人类活动下吉泰盆地典型流域水文干旱多要素响应特征

孙可可, 姚立强, 刘雁翼, 张秀平, 吴涛

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 32-41.

PDF(1738 KB)
PDF(1738 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 32-41. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250384
水资源

人类活动下吉泰盆地典型流域水文干旱多要素响应特征

作者信息 +

Responses of Multiple Elements to Hydrological Drought Driven by Human Activities in Typical Watersheds of Jitai Basin

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在气候变化与高强度人类活动交互作用下,吉泰盆地水文干旱演变机制呈现显著阶段性差异。基于1959—2023年数据,通过Pettitt检验划分基准期、过渡期和变化期,结合改进的两参数月水量平衡模型,剖析不同阶段干旱特征及多种驱动要素的差异化影响。结果表明:蜀水、乌江、同江典型流域在1980年、2008年前后产流机制发生转折,径流系数α 在过渡期显著增加后,变化期回落。过渡期干旱烈度和历时较基准期明显下降,变化期则反弹,3个典型流域平均干旱烈度较过渡期分别增加46.2%、26.9%和25.9%。夏秋高温少雨是吉泰盆地水文干旱的重要驱动因素,其与干旱烈度的敏感性较强,期间降水每减少10%,干旱烈度值增加0.14~0.23,存在边际递减效应。然而,与基准期相比,变化期人类活动影响占主导作用,其导致径流深和干旱烈度变化幅度超过气候变化因素。研究构建的多阶段驱动因子量化方法,揭示了不同要素对水文干旱烈度的非线性调控作用,可为吉泰盆地干旱预警及长期趋势预测提供参考。

Abstract

[Objective] This study aims to investigate the differentiated effects of various driving factors on the stage-specific characteristics of hydrological drought in the Jitai Basin under the influence of climate change and intensive human activities. [Methods] We collected meteorological and hydrological data from 1959 to 2023 from three typical watersheds (the Shushui, Wujiang, and Tongjiang Rivers) in the Jitai Basin, and adopted the Pettitt test to divide the study period into a baseline period, a transition period, and a change period. By using the improved two-parameter monthly water balance model, we analyzed the drought characteristics and the quantitative effects of driving factors in each stage, and clarified the dominant role of different driving factors as well as their nonlinear regulation mechanisms. [Results] 1) The runoff generation mechanisms of the three typical watersheds shifted around 1980 and 2008. Specifically, in baseline period (1959-1980), the underlying surface conditions of the watersheds were relatively stable, hydrological processes were dominated by natural climate drivers, and runoff variations were directly controlled by the precipitation-evaporation balance, with no obvious disturbance from human activities. In transition period (1981-2008 ), the intensifying regional human activities began to alter the original runoff generation mechanisms of the watersheds. In the change period (2009-2023), underlying surface modification and water conservancy project regulation became dominant factors. The runoff coefficient α increased significantly in transition period and then declined in the change period, which also indicated that the regulatory intensity of human activities on runoff exceeded natural fluctuations. In terms of drought characteristic variations, drought severity and duration decreased notably in the transition period compared with the baseline period, but rebounded in the change period; the average drought severity of the three typical watersheds increased by 46.2%, 26.9% and 25.9% respectively relative to the transition period. 2) By introducing a regulating coefficient of parameter C during wet and dry periods, the improved two-parameter monthly water balance model effectively improved the overall simulation accuracy of runoff series, especially for low-flow and drought months. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) was higher than 0.7 and the correlation coefficient R exceeded 0.85 in both the baseline and transition periods, with the water balance error controlled within ±1%. In the change period, the measured runoff series was heavily disturbed by human activities, which increased the difficulty of simulating monthly-scale runoff series. Parameter calibration results showed that the value of C for each typical watershed in transition period was lower than that in baseline period, but rebounded in the change period, reflecting regular variations in the precipitation-evaporation relationship of the watersheds across different stages. High temperature and low rainfall in summer and autumn were critical driving factors of hydrological drought in the Jitai Basin, with strong sensitivity to drought severity. A 10% reduction in precipitation during this period led to an increase of 0.14-0.23 in drought severity, accompanied by a marginally diminishing effect. Nevertheless, compared with the baseline period, human activities played a dominant role in the change period, causing greater variations in runoff depth and drought severity than climate change factors. [Conclusion] The multi-stage quantitative method for driving factors constructed in this study reveals the nonlinear regulatory effects of climate change and human activities on hydrological drought severity in the Jitai Basin at different stages, clarifies the influence intensity, sensitivity and stage characteristics of each driving factor, and identifies the nonlinear regulation of these factors on drought severity.

关键词

水文干旱 / 吉泰盆地 / 人类活动影响 / 两参数月水量平衡模型 / 干旱烈度

Key words

hydrological drought / Jitai Basin / effects of human activities / two-parameter monthly water balance model / drought severity

引用本文

导出引用
孙可可, 姚立强, 刘雁翼, . 人类活动下吉泰盆地典型流域水文干旱多要素响应特征[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(5): 32-41 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250384
SUN Ke-ke, YAO Li-qiang, LIU Yan-yi, et al. Responses of Multiple Elements to Hydrological Drought Driven by Human Activities in Typical Watersheds of Jitai Basin[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(5): 32-41 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250384
中图分类号: P339    TV213.4 (水利资源的管理、保护与改造)   

参考文献

[1]
He N, Guo W, Lan J, et al. The Impact of Human Activities and Climate Change on the Eco-hydrological Processes in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2024, 53: 101753.
[2]
Zhang K, Li Z L, Shi W Z, et al. Spatiotemporal Changes and Interconnections between Meteorological and Hydrological Droughts in China over Past 34 Years[J]. Water Science and Engineering, 2025, 18(3):274-287.
[3]
Zhao A, Zhang W, Zou L, et al. Characteristics of Propagation from Meteorological to Hydrological Drought under Natural Conditions in the Haihe River Basin of China: Time, Probability, and Threshold[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2025, 59: 102359.
[4]
Xu G, Wu Y, Liu S, et al. How 2022 Extreme Drought Influences the Spatiotemporal Variations of Terrestrial Water Storage in the Yangtze River Catchment: Insights from GRACE-based Drought Severity Index and In-situ Measurements[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 626: 130245.
[5]
Qin G, Wang N, Wu Y, et al. Spatiotemporal Variations in Eco-environmental Quality and Responses to Drought and Human Activities in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin, China from 1990 to 2022[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2024, 81: 102641.
[6]
Xiao J, Xie B, Zhou K, et al. Responses of Hydrological Processes to Vegetation Greening and Climate Change in Subtropical Watersheds[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2024, 55: 101946.
[7]
王文, 王靖淑, 陶奕源, 等. 人类活动对水文干旱形成与发展的影响研究进展[J]. 水文, 2020, 40(3): 1-8.
(Wang Wen, Wang Jing-shu, Tao Yi-yuan, et al. Review of Human Impacts on Formation and Development of Hydrologic Drought[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2020, 40(3): 1-8. (in Chinese))
[8]
刘雁翼, 王林强, 陈佳慧. 吉泰盆地1990—2020年气象和农业干旱的时空演变规律[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2025, 44(5): 70-82.
(Liu Yan-yi, Wang Lin-qiang, Chen Jia-hui. Spatiotemporal Variations of Meteorological and Agricultural Drought in the Jitai Basin from 1990 to 2020[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2025, 44(5): 70-82. (in Chinese))
[9]
Wang Y, Liao W, Ding Y, et al. Water Resource Spatiotemporal Pattern Evaluation of the Upstream Yangtze River Corresponding to Climate Changes[J]. Quaternary International, 2015, 380: 187-196.
[10]
Luo D, Yang X, Xie L, et al. Propagation Characteristics of Meteorological Drought to Hydrological Drought in China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2025, 656: 133023.
[11]
Zhang Z, Zhang L, Liu Y, et al. Responses of Annual Streamflow Variability to Annual Precipitation, Extreme Climate Events and Large-scale Climate Phenomena in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2024, 632: 130969.
[12]
朱玲慧, 关颖慧. 金沙江流域降水结构演变及非平稳性特征[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(3): 50-58.
摘要
为了解区域水循环的变异规律,以金沙江流域为研究对象,基于1960—2021年50个气象站点的日降水数据,采用Mann-Kendall非参数检验和Pettitt检验探讨了金沙江流域总降水量、极端降水量和不同等级降水事件的时空演变特征和非平稳性。结果表明:①金沙江流域总降水量变化趋势不明显,但极端降水量以2.67 mm/(10 a)的速率上升(P<0.05);且总降水量和极端降水量均具有较为明显的非平稳性特征。②金沙江流域以小雨、中雨、大雨3种等级降水事件为主,发生率合计高达94%,降水贡献率为70%,成为流域总降水量的贡献主体。③随降水等级的增加,降水发生率和贡献率的峰值中心均呈现出由北往南逐渐转移的空间格局。④小雨发生率和贡献率呈显著下降趋势,中雨及以上等级降水事件的发生率以及大暴雨的贡献率均呈显著上升趋势(P<0.05)。⑤降水发生率相比贡献率呈现出更明显的非平稳性特征,位于金沙江下段和雅砻江流域的站点的非平稳性最为显著。以上研究表明,1960—2021年金沙江流域降水结构发生了显著变化,区域内强降水事件增多、弱降水事件趋于减少,未来需要科学地调度与管理当地水资源。
(Zhu Ling-hui, Guan Ying-hui. Evolution and Non-stationarity of Precipitation Structure in the Jinsha River Basin[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(3): 50-58. (in Chinese))
[13]
叶许春, 袁燕萍, 刘婷婷, 等. 鄱阳湖流域气象干旱的区域性特征及干旱过程演变[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(9): 19-26, 34.
摘要
基于1960—2020年鄱阳湖流域及周边29个国家气象站的连续观测资料,通过计算标准化降水蒸发指数(SPEI)并结合游程理论,研究分析了气象干旱的区域性特征及干旱过程演变。结果表明:①鄱阳湖流域月尺度气象干旱的发生频率为31.7%~34.8%,不同等级干旱发生频率的空间格局差异明显;②春、秋季节流域尺度SPEI呈现微弱下降趋势,干旱影响范围呈不显著的增加趋势,夏、冬季节情况与此相反;③就干旱区域性特征而言,鄱阳湖流域季节性气象干旱以全流域性干旱和局域性干旱为主(发生频率分别为29.5%和23.4%),区域性干旱和部分区域性干旱的发生频率(分别为10.7%和5.7%)相对较低;④游程理论揭示在过去的61 a间共发生50次流域尺度气象干旱事件,干旱事件的发生频次随干旱历时的增加显著减少,其中干旱历时最长的可达49个月;⑤流域尺度气象干旱事件的历时、峰值烈度以及总烈度的演变呈现较强的年代际波动特征;⑥干旱历时与总烈度之间存在显著的线性关系,与峰值烈度之间存在显著的幂函数关系,与平均烈度之间的相关关系不明显。这些研究结果明晰了鄱阳湖流域气象干旱的区域性特征与干旱过程演变,为合理开展流域气象干旱影响评估和制定防范策略提供科学依据。
(Ye Xu-chun, Yuan Yan-ping, Liu Ting-ting, et al. Regional Characteristics and Evolution of Meteorological Droughts in Poyang Lake Basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2024, 41(9): 19-26, 34. (in Chinese))

Based on observation data from 29 national meteorological stations within and surrounding Poyang Lake basin from 1960 to 2020, we investigated the regional characteristics and evolution of meteorological droughts in the basin by calculating the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) in association with the run theory.The findings indicate that the frequency of monthly meteorological droughts in the Poyang Lake basin ranged from 31.7% to 34.8%. Moreover, the spatial patterns of drought frequency varied significantly across different drought levels.SPEI of the Poyang Lake basin exhibited a slight downward trend in spring and autumn, with the affected area showing a marginal increase. Conversely, opposite trend was observed in summer and winter. Regarding regional characteristics, basin-wide (29.5% occurrence) and local droughts (23.4% occurrence) were predominant seasonal droughts in the Poyang Lake basin, whereas regional (10.7% occurrence) and partial regional droughts (5.7% occurrence) occured less frequently. The run theory revealed that 50 meteorological drought events have occurred in the past 61 years. The frequency of these events decreased notably with increasing drought duration, with the longest drought lasting up to 49 months. The duration, peak intensity, and total intensity of drought events exhibited pronounced inter-decadal fluctuations. A significant linear correlation existed between drought duration and total intensity, while a notable power function relationship was observed between drought duration and peak intensity. However, no significant correlation was found between drought duration and average intensity. These findings have clarified the regional characteristics and evolutionary processes of meteorological droughts in the Poyang Lake basin, thereby providing a scientific basis for assessing drought impacts and formulating effective prevention strategies.

[14]
严昌盛, 王鹏, 靳莉君, 等. 1961—2020年黄河源区降水时空变化特征研究[J]. 水文, 2024, 44(5): 84-91.
(Yan Chang-sheng, Wang Peng, Jin Li-jun, et al. Research on the Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics of Precipitation in the Source Region of the Yellow River from 1961 to 2020[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2024, 44(5): 84-91. (in Chinese))
[15]
杨肖丽, 张佳乐, 黄星怡, 等. 气候变化和人类活动对长江流域极端径流的影响[J]. 水资源保护, 2025, 41(4):1-9.
(Yang Xiao-li, Zhang Jia-Le, Huang Xing-yi, et al. Impacts of Climate Change and Human Activities on Extreme Runoff in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2025, 41(4):1-9. (in Chinese))
[16]
姜瑶, 徐宗学, 王静. 基于年径流序列的五种趋势检测方法性能对比[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51(7): 845-857.
(Jiang Yao, Xu Zong-xue, Wang Jing. Comparison among Five Methods of Trend Detection for Annual Runoff Series[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 51(7): 845-857. (in Chinese))
[17]
孙可可, 姚立强, 许继军, 等. 基于用水效益函数的城市干旱损失评估方法[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(11):11-17.
摘要
为定量评价干旱对城镇地区缺水和产业损失的影响,选取以地表径流为供水水源的湘江干流株洲段为研究区,基于水量平衡原理构建城市干旱指标(CWSI),以月为尺度,计算不同来水频率下区域可供水量、不同产业类型需水量。分别从水量短缺、水位取水困难两种角度,计算湘江株洲段1960—2018年历史来水情景下月尺度区域缺水量和干旱指数(CWSI)。采用经济学领域HARA函数反映经济效益随用水量的变化关系,进而得到缺水量-干旱损失响应关系。在此基础上,构建基于效益最优的缺水量配置动态优化模型,计算不同干旱程度下不同类型产业缺水配置规模,并采用抗旱定额法对配置成果进行验证,进而计算缺水量对应的干旱损失。依据CWSI指数变化,计算不同干旱等级下不同类型产业缺水损失;在多年平均缺水损失曲线基础上,依据当前月来水变化和前期来水亏缺,绘制典型年干旱动态损失变化曲线。研究结果表明:城市干旱具有边际损失高、发生频率低的特点,符合基于HARA用水效益函数构建的缺水损失变化规律,研究成果可为城市干旱风险评价、预警及抗旱定额管理提供理论依据。
(Sun Ke-ke, Yao Li-qiang, Xu Ji-jun, et al. Evaluating Urban Drought Loss Based on Water Use Benefit Function[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2021, 38(11): 11-17. (in Chinese))
To quantitatively assess the impact of drought on water shortage and industrial loss in urban areas, the urban drought index (CWSI) is constructed based on the water balance principle to calculate the regional available water supply and water demand of different industrial types under varying water inflow frequency on a monthly scale. The Zhuzhou segment of Xiangjiang River with surface runoff as the water supply source is selected as the research area. The monthly regional water shortage and drought index (CWSI) of Zhuzhou segment from 1960 to 2018 were calculated from the perspectives of water shortage and water withdrawal difficulty. Moreover, the response relationship between water shortage and drought loss is obtained by using HARA (Hyperbolic Absolute Risk Aversion) function, which is commonly used in the field of economics, to reflect the relationship between economic benefits and water consumption. On this basis, a dynamic optimization model of water shortage allocation based on optimal benefits is constructed to calculate the water shortage allocation of various industries under different drought degrees. The drought quota method is used to verify the allocation results, and then the drought loss corresponding to water shortage is calculated. According to the change of CWSI, the drought loss of various industries under different drought degrees is calculated. Based on the curve of annual average drought loss, the dynamic drought loss curve of typical years can be acquired according to the current monthly water change and the previous water shortage. The results demonstrate that urban drought is of high marginal loss and low frequency, which conforms to the change law of water shortage and drought loss based on HARA function. The research findings offer theoretical basis for urban drought risk assessment, early warning and drought quota management.
[18]
熊立华, 郭生练, 付小平, 等. 两参数月水量平衡模型的研制和应用[J]. 水科学进展, 1996, 7(增刊1):80-86.
(Xiong Li-hua, Guo Sheng-lian, Fu Xiao-ping, et al. Two-parameter Monthly Water Balance Model and Its Application[J]. Advances in Water Science, 1996, 7(Supp. 1): 80-86. (in Chinese))
[19]
陆桂华, 闫桂霞, 吴志勇, 等. 基于Copula函数的区域干旱分析方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2010, 21(2):188-193.
(Lu Gui-hua, Yan Gui-xia, Wu Zhi-yong, et al. Regional Drought Analysis Approach Based on Copula Function[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2010, 21(2):188-193. (in Chinese))

基金

中国中铁股份有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(2022-重大-08)
江西省技术创新引导类计划项目(2023KSG01005)

编辑: 刘运飞
PDF(1738 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/