PDF(6728 KB)
PDF(6728 KB)
PDF(6728 KB)
四湖流域营养盐时空分布特征及来源分析
Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Source Analysis of Nutrients in the Four Lakes Basin
为评估四湖流域生态修复后水质的时空变化特征及污染源,基于2022—2023年水环境调查数据,结合水质环境质量指数(WQI)、相关性分析及主成分分析,对丰水期、平水期及枯水期水质指标进行了监测和分析。结果表明: ①四湖流域水质表现出明显的时空变化规律,丰水期水温(WT)、氨氮( -N)浓度、总磷(TP)浓度及高锰酸盐指数(CODMn)较平、枯水期明显升高,而溶解氧(DO)及总氮(TN)浓度的变化趋势则相反;平水期浊度(TUR)大于其他时期,化学需氧量(COD)和生化需氧量(BOD5)的变化差异不显著。空间分布上,下游水体的TUR、CODMn、COD和BOD5浓度明显高于中上游,中游水体的 -N浓度高于上、下游,上游水体的TP和TN浓度较低,且干流水质普遍较支流差。②WQI范围为15.61~32.88,整体水质为“差”“非常差”水平,且WQI呈现平水期 > 枯水期 > 丰水期的趋势,空间上为上游 > 中游 > 下游、支流 > 干流的变化特征。③主成分分析表明,污染源主要来自生活污水、工业废水、养殖及农业灌溉排水等外源污染,以及水体沉积物和动植物残体腐烂等内源污染。综上所述,尽管四湖流域已实施生态修复工程,但水质改善仍面临挑战,研究结果为区域污染防治与生态环境保护提供了科学依据。
[Objective] The Four Lakes (Changhu Lake, Sanhu Lake, Bailu Lake, and Honghu Lake) Basin, located in the hinterland of the Jianghan Plain in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, is an essential agricultural production area and an ecologically sensitive wetland area in Hubei Province. To reveal the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of nutrients and their pollution sources in the water bodies of the Four Lakes Basin after ecological restoration, this study systematically analyzes the variation patterns of water quality and the main driving factors based on measured monitoring data, aiming to provide a scientific basis for watershed water environment management and ecological restoration effectiveness assessment. [Methods] Based on field survey data from wet, normal, and dry seasons during 2022-2023, a total of 12 sampling sites were set up in the Four Lakes Basin, covering the upstream, midstream, and downstream areas, as well as mainstream and tributaries. Nine water quality indicators were measured, including water temperature (WT), dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity (TUR), permanganate index (CODMn), chemical oxygen demand (COD), five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), ammonium nitrogen ( -N), total phosphorus (TP), and total nitrogen (TN). The water quality was comprehensively evaluated using the water quality index (WQI) method. Correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA) were combined to identify the main pollution factors and sources. The characteristics of water quality evolution were systematically revealed from temporal, spatial, and pollution source aspects through data statistics, significance tests, and graphical visualization performed using software such as Excel, SPSS, and CANOCO. [Results] Water quality indicators in the Four Lakes Basin exhibited significant differences both temporally and spatially. Temporally, WT, -N, TP, and CODMn were the highest during the flood season, while DO and TN showed opposite trends. TUR peaked during the normal season. Spatially, the concentrations of TUR, CODMn, COD, and BOD5 in the downstream water bodies were significantly higher than those in the midstream and upstream. The -N concentration was the highest in the midstream, while the TP and TN concentrations were the lowest in the upstream. Overall, the concentrations of various nutrient indicators demonstrated a pattern of “mainstream > tributaries”. The WQI values ranged from 15.61 to 32.88, indicating that the overall water quality in the Four Lakes Basin was at a “poor” to “very poor” level. Its temporal variation followed the order: normal season > dry season > wet season, and its spatial variation was characterized by upstream > midstream > downstream, and tributaries > mainstream. Correlation analysis showed that WT, DO, COD, -N, TP, and TN were the main factors affecting WQI, among which N -N, TP, and TN were significantly negatively correlated with WQI (P<0.05). PCA results indicated that pollutants during wet season were dominated by nutrients, primarily originating from external inputs such as agricultural fertilization, livestock and poultry farming, and domestic sewage. Pollution during normal season was mainly organic matter, largely from domestic sewage and industrial wastewater discharge. Pollution during dry season was influenced by both external input and internal release, with sediment resuspension and decomposition of plant and animal residues being important internal pollution sources. Overall, although the water quality in the Four Lakes Basin improved slightly after the implementation of ecological restoration, significant seasonal and regional pollution characteristics remained. [Conclusion] In summary, the water quality in the Four Lakes Basin exhibits significant temporal differences across the flood, normal, and dry seasons, while spatially, the upstream areas are superior to the midstream and downstream areas, and the tributaries are superior to the mainstream.. Although ecological restoration projects have been effective, the overall water quality of the basin remains at a moderate to severe pollution level. Agricultural fertilization, livestock and poultry breeding wastewater, domestic sewage, and industrial discharge are the main exogenous pollution sources, while the release of water body sediments and the decomposition of organic residues are the main endogenous pollution pathways. The innovation of this study lies in systematically revealing the spatiotemporal distribution pattern and pollution causes of nutrients in the Four Lakes Basin under the background of ecological restoration for the first time. This study also constructs a multi-level analytical framework of “WQI comprehensive evaluation-correlation analysis-PCA”, which can effectively identify key pollution factors and dominant sources, thereby providing scientific support for assessing the performance of watershed ecological restoration and implementing targeted management in the basin. The findings indicate that agricultural non-point source pollution control and sediment remediation should be further strengthened, and an integrated management system combining exogenous reduction and endogenous treatment should be established to promote the sustained improvement of the water environment and long-term restoration of ecological functions in the Four Lakes Basin.
water quality / spatiotemporal distribution / nutrients / source analysis / Four Lakes Basin
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
卢宗福, 史小红, 李国华. 富营养化咸水湖泊岱海温室气体排放特征及驱动因素分析[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(10): 6157-6170.
(
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
赵楠芳, 成静清, 刘章君. 环鄱阳湖区入出湖总磷浓度与负荷变化分析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024, 41(8):31-37.
入、出湖总磷负荷变化是影响鄱阳湖富营养化状态的关键性要素。基于2009—2018年水质水量监测资料,计算环鄱阳湖区的入、出湖总磷负荷,并采用算术平均法和加权平均法分别计算总磷年平均浓度,探明其时空变化规律;运用双累积曲线法、回归分析法,分析入湖水量和入湖总磷浓度与入湖总磷负荷之间的相关关系,揭示污染负荷的主要控制因素。结果表明:①加权平均法比算术平均法更能反映环鄱阳湖区入、出湖水量、水质时空差异性,入湖总磷多年平均浓度高低排序依次为饶河区(0.123 mg/L)>信江区(0.091 mg/L)>抚河区(0.069 mg/L)>赣江区(0.063 mg/L)>修水区(0.045 mg/L)。②环鄱阳湖区各水资源分区入湖总磷负荷多年平均值为98 514 t,低于湖口出湖总磷负荷年均值108 442 t,这主要是由于鄱阳湖滨湖区输入、湖体内源释放以及干湿沉降等均未进行计算。③赣江区和饶河区入湖总磷年负荷多年平均值分别为45 208 t和19 320 t,占五河(赣江、抚河、信江、饶河、修水)总入湖负荷的比重位居前二,其中赣江区的占比达46%。④各水资源分区月入湖总磷负荷与入湖水量存在显著的相关关系,说明各分区入湖总磷负荷在很大程度上受水量控制。
(
|
| [5] |
陈天宇, 刘常清, 史小丽, 等. 近十年洪泽湖富营养化状态变化趋势及原因分析[J]. 环境科学, 2022, 43(7):3523-3531.
(
|
| [6] |
李青云, 汤显强, 林莉. 长江科学院流域水环境与水生态研究进展及展望[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2021, 38(10): 48-53, 59.
简要介绍了长江科学院流域水环境研究所创建十年来的发展历程,系统总结了10 a来的主要进展和创新成果。①建立了功能齐全的水环境及水生态实验室,通过国家计量认证体系的指标有130余项,覆盖了《地表水环境质量标准》(GB 3838—2002)规定的109项指标,建成了先进的流域水环境数值模拟平台,建成了河湖生态修复技术中试试验场;②特色研究成果包括:基于水沙过程的多面源营养物质输移机理与生态防治、水沙调控下大型水库磷输送特征、长江流域典型水域特殊污染物赋存特征及生态风险、长江源区主要鱼类栖息地形成机制、高原河湖水环境变化特征、饮用水水源地水质监测分析和保护管理、农村水电生态环境影响评价与对策、河湖水系连通的生态水文过程模拟和风险评价等;③主要的技术成果包括:湖库富营养化水体移动式水质净化系统、微电流电解抑藻技术、镉污染土壤生态水利修复技术、农村分散式供水的微电流电解灭菌技术、选铜尾砂改性及资源化利用技术等。最后,分析了水环境研究所发展中存在的不足,针对新时期面临的形势,对下一步研究重点进行了分析和展望。
(
In this paper we briefly introduce the development of the Basin Water Environmental Research Department (BWERD) of Changjiang(Yangtze) River Scientific Research Institute in the past decade since its inception, and systematically summarize its major achievements and innovations in science and technology. (i) A laboratory of water environment and ecology with complete functions has been established, based on which over 130 items related to water quality can be measured, including 109 items specified by <i>Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water</i> (GB 3838—2002), and their measurement has passed China Inspection Body and Laboratory Mandatory Approval. Moreover, an advanced numerical simulation platform for basin water environment has been established and a pilot site for river and lake ecological restoration technologies has been set up. (ii) Characteristic achievements in scientific research include: multi-nonpoint source nutrients transport mechanism and ecological prevention practices based on water and sediment processes, impacts of rural hydropower on environment and ecology and corresponding measurements, eco-hydrological processes simulation and risk assessment of river-lake system connectivity, phosphorus transport patterns under water and sediment regulation in large reservoirs, occurrence characteristics and ecological risks of specific pollutants in typical regions of the Yangtze River Basin, habitat formation mechanism of fishes in the source region of the Yangtze River, changing patterns of river and lake environment in Plateaus, and monitoring, analysis, management, and protection of water quality in drinking water sources, etc. (iii) Main achievements in technology include: mobile water purification system for eutrophic water bodies in lakes and reservoirs, algae growth suppression technology based on micro-electric electrolysis, eco-hydrological remediation technology for cadmium contaminated soil, sterilization technology for rural decentralized water supply based on micro-electric electrolysis, and modification and resource utilization technology for copperflotation tailings, etc.. Last but not the least, we examine the shortages that have arisen in the development of the BWERD, and expect the focus of future research in the light of the current situation.
|
| [7] |
朱广伟, 许海, 朱梦圆, 等. 三十年来长江中下游湖泊富营养化状况变迁及其影响因素[J]. 湖泊科学, 2019, 31(6): 1510-1524.
(
|
| [8] |
朱天顺, 刘梅, 申恒伦, 等. 南水北调东线湖群水体营养状态评价及其限制因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(12):2992-3002.
(
|
| [9] |
姚仕明, 何子灿. 长江中下游江湖演变规律及其影响效应[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2025, 42(1): 1-10.
受强人类活动和极端洪旱气候等因素综合影响,长江中下游江湖水沙情势、冲淤分布及江湖关系等均发生改变。三峡水库蓄水后,长江中下游干流年均输沙量大幅减少,减幅达70%~93%,年内流量过程总体有所坦化,但汛后因水库群蓄水而退水速率加快;洞庭湖四水及荆江三口年均入湖径流量无明显变化,入湖沙量呈减少趋势,入湖年均水、沙量分别减少了9%和38%;鄱阳湖五河年均入湖水、沙量分别减少了2%和57%,出湖年均水、沙量分别增多了1%和5%。水沙过程的改变引起长江中下游冲淤格局变化,2003—2021年长江中下游河段累计冲刷50.3亿m<sup>3</sup>,年均冲刷量2.65亿m<sup>3</sup>;洞庭湖区由淤积转为微冲,荆江三口洪道以冲刷为主;鄱阳湖区总体上由淤转冲,入江水道冲刷下切明显。未来30 a长江中下游干流河道仍将保持冲刷态势,至2050年末宜昌至大通河段、荆江三口洪道累计冲刷量分别为35.8亿m<sup>3</sup>和1.17亿m<sup>3</sup>,洞庭湖区呈微淤状态,鄱阳湖区呈微冲状态。基于长江中下游江湖冲淤新格局,从防洪、供水、航运、生态及涉水建筑物安全等5个方面,较为系统地阐述了江湖演变的影响效应,并针对性地提出了若干对策和建议。
(
|
| [10] |
夏盈, 张莹莹, 厉恩华, 等. 江汉平原四湖流域生境质量时空演化及预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2022, 31(7):1616-1626.
(
|
| [11] |
崔嘉宇, 郭蓉, 宋兴伟, 等. 洪泽湖出入河流及湖体氮、磷浓度时空变化(2010—2019年)[J]. 湖泊科学, 2021, 33(6):1727-1741.
(
|
| [12] |
孟子豪, 李学梅, 胡飞飞, 等. 汉江支流梯级水库氮磷营养盐分布及驱动因子[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2021, 44(8): 170-176.
(
|
| [13] |
班璇, 杜耘, 吴秋珍, 等. 四湖流域水环境污染现状空间分布和污染源分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(增刊1): 112-116.
(
|
| [14] |
刘永九, 黄素珍, 张璐, 等. 洪湖国际重要湿地沉积物磷空间分布特征及释放风险[J]. 环境科学, 2021, 42(7):3198-3205.
(
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
范泽宇, 袁林, 周亦, 等. 基于WQI法的滴水湖及入湖河道水质研究[J]. 上海海洋大学学报, 2021, 30(2): 276-283.
(
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
耿姣, 王洋, 胡术刚, 等. 基于WQI的平原河网地区河流水质评价与时空变化分析[J]. 环境工程, 2023, 41(6): 187-193, 209.
(
|
| [20] |
孙婷婷, 涂耀仁, 罗鹏程, 等. 2008—2022年上海大莲湖湿地营养盐时空分布特征、水质评价及来源解析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2023, 35(3):886-901.
(
|
| [21] |
李其轩, 张真, 徐梦娇, 等. 乌溪江水库富营养化程度及其影响因子时空分布探讨[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2024, 45(2): 31-38.
(
|
| [22] |
李子阳, 周明华, 徐鹏, 等. 沱江和涪江水系干支流氮磷营养盐的空间分布特征[J]. 环境科学, 2023, 44(7):3933-3944.
(
|
| [23] |
黄亚玲, 李悦, 陈志平, 等. 三沙湾营养盐时空分布特征及其潜在影响因素识别[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2023, 42(3): 440-448.
(
|
| [24] |
郝宇超, 张元, 杨文焕, 等. 寒旱区湖泊氮素类营养盐分布及与环境因子相关性分析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(3): 87-94.
(
|
| [25] |
杨军, 王海艳, 柴毅. 生态恢复对长湖水质时空变化的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2020(7): 77-81, 84.
湖泊富营养化是我国重要的水污染问题之一。为了研究富营养化湖泊生态恢复前后营养盐的动态变化,以湖北长湖为例,分析了2014-2018年期间长湖4个监测点的水质监测数据。结果表明:从时间变化看,长湖水体营养盐具有明显的年际和季节变化特征,2014-2018年,长湖水体各营养盐浓度总体呈逐渐下降趋势;营养盐含量在1、7月份较高,5月份较低。从空间变化看,沿庙湖、海子湖、马洪台和圆心湖区方向,营养盐含量呈下降趋势。尽管生态恢复工程实施后长湖水质逐渐改善,由恢复前的Ⅴ ~ 劣Ⅴ类转好为Ⅳ ~ Ⅴ类,但受湖泊周边畜禽养殖和农业种植等外源污染的影响,长湖水质依然不容乐观。为了恢复长湖水体的自净能力,需对流域内的农业面源污染进行有效控制。
(
Eutrophication of lakes is one of the most serious water-pollution problems in China. Much attention has been paid to ecological restoration as a way to reduce its impact on the environment. Research on the effect of ecological restoration on spatial and temporal variations of water nutrient can provide some important scientific evidence for the management of lake water quality. We conducted an investigation in Changhu Lake of Hubei Province where a series of ecological restoration projects including the “removal of aquaculture enclosure”, the “Planting aquatic plants”, and the “fishery stock enhancement” are implemented. According to the water quality monitoring data of four sampling spots from 2014 to 2018, spatiotemporal series analysis was adopted to analyze its variation characteristics, including total nitrogen (TN), ammonia nitrogen (NH+4-N), total phosphorus (TP), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). The results showed that in terms of temporal distribution, the annual and seasonal variations of water nutrients in Changhu Lake was obvious. Water nutrients showed a gradual decline trend from 2014 to 2018. Nutrient concentrations were high in January and July, while low in May. The spatial pattern of water quality showed a gradual improvement trend from Miaohu zone to Haizihu zone, Mahongtai zone, and Yuanxinhu zone. Water quality of Changhu Lake was improved after ecological restoration.. However, due to the wastewater discharged by non-point sources including livestock and farming from Changhu Lake basin, the situation is not optimistic. In order to recover the self-purification of water bodies and make the water environment in Changhu Lake favorable to people's production and life, we should control the non-point pollution from Changhu Lake basin effectively.
|
| [26] |
谢高华, 陈燕飞, 周元, 等. 洪湖浮游植物群落结构稳态转换及其影响因子[J]. 湿地科学, 2024, 22(2):264-272.
(
|
| [27] |
黄振华, 邵志平, 史新明, 等. 义乌岩口水库富营养化综合评价及水环境容量分析[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(12): 7073-7081.
(
|
| [28] |
高东东, 张涵, 任兴念, 等. 长江上游典型季节性河流富营养化评价及污染成因分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2024, 33(3):584-595.
(
|
| [29] |
林莉, 潘雄. 洪湖水质问题核心及水质综合提升途径思考[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2023, 40(6): 1-6, 20.
作为长江中游重要的生态敏感区域和节点区,洪湖多年来一直承接江汉平原的调蓄与灌溉功能,剧烈的人类活动导致洪湖水体污染和生态系统退化加剧,洪湖水质的提升现已成为实施长江保护修复攻坚战行动的重点。通过系统剖析发现洪湖水质提升的关键问题在于入湖水质不达标、内源污染较重以及水生态受损严重3个方面。要解决洪湖的水污染问题,应坚持系统思维和流域视角,做好洪湖外源控污截污、底泥清淤、湖区和湖滨带生态修复以及水资源科学调度利用等工作,并推行包括洪湖及其支流流域河湖长制联防联控联治机制、生态补偿机制等在内的综合水质提升管理措施。
(
|
| [30] |
刘韬, 夏智宏, 朱浪. 气象条件对湖北长湖水质的影响研究[J]. 气象科技进展, 2018, 8(5): 78-80.
(
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
袁梦祥, 赵洛琪, 高雨晗, 等. 考虑空间尺度效应的云南异龙湖流域主要入湖河流污染源解析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2024, 36(3): 770-781.
(
|
| [33] |
汤云, 卢毅敏, 吴升. 闽江流域水质时空分布特征及污染源解析[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(8): 30-35, 48.
为了解闽江流域河流中的污染物来源和水质时空分布特征,利用2014年1月至2017年2月流域内20个监测断面的8项水质指标月均值监测数据,采用多元统计方法对水质的时空变化规律及其影响因素进行分析。结果表明:流域水质在时间上可划分为T1时段(4—12月份)、T2时段(1—3月份);T1时段水质较好,氨氮是主要污染物,污染源以农业污染为主;T2时段的主要污染物是氨氮和总磷。在空间上可划分为3个群组。S1组主要位于建溪下游、沙溪、大樟溪、闽江干流,水质最差,污染物以营养盐为主,耗氧有机物次之,污染源为福州、三明、南平市的工业废水、生活污水、农业和禽畜养殖污水;S2组位于沙溪下游、富屯溪,水质最好,污染物主要是面源污染中的营养盐污染,水体自净能力良好;S3组位于建溪中上游、富屯溪中上游,污染源主要是农业面源污染。研究成果可为闽江流域的污染治理和水质改善提供参考。
(
According to the monthly monitoring data of eight water quality indicators at 20 sites from January 2014 to February 2017, we probed into the spatio-temporal variations and influential factors of water quality in streams of Minjiang River basin via multivariate statistical method and identified the sources of water pollutants. In temporal scale, the water quality in Minjiang River basin can be categorized in line with two time periods: T1 (April to December), during which the water quality is good with ammonia nitrogen as major pollutant overwhelmingly coming from agriculture;and T2 (January to March) when ammonia nitrogen and total phosphorus are dominant pollutants.In spatial scale, the water quality in Minjiang River basin can be classified according to three regions: the S1 region located in the downstream of Jianxi River, the Shaxi River, the Dazhang River and the main stream of Minjiang River where water quality is the worst with nutrients as main pollutants followed by oxygen consumption organics coming from the industrial wastewater, agricultural and livestock husbandry sewage, and sanitary sewage from cities of Fuzhou, Sanming, and Nanping;the S2 region which is located in the downstream of Shaxi River and the mid-upper reaches of Futun River featured by good self-purification ability and the best water quality with nutrients coming from non-point source pollution; and the S3 region which stands for the mid-upper reaches of Jianxi River and Futun River, with agricultural non-point source pollution as chief pollution source.
|
| [34] |
刘鑫, 史斌, 孟晶, 等. 白洋淀水体富营养化和沉积物污染时空变化特征[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(5):2127-2136.
(
|
| [35] |
王灿, 袁婷, 张建利, 等. 贵州草海水质时空变化和水体营养状况[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2019, 36(6): 14-19.
为了解和改善草海水质现状,于2017年分季度监测了12个样点的11项水质指标,并分别采用综合营养状态指数法(TLI)和ArcGIS软件对全湖水体进行了营养状况评价和分区,根据《地表水环境质量标准》(GB 3838—2002)对水质进行了类别划分。研究表明:①除pH值和溶氧(DO)外,其他指标季节差异显著,悬浮物(SPM)在秋季最高,TN,TP浓度在春季最高,COD<sub>Mn</sub>,NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N和Chl.a浓度在夏季最高;TN,TP,NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N和SPM浓度从上游到下游逐渐降低;②草海水体呈中营养-轻度富营养化(45.3≤TLI(∑)≤57.7);根据TLI(∑)值将全湖分为入水口(轻度富营养化)、近县城和入水口(主要为轻度富营养化)、湖中部(中营养-轻度富营养化)、中下游至近出水口(中营养水平)4个区;③草海水质主要为 Ⅱ— Ⅳ类,TN和COD<sub>Mn</sub>是影响水质类别的主要指标。因此,草海水质保护的关键是周边污水排放治理,重点区域是湖区上游和入湖河流。
(
In the purpose of revealing and moreover improving the water quality of Caohai Lake, eleven water quality parameters were monitored seasonally in 2017 at 12 sampling sites, and in subsequence, the nutritional status in the lake was assessed and divided into different partitions by employing comprehensive trophic status index (TLI) and ArcGIS. According to national standard <i>Quality Standard for Surface Water Environment</i>(GB 3838-2002), the water quality in the lake was classified. Results unveiled that: (1) except for pH and dissolved oxygen, all parameters showed significant seasonal differences. The concentration of suspended solid material (SPM) was highest in autumn, and the concentrations of TN and TP were highest in spring, while those of COD<sub>Mn</sub>, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, and Chl.<i>a</i> were highest in summer; concentrations of TN, TP, NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N and SPM decreased gradually from the upstream to the downstream. (2) In a holistic sense, the water body in Caohai Lake was mesotrophic to slightly eutrophic (45.3≤ TLI(∑)≤57.7). According to the TLI(∑) values, the lake was divided into four sectors, namely, the inlet area of the lake (slightly eutrophic in general), the areas located near the urban area of Weining county and river inlet (slightly eutrophic), the middle area of the lake (mesotrophic to slightly eutrophic), and the middle-lower reach to the outlet of the lake (mesotrophic). (3) The water quality classification of Caohai Lake was mainly Ⅱ-Ⅳ, dominantly affected by TN and COD<sub>Mn</sub>. In conclusion, controlling the discharge of waste water in surrounding areas, in particular, the upstream of the lake area and the water inlets, should be the key of improving the water quality of Caohai Lake.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |