黏弹性管道瞬变流计算方法及预测模拟

张小莹, 雷玲通, 王义淞, 王超

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 105-111.

PDF(5344 KB)
PDF(5344 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 105-111. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250656
水力学

黏弹性管道瞬变流计算方法及预测模拟

作者信息 +

Calculation Method and Prediction Simulation of Transient Flow in Viscoelastic Pipeline

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

针对黏弹性管道水锤压力精准计算问题,基于有机玻璃管水锤压力试验数据进行分析,并结合黏弹性管材的蠕变特性,对经典黏弹性理论水锤压力计算公式进行修正,构建适用于黏弹性管道的水锤压力计算公式。基于修正后的水锤压力计算公式,利用反向传播(BP)神经网络的非线性拟合功能,预测了同类型管材的水锤压力。研究结果表明:黏弹性管道水锤压力与阀门关闭时间呈反向变化,关阀时间越短,产生的水锤压力值越大;修正后的黏弹性水锤压力公式计算值与试验值的最大误差仅为3.3%,显著优于传统黏弹性理论模型,神经网络预测结果与拟合公式计算结果误差为1%~4%;提出的数值模拟方法可为黏弹性管道工程水锤风险评估提供可靠的参考依据。

Abstract

[Objective] The water hammer pressure in pipeline systems is a key factor that endangers the safe and stable operation of the system. Especially for the viscoelastic pipes, their time-dependent mechanical behavior makes the analysis and calculation of water hammer pressure more complicated. This study aims to 1) explore the direct water hammer pressure response characteristics of viscoelastic pipes under rapid valve closing by combining experiment and theory, 2) modify the existing theoretical calculation model, and introduce an intelligent algorithm to predict the pressure, and 3) finally to establish a more accurate and practical calculation method for water hammer pressure in viscoelastic pipes. [Methods] The classical Joukowsky formula for direct water hammer pressure was modified and the creep compliance function of pipeline was introduced to derive the direct water hammer pressure calculation formula suitable for viscoelastic pipelines. The formula was then modified by using experimental data. Based on the modified pressure rise formula, the nonlinear fitting function of a backpropagation (BP) neural network was used to predict the direct water hammer pressure rise value of the same type of pipe with the valve closing time, initial flow rate and pipeline material parameters as input features and the peak value of water hammer pressure as the output target, and an intelligent prediction model of direct water hammer pressure in viscoelastic pipeline was established. [Results] In viscoelastic pipes, the shorter the valve closing time, the greater the water hammer pressure value. The delayed strain of viscoelastic material was introduced into the viscoelastic calculation formula. The mechanical response of the pipe wall included two parts: instantaneous elastic strain and delayed strain, resulting in a higher peak value of water hammer pressure, which made the calculated value of the viscoelastic water hammer pressure formula higher than that of the classical water hammer pressure formula. The calculation results showed that the classical elastic theory was no longer suitable for the calculation of direct water hammer pressure in viscoelastic pipelines. The comparison showed that the maximum error between the calculated value and the measured value of the modified formula was small under all test conditions, indicating that the proposed modified formula could better characterize the direct water hammer pressure in viscoelastic pipeline. In the BP neural network prediction model, the prediction results were compared with the calculation results of the modified viscoelastic pipe direct water hammer pressure calculation formula, and it was found that the error between the two was kept in the range of 1% to 4%. [Conclusion] In the water hammer test of PMMA pipeline, the deviation between the calculation results of classical viscoelastic water hammer pressure rise formula and the measured values is large, with a maximum deviation of 15.1%. Based on the viscoelastic theory derivation and experimental data fitting, a modified direct water hammer pressure calculation formula is proposed, which effectively characterizes the influence of pipe viscoelasticity and valve operation rate on the pressure peak. Verification shows that the maximum error of the calculation is only 3.3%, which is significantly better than the classical elastic theory. Furthermore, a hybrid prediction method combining theoretical model and BP neural network is constructed in this study. The theoretical formula is embedded in the network structure, and the prediction error of pressure peak is controlled within 0.1 m under various flow velocity conditions, showing good accuracy, reliability, and adaptability to working conditions. This provides a feasible reference method for pressure prediction and water hammer risk assessment in engineering practice.

关键词

水锤压力 / 蠕变特性 / 黏弹性管道 / BP神经网络 / 压力预测

Key words

water hammer pressure / creep characteristics / viscoelastic pipeline / BP neural network / pressure prediction

引用本文

导出引用
张小莹, 雷玲通, 王义淞, . 黏弹性管道瞬变流计算方法及预测模拟[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(8): 105-111 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250656
ZHANG Xiao-ying, LEI Ling-tong, WANG Yi-song, et al. Calculation Method and Prediction Simulation of Transient Flow in Viscoelastic Pipeline[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(8): 105-111 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250656
中图分类号: TV134.1 (有压管道非恒定流)   

参考文献

[1]
张小莹, 边少康, 冯梦雪, 等. 有机玻璃管道直接水锤压力特性试验研究[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2024, 42(1): 37-42.
(Zhang Xiaoying, Bian Shaokang, Feng Mengxue, et al. Experimental Study on Direct Water Hammer Pressure Characteristics in PMMA Pipelines[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2024, 42(1): 37-42. (in Chinese))
[2]
姜博浩. 基于水力瞬变分析的黏弹性管道本构参数辨识[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019.
(Jiang Bohao. Identification of Constitutive Parameters of Viscoelastic Pipeline Based on Hydraulic Transient Analysis[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese))
[3]
边少康, 张小莹, 李刚, 等. 重力流关阀规律及空气阀优化研究[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2025(1): 55-61.
(Bian Shaokang, Zhang Xiaoying, Li Gang, et al. Study on Valve-closure Law of Gravity Flow and Optimization of Air Valve[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2025(1): 55-61. (in Chinese))
[4]
梁欢. 基于准二维模型的黏弹性管道瞬变压力波动分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.
(Liang Huan. Transient Pressure Analysis of Viscoelastic Pipe Based on Quasi-2D Model[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020. (in Chinese))
[5]
Julian R, Dragna D, Ollivier S, et al. Rational Approximation of Unsteady Friction Weighting Functions in the Laplace Domain[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2021, 147(9): 04021031.
[6]
Fox G L Jr, Stepnewski D D. Pressure Wave Transmission in A Fluid Contained in a Plastically Deforming Pipe[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1974, 96(4):258-262.
[7]
Andrade D M, de Freitas Rachid F B, Tijsseling A S. Fluid Transients in Viscoelastic Pipes via an Internal Variable Constitutive Theory[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2023, 114: 846-869.
[8]
朱炎, 吴晨光, 袁一星, 等. 黏弹性输水管道中含气瞬变流压力衰减分析[J]. 水利学报, 2018, 49(3): 303-312.
(Zhu Yan, Wu Chenguang, Yuan Yixing, et al. Analysis of Pressure Damping in Air-water Transient Flow in Viscoelastic Pipes[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2018, 49(3): 303-312. (in Chinese))
[9]
Pan B, Duan H F, Meniconi S, et al. Multistage Frequency-domain Transient-based Method for the Analysis of Viscoelastic Parameters of Plastic Pipes[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 146(3): 04019068.
[10]
Ghodhbani A, Haj Taïeb E, Akrout M, et al. One-dimen-sional transient flow in pipelines modelling and simulation[M]. UAE: Bentham Science Publishers, 2023.
[11]
Sun Q, Wang X, Wu Y, et al. Sensitivity of Creep Parameters to Pressure Fluctuation of Transient Flow in Viscoelastic Pipes[J]. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2024, 26(7): 1753-1770.
[12]
Ramos H, Covas D, Borga A, et al. Surge Damping Analysis in Pipe Systems: Modelling and Experiments[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2004, 42(4): 413-425.
[13]
Covas D, Stoianov I, Mano J F, et al. The Dynamic Effect of Pipe-wall Viscoelasticity in Hydraulic Transients. Part II-Model Development, Calibration and Verification[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2005, 43(1): 56-70.
[14]
Rieutord E. Transient Response of Fluid Viscoelastic Lines[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1982, 104(3): 335-341.
[15]
Gally M, Gu¨ney M, Rieutord E. An Investigation of Pressure Transients in Viscoelastic Pipes[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1979, 101(4): 495-499.
[16]
Firuz J R, Sabagh Yazdi S R, et al. Numerical Methods of Visco-elastic Segments on Water Hammer Pressures[J]. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 2020, 4(4): 49-57.
[17]
Keramat A, Haghighi A. Straightforward Transient-based Approach for the Creep Function Determination in Viscoelastic Pipes[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014, 140(12): 04014058.
[18]
Wineman A S, Rajagopal K R. Mechanical Response of Polymers[M]. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[19]
Zhang X, Bian S, Wang H, et al. Effects of Valve Opening on Direct Water Hammer Pressure Characteristics in PMMA Pipelines[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 408.
[20]
王发刚, 邹平, 王忠康, 等. 基于GA-BP神经网络边坡稳定性预测的方法及应用[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2024, 20(6):161-167.
(Wang Fagang, Zhou Ping, Wang ZHongkang, et al. Method and Application of Slope Stability Prediction Based on GA-BP Neural Network[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology. 2024, 20(6):161-167. (in Chinese))

基金

国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(52509132)
天山英才培养计划青年托举人才项目(2023TSYCQNTJ0014)

编辑: 任坤杰
PDF(5344 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/