PDF(4270 KB)
基于海藻多糖复合改性基材的红壤边坡模拟降雨试验
许文盛, 王家祥, 陈晓枫, 李力, 张志华, 肖海, 夏振尧, 刘尧松
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 77-85.
PDF(4270 KB)
PDF(4270 KB)
基于海藻多糖复合改性基材的红壤边坡模拟降雨试验
Simulated Rainfall Experiment on Red Soil Slopes Based on Algal Polysaccharide Composite Modified Substrates
红壤区生态保护修复对于我国国土生态安全建设具有重要意义,针对喷混植生技术使用水泥作为固化剂导致的环境污染、降解难度大、植物生长受限等问题,以南方某输变电工程红壤边坡为对象,以海藻多糖为固化剂替代水泥,加入玉米纤维、保水剂和生态肥料以提高基材生态恢复性能,开展室内模拟降雨试验,分析不同基材对初始产流时间、产流产沙过程和水动力参数的影响,最终选出一组最优基材。结果表明:相较于裸坡,基材坡面的初始产流时间显著缩短;产流率显著增加,排水效益达16.35%~52.73%,产沙率显著降低,保土效益达97.33%~98.31%;随着降雨历时的增大,产流率和产沙率均呈现先增加后趋于稳定的趋势,2号基材坡面的产流率高于1号和3号基材,各基材坡面产沙率之间的差异较小;基材坡面的产流率与产沙率均与径流剪切力显著相关(p<0.05),随着径流剪切力的增加,基材坡面的产流率和产沙率均呈现出一定的线性增大现象;鉴于2号基材在抗侵蚀方面的良好效果,建议选作工程应用基材,海藻多糖、纤维、肥料、保水剂配比为1%∶0.8%∶3%∶0.9%。研究结果可为类似工程边坡防护提供新的材料与技术支撑,促进绿色工程建设和水土保持高质量发展。
[Objective] Algal polysaccharide is used as a curing agent in place of traditional cement, with the addition of corn fiber, water-retaining agents, and ecological fertilizers, to improve the ecological restoration performance of the substrate. In previous studies, the algal polysaccharide composite substrate has been preliminarily applied in the ecological restoration of slopes in red soil regions. However, there is still a lack of sufficient research on improving the erosion resistance of the algal polysaccharide composite substrates in red soil. This study aims to address the issues caused by the use of cement as a curing agent in sprayed vegetation techniques, including environmental pollution, difficulty in degradation, and restricted plant growth. [Methods] We selected the red soil slope of a power transmission and transformation project in southern China as the research subject. From previous 16 sets of orthogonal experiments, the best three types of substrates were selected for indoor simulated rainfall experiments. Rainfall intensities were set at 60, 90, 120 mm/h, and the slope gradients were set at 20° and 30°. With a bare slope treated only with clean water as the control group, a total of 72 rainfall experiments were conducted (2 slope angles×3 rainfall intensities×4 slope surfaces×3 repetitions), and the substrate with the best erosion resistance was ultimately selected. [Results] 1) Experimental results showed that on a 20° slope, when the rainfall intensity increased from 60 mm/h to 120 mm/h, the initial runoff yield time for substrates 1, 2, and 3 was shortened by 19.48%, 16.67%, and 30.43%, respectively, compared to the control group. The corresponding stable runoff yield rates were in the ranges of 0.56-2.08, 0.68-2.15,0.61-2.09 L/(min·m2), while the sediment yield rates at rainfall intensities of 60, 90, 120 mm/h were 0.18-0.22 L/(min·m2), 0.41-0.75 L/(min·m2), and 1.12-1.44 g/(min·m2), respectively. On a 30° slope, the initial runoff yield time was shortened by 25.80%, 48.48%, and 40.41%, respectively. The stable runoff yield rates were in the ranges of 0.63-2.21, 0.86-2.38,0.78-2.24 L/(min·m2), and the sediment yield rates under the corresponding rainfall intensities were 0.18-0.39 L/(min·m2), 0.68-0.86 L/(min·m2), and 1.27-1.77 g/(min·m2). 2) The drainage efficiency of the three substrates ranged from 16.35% to 52.73%, with substrate 2 showing the best performance, while the soil conservation efficiency remained stable at 97% to 98%. With increasing rainfall duration, both runoff yield rate and sediment yield rate exhibited a trend of first increasing and then stabilizing. The runoff yield rate of substrate 2 was higher than that of substrates 1 and 3, while the differences in sediment yield rates among the substrates were small. Both the runoff yield rate and sediment yield rate were significantly correlated with runoff shear force (p<0.05). As runoff shear force increased, both the runoff rate and sediment yield rate showed a linear increasing trend. Runoff shear force had the greatest impact on both runoff yield rate and sediment yield, with a significantly higher correlation compared to runoff power, resistance coefficient, and other factors, indicating that it was the primary controlling factor for runoff and sediment yield on the slope. [Conclusion] Algal polysaccharides significantly reduce the initial runoff yield time on substrate slopes, with the reduction becoming more pronounced as the slope angle or rainfall intensity increases. The runoff and sediment yield processes for different substrates under various slope gradients and rainfall intensities are generally consistent. Compared to bare slopes, runoff yield rates of substrate-covered slopes significantly increase, while the sediment yield rates markedly decrease. A significant positive correlation is observed between the runoff yield rate and the hydrodynamic parameters, especially with runoff shear force, which exhibits the highest correlation. However, except for runoff shear force, no significant correlation is found between sediment yield rate and other hydrodynamic parameters. Among the three test substrates, substrate 2 demonstrates superior erosion resistance and is recommended for engineering applications. The optimal formulation for this substrate is algal polysaccharide∶fiber∶fertilizer∶water-retaining agent=1%∶0.8%∶3%∶0.9%. The findings of this study can provide new materials and technical support for similar slope protection projects, promoting the development of green engineering and the high-quality advancement of soil and water conservation.
海藻多糖 / 红壤边坡 / 喷混植生基材 / 产流产沙 / 模拟降雨
algal polysaccharide / red soil slope / sprayed vegetation substrate / runoff and sediment yield / simulated rainfall
| [1] |
彭浪, 段剑, 刘士余, 等. 红壤侵蚀区不同恢复年限植物群落演替规律[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(1):10-16.
(
|
| [2] |
王晓燕, 宁佳, 史文娇. 南方红壤丘陵区耕地生态问题识别与修复分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(24):197-206.
(
|
| [3] |
叶建军, 陈阳阳, 黄涛. 湿喷植被混凝土生态护坡技术在水渠边坡工程中的应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(3): 228-234.
(
|
| [4] |
余飞, 夏栋, 刘文景, 等. 模拟暴雨条件下植被混凝土坡面侵蚀的水动力学特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(3): 152-158.
(
|
| [5] |
夏冬, 邵国梁, 李小光, 等. 基于岩质边坡生态修复的土壤重构研究现状及趋势[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2025, 53(增刊2): 443-462.
(
|
| [6] |
刘黎明, 宋岩松, 钟斌, 等. 植被混凝土生态修复技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2022, 12(3): 916-927.
(
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
宋泽卓, 刘瑾, 梅红, 等. 黄原胶-黏土复合基材岩坡生态修复试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 54(5): 1978-1989.
(
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
陈晓东, 聂小军, 张永慧, 等. 中国高陡岩质边坡植被重建技术现状与展望[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2024, 47(增刊1): 70-78.
(
|
| [12] |
许文盛, 刘尧松, 王可, 等. 红壤高陡边坡新型生态修复喷混植生基材试验[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(11): 56-64.
边坡生态修复是输变电工程建设的一项重要内容,传统的喷混植生技术使用水泥作为粘结剂导致基材植被出芽率较低,制约了生态修复效果。以红壤区输变电工程高陡边坡为研究对象,用高分子化学粘结剂海藻多糖代替水泥,外加生态肥料和纤维,以狗牙根为植物物种,开展室内直剪试验和盆栽试验,分析红壤新型喷混植生基材的力学和植生性能。结果表明:海藻多糖和纤维是影响新型喷混植生基材黏聚力的主要因素,对于狗牙根出芽率,海藻多糖与其呈负相关,生态肥料与其呈显著正相关,纤维对其无显著影响;海藻多糖提升基材黏聚力的最佳掺量为1%,纤维的掺入也能提高黏聚力,且掺量为0.75%时达到峰值;当海藻多糖掺量为1%,生态肥料掺量为5%时,狗牙根出芽率达到100%,有较好的应用效果。研究成果可为红壤高陡边坡生态修复提供新的技术参考。
(
|
| [13] |
蓝群力, 张新天, 卞立波, 等. 高陡岩石边坡植被恢复组合结构与材料性能研究[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(增刊2):143-146.
(
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
郭建行, 贾颂华, 李博润, 等. 红海藻多糖提取、分离纯化及生物活性研究进展[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2022, 43(16): 216-224.
(
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
李昊, 程冬兵, 孙宝洋, 等. 海藻多糖抗蚀剂对土壤抗剪与入渗特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(22):144-150.
(
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
丁文峰, 林庆明, 李昊, 等. 海藻多糖抗蚀剂对红壤坡面侵蚀过程的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(1):108-115.
(
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
岳桐葭, 张守红. 降雨变化对雨水收集系统节水及径流的调控效应[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(2): 43-51.
(
|
| [24] |
王蕙, 卢德宝, 黄冬菁, 等. 不同砾石存在形式红壤坡面侵蚀特征的比较[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2019, 17(4): 49-58.
(
|
| [25] |
肖海, 向瑞, 刘畅, 等. 聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)对三峡库区紫色土坡面片蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(5): 32-37.
(
|
| [26] |
王婷婷, 沈海鸥, 梁羽石, 等. 不同坡度条件下连续降雨及汇流对黑土坡面侵蚀的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2025, 39(2): 12-20, 29.
(
|
| [27] |
戴育全, 肖理, 刘文虎, 等. 西南山区土质边坡防护措施的减流减沙效益评估[J]. 中国水土保持科学(中英文), 2023, 21(1):73-82.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |