PDF(10255 KB)
PDF(10255 KB)
PDF(10255 KB)
数字孪生平台支撑下长江骨干水库抗旱补水调度情景推演
Scenario Simulation of Drought Relief and Water Replenishment Scheduling for Key Reservoirs in Yangtze River Basin Supported by Digital Twin Platform
在全球气候变暖的背景下,长江流域干旱灾害风险持续增加,流域抗旱管理面临着旱情监测预警精度不高、抗旱调度预演预判能力不足等瓶颈问题,亟待深入研究。从抗旱业务管理和“四预”应用需求出发,构建了抗旱补水调度数字孪生平台,选择长江流域2022年特大干旱为典型案例,围绕“当前旱情诊断-未来趋势研判-抗旱调度推演-预案会商决策”全链条全过程开展了情景推演,构建了干旱网络舆情监测分析、旱警水位超限告警预警、抗旱调度方案知识库和场景匹配等关键技术,实现了抗旱“四预”目标,切实提升了流域抗旱管理智能化、精细化水平,为推进干旱防御数字孪生建设提供了技术示范。
[Objective] In response to the persistent high-temperature drought of the highest intensity since 1961 that occurred across most of the Yangtze River Basin during the summer and autumn of 2022, the Changjiang Water Resources Commission successively launched two rounds of special campaigns to combat drought, ensure water supply, and secure autumn grain harvest. A digital twin platform for drought relief scheduling in the Yangtze River Basin was developed and scenario simulations for drought defense were conducted, providing technical demonstration for the construction of a digital twin system for drought defense in the river basin. [Methods] The platform was developed in line with the operational requirements of early warning, simulation, and contingency planning. Using the platform, the severe drought in the Yangtze River Basin in 2022 were simulated. [Results] (1) Guided by the requirements of drought relief based on prediction, early warning, simulation, and contingency planning, and combining needs such as drought relief information management, emergency response, drought disaster verification and assessment, drought relief benefit evaluation, and drought relief contingency planning, a digital twin platform for drought relief and water replenishment scheduling was developed. Functions such as monitoring and alarm, prediction and early warning, scheduling simulation, contingency plan consultation, and user management were realized. (2) The severe drought in the Yangtze River Basin in 2022 was selected as a case study. Scenario simulations were conducted along the whole chain and entire process of “current drought diagnosis,future trend analysis,drought relief scheduling simulation,contingency plan consultation and decision-making”. “Current drought diagnosis” included drought monitoring data access, over-limit alarm for monitoring data, and monitoring of drought-related online public opinion, addressing the question of “where is the drought occurring?” “Future trend analysis” included drought prediction data access, prediction model calculation, and over-limit early warning for prediction data, addressing the question of “how will the drought evolve?” “Drought relief scheduling simulation” included the construction of a knowledge base of drought relief scheduling schemes and drought relief scheduling schemes based on knowledge base and scenario simulation, addressing the question of “how should the reservoirs be operated?” “Contingency plan consultation and decision-making” included drought relief emergency plan query, automatic generation of drought relief reports, and intelligent response of drought relief knowledge base, addressing the question of “what actions should be taken for drought relief?” [Conclusion] (1) A digital twin platform for drought relief and water replenishment scheduling is developed, and scenario simulation of the severe drought in the Yangtze River Basin in 2022 is conducted, forming a model case of a basin-level digital twin system for drought defense. (2) Future research should focus on water inflow and demand prediction models for the river basin, big data analysis of online public opinion, and intelligent matching and rolling optimization of drought relief scheduling scenarios, to effectively improve the intelligent level of drought relief and disaster reduction management in the Yangtze River Basin.
数字孪生平台 / 抗旱调度 / “四预” / 情景推演 / 长江流域
digital twin platform / drought relief scheduling / prediction, early warning, simulation, and contingency planning / scenario simulation / Yangtze River Basin
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
周波涛, 钱进. IPCC AR6报告解读:极端天气气候事件变化[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2021, 17(6):713-718.
(
|
| [4] |
武新英, 郝增超, 张璇, 等. 中国夏季复合高温干旱分布及变异趋势[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2021, 52(12):90-98.
(
|
| [5] |
梅梅, 高歌, 李莹, 等. 1961—2022年长江流域高温干旱复合极端事件变化特征[J]. 人民长江, 2023, 54(2):12-20.
(
|
| [6] |
史芳斌, 张方伟, 万汉生. 2001年长江流域干旱及成因分析[J]. 水利水电快报, 2002, 23(8): 28-29, 32.
(
|
| [7] |
彭京备, 张庆云, 布和朝鲁. 2006年川渝地区高温干旱特征及其成因分析[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2007, 12(3):464-474.
(
|
| [8] |
陈鲜艳, 周兵, 钟海玲, 等. 2011年长江中下游春旱的气候特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(1): 139-145.
(
|
| [9] |
彭京备, 刘舸, 孙淑清. 2013年我国南方持续性高温天气及副热带高压异常维持的成因分析[J]. 大气科学, 2016, 40(5): 897-906.
(
|
| [10] |
李俊, 袁媛, 王遵娅, 等. 2019年长江中下游伏秋连旱演变特征[J]. 气象, 2020, 46(12): 1641-1650.
(
|
| [11] |
冯宝飞, 邱辉, 纪国良. 2022年夏季长江流域气象干旱特征及成因初探[J]. 人民长江, 2022, 53(12): 6-15.
(
|
| [12] |
蔡阳, 成建国, 曾焱, 等. 加快构建具有“四预” 功能的智慧水利体系[J]. 中国水利, 2021(20): 2-5.
(
|
| [13] |
杨旭颖. 阜新市防汛抗旱指挥系统研究与应用分析[J]. 水利科学与寒区工程, 2022, 5(11): 168-170.
(
|
| [14] |
杨帆, 邓丽仙, 付奔, 等. 基于“两台一库” 的云南省抗旱业务应用系统设计与实现[J]. 水利信息化, 2022(5): 88-92.
(
|
| [15] |
李鹏飞, 王延乐, 王志飞, 等. 基于WebGIS的长江流域干旱评估预报系统设计[J]. 人民长江, 2014, 45(2):18-21.
(
|
| [16] |
范光伟, 王高丹, 杨跃, 等. 珠江流域抗旱抑咸“四预”系统研发与应用[J]. 中国水利, 2022(1):12-13,18.
(
|
| [17] |
李喆, 向大享, 陈喆, 等. 数字孪生驱动的长江流域干旱防御平台设计与开发[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(8): 180-188.
在全球气候变化的背景下,长江流域发生了多次严重的高温干旱灾害,流域抗旱管理面临着旱情监测告警效率较低、旱灾预报预警精度不高、抗旱预案推演能力不足等瓶颈,迫切需要开展数字化转型。从长江流域抗旱减灾业务管理和“四预”应用需求出发,基于智慧水利和数字孪生建设的总体要求,综合运用WebGL、GIS等技术,建立了干旱防御数字孪生平台,研发了遥感干旱监测评估、干旱专业模型动态加载、旱警水位超限预警、抗旱预案可视化等关键技术,初步实现了“预报-预警-预演-预案”全链条贯通业务应用,切实提升了长江流域抗旱管理智能化、精细化水平,为流域干旱防灾减灾提供了技术支撑。
(
|
| [18] |
严子奇, 周祖昊, 韦瑞深, 等. 基于双层滑动的水库旱限水位确定算法[J]. 水科学进展, 2022, 33(6):914-923.
(
|
| [19] |
罗成鑫, 丁伟, 张弛, 等. 水库分级分期旱限水位设计与控制研究[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(3):348-357.
(
|
| [20] |
严子奇, 周祖昊, 严登华, 等. 江河断面分级分期旱限水位(流量)确定方法[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(1): 53-62.
(
|
| [21] |
李喆, 陈喆, 向大享, 等. 基于微博文本的2022年长江流域特大干旱关注热度时空特征分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(6):185-193.
在移动互联网大数据的背景下,带有发布时间、发布位置等特征标签的社交媒体数据在自然灾害应对中的关键作用受到了广泛的关注。选择我国2022年长江流域特大干旱为应用案例,以主流的互联网社交媒体——微博文本作为数据源,基于机器学习与人工智能算法,抓取干旱演化过程数据,深入分析旱灾舆情时空特征与主题特征。研究结果表明:① 社交媒体关注热度时间变化与干旱发生演化过程较为同步,7月份长江全流域干旱在微博的讨论数据较小,到8月上旬陡然上升,至8月中下旬达到顶峰,12月初基本归零。从旱灾发生演化过程上看,四川、重庆、江西等受旱严重省市微博讨论热度时间特征与当地水文径流数据时间变化整体呈“此消彼长”趋势;② 社交媒体关注热度空间特征与区域受旱严重程度分布基本吻合,四川、重庆、江西等高热度省市微博讨论占比超过50%,而云南、西藏、上海、青海等省市的微博讨论占比较低;③ 社交媒体干旱主题特征差异较大,江西、湖南两省主题热词为“鄱阳湖面积萎缩”、“水位下降”,四川、重庆两省市舆情热词是“山火”、“地震”、“农户减产”、“用电紧张”。伴随旱情发展演化过程,公众干旱舆情的情感倾向经历了从负向逐步趋向正向的过程。研究成果可为流域旱灾跟踪分析与社会公众抗旱动员提供技术支撑。
(
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |