四面体透水框架水力特性研究进展

邱名松, 丁兵, 闵凤阳, 曹忞祎, 王继保

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 17-23.

PDF(1286 KB)
PDF(1286 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 17-23. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250804
河湖保护与治理

四面体透水框架水力特性研究进展

作者信息 +

Advances in the Study of Hydraulic Characteristics of Tetrahedral Permeable Frames

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

河道护岸是维持河道岸坡稳定的重要手段,四面体透水框架因其良好的扰流减速、促淤护岸和生态性能,受到许多学者的关注。回顾了四面体透水框架水力特性相关成果,通过梳理其结构特征,结合试验与观测数据,分析其减速促淤机理,系统总结架空率、杆件长宽比等参数对流速、紊动强度及雷诺应力的影响规律。研究结果表明,四面体透水框架可使减速率达30%~70%,能有效扰流减速、促淤护岸;四面体透水框架在架空率4.5~5.0、杆件长宽比为16左右时效果最优。此外,四面体透水框架“尖头迎流”布置减速效果要优于“钝头迎流”。在此基础上,分析了目前相关研究中的不足之处,并提出未来研究的方向,旨在为相关河道整治工程提供理论依据与实践参考。

Abstract

[Objective] Tetrahedral permeable frames exhibit prominent advantages in flow dissipation, velocity reduction, sediment promotion and ecological conservation. Existing research concerning its hydraulic characteristics remain scattered, lacking systematic collation of action mechanisms, quantitative parametric laws and practical engineering references. This study aims to sort out research advances on tetrahedral permeable frames in China and abroad, reveal its flow-decelerating and sediment-promoting mechanisms, summarize the quantitative influence of key structural and layout parameters on local hydrodynamic behaviours, identify existing research gaps, and propose prospective research directions. It intends to provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the optimisation design and popularisation application of tetrahedral permeable frames in riverbank-protection regulation. [Methods] This paper adopts a literature-review approach. By examining the structural features and integrating experimental and observational data, the mechanisms behind flow reduction and sediment promotion are reviewed. The influence of parameters such as void ratio and the length-to-width ratio of frame members on flow velocity, turbulence intensity, and Reynolds stress is systematically summarized. [Results and Conclusion] (1) Mechanism: tetrahedral permeable frames realise flow deceleration and sediment promotion through micro-scale vortex disturbance of frame members and macro-scale flow-field reconstruction, which serves as an eco-friendly alternative and supplement for traditional riprap revetment rather than a complete replacement. Tetrahedral permeable frames can achieve a velocity reduction rate of 30%-70%, effectively disturbing flow, decelerating currents, promoting sedimentation, and protecting banks. Inside the frames, time-averaged flow velocity decreases significantly and presents an S-shaped vertical distribution; turbulence intensity and Reynolds stress rise notably inside frames and in the wake zone, achieving efficient energy dissipation. (2) Optimization parameters: key structural parameters and layout modes exert decisive influences on its anti-scour and sediment-promoting performances. Optimal performance is achieved when the void ratio ranges between 4.5 and 5.0 and the length-to-width ratio of the members is approximately 16. The pointed-end-toward-flow layout yields better velocity-reduction effects than the blunt-end-toward-flow pattern. Prototype projects demonstrate that sediment-deposition thickness can reach 1.2-1.8 m after frame-group implementation, effectively converting erosion-prone concave banks into deposition-favoured zones. Compared with conventional riprap revetment, tetrahedral permeable frames show superior structural stability and favourable economic benefits. (3) Current limitations: current studies are mostly based on laboratory flume tests under constant flow and uniform sediment conditions; high-resolution measurement of transient three-dimensional vortex structures is insufficient, and long-period prototype monitoring data and full-life-cycle stability analysis remain scarce. (4) Future research directions: future work should strengthen the joint research of laboratory experiments, high-fidelity numerical simulation represented by LES and DNS, and long-term prototype observation. It is necessary to carry out quantitative research on sediment transport and deposition rules under complex non-uniform sediment and unsteady flood conditions, and establish an assessment framework for long-term service stability considering scour, abrasion and structural degradation.

关键词

四面体透水框架 / 水力特性 / 扰流减速 / 促淤护岸

Key words

tetrahedral permeable frame / hydraulic characteristics / flow retardation / sediment deposition and bank protection

引用本文

导出引用
邱名松, 丁兵, 闵凤阳, 等. 四面体透水框架水力特性研究进展[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(10): 17-23 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250804
QIU Ming-song, DING Bing, MIN Feng-yang, et al. Advances in the Study of Hydraulic Characteristics of Tetrahedral Permeable Frames[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(10): 17-23 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250804
中图分类号: TV85 (治河方法(河道整治))   

