PDF(1314 KB)
PDF(1314 KB)
PDF(1314 KB)
长江上游水库群拦沙与长江中下游河道冲刷的关联性
Correlation between Sediment Retention by Group Reserviors in the Upper Yangtze River and Channel Scour in Middle and Lower Reaches
以三峡水库为核心的长江上游水库群陆续投用后,水库拦截大量泥沙,“清水”下泄,导致坝下游河道处于长时间、大范围冲刷下切,对河势稳定、防洪安全及供水安全等带来影响。基于实测资料分析了三峡等上游水库拦沙与长江中下游河道冲刷的关联性,得到以下结论:2003年7月1日—2021年10月31日三峡水库泥沙淤积量断面法统计结果为17.84亿m3,考虑库区区间来沙输沙量法统计为22.38亿m3,两者相对误差为25.4%,2种方法计算结果差异不大;长江中下游宜昌—大通河段累计冲刷量断面法测算为31.46亿m3,显著高于输沙量法的8.99亿m3,结合枯水期水位下降规律得到河槽冲刷量来判别,断面法结果更具合理性;流域减沙总量达84.95亿m3,不考虑中下游人类活动影响,流域拦(减)沙量与下游冲刷量比值为1∶0.48,这与典型已建水库的规律基本相符,其中三峡水库淤积量引起长江中下游河道冲刷量约为10.74亿m3。
[Objective] After the operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir, the ratio between siltation volume in the Three Gorges Reservoir and channel scour volume in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River does not conform to the value (1∶0.5) determined in previous studies, mainly due to the substantial reduction in sediment inflow into the Three Gorges Reservoir. This study aims to analyze the characteristics of sediment deposition in the Three Gorges Reservoir and the scouring variations in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and to investigate the correlation between sediment retention by the Three Gorges and other reservoirs and the resulting channel scouring in the middle and lower Yangtze River. [Methods] Measured hydrological data and topographic data from 2003 to 2021 were utilized. The sediment transport method, cross-sectional method, and low-water-level verification were comprehensively adopted for the analysis. [Results] The ratio between basin-scale sediment retention and downstream channel scour was 1∶0.48, which was generally consistent with that of typical reservoirs in China such as Sanmenxia Reservoir and Danjiangkou Reservoir. 1) Regarding siltation volume in the Three Gorges Reservoir, the cumulative siltation from 2003 to 2021 was calculated as 2.381×109 t, which was equivalent to 2.238×109 m3, using the sediment transport method. The cross-sectional method estimated 1.784×109 m3 of siltation in the mainstream of the reservoir area. The difference between the two methods was 25.4%, due to differences in calculation principles, but the results were generally consistent. Siltation was mainly concentrated in the perennial backwater zone, totaling 1.853×109 m3. Siltation within the flood control storage accounted for only 0.67%, indicating a relatively small loss of effective storage capacity. 2) Regarding channel scour in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, the cumulative scour in the Yichang-Datong reach was calculated as 8.99×108 m3 using the sediment transport method. The cross-sectional method yielded 3.146×109 m3. The minimum scour volume inferred from the decline in water level under low-flow discharge conditions was 2.160×109 m3, demonstrating that the cross-sectional method results were more reasonable. The discrepancy was mainly attributed to the underestimation of fine-grained sediment in the sediment transport method and the exclusion of human activities, including sand mining of 6.64×108 m3 and channel dredging of 3.08×108 m3. The cumulative scour of the entire river reach reached 5.03×109 m3. Continuous scour persisted in the Jingjiang reach with no reduction in intensity, and scour in the downstream reaches significantly intensified after 2013. 3) At the basin scale, the total reduction in sediment volume from 2003 to 2021 was 8.497×109 m3. After excluding the influence of human activities, the ratio between sediment retention and scour was 1∶0.48, which was consistent with the sediment retention-scour pattern of large reservoirs. Siltation in the Three Gorges Reservoir itself was 2.238×109 m3, which directly caused 1.074×109 m3 of downstream scour and accounted for 26.5% of the total scour. The contribution in the first decade was significantly higher than that in the second decade, indicating that its impact gradually weakened with the enhanced sediment retention effect of upstream reservoir groups. [Conclusion] It is necessary to optimize sediment release scheduling of reservoir groups to improve the sediment flushing ratio. Measures such as dredged sediment resource utilization and sediment replenishment should be combined to mitigate channel scour, while strengthening sand mining management and long-term monitoring of scour and deposition.
