANG Xing-yu, et al. Deformation and Failure Mechanism of Rock Anchor Body Anchorage Based on Field Model Test[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(10): 112-118 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250821
中图分类号: TU4 (土力学、地基基础工程)   

参考文献

[1]
夏才初, 程鸿鑫, 李荣强. 广东虎门大桥东锚碇现场结构模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1997, 16(6): 571-576.
(Xia Caichu, Cheng Hongxin, Li Rongqiang. Testing study on field structure model of the east anchorage of guangdong humen bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1997, 16(6): 571-576. (in Chinese))
[2]
汪海滨, 高波, 孙振. 悬索桥隧道式锚碇系统力学行为研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(15): 2728-2735.
(Wang Haibin, Gao Bo, Sun Zhen. Study on mechanical behaviour of tunnel anchorage system for suspension bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(15): 2728-2735. (in Chinese))
[3]
胡波, 曾钱帮, 饶旦, 等. 锚碇-围岩系统在拉剪复合应力条件下的变形规律及破坏机制研究: 以坝陵河特大岩锚悬索桥为例[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(4): 712-719.
(Hu Bo, Zeng Qianbang, Rao Dan, et al. Study on deformation law and failure mechanism of anchorage-surrounding rock system under tensile-shear complex stresses:taking super-large suspension bridge on baling river for example[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(4): 712-719. (in Chinese))
[4]
邬爱清, 彭元诚, 黄正加, 等. 超大跨度悬索桥隧道锚承载特性的岩石力学综合研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2010, 29(3): 433-441.
(Wu Aiqing, Peng Yuancheng, Huang Zhengjia, et al. Rock mechanics comprehensive study of bearing capacity characteristics of tunnel anchorage for super-large span suspension bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 29(3): 433-441. (in Chinese))
[5]
张奇华, 余美万, 喻正富, 等. 普立特大桥隧道锚现场模型试验研究: 抗拔能力试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(1): 93-103.
(Zhang Qihua, Yu Meiwan, Yu Zhengfu, et al. Field model tests on pullout capacity of tunnel-type anchorages of puli bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(1): 93-103. (in Chinese))
[6]
汤华, 熊晓荣, 吴振君, 等. 隧道锚抗拔作用机理的室内模型试验[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2015, 49(7): 935-939, 945.
(Tang Hua, Xiong Xiaorong, Wu Zhenjun, et al. Laboratory model test study of pullout mechanism of tunnel anchorage[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2015, 49(7): 935-939, 945. (in Chinese))
[7]
周火明, 李维树, 王帅, 等. 软岩隧道锚变形破坏机理缩尺模型试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2016, 33(10): 67-71.
摘要
为了研究软岩中隧道锚变形破坏机理及破坏模式,通过对隧道锚现场1∶10缩尺模型进行超载破坏试验,对加载过程中锚体模型的外观变形、内观变形、钻孔测斜以及破坏裂缝进行分析,获得了锚体模型在推力作用下载荷-变形全过程曲线以及变形破坏特征,并结合数值模拟的超载试验结果进行了综合分析。研究成果表明锚体模型变形破坏全过程类似于软岩载荷试验变形破坏3个阶段;锚塞体底部与岩体接触面部位受拉剪破坏形成破坏底边界,锚塞体上方岩体受锚塞体向上挤压形成纵向拉裂缝以及与锚塞体成约45°夹角的剪裂缝。隧道锚极限承载能力主要取决于锚塞体底界面以及上部岩体抗拉能力和抗剪能力。
(Zhou Huoming, Li Weishu, Wang Shuai, et al. Scale Model Test on the deformation and failure mechanism of tunnel-type anchorage surrounded by soft rock[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2016, 33(10): 67-71. (in Chinese))
To study the failure mechanism and failure mode of tunnel-type anchorage at soft rocks, overloading failure test was conducted through 1∶10 scale field model of tunnel-type anchorage. The surface deformation and internal deformation, the results of borehole inclinometers and the cracks of tunnel-type anchorage model in the overloading process were analyzed. The deformation-load curve and the characteristics of deformation failure of tunnel-type anchorage model under thrust were obtained. Furthermore, the results were comprehensively analyzed in association with numerical simulation results. Research results showed that: similar with the deformation failure of soft rock under loading test, the whole process of the deformation failure of tunnel-type anchorage model experienced three stages. Destructive bottom boundary was formed by tension-shear between the bottom of anchorage and contact area of rocks. Due to upward extrusion, longitudinal tensile cracks of rocks above the anchorage and shear fractures with angle of about 45 degrees to the anchorage were formed. The ultimate bearing capacity of tunnel-type anchorage is mainly decided by the tensile capacity and shear capacity of rocks on the bottom boundary and top of the anchorage.
[8]
蒋昱州, 王瑞红, 朱杰兵, 等. 伍家岗大桥隧道锚三维地质力学模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(增刊2): 4103-4113.
(Jiang Yuzhou, Wang Ruihong, Zhu Jiebing, et al. Experimental study on three-dimensional geomechanical model of tunnel anchor of wujiagang bridge[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 35(S2): 4103-4113. (in Chinese))
[9]
刘新荣, 韩亚峰, 周小涵, 等. 软岩隧道锚渐进破坏演化特征的模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(9):1760-1770.
(Liu Xinrong, Han Yafeng, Zhou Xiaohan, et al. Model test on the progressive failure characteristics of tunnel-type anchorage in soft rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(9):1760-1770. (in Chinese))
[10]
王东英, 汤华, 尹小涛, 等. 基于应变软化的隧道锚渐进破坏过程探究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(增刊2): 3448-3459.
(Wang Dongying, Tang Hua, Yin Xiaotao, et al. Study on progressive failure process of tunnel anchor based on strain softening[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(S2): 3448-3459. (in Chinese))
[11]
An I, Kim K, Park K, et al. The design of rock anchored anchorage of suspension bridge[C]// Korean Geographical Society. Proceedings of KGS Fall National Conference, Gwangju,Korean, October 10-11, 2008:629-640.
[12]
Hong E. Numerical study on pull-out behaviour of cavern-type rock anchorages[J]. Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, 2014, 16(6):521-531.
[13]
Yang E, Choi Y, Choi K, et al. A study on the physical behavior and the applicability of rock anchorage system of a suspension bridge in domestic island[J]. Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 2021, 37(2): 33-48.
[14]
严爱国, 樊少彻, 王鹏宇, 等. 西堠门公铁两用大桥岩锚锚碇承载特性研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2023(3): 33-39.
(Yan Aiguo, Fan Shaoche, Wang Pengyu, et al. Research on load bearing behavior of rock anchorage of xihoumen rail-cum-road bridge[J]. Bridge Construction, 2023(3): 33-39. (in Chinese))

基金

中国国家铁路集团有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(P2022G054)

编辑: 占学军
PDF(1687 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