长江下游官洲水道河床演变特性及趋势

徐华, 王浩杰, 张帆一, 张世钊, 闻云呈, 赵泽亚, 阮俊生

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 18-26.

PDF(11958 KB)
PDF(11958 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4) : 18-26. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20250207
河湖保护与治理

长江下游官洲水道河床演变特性及趋势

作者信息 +

Riverbed Evolution Characteristics and Trends of Guanzhou Waterway in Lower Reaches of Yangtze River

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

长江下游官洲段是典型的鹅头型汊道河段,洲滩汊道及分流分沙格局复杂多变。根据官洲段1966—2023年实测资料,分析了该河段近期河床演变特性,并对其演变影响因素及发展趋势进行了探讨。研究表明:在一系列护岸工程约束下,官洲水道总体河势稳定,新中汊目前已不具备大幅发展的条件,东江主汊地位将持续相对稳固;新水沙条件下,清水下泄、短汊发展,清洁洲头部仍有一定程度冲淤调整,继而可能引起南夹江口门进流及分流的小幅变化;与此同时,汊道汇流段左岸边滩的冲刷将长期存在,对下游河势变化会产生一定影响。结合研究结果提出今后河势发展控制要点:加强对清洁洲头、复生洲左缘及汊道汇流段左岸等关键区域的监测与防护,可为河势稳定和滩槽控导等提供技术参考。

Abstract

[Objective] The Guanzhou Waterway, a typical goose-head-shaped braided channel in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River, is characterized by complex and dynamic shoals, braided channels, and flow-sediment diversion patterns. This study aims to: (1) analyze recent riverbed evolution characteristics (2003-2023) from multiple perspectives, including boundary conditions, diversion ratios, shoal dynamics, thalweg shifts, and erosion-deposition changes; (2) quantify the effects of revetment works, upstream reservoir impoundment, and downstream confluence processes; (3) predict future evolution trends; and (4) propose targeted measures for river regime stability. [Methods] Long-term hydro-morphological datasets were employed, including: (1) topographic surveys derived from 1∶10 000 scale maps from the years 1966, 1977, 1987, 1998, 2003, 2012, and 2023. These datasets were used to analyze changes in shoal areas (e.g., Qingjie Shoal, Fusheng Shoal), thalweg positions, and cross-sectional parameters (width, depth, width-depth ratio). (2) Hydrological data, including annual runoff and sediment load at Datong station from 1966 to 2022, were collected to characterize changes in the flow-sediment regime, particularly following the impoundment of the Three Gorges Reservoir in 2003. (3) Engineering records of historical revetment projects (e.g., Sanyiwei, Guanzhou Shoal) were compiled to assess their effects on channel boundary stability. Quantitative analyses included: (1) statistical comparisons of diversion ratios among branches (Dongjiang, Xinzhong Branch, Nanjiajiang); (2) calculations of erosion and deposition volumes (volume changes in the riverbed below +5 m elevation); and (3) trend analysis of key cross-sections (GZ2#, GZ7#, GZ19#) to identify dominant evolution patterns. [Results] (1) River regime stability under revetment works: continuous revetment works since the 1980s have stabilized the overall river regime. The width-depth ratio of key cross-section GZ7# decreased from 1.45 in 1998 to 1.28 in 2023, indicating channel stabilization. The Xinzhong Branch, previously active, became nearly inactive, with its dry-season diversion ratio dropping to approximately 1% in 2023 due to sedimentation at its entrance. (2) Effects of clear water discharge: after 2003, the annual sediment load at Datong station decreased by 68.5%, leading to net erosion in the study reach. From 1998 to 2023, the channel from the Qingjie Shoal inlet to Yangjiatao experienced net erosion of approximately 37.9 million m3, with the channel volume below the +5 m elevation increasing by about 6% from 2003 to 2023. Severe erosion was observed at the left bank of the confluence section and at the head of Qingjie Shoal. (3) Critical evolution trends: the diversion ratio of the Nanjiajiang Branch gradually increased from 15% in the 1980s to 24% in 2023 due to scouring along the left margin of Fusheng Shoal. However, its development was constrained by the nodal control of Huangshiji. The left-bank shoal in the confluence section was expected to continue eroding, threatening downstream stability. [Conclusion] This study highlights the critical role of revetment projects in stabilizing this historically unstable braided channel, while revealing new challenges posed by clear water discharge. Key findings include: (1) upstream changes, such as the shrinkage of the left branch in the Dongliu Waterway and the increased diversion to the right branch, cause a slight leftward shift of the main channel. After being deflected by Jiyangji, this shift leads to a minor rightward displacement of the diversion point between the left branch and Nanjiajiang. (2) Under the new flow-sediment regime, the reduced sediment load accelerates erosion in unprotected areas (e.g., the head of Qingjie Shoal and the left bank of the confluence section). Ongoing adjustments at the head of Qingjie Shoal may subtly alter the inflow conditions and diversion ratio of the Nanjiajiang branch. Targeted control measures are proposed for three critical zones: (1) the head of Qingjie Shoal, to manage scouring-induced changes in the inflow to the Nanjiajiang branch; (2) the left margin of Fusheng Shoal, to mitigate the enhanced deflection effects from Huangshiji; and (3) the left bank of the confluence section, to prevent downstream channel instability caused by persistent scouring. Enhanced monitoring and data collection in these areas are essential for ensuring future river regime stability.

关键词

河床演变 / 鹅头分汊河型 / 演变影响因素 / 发展趋势 / 官洲水道

Key words

riverbed evolution / goose-head-shaped braided channel / influencing factors of evolution / development trend / Guanzhou Waterway

引用本文

导出引用
徐华, 王浩杰, 张帆一, . 长江下游官洲水道河床演变特性及趋势[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(4): 18-26 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250207
XU Hua, WANG Hao-jie, ZHANG Fan-yi, et al. Riverbed Evolution Characteristics and Trends of Guanzhou Waterway in Lower Reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(4): 18-26 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20250207
中图分类号: TV147   

参考文献

[1]
何晓志, 岳红艳, 栾华龙, 等. 太子矶河段近期河床演变与防护措施探讨[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(6):1-7.
(He Xiao-zhi, Yue Hong-yan, Luan Hua-long, et al. Analysis of Recent Riverbed Evolution and Protection Measures in the Taiziji Reach[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2025, 42(6):1-7. (in Chinese))
[2]
刘中惠. 长江中下游鹅头型汊道演变及治理[J]. 人民长江, 1993, 24(12): 31-37.
(Liu Zhong-hui. Evolution and Treatment of Goose-head-shaped Inlet in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Yangtze River, 1993, 24(12): 31-37. (in Chinese))
[3]
李明, 朱玲玲, 李义天, 等. 长江中下游鹅头型分汊河道演变机理及发展趋势研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2013, 32(1): 174-180, 186.
(Li Ming, Zhu Ling-ling, Li Yi-tian, et al. Study on Evolution Mechanism and Development Trend of the Goose-head Pattern Braided Channel in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2013, 32(1): 174-180, 186. (in Chinese))
[4]
刘亚, 李义天. 鹅头型汊道个体差异研究[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2015, 47(2): 8-14.
(Liu Ya, Li Yi-tian. Study on Individual Differences between Goose-head-shaped Anabranching Channels[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2015, 47(2): 8-14. (in Chinese))
[5]
谢炎. 鹅头型分汊河道冲淤特性对水沙过程的响应研究[D]. 武汉: 长江科学院, 2019.
(Xie Yan. Study on the Response of Scouring and Deposition Characteristics of Goose-head Bifurcated Channel to Flow-sediment Regime[D]. Wuhan: Changjiang River Scientiffic Research Institute, 2019. (in Chinese))
[6]
仵宇凡, 姚仕明, 栾华龙, 等. 长江下游官洲段演变规律与治理思路研究[J]. 中国水运, 2021(23): 117-120.
(Wu Yu-fan, Yao Shi-ming, Luan Hua-long, et al. Study on Evolution Law and Harnessing Ideas of Guanzhou Section in the Lower Reaches of Yangtze River[J]. China Water Transport, 2021(23): 117-120. (in Chinese))
[7]
王宁, 杨云平, 刘晓菲, 等. 边界条件对长江中游周天河段河道演变影响[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(11):30-36.
(Wang Ning, Yang Yun-ping, Liu Xiao-fei, et al. Influence of Boundary Condition on River Channel Evolution of Zhoutian River Reach in Middle Reach of Yangtze River[J]. Yangtze River, 2019, 50(11):30-36. (in Chinese))
[8]
Fotherby L M. Valley Confinement as a Factor of Braided River Pattern for the Platte River[J]. Geomorphology, 2009, 103(4): 562-576.
[9]
Gamberi F, Marani M. Geomorphology and Sedimentary Processes of a Modern Confined Braided Submarine Channel Belt (Stromboli Slope Valley, Southeastern Tyrrhenian Sea)[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2011, 81(9): 686-701.
[10]
夏细禾, 颜国红. 长江中下游分汊河道稳定性研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2000, 17(5):9-11,18.
摘要
为了研究长江中下游分汊河道的稳定性,在总结其 演变特点的基础上,分析了分汊河道赖以长期稳定的原因,并用河床自动调整理论和能耗最小假说来加以解释。认为特定的来水来沙条件和汊道进出口节点的控制作用,使得分汊河道 的能量分配可以通过向支汊输送一定流量来实现。
(Xia Xi-he, Yan Guo-hong. Study on Stability of Branch Channels on Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2000, 17(5):9-11,18. (in Chinese))
In order to study the stability of branch channels o f Yangtze River's middle and lower reaches,on the base of summarizing the evolu tion features of branch channels,the causes of longterm stability of branch ch annels are analyzed and explained by using automatic adjustment theory of riverb ed and energy loss minimum hypotheses.It is considered in this article that spec ific watersand conditions and control function of branch channel's import and export nodes make energy distribution to be achieved by transporting a specified discharge to branch.
[11]
冷魁, 罗海超. 长江中下游鹅头型分汊河道的演变特征及形成条件[J]. 水利学报, 1994, 25(10):82-89.
(Leng Kui, Luo Hai-chao. The Evolution Characteristics and Formation Condition of Goose-head Pattern Diverged Channels in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1994, 25(10):82-89. (in Chinese))
[12]
余文畴. 长江下游分汊河道节点在河床演变中的作用[J]. 泥沙研究, 1987, 12(4):12-21.
(Yu Wen-chou. Action of Nodes of the Braided Channel at the Lower Yangtze River in the Fluvial Processes[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 1987, 12(4): 12-21. (in Chinese))
[13]
李元生. 鹅头型分汊河段变化特征及治理措施[J]. 水运工程, 2013(4): 113-116.
(Li Yuan-sheng. Goose-head Variation Characteristics of Braided River and Its Control Measures[J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2013(4): 113-116. (in Chinese))
[14]
马有国, 高幼华. 长江中下游鹅头型汊道演变规律的分析[J]. 泥沙研究, 2001, 26(1): 11-15.
(Ma You-guo, Gao You-hua. Study on the Evolution of Goose-neck Bifurcated Channel in the Middle and Lower Reaches of Changjiang(Yangtze) River[J]. Journal of Sediment Rese Arch, 2001, 26(1): 11-15. (in Chinese))
[15]
刘亚, 汪飞, 李义天. 长江中下游鹅头型汊道航道整治目标河型研究[J]. 水利学报, 2015, 46(4): 443-451.
(Liu Ya, Wang Fei, Li Yi-tian. Objective River Pattern of Waterway Regulation of Goose-head-shaped Anabranching Channel in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46(4): 443-451. (in Chinese))
[16]
朱玲玲, 葛华, 李义天, 等. 三峡水库蓄水后长江中游分汊河道演变机理及趋势[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2015, 23(2): 246-258.
(Zhu Ling-ling, Ge Hua, Li Yi-tian, et al. Branching Channels in the Middle Yangtze River, China[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(2): 246-258. (in Chinese))
[17]
闻云呈, 徐华, 夏云峰, 等. 新水沙条件下靖江边滩演变特性及影响因素研究[J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(增刊1): 6-10.
(Wen Yun-cheng, Xu Hua, Xia Yun-feng, et al. Evolution Characteristics and Influential Factors of Marginal Bank of Jingjiang River under New Sediment and Flow Conditions[J]. Yangtze River, 2018, 49(Supp.1): 6-10. (in Chinese))

基金

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3204504)
长江水科学联合基金项目(U2340227)
国家自然科学基金项目(52201332)
南京水利科学研究院研究生学位论文基金项目(Yy225012)

编辑: 刘运飞
PDF(11958 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/