PDF(4034 KB)
基于CSLE模型的皖南丰乐河流域茶园土壤侵蚀特征分析
许静, 彭鹏, 刘乐, 李郑, 段俊斌, 施成艳, 杨娟, 汪燕
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 123-134.
PDF(4034 KB)
PDF(4034 KB)
基于CSLE模型的皖南丰乐河流域茶园土壤侵蚀特征分析
Soil Erosion Characteristics of Tea Plantations in Fengle River Basin of South Anhui Based on Chinese Soil Loss Equation Model
探究皖南丘陵区丰乐河流域大规模茶园种植区土壤侵蚀状况,可为茶园水土流失防治提供决策参考。基于中国土壤流失方程(CSLE)模型分析丰乐河流域茶园土壤侵蚀特征,以及地形坡度和土壤类型对土壤侵蚀的影响。结果表明:①丰乐河流域茶园2022年平均土壤侵蚀模数为9 621.59 t/(km2·a);茶园土壤侵蚀面积27.76 km2,占茶园面积的68.19%,占流域总土壤侵蚀面积的12.55%,轻度侵蚀面积占比为47.14%;土壤侵蚀强度整体呈北高南低的空间分布特征。②茶园土壤侵蚀主要分布在高程[200,500)m以及坡度[25°,35°]的坡面。③茶园平均土壤侵蚀模数呈石质土>粗骨土>黄壤>红壤>水稻土>紫色土的特征,土壤侵蚀面积呈红壤>粗骨土>水稻土>黄壤>紫色土>石质土的特征。④综合地形坡度和土壤类型对茶园土壤侵蚀的影响,属于剧烈侵蚀强度的为坡度[25°,35°]的粗骨土、坡度[25°,35°]的石质土和坡度>35°的紫色土条件下的茶园。土壤侵蚀面积前三位的茶园为坡度>35°的红壤茶园、坡度[25°,35°]的红壤茶园和坡度[15°,25°)的红壤茶园。丰乐河流域茶园土壤侵蚀情况较为突出,高陡茶园面积较广、水土保持措施不完善,是今后防治茶园土壤侵蚀及促进茶园产业可持续发展的重点区域。
[Objective] This study represents the first systematic quantification of soil erosion in large-scale tea plantations within the hilly region of southern Anhui Province, aiming to provide critical insights for soil and water conservation strategies. [Methods] We built a comprehensive soil erosion factor dataset through integration of field-measured soil parameters and multi-source geospatial data. Based on the CSLE (Chinese Soil Loss Equation) model, we analyzed the characteristics of soil erosion in tea plantations and evaluated the influences of topography and soil types in Fengle River Basin. [Results] (1) The 2022 average soil erosion modulus of Fengle River Basin was 2 953.24 t/(km2·a), with 43.02% of the watershed area experiencing erosion. The area of soil erosion was mainly classified as mild erosion and decreased with increasing erosion intensity. The overall soil erosion intensity exhibited a spatial pattern of higher values in the northwest and lower values in the southeast. (2) Tea plantations exhibited an average soil erosion modulus of 9 621.59 t/(km2·a). The soil erosion area in tea plantations covered 27.76 km2, accounting for 68.19% of the total tea plantations and 12.55% of the basin’s total erosion area. Among the eroded tea plantations, mild erosion accounted for 47.14%. The area of soil erosion in tea plantations gradually decreases with the increase of erosion intensity level. The overall spatial distribution of soil erosion intensity revealed higher erosion levels in the northern regions and lower levels in the southern regions. (3) Average erosion modules exhibited a unimodal relationship with elevation, peaking at 500-1 000 m. The proportion of soil erosion area in tea plantations at altitudes of 200-500 m reached 75.81%, followed by the 500-1 000 m zone, with minimal loss in other altitude ranges. Regarding slope changes, the average soil erosion modulus and erosion area of tea plantations in Fengle River Basin both exhibited increasing trends with slope, reaching maximum values at slopes of 25°-35°, and then slightly decreasing at slopes above 35°. Tea plantations in slope zones above 25° accounted for 75.44% of the total erosion area, classified as having extremely intense erosion intensity, with severe forms of soil loss. (4) The average soil erosion modulus of tea plantations ranked: litho soils > skeletal soils > yellow earths > red earths > paddy soils > purplish