三峡水库 / 拦沙作用 / 长江中下游 / 河道冲刷 / “清水”下泄 / 冲刷下切 / 河势稳定
Three Gorges Reservoir / sediment retention effect / middle-lower Yangtze River / channel scour / clear water discharge / downcutting / river regime stability
| [1] |
长江科学院. 三峡水库下游宜昌至大通河段冲淤一维数模计算分析(一)[C]// 长江三峡工程泥沙问题研究(第七卷). 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2002:211-258.
(Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 1D Numerical Simulation Analysis of Scour and Deposition in the Yichang-Datong Reach Downstream of the Three Gorges Reservoir (Part I)[C]// Research on Sediment Issues of the Three Gorges Project (Volume Ⅶ). Beijing: Intellectual Property Press, 2002: 211-258. (in Chinese))
|
| [2] |
姚仕明, 卢金友. 长江中下游河道演变规律及冲淤预测[J]. 人民长江, 2013, 44(23):22-28.
(
|
| [3] |
胡春宏, 王延贵. 三峡工程运行后泥沙问题与江湖关系变化[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2014, 31(5): 107-116.
(
Sediment problem is one of the key factors which affect the dispatching operation and life of the Three Gorges Project (TGP). Many approaches were employed to research the sediment problems of the TGP during its demonstration, planning, design, construction and operation, and many important results were obtained. It was confirmed that the previous sediment research results are reasonable and reliable by analyzing the field data of the actual testing operation of TGP. The 10-year operation of TGP shows that the basic situation of sediment problems is good, and the local problems were or are in control through proper treatment. However, these sediment problems can probably accumulate, develop and transform with time, so they should be paid continuous attention. The influence of the TGP operation on the relationship between rivers and lakes was also analyzed in this paper. It was pointed out that intense and large-scale erosion happens in the downstream channel of the dam since TGP operation, and the water levels at the outlets of Dongting Lake and Poyang Lake have decreased, which has some influence on the water and sediment diversions and results in sharp contradiction of water resource supply and demand in dry season for both lakes. It is effective and feasible to solve the existing problems through constructing sluices and other measures in the Dongting Lake and the Poyang Lake.
|
| [4] |
郭小虎, 渠庚, 刘亚, 等. 三峡工程运用后坝下游河道泥沙输移变化规律[J]. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32(2): 564-572.
(
|
| [5] |
许全喜. 三峡工程蓄水运用前后长江中下游干流河道冲淤规律研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2013(2):146-154.
(
|
| [6] |
徐照明, 徐兴亚, 李安强, 等. 长江中下游河道冲淤演变的防洪效应[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(3):366-376.
(
|
| [7] |
李少希, 杨云平, 张华庆, 等. 三峡工程运行前后的长江中游河段冲淤变化(1975—2017年)[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(5):1520-1531.
(
|
| [8] |
张为, 吴美琴, 李思璇, 等. 三峡水库蓄水后城陵矶至九江段河道冲淤调整机理[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(2): 162-171.
(
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
袁晶, 许全喜, 董炳江. 输沙量法与断面法差别原因及其适用性研究:以三峡水库为例[J]. 水文, 2011, 31(增刊1):87-91.
(
|
| [13] |
刘尚武, 张小峰, 许全喜, 等. 三峡水库区间来沙量估算及水库排沙效果分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2019, 31(1): 28-38.
(
|
| [14] |
长江水利委员会水文局. 2022年度三峡水库入出库水沙特性、水库淤积及坝下游河道冲刷分析[R]. 武汉: 长江水利委员会水文局, 2022.
(Bureau of Hydrology, Changjiang Water Resources Commission. Analysis of Inflow-Outflow Water-Sediment Characteristics, Reservoir Sedimentation, and Downstream Channel Scouring of the Three Gorges Reservoir in 2022[R]. Wuhan: Bureau of Hydrology, CWRC, 2022. (in Chinese))
|
| [15] |
许全喜, 董炳江, 袁晶, 等. 三峡工程运用后长江中下游河道冲刷特征及其影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023, 35(2): 650-661.
(
|
| [16] |
郭小虎, 李义天, 邓金运, 等. 枝城—城陵矶河段冲刷量分析[J]. 水力发电学报, 2011, 30(5):101-105,113.
(
|
| [17] |
韩剑桥, 孙昭华, 杨云平. 三峡水库运行后长江中游洪、枯水位变化特征[J]. 湖泊科学, 2017, 29(5): 1217-1226.
(
|
| [18] |
梁栖蓉, 黄龄. 三峡水库泥沙淤积预估[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1994, 11(3): 1-8.
在三峡工程可行性论证阶段,利用泥沙数学模型对三峡水库各种蓄水方案库区泥沙冲淤变化进行了预估。本文根据大量计算成果对三峡水库不同蓄水位方案的库区泥沙淤积量、淤积沿程分布、排沙率、保留库容、洪水位抬高等主要问题进行了论述,并分析了水库运用过程中泥沙冲淤变化特点。
(
|
| [19] |
水利部长江水利委员会. 长江中下游干流河道采砂管理规划(2021—2025年)[R]. 武汉: 水利部长江水利委员会, 2022.
(Changjiang Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources. Management Plan for Sand Mining in the Mainstream of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River (2021-2025)[R]. Wuhan: Changjiang Water Resources Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources, 2022. (in Chinese))
|
| [20] |
胡一三, 姜乃迁, 张翠萍, 等. 小浪底水库运用初期三门峡水库运用方式研究[M]. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2004.
(
|
| [21] |
陈建国, 周文浩, 赵华侠, 等. 三门峡水库不同运用时期下游河道不同粒径泥沙的冲淤调整趋势[J]. 水利水电技术, 1997, 28(6): 14-17.
(
|
| [22] |
章厚玉, 胡家庆, 郎理民, 等. 丹江口水库泥沙淤积特点与问题[J]. 人民长江, 2005, 36(1):27-30.
(
|
| [23] |
林云发, 罗媛, 叶志雄, 等. 丹江口水库汉江干流库区近期淤积规律分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2014, 31(7):7-12.
丹江口水库修建后,改变了原有天然河道的水沙输移条件,入库水沙经多年人工调度运用,形成了一定的水库冲淤规律。以往研究成果分析仅至2003年,为了对近期水库淤积情况进行了解,根据2003,2009,2011年丹江口水库断面测量资料,利用断面法进行淤积量计算;根据计算结果,对汉江干流库区的纵、横、垂3向的淤积分布进行了详细的对比分析。结果表明:水库淤积速度较以往减缓;淤积部位仍是宽阔段淤积多,狭谷段淤积少。
(
The construction of Danjiangkou reservoir has changed the natural water and sediment conditions. After years of operation, the riverbed in the reservoir was reformed. Previous researches only dealt with the period up to 2003. To understand the recent sedimentation in the reservoir, we calculated the sedimentation using method of section based on section data of Danjiangkou reservoir in 2003, 2009 and 2011. According to the calculation result, the sediment distribution in longitudinal, transverse and vertical directions are compared and analyzed. Results reveal that sediment deposits more at wide sections than at narrow valleys, with the entire sedimentation rate attenuating.
|
| [24] |
白亮, 许全喜, 董炳江. 丹江口水库蓄水以来汉江中下游河床冲淤变化研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(12):15-20.
(
|
| [25] |
万占伟, 安催花, 闫朝晖. 小浪底水库对下游河道的冲刷效果及趋势预测[J]. 人民黄河, 2012, 34(5): 6-8.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |