丹江口水库突发超标准泄洪及淹没风险研究

李晨, 孙远莹, 魏为, 黄卫

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 111-117.

PDF(23124 KB)
PDF(23124 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5) : 111-117. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250225
水灾害

丹江口水库突发超标准泄洪及淹没风险研究

作者信息 +

Sudden Over-standard Flood Discharge and Inundation Risks of Danjiangkou Reservoir

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为适应现代化水库运行管理矩阵建设需求,进一步提升丹江口水库洪水预报预警能力,推动洪水预演可视化、预案精准化,基于MIKE和GIS软件,模拟了7种情景丹江口水库超标准泄洪时下游洪水演进情况,分析了不同情景下游区域洪水的到达时间及洪峰出现时间,对比了洪峰水位、洪峰水量与典型断面设计水位、最大允许流量的关系,研究了不同情景下游区域淹没范围和淹没深度。结果显示:工程调蓄作用下,襄阳及其上游的洪水均在2~10 h内到达,宜城至沙洋段洪水在10~24 h内到达,仙桃地区洪水约在2 d后出现,各典型断面洪峰出现时间均超过68 h;混凝土坝溃坝工况下,近坝山区的洪水漫延规律与调蓄情景相似,平原地区的洪水演进速度整体上比工程调控情景慢3 h以上;突发超标准来水土坝溃坝工况,钟祥以上区域的洪水和洪峰分别在12 h和18 h内到达,钟祥以下区域的洪水和洪峰则分别在13 h和31 h后到达;丹江至宜城河段有较多漫堤险情。校核洪水、设计洪水、混凝土坝死水位溃坝和混凝土坝加高部分溃坝工况下,坝址至襄阳樊城大部分区域淹没深度为16~20 m,天门下游淹没深度<3 m;特大洪水土石全溃工况,坝址至襄阳樊城区淹没深度约为35 m,丹江口河段淹没深度>50 m;沙洋县洪水倒灌致潜江市>70%区域被淹,整体淹没深度≤2 m。研究成果为丹江口水库大坝安全管理应急预编制,洪水预演可视化和现代化水库运行管理矩阵建设提供了有力支撑。

Abstract

[Objective] To meet the demands of constructing a modern reservoir operation and management matrix and to further enhance the flood forecasting and early warning capabilities of the Danjiangkou Reservoir, this study simulates the over-standard flood discharge scenario of the Danjiangkou Reservoir, and analyzes the evolution and inundated conditions of the downstream flood, aiming to improve the accuracy of the flood forecasting visualization and emergency planning. In doing so, the study seeks to provide stronger support for ensuring the safety of the Danjiangkou Reservoir Project and the security of water supply. [Methods] Based on the principles of the continuity equation and the momentum equation, the MIKE series model software was used to establish a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of the downstream river channel and floodplain. Fully considering the impact of flood evolution on key cities downstream, a computational grid was constructed based on DEM and measured terrain to simulate the flood evolution of the downstream areas during over-standard discharge from the Danjiangkou Reservoir under seven scenarios. The arrival time of flood and peak flood in downstream areas under different scenarios was analyzed. The relationships between peak flood water level, peak flood discharge, design water level, and maximum allowable flow at typical cross-sections were compared. Based on GIS software, the inundation range and inundation depth in the downstream areas under different scenarios were analyzed. [Results] Under the regulation and storage effect of the project, the flood reached Xiangyang and its upstream areas within 2 to 10 hours, the Yicheng-Shayang cross-section within 10 to 24 hours, and the Xiantao area approximately two days later. The arrival time of the flood peak at each typical cross-section exceeded 68 hours. Under the condition of concrete dam failure, the flood spread pattern in the mountainous areas near the dam was similar to that under the regulation and storage scenario, while the flood evolution speed in the plain areas was generally more than 3 hours slower than that under the engineering regulation and control scenario. In the case of sudden over-standard water inflow and earth dam failure, the flood and flood peak in the areas upstream of Zhongxiang arrived within 12 and 18 hours, respectively, while in the areas downstream of Zhongxiang, they arrived after 13 and 31 hours, respectively. There were high risks of embankment overflow in the section from Danjiang to Yicheng. Under the conditions of verification flood, design flood, dead water level failure of the concrete dam, and failure of the elevated part of the concrete dam, the inundation depth of most areas from the dam site to Fancheng, Xiangyang was 16-20 meters, while that downstream of Tianmen was less than 3 meters. In the case of a severe flood in which all soil and rocks collapsed, the inundation depth from the dam site to Fancheng, Xiangyang was approximately 35 meters, while that of the Danjiangkou section exceeded 50 meters. The flood in Shayang County caused the inundation of over 70% of the area in Qianjiang City, with the overall inundation depth below 2 meters. [Conclusion] Based on the above results, this study provides strong support for the emergency preparedness for the safety management of the Danjiangkou Reservoir Dam, the development of a visualized flood rehearsal, and the construction of a modern reservoir operation management matrix.

关键词

丹江口大坝 / 突发洪水事件 / 溃坝 / 洪水演进

Key words

Danjiangkou Reservoir / sudden flood events / dam failure / flood evolution

引用本文

导出引用
李晨, 孙远莹, 魏为, . 丹江口水库突发超标准泄洪及淹没风险研究[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(5): 111-117 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250225
LI Chen, SUN Yuan-ying, WEI Wei, et al. Sudden Over-standard Flood Discharge and Inundation Risks of Danjiangkou Reservoir[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(5): 111-117 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250225
中图分类号: TV697   

参考文献

[1]
张建云, 盛金保, 金君良, 等. 全国水库大坝应急管理存在问题和对策建议[J]. 中国应急管理科学, 2022(9):23-30.
(Zhang Jian-yun, Sheng Jin-bao, Jin Jun-liang, et al. The Problems and Countermeasures of Reservoir-dam Emergency Management in China[J]. Journal of China Emergency Management Science, 2022(9):23-30. (in Chinese))
[2]
盛金保, 李宏恩, 盛韬桢. 我国水库溃坝及其生命损失统计分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2023(1): 1-15.
(Sheng Jin-bao, Li Hong-en, Sheng Tao-zhen. Statistical Analysis of Dam Failure and Its Loss of Life in China[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2023(1): 1-15. (in Chinese))
[3]
李昌志, 黄金池, 何晓燕, 等. 丹江口水库溃坝洪水分析[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 5(3): 1-7.
(Li Chang-zhi, Huang Jin-chi, He Xiao-yan, et al. Flood Caused by Dam Failure of the Danjiangkou Reservoir[J]. Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2008, 5(3): 1-7. (in Chinese))
[4]
李昌志, 黄金池, 何晓燕, 等. 丹江口水库洪水风险图编制[J]. 中国防汛抗旱, 2008, 18(4): 63-66.
(Li Chang-zhi, Huang Jin-chi, He Xiao-yan, et al. Compilation of Flood Risk Map of Danjiangkou Reservoir[J]. China Flood and Drought Management, 2008, 18(4): 63-66. (in Chinese))
[5]
务境飞. 尾矿堆积坝溃口演变规律及溃坝模拟[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2019.
(Wu Jing-fei. Evolution Law of Tailings Accumulation Dam and Simulation of Dam Break[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2019. (in Chinese))
[6]
张卓, 张新华. 紫坪铺水库溃坝洪水风险分析[J]. 科学技术创新, 2025(5): 183-187.
(Zhang Zhuo, Zhang Xin-hua. Risk Analysis of Zipingpu Reservoir Dam Break Floods[J]. Scientific and Technological InnovationInformation, 2025(5): 183-187. (in Chinese))
[7]
杨蒙, 钟启明, 林忠, 等. 沥青混凝土心墙坝漫顶溃坝试验与溃坝过程数值模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2024, 46(7): 1534-1540.
(Yang Meng, Zhong Qi-ming, Lin Zhong, et al. Model Tests and Numerical Simulation of Overtopping-induced Breach Process of Asphalt Concrete Core Dams[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(7): 1534-1540. (in Chinese))
[8]
李同春, 贾玉彤, 李宏恩, 等. 基于改进SPH模型的溃坝洪水演进模拟方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(5):744-752.
(Li Tong-chun, Jia Yu-tong, Li Hong-en, et al. Simulation Method of Dam Break Flood Propagation Based on Improved SPH Model[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2023, 34(5): 744-752. (in Chinese))
[9]
Samma H, Khosrojerdi A, Rostam-Abadi M, et al. Numerical Simulation of Scour and Flow Field over Movable Bed Induced by a Submerged Wall Jet[J]. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2020, 22(2): 385-401.
Dam construction continues its rapid expansion around the world primarily for the purpose of hydropower generation. One important consequence of such projects is local scour at the downstream of the dam caused by outflow of excess reservoir water through spillways or bottom outlets that is associated with high velocities. The scour development endangers the dam foundation and river banks and undermines the stability of the hydraulic structures. In this study, a detailed three-dimensional (3D) flow simulation is conducted to investigate the complex fluid–sediment interactions leading to the formation of the scour hole and ridge systems downstream of a near-bottom jet. Three different bed-load equations, including Meyer-Peter–Müller, Nielsen, and Van Rijn formulas, are applied for calculating the bed-load transport rate. Comparison with a series of available experimental data shows that the Meyer-Peter–Müller equation results in better predictions than the two other relations. The performance of different turbulence models to reproduce vertical profiles of velocity and scour characteristic against the experimental data were evaluated. The vertical and horizontal profiles of the scour hole-ridge system are also compared with the corresponding experimental ones. The numerical model satisfactorily reproduces the geometric parameters representing the scour hole. However, the model overestimates the length of the scour hole.
[10]
刘梦凡. 二维非黏性土石坝溃决改进模型的开发与验证[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2022.
(Liu Meng-fan. Development and Validation of Improved 2D Non-cohesive Embankment Breach Model[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2022. (in Chinese))
[11]
邵广哲, 李云瑶, 宋利祥, 等. 基于一维、二维耦合水动力模型的水库溃坝洪水演进分析[J]. 大坝与安全, 2024(6): 61-67.
(Shao Guang-zhe, Li Yun-yao, Song Li-xiang, et al. Analysis of Dam-break Flood Propagation Based on 1D and 2D Coupled Hydraulic Model[J]. Dam & Safety, 2024(6): 61-67. (in Chinese))
[12]
李红艳, 郝景开, 刘大为, 等. 基于元启发式算法优化的洪水风险评价模型[J/OL]. 水资源保护, 2024: 1-17. (2024-07-10). https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=SZYB2024070300E&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ.
(Li Hong-yan, Hao Jing-kai, Liu Da-wei, et al. Flood Risk Assessment Model Based on Meta-heuristic Algorithm Optimization[J/OL]. Water Resources Protection, 2024: 1-17. (2024-07-10). https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=SZYB2024070300E&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ. (in Chinese))
[13]
石振明, 周明俊, 彭铭, 等. 崩滑型堰塞坝漫顶溃决机制及溃坝洪水研究进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(11): 2173-2188.
(Shi Zhen-ming, Zhou Ming-jun, Peng Ming, et al. Research Progress on Overtopping Failure Mechanisms and Breaching Flood of Landslide Dams Caused by Landslides and Avalanches[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(11): 2173-2188. (in Chinese))
[14]
闫琪琪. 溃坝洪水的数值模型研究与应用[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2020.
(Yan Qi-qi. Research and Application of Numerical Model of Dam-break Flood[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2020. (in Chinese))
[15]
来亦姝, 张社荣, 王超, 等. 洪水演进融合三维动态可视化关键技术与应用[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2024, 57(12): 1232-1244.
(Lai Yi-shu, Zhang She-rong, Wang Chao, et al. Key Technologies and Application of Three-dimensional Dynamic Visualization of Flood Evolution[J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2024, 57(12): 1232-1244. (in Chinese))
[16]
苏强. 水利工程BIM+GIS协同管理平台研发与应用[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(11): 133-136, 148.
(Su Qiang. Research and Application of BIM+GIS Collaborative Management Platform for Hydraulic Engineering Works[J]. Yellow River, 2024, 46(11): 133-136, 148. (in Chinese))
[17]
冶运涛, 梁犁丽, 曹引, 等. 流域洪水演进实时高效可视化仿真方法[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2020, 28(2): 271-286.
(Ye Yun-tao, Liang Li-li, Cao Yin, et al. A Real-time and Efficient Method of Visual Simulation of Flood Routing in River Basin[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2020, 28(2): 271-286. (in Chinese))
[18]
冶运涛, 蒋云钟, 梁犁丽, 等. 数字孪生流域: 未来流域治理管理的新基建新范式[J]. 水科学进展, 2022, 33(5): 683-704.
(Ye Yun-tao, Jiang Yun-zhong, Liang Li-li, et al. Digital Twin Watershed: New Infrastructure and New Paradigm of Future Watershed Governance and Management[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2022, 33(5): 683-704. (in Chinese))
[19]
黄艳, 喻杉, 罗斌, 等. 面向流域水工程防灾联合智能调度的数字孪生长江探索[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(3): 253-269.
(Huang Yan, Yu Shan, Luo Bin, et al. Development of the Digital Twin Changjiang River with the Pilot System of Joint and Intelligent Regulation of Water Projects for Flood Management[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2022, 53(3): 253-269. (in Chinese))
[20]
谢明霞. 数字孪生水利内涵及应用场景研究[J]. 人民长江, 2024, 55(2): 245-251, 264.
(Xie Ming-xia. Connotation and Application Scenarios of Digital Twin Water Conservancy[J]. Yangtze River, 2024, 55(2): 245-251, 264. (in Chinese))
[21]
马强, 李郑淼, 董芳睿, 等. 流域数字孪生防洪模型的构建:以子牙河“23·7”大洪水复盘为例[J]. 水利学报, 2025, 56(1):73-84.
(Ma Qiang, Li Zheng-miao, Dong Fang-rui, et al. Flood Modeling Developed for Digital Twin Watershed: a Case Study of “23·7” Great Flood Assessment in Ziya River Basin[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2025, 56(1): 73-84. (in Chinese))
[22]
张文洁. 夯实水利工程安全管理基础提升现代化运行管理水平[J]. 中国水利, 2023(24): 15-16.
(Zhang Wen-jie. Consolidate the Foundation of Safety Management of Water Conservancy Projects and Improve the Level of Modern Operation Management[J]. China Water Resources, 2023(24): 15-16. (in Chinese))
[23]
刘六宴. 构建现代化水库运行管理矩阵与发展水利新质生产力[J]. 中国水利, 2024(9): 5-8.
(Liu Liu-yan. Accelerating the Development of Modern Reservoir Operation and Management Matrix to Foster New Quality Productive Forces of Water Conservancy[J]. China Water Resources, 2024(9): 5-8. (in Chinese))
[24]
赵永涛, 党永超. 大型水库大坝安全管理应急预案编制实践和探讨[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(增刊1): 121-122, 124.
(Zhao Yong-tao, Dang Yong-chao. Practice and Discussion on the Compilation of Emergency Plan for Dam Safety Management of Large Reservoirs[J]. Yellow River, 2024, 46(Supp. 1): 121-122, 124. (in Chinese))
[25]
方卫华, 袁威, 杨浩东. 现代化水库运行管理矩阵体系分析与构建关键问题研究[J]. 中国水利, 2024(4):53-60.
(Fang Wei-hua, Yuan Wei, Yang Hao-dong. Studies on Key Issues Related to Construction of a Modern Reservoir Operation and Management Matrix System[J]. China Water Resources, 2024(4): 53-60. (in Chinese))
[26]
付建军. 丹江口水库现代化运行管理矩阵构建实践[J]. 中国水利, 2024(20): 25-33, 44.
(Fu Jian-jun. Construction of a Modernized Operation and Management Matrix for the Danjiangkou Reservoir[J]. China Water Resources, 2024(20): 25-33, 44. (in Chinese))
[27]
SL/T164—2019,溃坝洪水模拟技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2019.
(SL/T164-2019,Technical Codefor Simulation of Dam Break Flow[S]. Beijing: China Water Resources and Hydropower Press, 2019. (in Chinese))
[28]
姚志坚, 彭瑜. 溃坝洪水数值模拟及其应用[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2013.
(Yao Zhi-jian, Peng Yu. Numerical Simulation of Dam-break Flood and Its Application[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2013. (in Chinese))

编辑: 王慰
PDF(23124 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/