参考文献

[1]
Chiew Y M, Lim S Y. Protection of bridge piers using a sacrificial sill[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineering,Water & Martine Engineering, 2003, 156(1):53-62.
[2]
Chiew Y M. Mechanics of riprap failure at bridge piers[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1995, 121(9):635-643.
[3]
Chiew Y M, Lim F H. Failure behavior of riprap layer at bridge piers under live-bed conditions[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2000, 126(1): 43-55.
[4]
Lauchlan C S, Melville B W. Riprap protection at bridge piers[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001, 127(5):412-418.
[5]
王南海, 张文捷, 王玢. 新型护岸技术: 四面六边透水框架群在长江护岸工程中的应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1999, 16(2): 11-16.
摘要
介绍一种新型护岸技术——四面六边透水框架群护岸。通过室内试验和工程现场试验,证实四面六边透水框架群有很好的消能、减速、缓冲、落淤作用,它可以改变江岸冲势为缓冲或淤势,保护了江岸, 可用于防止条崩的发生,亦可用于窝崩口的治理,是一项值得推广的护岸新技术。已成功地应用于长江护岸。
(Wang Nanhai, Zhang Wenjie, Wang Fen. Application of a new technology of bank protection Employing Tetrahedron-like penetrating frame groups in Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 1999, 16(2): 11-16. (in Chinese))
[6]
Posey C J. Test of scour protection at bridge piers[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004, 110(12):1173-1183.
[7]
Huai W X, Han J, Zeng Y H, et al. Velocity distribution of flow with submerged flexible vegetations based on mixing-length approach[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 2009, 30(3): 343-351.
[8]
徐锡荣, 唐洪武, 宗竞, 等. 长江南京河段护岸新技术探讨[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2004, 24(4):26-28,39.
(Xu Xirong, Tang Hongwu, Zong Jing, et al. New technique for bank protection on Nanjing reach of Yangtze River[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2004, 24(4):26-28,39. (in Chinese))
[9]
丁兵, 刘同宦, 雷文韬, 等. 四面六边透水框架防护层稳定性试验[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(2):251-256.
(Ding Bing, Liu Tonghuan, Lei Wentao, et al. Experimental research on stability of tetrahedral frames layer[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2015, 49(2): 251-256. (in Chinese))
[10]
周生利, 刘常全, 张俊. 混凝土四面六边透水框架结构在长江航道整治中的应用[J]. 水运工程, 2012(10): 102-106, 114.
(Zhou Shengli, Liu Changquan, Zhang Jun. Application of concrete tetrahedron permeable frame in the Yangtze River channel improvement[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2012(10): 102-106, 114. (in Chinese))
[11]
李若华, 王少东, 曾甄. 穿越四面六边透水框架群的水流阻力特性试验研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2005(10):64-66.
(Li Ruohua, Wang Shaodong, Zeng Zhen. Experimental study on the resistance characteristic of water flow through the permeable frames of tetrahedron with six sides[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2005(10):64-66. (in Chinese))
[12]
尚倩倩, 许慧, 李国斌, 等. 刚性透水结构作用下水流泥沙特性研究综述[J]. 水运工程, 2016(3): 95-101.
(Shang Qianqian, Xu Hui, Li Guobin, et al. Flow and sediment characteristics near rigid permeable structures[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2016(3): 95-101. (in Chinese))
[13]
朱昊, 王茂枚, 赵钢, 等. 长江老海坝段河床形态对抛石护岸的响应研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2022, 40(5): 118-122, 117.
(Zhu Hao, Wang Maomei, Zhao Gang, et al. Study on the Response of River Bed Morphology to Riprap Revetment in the Laohaiba reach of the Yangtze River[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2022, 40(5): 118-122, 117. (in Chinese))
[14]
李最森, 唐洪武, 戴文鸿. 透水四面体框架群防护特性及其与抛石防护的对比研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 2011, 36(6): 75-80.
(Li Zuisen, Tang Hongwu, Dai Wenhong. Case study of protective effects of ripraps or tetrahedron frame group with different densities on local scour around a pier[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2011, 36(6): 75-80. (in Chinese))
Color variations (orange zones within buff-colored till) in drift in east-central North Dakota are believed to represent two tills of separate origin. Mean size, standard deviation, and number and type of pebbles show greater difference between the two tills than do skewness, kurtosis, and partial chemical analyses. Probably blocks of older till were moved by the last glacier crossing the area and were redeposited in a matrix of younger till.
[15]
丁兵. 四面体透水框架群防护冲刷机理及自身稳定性研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2011.
(Ding Bing.Study on scour protection mechanism and self-stability of tetrahedral-hexahedral permeable frame groups[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2011. (in Chinese))
[16]
刘刚. 透水框架体水流特性及护岸应用试验研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2006.
(Liu Gang. Experimental study on flow characteristics and revetment applications of permeable frames[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2006. (in Chinese))
[17]
张爱社, 张陵. 等边布置三圆柱绕流的数值分析[J]. 应用力学学报, 2003, 20(1):31-36,159.
(Zhang Aishe, Zhang Ling. Numerical simulation of three equispaced circular cylinders[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2003, 20(1):31-36,159. (in Chinese))
[18]
顾志福, 孙天风. 三圆柱绕流的实验研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2000, 18(4): 441-447.
(Gu Zhifu, Sun Tianfeng. Experimental research on flow around three circular cylinders[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2000, 18(4): 441-447. (in Chinese))
[19]
张文捷, 王南海, 王玢, 等. 四面六边透水框架群用于长江护岸固脚工程实例及设计要点[J]. 江西水利科技, 2002, 28(1):11-16.
(Zhang Wenjie, Wang Nanhai, Wang Fen, et al. The engineering examples and the design key of triangular taper penetrating frames used in the bank protection of Changjiang river[J]. Jiangxi Hydraulic Science & Technology, 2002, 28(1):11-16. (in Chinese))
[20]
徐锡荣, 刘刚, 徐松年, 等. 透水框架四面体防洪护岸试验研究[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2007, 27(5): 65-68.
(Xu Xirong, Liu Gang, Xu Songnian, et al. Experimental study on flood control and bank protection by tetrahedron permeable frames[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2007, 27(5): 65-68. (in Chinese))
[21]
唐洪武, 李福田, 肖洋, 等. 四面体框架群护岸型式防冲促淤效果试验研究[J]. 水运工程, 2002(9): 25-28.
(Tang Hongwu, Li Futian, Xiao Yang, et al. Experimental study on effect of scour prevention and sedimentation promotion of bank protection of tetrahedron penetrating frame groups[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2002(9): 25-28. (in Chinese))
[22]
李晶, 喻涛, 王平义. 四面六边透水框架构筑心滩防护工程清水冲刷试验研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2014, 12(4):50-54,65.
(Li Jing, Yu Tao, Wang Pingyi. Scouring experiment research on diara protective constructions: permeable six-sided tetrahedron frame groups[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, 2014, 12(4):50-54,65. (in Chinese))
[23]
吴龙华. 透空四面体(群)尾流水力特性及应用研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2006.
(Wu Longhua. Study on hydraulic characteristics of wake stream of permeable tetrahedron(s) and application[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2006. (in Chinese))
[24]
李若华, 周春天, 严忠民. 四面六边透水框架群减速效果的优化研究[J]. 水利水电快报, 2003, 24(11): 13-15.
(Li Ruohua, Zhou Chuntian, Yan Zhongmin. Study on optimization of deceleration effect of four-sided hexagonal permeable frame group[J]. Express Water Resources & Hydropower Information, 2003, 24(11): 13-15. (in Chinese))
[25]
吴龙华, 周春天, 严忠民, 等. 架空率、杆件长宽比对四面六边透水框架群减速促淤效果的影响[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2003(3):74-77.
(Wu Longhua, Zhou Chuntian, Yan Zhongmin, et al. Effects of overhead ratio and pole’s length-width ratio on deceleration and accretion promotion of tetrahedron-like penetrating frames[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2003(3):74-77. (in Chinese))
[26]
余新明. 透水框架群水力特性试验研究[J]. 水运工程, 2014(1):117-122.
(Yu Xinming. Experimental study on hydraulic characteristics of penetrating frame groups[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2014(1):117-122. (in Chinese))
[27]
李若华. 空心四面体框架群减速特性研究[D]. 南京: 河海大学, 2004.
(Li Ruohua. Study on flow deceleration through frames made of hollow tetrahedron[D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, 2004. (in Chinese))
[28]
王军, 张伟, 陈丹. 四面体透水框架附近流场水力特性研究[J]. 中国水运(下半月), 2016, 16(1): 180-181.
(Wang Jun, Zhang Wei, Chen Dan. Study on hydraulic characteristics of flow field near tetrahedral permeable frame[J]. China Water Transport, 2016, 16(1): 180-181. (in Chinese))
[29]
周根娣, 顾正华, 高柱, 等. 四面六边透水框架尾流场水力特性[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2005, 22(3): 9-12.
摘要
采用声学多普勒流速仪(ADV)自动测量分析系统,测量了水槽中四面六边透水框架和四面六边实体块尾流场的流速垂线分布和紊动量垂线分布,对比研究了两者的水流结构和防护机理。采用动量积分的方法,计算了四面六边透水框架绕流体的阻力,研究表明,在一定雷诺数范围内,四面六边透水框架的阻力大小开始随着雷诺数的增大而增大,当达到一个峰值后,又逐渐趋于一个常数值。
(Zhou Gendi, Gu Zhenghua, Gao Zhu, et al. Hydraulic characteristics of tetrahedron-like penetrating frame wake[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2005, 22(3): 9-12. (in Chinese))
[30]
刘莉莉, 刘洪言. 一种新型护岸构件-透水框架在长江干堤护岸的应用[J]. 湖南水利水电, 2000(6): 32.
(Liu Lili, Liu Hongyan. Application of a new revetment component-permeable frame in revetment of Yangtze River trunk dike[J]. Hunan Hydro & Power, 2000(6): 32. (in Chinese))

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YEC3202601)
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(CKSF2024326/HL)

编辑: 罗玉兰
PDF(1286 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