纤维改性粗粒硫酸盐渍土的微观结构及强度变化规律

丁金华, 李家俊, 宫淼淼, 罗巍, 李腾飞

长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7) : 190-198.

PDF(8242 KB)
PDF(8242 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7) : 190-198. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250237
第31届全国土工测试学术研讨会论文专栏

纤维改性粗粒硫酸盐渍土的微观结构及强度变化规律

作者信息 +

Microscopic Structure and Strength Variation Patterns of Fiber-Modified Coarse-Grained Sulfate Saline Soil

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

西北内陆干旱区广泛分布粗粒盐渍土,盐分类型多样,工程性质复杂,有别于一般的细粒盐渍土,对工程建设危害严重。引入2种不同表面特性的纤维,结合室内纤维吸水试验、扫描电镜试验(SEM)、X射线能谱分析(EDS)和无侧限抗压强度试验等方法,对不同含盐量盐渍土改性前后的强度变化规律开展研究。试验结果表明,含盐量增大使盐渍土应力-应变关系逐渐由应变软化型向应变硬化型转变,无侧限抗压强度呈现先增大后减小的趋势,含盐量1.5%时最大,较非盐渍土提高约40.3%;不同纤维对盐渍土抗压强度的影响效果和机制与纤维的微观构造、盐分溶解度和结晶度、水盐吸附作用等密切相关。木质素纤维具有良好的吸水吸盐性,提高了盐分的溶解比例,盐分多聚集在纤维表面,对弱-中-强盐渍土的抗压强度有改善效果,最优掺量在2%左右,强度增幅12%~118%,但对超盐渍土,强度反而降低;聚丙烯纤维对盐分的吸附效应不明显,纤维在土中交织成网络,更易发挥其抗拉性能,显著增强盐渍土的强度,随纤维掺量的增加,强度增幅呈现先增后减的趋势,弱-中-强盐渍土最优纤维掺量为0.35%,强度最大增幅可达150%~213%。

Abstract

[Objective] This study investigates the mechanical properties and microstructural evolution of coarse-grained sulfate saline soils in the arid inland regions of Northwest China, modified with lignin fiber (LF) and polypropylene fiber (PP). It aims to clarify the effects of fiber dispersion methods, salt dissolution behavior, and fiber-salt interactions on soil strength with different sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) contents, thereby providing engineering strategies to mitigate soil-related hazards in construction. [Methods] Lignin fiber (hydrophilic) and polypropylene fiber (hydrophobic) were incorporated into saline soils using dry and wet mixing methods, respectively, to ensure uniform dispersion. A series of laboratory tests were performed, including fiber water absorption measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for microstructural observation, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for elemental analysis, and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests on soil samples with Na2SO4 contents ranging from 0% to 6%. The effects of salt content, fiber type (LF or PP), dosage, and their interactions on compressive strength were evaluated through multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS software. [Results] (1) Fiber characteristics: The lignin fiber, hydrophilic and flat with a ribbon-like structure, had a porous, rough surface, demonstrating a water absorption ratio of 6.70 in pure water (an 8% reduction in saline solutions). Salt crystals adhered to its surface in the form of scales or layers, leaving minimal salt in soil pores. In contrast, the polypropylene fiber, hydrophobic and smooth with a cylindrical shape, exhibited a lower water absorption ratio (4.25 in pure water, 63% of that of LF), with further reduction (7%-23%) in saline conditions. Salt crystallized within the soil pores rather than on the fiber surface. (2) Salt dissolution dynamics: At salt contents ≤3%, complete salt dissolution occurred regardless of fiber type. At 6% salt content, approximately 83% dissolved, while the remaining 17% formed needle-like crystalline clusters that reinforced the soil skeleton. Lignin fiber increased the optimal water content in high-salt soils, promoting nearly complete salt dissolution. Polypropylene fiber had no significant effect on salt dissolution. (3) Strength behavior: Salt content primarily influenced UCS trends. Strength peaked at 1.5% salt (a 40.3% increase compared to untreated soil), then declined sharply, with a 37% reduction at 6% salt. Stress-strain curves shifted from strain-softening to strain-hardening behavior as salt content increased. Polypropylene fiber consistently enhanced UCS and residual strength. Optimal dosages were 0.35% for low-to-moderate salt soils (<3%, with strength increases of 150%-213%) and 0.45% for hypersaline soil (6%). Its smooth structure allowed salts to remain dissolved, while the fiber network facilitated load redistribution. Lignin fiber improved strength in low-to-moderate salt soils (12%-118% increase at 2%-4% dosage, optimal at 2%) but weakened high-salt soils (4%-17% decrease at 6%) due to salt aggregation on its rough surface. (4) Statistical significance (ANOVA): For LF-modified soils, salt content had the most significant effect on strength, followed by the interaction between salt content and fiber dosage. In PP-modified soils, salt content and fiber dosage were significant independent factors, with minimal interaction effects. [Conclusion] (1) Fiber performance hinges on microstructure and hydrophilicity. Polypropylene fiber, with its hydrophobic nature and load-distributing network, strengthens soil across all salt levels but requires higher dosages in hypersaline conditions. Lignin fiber enhances the strength of low-to-moderate salt soils by promoting salt dissolution but destabilizes high-salt soils due to surface-induced salt crystallization. (2) Salt dissolution and crystallization play a critical role in the mechanical properties. At high salt contents, undissolved crystals become part of the soil structure, while the fiber type influences both salt solubility and distribution. (3) Engineering strategies must align fiber selection with salt content. Polypropylene fiber is recommended for hypersaline soil, while lignin fiber proves more effective under moderately saline conditions. This study provides practical guidelines for managing sulfate saline soils in arid regions, emphasizing microstructure-driven design approaches.

关键词

粗粒硫酸盐渍土 / 木质素纤维 / 聚丙烯纤维 / 无侧限抗压强度 / 扫描电子显微镜(SEM) / X射线能谱分析(EDS)

Key words

coarse-grained sulphate saline soils / lignin fibers(LF) / polypropylene fibers(PP) / unconfined compressive strength / scanning electron microscopy(SEM) / X-ray energy spectrometry(EDS)

引用本文

导出引用
丁金华, 李家俊, 宫淼淼, . 纤维改性粗粒硫酸盐渍土的微观结构及强度变化规律[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2025, 42(7): 190-198 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250237
DING Jin-hua, LI Jia-jun, GONG Miao-miao, et al. Microscopic Structure and Strength Variation Patterns of Fiber-Modified Coarse-Grained Sulfate Saline Soil[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2025, 42(7): 190-198 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250237
中图分类号: TU448 (盐渍土与地基)    P642.16   

参考文献

[1]
程东幸, 刘志伟, 胡昕. 粗颗粒盐渍土地基[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.
(CHENG Dong-xing, LIU Zhi-wei, HU Xin. Coarse-Grained Saline Soil Foundation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.(in Chinese))
[2]
温利强. 我国盐渍土的成因及分布特征[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2010.
(WEN Li-qiang. Origin and Distribution Characteristics of Saline Soil in China[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2010.(in Chinese))
[3]
GB/T 50145—2007, 土的工程分类标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2008.
(GB/T 50145—2007, Standard for Engineering Classification of soil[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2008.(in Chinese))
[4]
KONRAD J M, LEMIEUX N. Influence of Fines on Frost Heave Characteristics of a Well-graded Base-course Material[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2005, 42(2): 515-527.
[5]
孙安元. 粗颗粒硫酸盐渍土盐胀及溶陷特性试验研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2018.
(SUN An-yuan. Experimental Study on Salt Expansion and Melt Sinking Behavior of Coarse-grained Sulphate Soil[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiatong University, 2018.(in Chinese))
[6]
张莎莎, 张超, 王旭超, 等. 含泥量对砂类硫酸盐渍土工程特性的影响分析[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2024, 45(1): 98-106.
(ZHANG Sha-sha, ZHANG Chao, WANG Xu-chao, et al. Analysis of the Influence of Mud Content on the Engineering Characteristics of Sand Sulfate Saline Soil[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2024, 45(1): 98-106.(in Chinese))
[7]
杨晓华, 张莎莎, 刘伟, 等. 粗颗粒盐渍土工程特性研究进展[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(5): 22-40.
(YANG Xiao-hua, ZHANG Sha-sha, LIU Wei, et al. Research Progress on Engineering Properties of Coarse-grained Saline Soil[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 22-40.(in Chinese))
[8]
周瑞璞, 张卫兵. 盐渍土工程特性改良研究综述[J]. 土木工程, 2019(3): 596-604.
(ZHOU Rui-pu, ZHANG Wei-bing. A Summary of Research on Improvement of Engineering Characteristics of Saline Soil[J]. Hans Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019(3): 596-604.(in Chinese))
[9]
TANG C, SHI B, GAO W, et al. Strength and Mechanical Behavior of Short Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced and Cement Stabilized Clayey Soil[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2007, 25(3): 194-202.
[10]
包承纲, 丁金华. 纤维加筋土的研究和工程应用[J]. 土工基础, 2012, 26(1): 80-83.
(BAO Cheng-gang, DING Jinhua. Researches and Applications of Fiber Reinforced Soils[J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2012, 26(1): 80-83.(in Chinese))
[11]
柴寿喜, 王沛, 魏丽. 以峰值轴向应变评价麦秸秆和石灰加筋固化盐渍土的抗变形性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(3): 645-650.
(CHAI Shou-xi, WANG Pei, WEI Li. Evaluation on Anti-deformation Capability of Saline Soil Reinforced by Wheat Straw and Lime on the Basis of Axial Strain at Failure[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology), 2012, 42(3): 645-650.(in Chinese))
[12]
魏丽, 柴寿喜, 蔡宏洲, 等. 麦秸秆的物理力学性能及加筋盐渍土的抗压强度[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(3): 93-98.
(WEI Li, CHAI Shou-xi, CAI Hong-zhou, et al. Physical and Mechanical Properties of Wheat Straw and Unconfined Compressive Strength of Reinforced Inshore Saline Soil with Wheat Straw[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(3): 93-98.(in Chinese))
[13]
杨继位, 柴寿喜, 王晓燕, 等. 以抗压强度确定麦秸秆加筋盐渍土的加筋条件[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(10): 3260-3264.
(YANG Ji-wei, CHAI Shou-xi, WANG Xiao-yan, et al. Suitable Reinforcement Conditions on the Basis of Compressive Strength of Reinforced Saline Soils with Wheat Straw[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(10): 3260-3264.(in Chinese))
[14]
柴寿喜, 张琳, 魏丽, 等. 冻融作用下纤维加筋固化盐渍土的抗压性能与微观结构[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2022, 49(5): 96-105.
(CHAI Shou-xi, ZHANG Lin, WEI Li, et al. Compressive Properties and Microstructure of Saline Soil Added Fiber and Lime under Freezing-thawing Cycles[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(5): 96-105.(in Chinese))
[15]
GB/T 50123—2019, 土工试验方法标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019.
(GB/T 50123—2019, Standard for Geotechnical Testing Method[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019.(in Chinese))
[16]
赵天宇, 张虎元, 王志硕, 等. 含氯硫酸盐渍土中硫酸钠结晶量理论分析研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(7): 1340-1347.
(ZHAO Tian-yu, ZHANG Hu-yuan, WANG Zhi-shuo, et al. Theoretical Analysis of Crystallization of Sodium Sulphate for Sulphate Saline Soil Containing Chloride[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(7): 1340-1347.(in Chinese))
[17]
贾艳军, 庄建琦, 王颖, 等. 硫酸钠浓度对黄土强度影响的试验研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2019, 27(5): 1041-1047.
(JIA Yan-jun, ZHUANG Jian-qi, WANG Ying, et al. Experimental Study for Effect of Sodium Sulfate’s Concentration on Shear Strength of Loess[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2019, 27(5): 1041-1047.(in Chinese))

致谢

感谢新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院李博、赵一挥、黄涛、张超翔为试验付出的辛勤工作。

基金

新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2022D01A200)
“天池英才”引进计划项目
新疆维吾尔自治区高校基本科研业务费科研项目(XJEDU2024J044)
新疆农业大学大学生创新训练计划项目(dxscx2023387)

编辑: 黄玲
PDF(8242 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/