soils. Erosion area of tea plantations distribution followed: red earths > skeletal soil > paddy soil > yellow earths > purplish soils > litho soils. (5) Combining topography and soil impacts, in terms of average soil erosion modulus, severe erosion combinations included skeletal soil with slope 25°-35°, limestone soil with slope 25°-35°, and purple soil with slope >35°. There were 12 extremely intense, 4 intense, and 5 moderate erosion combinations. The top three erosion contributors were red earths with slope >35°,red earths with slope 25°-35° ,and red earths with slope 15°-25° , accounting for 69.92% of the total erosion area in tea plantations. Other combination conditions had a minimal erosion area. [Conclusion] Fengle River Basin is characterized by pronounced soil erosion factors, including high rainfall erosivity (R-factor), low vegetation coverage (C-factor), steep slope gradients (LS-factor), and poor soil erodibility (K-factor). Fengle River Basin’s tea plantations face serious soil erosion issues. Tea plantations are widely distributed on high and steep slopes, while soil and water conservation measures are limited. These regions are the key areas for preventing soil erosion and promoting sustainable development of the tea industry in the future.
土壤侵蚀 / CSLE模型 / 地形坡度 / 土壤类型 / 茶园 / 皖南 / 丰乐河流域
soil erosion / CSLE model / terrain slope / soil type / tea plantations / south Anhui / Fengle River Basin
| [1] |
王一峰, 屈丽琴, 李建明, 等. 基于近20年《中国水土保持公报》的水土流失治理分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(7): 59-65.
(
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
陈起伟, 熊康宁, 兰安军. 基于GIS技术的贵州省土壤侵蚀危险性评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(12):47-52,66.
(
|
| [4] |
陈硕, 赵文武. 中国干旱半干旱区1990—2020年土壤水蚀时空变化及动态驱动力[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025, 39(1): 10-20.
(
|
| [5] |
陈四宾, 霍艾迪, 陈思名, 等. 土壤侵蚀时空分布规律及侵蚀热点分析: 以陕西省王益区为例[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(8): 50-57.
(
|
| [6] |
中华人民共和国水利部. 中国水土保持公报(2024年)[EB/OL].(2025-03-21)[2025-03-26].
(Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. China Soil and Water Conservation Bulletin(2024)[EB/OL].(2025-03-21) (in Chinese))
|
| [7] |
鲍捷, 陆林, 凌善金, 等. 新安江流域旅游空间生产及其演化逻辑[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(10): 2609-2629.
(
|
| [8] |
安徽省水利厅. 安徽省水土保持公报(2023年)[EB/OL].(2024-07-15)[2025-03-26].
Department of Water Resources of Anhui Province. Anhui Province Soil and Water Conservation Bulletin (2023)[EB/OL].(2023-07-15) [2025-03-26]. (in Chinese))
|
| [9] |
马友华, 谢昕云, 马中文, 等. 安徽省园地氮磷径流流失[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(3): 12-17.
(
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
陈俞池, 何源,
(
|
| [14] |
郭伟玲, 徐刘洋, 贾纪昂, 等. 耦合PLUS-CSLE模型预测淮河流域多情景土地利用变化与土壤侵蚀[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(6):234-243,252.
(
|
| [15] |
李澳, 于志静, 王德富, 等. 黄土高原地区水土流失对土地利用和降水变化的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(4):95-102,113.
(
|
| [16] |
许长安, 王乃举. 基于RUSLE和地理探测器的皖南地区土壤侵蚀时空分异及定量归因[J]. 水土保持研究, 2025, 32(1): 21-29.
(
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
叶宏萌, 华伟平, 吴星怡, 等. 土地利用对红壤丘陵区小流域土壤侵蚀和养分流失的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2022, 41(12): 4154-4164.
(
|
| [21] |
刘岑薇, 张燕, 陈锦辉, 等. 南方山地茶园小流域径流演变规律[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(7): 85-89.
(
|
| [22] |
林子墨, 王纪杰, 唐张轩, 等. 红壤丘陵区种植茶树和柑橘对土壤肥力和水土流失的影响[J]. 福建农业科技, 2024, 55(9): 17-22.
(
|
| [23] |
廖承彬, 魏天儒. 红壤坡地不同树种林下水土流失特征研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2013, 33(2): 198-202.
(
|
| [24] |
黄昱楠, 齐斐, 袁利, 等. 大别山北麓林地与园地土壤侵蚀空间分异及驱动分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2025, 23(1): 51-61.
(
|
| [25] |
王甜. 三峡库区柑橘园和茶园土壤氮磷流失过程研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2022.
(
|
| [26] |
席运官, 陈瑞冰, 李国平, 等. 太湖流域坡地茶园径流流失规律[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2010, 26(4):381-385.
(
|
| [27] |
纪昕雨, 于悦, 张思帆, 等. 基于CSLE模型的大连市果园土壤侵蚀特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 117-124.
(
|
| [28] |
徐少杰, 邓良, 赵明松, 等. 安徽省1980—2020年土壤侵蚀时空变化特征[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(1): 109-116.
(
|
| [29] |
李忠武, 李嘉奇, 王凌霞, 等. 基于CSLE-TLSD耦合模型的近40年洞庭湖流域土壤侵蚀时空分异及归因分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(5): 207-214, 266.
(
|
| [30] |
吴思颖, 汪小钦, 曾舒娇, 等. 基于CSLE的安溪县土壤侵蚀估算与分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(4):112-121.
(
|
| [31] |
陈镇远. 徽州区丰乐河流域土壤重金属的分布、来源和风险评估[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2023.
(
|
| [32] |
刘宝元, 谢云, 张科利. 土壤侵蚀预报模型[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2001.
(
|
| [33] |
鲁向晖, 张海娜, 白桦, 等. 赣江流域1986—2015年降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(10): 51-58.
(
|
| [34] |
水利部水土保持监测中心. 区域土壤侵蚀动态监测技术规定(试行)[EB/OL].(2018-08-13) [2025-03-26].
Soil and Water Conservation Monitoring Center, Ministry of Water Resources. Technical Provisions for Dynamic Monitoring of Regional Soil Erosion (Trial)[EB/OL].(2018-08-13) [2025-03-26]. (in Chinese))
|
| [35] |
殷水清, 章文波, 谢云, 等. 基于高密度站网的中国降雨侵蚀力空间分布[J]. 中国水土保持, 2013(10):45-51.
(
|
| [36] |
陈锐银, 严冬春, 文安邦, 等. 基于GIS/CSLE的四川省水土流失重点防治区土壤侵蚀研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(1):17-26.
(
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
许文盛, 谷金钰, 孙宝洋, 等. 全坡面水土流失时空分异规律及观测技术研究进展[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(6): 77-85.
(
|
| [39] |
《第一次全国水利普查成果丛书》编委会. 水土保持情况普查报告[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2017.
(Editorial Committee of the Series of Reports on the First National Water Conservancy Census. Report on the Census of Soil and Water Conservation[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2017.(in Chinese))
|
| [40] |
符素华, 刘宝元, 周贵云, 等. 坡长坡度因子计算工具[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(5):105-110.
(
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
何源, 陈俞池,
(
|
| [46] |
齐述华, 蒋梅鑫, 于秀波. 基于遥感和ULSE模型评价1995—2005年江西土壤侵蚀[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011, 31(7):1197-1203.
(
|
| [47] |
王秀艳, 郭兵, 姜琳. 基于USLE、GIS、RS的流域土壤侵蚀研究进展[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2012, 24(1): 42-48.
(
|
| [48] |
肖粤新, 孙泽龙, 闵英姿, 等. 皖南山区1990—2020年间土壤侵蚀特征及影响因素[J]. 现代地质, 2025, 39(2): 478-494.
(
|
| [49] |
SL 190—2007, 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S].
(SL190—2007,StandardsforClassificationandGradationofSoilErosion[S].(in Chinese))
|
| [50] |
刘纪根, 丁文峰, 黄金权. 长江流域水土保持科学研究进展及展望[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(10): 54-59.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |