PDF(1833 KB)
PDF(1833 KB)
PDF(1833 KB)
低水头枢纽泄流曲线率定方法与效果研究
Calibration Methods and Performance of Discharge Curves for Low-head Hydraulic Hubs
为解决低水头枢纽设计泄流曲线与实际调度运行不符的问题,基于泄流曲线差异成因分析,提出一种结合水力学计算、原型观测和数值模拟的泄水闸泄流曲线率定方法。以赣江中游某航电枢纽为例,基于走航式声学多普勒流速剖面仪(ADCP)测流技术开展发电和泄洪工况下流量原型观测,并结合水力学计算和三维CFD数值模拟对枢纽泄流曲线进行率定,提出了适应现场时变边界条件的泄水闸控泄和敞泄泄流曲线族。研究表明,机组流量特性(N-H-Q)曲线插值法计算发电引用流量精度较高,可用于分析枢纽总出库流量中发电和弃水流量占比。经率定的泄水闸泄流曲线与实测数据偏差≤5%,可供枢纽调度运行使用。研究成果可为类似工程泄流曲线率定提供借鉴。
[Objective] Under changing environmental factors such as sediment deposition, riverbed incision, and backwater effects induced by cascade reservoir impoundments, low-head hydraulic hubs in plain river basins often face the challenge that the design discharge curves of sluice structures do not match actual scheduling operation. To address the issues of low accuracy in the design discharge curves of low-head hydraulic hubs, this study, based on the analysis of the causes of discharge curve discrepancies, proposes a calibration method for discharge curves of sluice gates and demonstrates its performance through an engineering case study. [Methods] Taking a navigation and hydropower hub in the middle reaches of the Ganjiang River as an example, field measurements of discharge were conducted for sluice gates using a moving-vessel ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) measurement technique. The prototype observation results were used to calibrate empirical coefficients of hydraulic formulas and to validate the accuracy of a three-dimensional CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) numerical model. Under free-flow operation conditions of the sluice gates, the validated three-dimensional numerical model was employed to calculate discharge capacities of the sluice gates. The simulation results were further used to calibrate empirical coefficients in hydraulic formulas, enabling the calculation of sluice-gate discharge under different combinations of upstream and downstream water levels. [Results] The N-H-Q curve interpolation method provided high accuracy in calculating power-generation reference discharge and could be used to analyze the respective proportions of power-generation discharge and spilled discharge in the total outbound flow of the hub. When the sluice gate was partially opened to 0.5 m, the flow pattern downstream of the gate was submerged. When the gate was partially opened to 1.5 m, the flow transitioned to a free-flow pattern. Under the same conditions, the flow patterns through the sluice gate openings obtained from the three-dimensional CFD numerical simulation were consistent with field observations. Discharge values calculated using hydraulic formulas and three-dimensional CFD calculations agreed well with measured data, with a maximum deviation of less than 5% and an average deviation of approximately 1%. Considering variations in upstream and downstream water levels of the hub and the operational range of sluice gate openings, a family of calibrated discharge curves for partially opened gates was calculated. When the gate was fully open for free discharge, different submergence coefficient calculation methods were required to determine the discharge depending on the degree of downstream submergence. [Conclusion] By integrating hydraulic calculation, prototype observation,and three-dimensional numerical simulation,a family of discharge curves under both controlled and free-flow operations of sluice gates is developed,adaptable to changing field boundary conditions and unaffected by time-varying environmental factors such as inflow magnitude,downstream backwater effects,or unsteady water level-discharge relationships.The calibrated discharge curves deviate from the measured data by less than 5% and can be used for practical application in hub scheduling and operation.
原型观测 / 泄流曲线 / 数值模拟 / 低水头枢纽 / 泄水闸
prototype observation / discharge curve / numerical simulation / low-head hydraulic hub / sluice gate
| [1] |
华子平. 对淹没宽顶堰泄流能力计算公式的探讨[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 1998, 26(3): 97-101.
(
|
| [2] |
张绪进, 樊卫平, 张厚强. 低闸枢纽泄流能力研究[J]. 水利学报, 2005, 36(10): 1246-1251.
(
|
| [3] |
穆祥鹏, 陈文学, 崔巍, 等. 弧形闸门流量计算方法的比较与分析[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2009, 7(5): 20-22, 27.
(
|
| [4] |
袁新明, 邓继军, 祁国军. 高淹没度下平底宽顶堰流量计算问题探讨[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2010, 30(4): 22-24, 66.
(
|
| [5] |
程锐, 赵建平. 低水头弧形闸门淹没孔流流量计算分析研究[C]// 2022中国水利学术大会(中国水利学会2022学术年会)论文集. 郑州: 黄河水利出版社, 2022: 569-574.
(
|
| [6] |
田向忠, 张黄胜. 白莲崖水库泄洪设施泄流能力分析研究[J]. 江淮水利科技, 2023(4): 19-24.
(
|
| [7] |
陈清, 陈士永. 基于水量平衡的洋口电站泄洪闸门泄流曲线复核[J]. 人民珠江, 2018, 39(10): 102-106.
(
|
| [8] |
陈其远. 利用区间流量修正紧水滩电站闸门泄流曲线[J]. 中国水能及电气化, 2014(3): 18-23, 36.
(
|
| [9] |
丁义. 表孔局部开启泄流能力曲线计算方法的改进研究:以锦屏一级水电站为例[J]. 人民长江, 2016, 47(8):73-75,93.
(
|
| [10] |
刘和咏, 王伟, 胡晨贺, 等. 基于关系曲线和水力学法的泄洪闸门泄流曲线率定[J]. 水电与抽水蓄能, 2018, 4(1): 99-103, 84.
(
|
| [11] |
蔡界清, 陈川建. 走航式ADCP测流在重庆狮子滩水库泄流曲线复核中的应用[J]. 水利水电快报, 2019, 40(4): 22-26.
(
|
| [12] |
李蔚, 郝学宁, 王保申. 刘家道口节制闸泄流曲线研究[J]. 山东水利, 2012(9): 5-7.
(
|
| [13] |
杨峰. 泄洪建筑物泄流能力复核的探讨[J]. 河北水利, 2000(2):42-43.
(
|
| [14] |
王智欣, 聂头龙, 黄勇, 等. 变化环境下航电枢纽泄流曲线差异成因及率定方法[J]. 水力发电, 2025, 51(8): 91-98.
(
|
| [15] |
NB/T35023—2014,水闸设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2014.
(NB/T 35023—2014,Design Code for Sluice[S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2014. (in Chinese))
|
| [16] |
赵建均. 江西省赣江新干航电枢纽工程枢纽泄水闸断面模型试验报告[R]. 南京: 南京水利科学研究院, 2013.
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |