PDF(8496 KB)
PDF(8496 KB)
PDF(8496 KB)
基于降阶投影的非稳态渗流渗透系数反演方法
Inversion Method for Unsteady Seepage Permeability Coefficients Based on Reduced-Order Projection
为了解决地下水模型反演的高耗时问题,提出了一种可快速识别非稳态渗透系数的耦合反演算法。该算法将参数反演过程与降阶模型训练相耦合,用降阶模型替代原始模型从而减少总反演耗时。为了使降阶模型能准确捕捉原始模型在时域上的响应特征,采用均匀策略法对时间步快照进行采集。基于耦合反演算法的特点,通过计算最优参数对应的降阶解在时域内各节点的相对误差,以最大误差值小于预设阈值为迭代终止条件。以一个二维抽水井模型为例,将该方法与基于原始模型的反演方法进行了对比。结果表明: 在取得相当的反演精度的前提下,该方法可节省约95.38%的计算耗时。此外,在不同观测误差、网格密度及反演维数条件下,该方法的反演结果与原始模型一致,而计算耗时均小于原始模型的5%,且对“维数诅咒”问题具有更强的鲁棒性。因此,该方法显著提升了参数反演的计算效率,具有良好的工程应用前景。
[Objective] During the parameter inversion process of groundwater models, frequent calls to the forward model result in excessive computational demand and prolonged processing time, which severely limits their practical applicability. To address the high time consumption in groundwater model inversion, this study proposes a coupled inversion algorithm capable of rapidly identifying unsteady permeability coefficients. [Methods] The proposed algorithm coupled the parameter inversion process with reduced-order model training, where the reduced-order model was employed instead of the original model for parameter inversion calculation, thereby reducing total inversion time. During the iteration process, the sum of squared errors between the reduced-order model calculation values and observations was used as the objective function, and an improved differential evolution algorithm with strong global search capability was employed as the optimization method for parameter inversion. In each iteration, the parameters that best matched the observations were identified as optimal, and snapshots of these optimal parameters were calculated to train the reduced-order model, thereby enhancing the inversion accuracy in the next generation. To enable the reduced-order model to accurately capture the time-domain response characteristics of the original model, a uniform snapshot strategy was employed to collect time-step snapshots. Based on the characteristics of the coupled inversion algorithm, the relative error of the reduced-order solution corresponding to the optimal parameters was calculated at all nodes within the time domain, and iteration was terminated when the maximum error fell below a preset threshold. [Results] Taking a two-dimensional pumping well model as an example, the proposed method was compared with an inversion approach based on the original model. The results indicated that: (1) For unsteady seepage parameter inversion, compared with the optimal time snapshot strategy, using a uniform snapshot collection strategy to construct the reduced-order model could achieve higher computational accuracy, while the reduced-order model had a lower average order. (2) While maintaining inversion accuracy comparable to that of the original model, the proposed algorithm could reduce computational time by approximately 95.37%. (3) Near the optimal parameters, the reduced-order model obtained by the proposed method showed almost identical responses to the original model. However, the error increased significantly when moving away from the optimal solution. (4) The effects of observation error, mesh density, and inversion dimensionality on the inversion accuracy of the proposed algorithm were consistent with those of the original model, but the computational time of the proposed algorithm was less than 5% of that of the original model. (5) The proposed algorithm was less affected by the order of the original model, and the increase in the computational time was proportionally smaller than the increase in model order, indicating higher computational efficiency for high-order models than for low-order ones. (6) Compared with low-dimensional inversion problems, the proposed algorithm exhibited greater time-saving efficiency in handling high-dimensional cases, suggesting stronger robustness against the curse of dimensionality. (7) Under different convergence accuracies, the proposed algorithm could consistently reproduce the results of the original model without a significant increase in computational time even as accuracy improved. [Conclusion] The proposed coupled inversion algorithm in this study, as a deterministic finite element-based inversion framework, innovatively couples the training process of the reduced-order model with the parameter inversion process and significantly improves the computational efficiency of parameter inversion.Characterized by a simple structure,ease of implementation, and no need for posterior error calculation,the algorithm has significant engineering application value and promising prospects for broad application.
非稳态渗流 / 降阶模型 / 参数反演 / 优化算法 / 渗透系数 / 地下水模拟
unsteady seepage / reduced-order model / parameter inversion / optimization algorithm / permeability coefficient / groundwater simulation
| [1] |
刘长吉, 陈建生, 陈亮, 等. 库坝区地下水渗流场模式识别模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(增刊1):2808-2814.
(
|
| [2] |
孙超伟, 柴军瑞, 许增光, 等. 金川水电站地下厂房裂隙围岩渗控效应数值模拟与评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(5): 786-797.
(
|
| [3] |
周建平, 杜效鹄, 周兴波, 等. 世界高坝研究及其未来发展趋势[J]. 水力发电学报, 2019, 38(2): 1-14.
(
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
陈益峰, 周创兵, 胡冉, 等. 大型水电工程渗流分析的若干关键问题研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(9): 1448-1454.
(
|
| [7] |
余红玲, 王晓玲, 王成, 等. 贝叶斯框架下大坝渗流参数反演组合代理模型研究[J]. 水利学报, 2022, 53(3): 306-315, 324.
(
|
| [8] |
余红玲, 王晓玲, 任炳昱, 等. 土石坝渗流性态分析的IAO-XGBoost集成学习模型与预测结果解释[J]. 水利学报, 2023, 54(10):1195-1209.
(
|
| [9] |
蒋水华, 熊威, 朱光源, 等. 暴雨及水位骤降条件下渗流参数空间变异的水库滑坡概率分析[J]. 地球科学, 2024, 49(5): 1679-1691.
(
|
| [10] |
李雅琦, 杨杰, 程琳, 等. 基于RVM-CS的工程区地层渗透系数反演分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2020, 37(11): 121-127, 135.
为了准确确定工程区各地层渗透系数,基于相关向量机(RVM)与布谷鸟算法(CS)建立反演分析模型,对研究区域内各地层的渗透系数进行反演分析。首先,基于均匀设计法构造渗透系数组合,利用有限元计算测点水位值并生成RVM学习样本;随后,通过训练RVM构建渗透系数与水头之间的映射关系,使其能够代替有限元方法快速地完成渗流计算;最后,根据工程区钻孔的实测水位值,利用CS算法搜索确定区域内各地层的渗透系数。将建立的渗流反演模型应用于某大型抽水蓄能电站工程区的初始渗流场中,结果表明:所建立的渗流反演模型能够考虑多地层渗透系数和钻孔水头间的非线性,RVM能代替有限元模型,可快速、精确地确定渗透系数;此渗流反演模型在大型抽水蓄能电站工程区反演结果合理,精度满足工程要求。
(
An inversion analysis model integrating relevance vector machine (RVM) and cuckoo search (CS) is established to accurately determine the permeability coefficients of strata in engineering area. Firstly, the uniform design method is employed to construct combinations of permeability coefficients, and the finite element method is used to calculate the water head values and generate RVM learning samples. In subsequence, the mapping relation between permeability coefficient and water head is constructed by RVM training which replaces the finite element method in calculating seepage. According to the measured water head values of drilling holes in the project area, the CS algorithm is adopted to search and determine the permeability coefficient of stratum. The seepage inversion model is applied to the inversion of initial seepage field of a large pumped storage power station project. Results demonstrate that the proposed model reflects the nonlinear relation between water head in borehole and permeability coefficient of multiple strata. RVM could replace the finite element method to determine quickly and accurately the permeability coefficient. The inversion results for the large pumped storage power station are reasonable and the accuracy of the proposed model meets engineering requirements.
|
| [11] |
邓志平, 邹艺, 潘敏, 等. 考虑多参数空间变异性的非饱和土石坝坝坡可靠度分析[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2024, 32(4):1108-1123.
(
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
梅冠华, 康灿, 张家忠. 二维壁板颤振的本征正交分解降阶模型研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(23): 144-151.
(
|
| [15] |
胡金秀, 郑保敬, 高效伟. 基于特征正交分解降阶模型的瞬态热传导分析[J]. 中国科学:物理学力学天文学, 2015, 45(1):73-84.
(
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
方卫华, 李琳, 周克明. 基于特征正交分解的土坝变形安全监控模型[J]. 水电能源科学, 2016, 34(8): 99-102, 98.
(
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
刘营, 李鸿光, 李韵, 等. 基于子结构的参数化模型降阶方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(16): 148-154.
(
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
钱武文, 赵新宇, 陈柏全, 等. 基于降阶投影的初始渗流场反演方法[J]. 南昌工程学院学报, 2024, 43(1): 27-33.
(
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |