天津市植被演变特征及其对水热效应的时滞分析

吴华, 李佳潼, 徐悦, 朱嘉琦, 郭齐韵, 张鑫, 谢雪

长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 66-75.

PDF(8162 KB)
PDF(8162 KB)
长江科学院院报 ›› 2026, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1) : 66-75. DOI: 10.11988/ckyyb.20241084
水土保持与生态修复

天津市植被演变特征及其对水热效应的时滞分析

作者信息 +

Characteristics of Vegetation Evolution and Time-Lag Response to Hydrothermal Effects in Tianjin, China

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

明确天津市植被活动的动态变化及其对水热条件响应的时滞性,可为区域生态环境治理和持续发展提供科学依据。以2000—2022年的天津市MODIS13数据集、气温和降雨数据集为研究对象,采用Hurst指数、Theil-Sen趋势分析、M-K检验、地理信息系统(GIS)空间分析和时滞偏相关分析等方法,探究近23 a天津市植被动态变化特征及其水热效应。结果表明: ①天津市年归一化植被指数(NDVI)均值为0.782,年内波动趋势与气温、降雨的变化存在一定的正向联系;②全市Hurst指数均值为0.493,59.62%的区域NDVI向恶性发展;③天津市分别有10.943%和61.408%的区域与气温和降雨存在时滞效应,植被对气温的平均滞后时长为2.737个月,对降雨的平均滞后时间为1.016个月;④不同植被类型对气温和降雨的响应有所不同,阔叶林对降雨的响应时间最短,草本植物覆盖的响应时间最长;稀疏植被对气温的响应最快,阔叶林对其响应最慢。近23 a天津地区植被整体覆盖水平较好,呈现过去退化但未来改善的趋势。降雨与植被相关性更高,气温的滞后时间更长。

Abstract

[Objective] Clarifying dynamic changes of vegetation activities and time lag in response to hydrothermal conditions in Tianjin can provide a scientific basis for regional ecological environment management and sustainable development. Previous studies have investigated urban vegetation dynamic differentiation based on different data sources and time scales, while spatiotemporal patterns of vegetation over long time series, as well as the direction and extent of vegetation response to changes in hydrothermal conditions, still remain uncertain. Most current studies lack specific quantification of the lag duration of climate change. [Methods] This paper took the MODIS13 dataset, air temperature, and precipitation dataset of Tianjin from 2000 to 2022 as research objects. Based on the MatLab platform, methods such as the Hurst index, Theil-Sen trend analysis, Mann-Kendall test, geographic information system (GIS) spatial analysis, and time-lagged partial correlation analysis were adopted to investigate the characteristics of vegetation dynamics and their response to hydrothermal effects in Tianjin over the past 23 years. Additionally, this study analyzed vegetation evolution characteristics and their response to climate change, providing references for understanding ecological environment response under climate change. [Results] The results showed that: (1) annual average NDVI in Tianjin was 0.782, showing an overall trend of first increasing and then decreasing. Areas with high vegetation cover were mainly distributed in northern Jizhou District, northern Baodi District, and Ninghe District. The intra-annual fluctuation trend showed a certain positive correlation with changes in temperature and precipitation. (2) The mean Hurst index for the entire city was 0.493, with 45.225% of the areas having a Hurst index >0.5. Overall, vegetation in Tianjin showed a trend of past degradation but future improvement. Areas with continuous NDVI degradation were mainly distributed in Xiqing District, Ninghe District, and Dongli District. (3) 10.943% and 61.408% of the areas in Tianjin had time-lag effects on temperature and precipitation, respectively. The average lag time of vegetation response to temperature across the city was 2.737 months. The vegetation response to precipitation had a time lag of 1 to 3 months, with an average lag time of 1.016 months. Overall, vegetation was more sensitive to precipitation, and the average lag time of vegetation response to precipitation in the city was shorter than that to air temperature. (4) The responses of different vegetation types to air temperature and precipitation varied. Broad-leaved forests had the shortest response time to precipitation, while herbaceous cover had the longest response time. Sparse vegetation had the fastest response to air temperature, and broad-leaved forests had the slowest response. [Conclusion] From 2000 to 2022, the overall vegetation cover level in Tianjin was good, with NDVI showing a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, indicating past degradation but future improvement. The correlation between precipitation and vegetation is higher, and the lag time of air temperature is longer. Vegetation in Tianjin exhibits lag response characteristics to both air temperature and precipitation, and lag time varies among different vegetation types.

关键词

水热效应 / 归一化植被指数(NDVI) / 偏相关分析 / 气温 / 降雨 / 时滞效应 / 天津市

Key words

hydrothermal effects / NDVI / partial correlation analysis / air temperature / rainfall / time-lag effect / Tianjin

引用本文

导出引用
吴华, 李佳潼, 徐悦, . 天津市植被演变特征及其对水热效应的时滞分析[J]. 长江科学院院报. 2026, 43(1): 66-75 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20241084
WU Hua, LI Jia-tong, XU Yue, et al. Characteristics of Vegetation Evolution and Time-Lag Response to Hydrothermal Effects in Tianjin, China[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2026, 43(1): 66-75 https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20241084
中图分类号: Q948    X87 (环境遥感)   

参考文献

[1]
唐见, 曹慧群, 陈进. 生态保护工程和气候变化对长江源区植被变化的影响量化[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(1): 76-86.
摘要
分析长江源区生态保护工程和气候变化对植被变化的影响程度,对于长江源区生态工程的生态效益评估,以及区域植被适应性生态管理政策的制定具有重要意义。因此,本文基于1982-2015年的归一化植被指数数据(Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, NDVI)和气象数据,分析长江源区植被NDVI的时空变化规律,构建预测植被NDVI对气候因子响应的人工神经网络模型,在此基础上,在年和季节尺度上量化气候变化和生态保护工程对长江源区植被变化的影响程度。结果表明:① 在长江源区气候条件变化和生态保护工程影响下,长江源区植被退化得到遏制,植被生长呈好转趋势;② 海拔相对较低的通天河附近植被NDVI增加幅度较大,高海拔的沱沱河和当曲流域的植被NDVI增加幅度相对较小;③ 长江源区植被NDVI对气候因子响应存在1~2月的滞后性。构建的人工神经网络模型的拟合优度参数人工神经网模型具有较高的预测精度,可以用来模拟植被NDVI对气候因子的响应;④ 年尺度的植被NDVI增加受到生态保护工程的影响程度(58.5%)大于气候变化的影响程度(41.5%)。生长季生态保护工程对NDVI的影响程度(63.3%)大于气候变化对NDVI的影响程度(36.7%),而非生长季气候变化是影响长江源区植被生长的关键要素(52.8%)。研究结果有助于为长江源区植被生态系统恢复、管理和利用战略的科学制定提供决策依据。
(TANG Jian, CAO Hui-qun, CHEN Jin. Effects of Ecological Conservation Projects and Climate Variations on Vegetation Changes in the Source Region of the Yangtze River[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(1): 76-86.) (in Chinese)

Quantitative research on the effects of ecological conservation projects and climate variations on vegetation changes is vital to the ecological benefit evaluation of ecological conservation projects, and has important implications for sustainable ecological rehabilitation management strategies in the source region of the Yangtze River. Based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data and meteorological data during 1982-2015, this paper examines the temporal and spatial variations of NDVI; constructs back propagation artificial neural network (BPANN) model to simulate the responses of NDVI to climate factors; and quantifies the effects of ecological conservation projects and climate variations on vegetation changes at the annual and seasonal scales in the source region of the Yangtze River. The results indicate that: (1) Because of the effects of ecological conservation projects and climate variations, vegetation degradation curbed in the source region of the Yangtze River. (2) NDVI increased greatly near the Tongtian River located at relatively low altitudes. Minor increases in NDVI were observed near the Tuotuo and Dangqu rivers located at relatively high altitudes. (3) A time lag (about 1-2 months) existed between NDVI and major climate factors in the source region of the Yangtze River. The goodness of fit of the BPANN model shows that the simulation accuracy is relatively high. The model can be used to simulate the responses of NDVI to climate variations. (4) Ecological conservation projects exerted a slightly greater impact on NDVI changes than they did on climate variations at the yearly time scale (58.5% and 41.5%, respectively). During growing season, ecological conservation projects also exerted a slightly greater impact on NDVI changes than they did on climate variations (63.3% and 36.7%, respectively). During non-growth season, climate variations are the key factor affecting vegetation growth in the source region of the Yangtze River (52.8%). The research results provide a basis for scientific decision-making about the vegetation ecosystem rehabilitation, management and utilization strategies in the source region of the Yangtze River.

[2]
刘雪佳. 中国陆地主要植被类型生产力及其与气候因子的关系[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2019.
(LIU Xue-jia. Productivity of Major Vegetation Types on land in China and its Relationship with Climate Factors[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2019.) (in Chinese)
[3]
刘智源, 李继红. 2000—2020年黑龙江省植被时空变化对气候因子响应[J]. 森林工程, 2024, 40(1): 85-97.
(LIU Zhi-yuan, LI Ji-hong. Responses of Temporal and Spatial Changes of Vegetation to Climate Factors in Heilongjiang Province from 2000 to 2020[J]. Forest Engineering, 2024, 40(1): 85-97.) (in Chinese)
[4]
杨铭鑫, 李俊, 同小娟, 等. 2001—2020年中国森林植被EVI对气候因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(23): 10850-10863.
(YANG Ming-xin, LI Jun, TONG Xiao-juan, et al. Response of Forest Vegetation Enhanced Vegetation Index to Climatic Factors in China in 2001—2020[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(23): 10850-10863.) (in Chinese)
[5]
王会静, 郭玉川, 白运保, 等. 新疆植被动态格局及其对气候的时滞效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(11): 137-145.
(WANG Hui-jing, GUO Yu-chuan, BAI Yun-bao, et al. Dynamic Pattern of Vegetation in Xinjiang and Its Time-lag Effect on Climate[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(11): 137-145.) (in Chinese)
[6]
逯金鑫. 黄土高原植被恢复成效评估与气候变化及干旱的时滞效应[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2022.
(LU Jin-xin. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Vegetation Restoration on the Loess Plateau with the Time-lag Effect of Climate Change and Drought[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2022.) (in Chinese)
[7]
郭岚瑄, 王贺封, 沈石凯, 等. 京津冀地区kNDVI时空变化及对气候因子的响应[J]. 西南农业学报, 2024, 37(8):1837-1849.
(GUO Lan-xuan, WANG He-feng, SHEN Shi-kai, et al. Spatiotemporal Variation of kNDVI and Its Response to Climatic Factors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 37(8): 1837-1849.) (in Chinese)
[8]
张景华, 封志明, 姜鲁光, 等. 澜沧江流域植被NDVI与气候因子的相关性分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(9): 1425-1435.
(ZHANG Jing-hua, FENG Zhi-ming, JIANG Lu-guang, et al. Analysis of the Correlation between NDVI and Climate Factors in the Lancang River Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(9): 1425-1435.) (in Chinese)
<p>Based on MODIS NDVI and meteorological data from 2000 to 2010, this study analyzed the correlation between NDVI and meteorological factors pixel by pixel in the Lancang River Basin, studied the spatial pattern of the relationship between vegetation and climate, and explored the possible influence factors. The study indicated that: 1) Both temperature and precipitation had significant impacts on vegetation growth in the Lancang River Basin, and the temperature&rsquo;s effect was particularly striking. 2) The response of vegetation growth to climate change showed significant time lag effect, and the lag time shortened as the latitude went up. 3) For different vegetation types, both the orders of influence degree of meteorological factors on NDVI and the sensitive degree of NDVI to climate change were, in turn, grassland, cropland, shrub forest and woodland. For the same vegetation, the impact of temperature was greater than that of precipitation, but NDVI was more sensitive to precipitation. 4) Climate characteristics (perennial mean temperature and multi-year average precipitation) had significant impacts on the response time of NDVI to climate change. There is no significant influence of perennial mean temperature on the relationship between NDVI and temperature, but multi-year average precipitation has impacts on the degree of correlation between NDVI and precipitation.</p>
[9]
王惠平, 曹晓云, 孙树娇, 等. 青藏高原植被-气候因果响应关系及未来植被动态预测[C]// 中国环境科学学会,中国光大国际有限公司.中国环境科学学会2024年科学技术年会论文集(三). 青海: 青海省气象科学研究所,2024:16.
(WANG Hui-ping, CAO Xiao-yun, SUN Shu-jiao, et al. Vegetation-climate Causal Response Relationship and Prediction of Future Vegetation Dynamics on the Tibetan Plateau[C]// Chinese Society of Environmental Sciences,China Everbright International Co. Proceedings of the 2024 Annual Scientific and Technical Conference of the Chinese Society of Environmental Science (III). Qinghai: Qinghai Institute of Meteorological Science, 2024:16.) (in Chinese)
[10]
何航, 张勃, 侯启, 等. 1982—2015年中国北方归一化植被指数(NDVI)变化特征及对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020, 36(1): 70-80.
(HE Hang, ZHANG Bo, HOU Qi, et al. Variation Characteristic of NDVI and Its Response to Climate Change in Northern China from 1982 to 2015[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020, 36(1): 70-80.) (in Chinese)
[11]
王艳召, 王泽根, 王继燕, 等. 近20年中国不同季节植被变化及其对气候的瞬时与滞后响应[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2020, 36(4): 33-40, 76.
(WANG Yan-zhao, WANG Ze-gen, WANG Ji-yan, et al. Transient and Lagged Response of Seasonal Vegetation Changes to Climate in China during the Past Two Decades[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2020, 36(4): 33-40, 76.) (in Chinese)
[12]
包春兰, 陈华根. 东北平原植被对气候变化的滞后响应研究[J]. 测绘标准化, 2020, 36(3):14-20.
(BAO Chun-lan, CHEN Hua-gen. On Time-lag Response of Vegetation Cover to Climate Change in Northeast Plain[J]. Standardization of Surveying and Mapping, 2020, 36(3): 14-20.) (in Chinese)
[13]
TANG W, LIU S, KANG P, et al. Quantifying the Lagged Effects of Climate Factors on Vegetation Growth in 32 Major Cities of China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 132: 108290.
[14]
王永锋, 靖娟利, 刘海红, 等. 顾及时滞和累积效应的西南喀斯特地区植被变化归因分析[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(7):4382-4391.
(WANG Yong-feng, JING Juan-li, LIU Hai-hong, et al. Attribution Analysis of Vegetation Variation in the Karst Region of Southwest China Considering Time Lag and Accumulation Effects[J]. Environmental Science, 2025, 46(7): 4382-4391.) (in Chinese)
[15]
高越, 布仁仓, 熊在平, 等. 基于气候时滞效应和空间异质性对中国植被总初级生产力的模拟[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(17): 7615-7630.
(GAO Yue, BU Ren-cang, XIONG Zai-ping, et al. GPP Simulation of Vegetation in China Based on Time-lag Effect and Spatial Heterogeneity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(17): 7615-7630.) (in Chinese)
[16]
宋梦来, 陈海涛, 丁晗, 等. 1990—2020年天津市植被覆盖度时空演变特征及影响因素分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(1): 154-163.
(SONG Meng-lai, CHEN Hai-tao, DING Han, et al. Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristic and Influencing Factors of Vegetation Coverage in Tianjin during 1990-2020[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(1): 154-163.) (in Chinese)
[17]
彭守璋. 中国1 km分辨率逐月平均气温数据集(1901—2023)[Z]. 国家青藏高原数据中心,(2019-11-19)[2024-07-18].
(PENG Shou-zhang. China 1 km Resolution Month-by-Month Mean TemperaturE Dataset (1901-2023)[Z]. National Tibetan Plateau Data Chenter,(2019-11-19)[2024-07-18].) (in Chinese)
[18]
彭守璋. 中国1km分辨率逐月降水量数据集(1901—2023)[Z]. 国家青藏高原数据中心,(2020-06-08)[2024-07-16].
(PENG Shou-zhang. Monthly precipitation dataset at 1km resolution for China (1901-2023)[Z]. National Tibetan Plateau Data Center. (2020-06-08)[2024-07-16].) (in Chinese)
[19]
ZHANG X, LIU L, CHEN X, et al. GLC\_FCS30: Global Land-cover Product with Fine Classification System at 30 m Using Time-series Landsat Imagery[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13(6): 2753-2776.
. Over past decades, a lot of global land-cover products have been released; however, these still lack a global land-cover map with a fine classification system and spatial resolution simultaneously. In this study, a novel global 30 m land-cover classification with a fine classification system for the year 2015 (GLC_FCS30-2015) was produced by combining time series of Landsat imagery and high-quality training data from the GSPECLib (Global Spatial Temporal Spectra Library) on the Google Earth Engine computing platform. First, the global training data from the GSPECLib were developed by applying a series of rigorous filters to the CCI_LC (Climate Change Initiative Global Land Cover) land-cover and MCD43A4 NBAR products (MODIS Nadir Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function-Adjusted Reflectance). Secondly, a local adaptive random forest model was built for each 5∘×5∘ geographical tile by using the multi-temporal Landsat spectral and texture features and the corresponding training data, and the GLC_FCS30-2015 land-cover product containing 30 land-cover types was generated for each tile. Lastly, the GLC_FCS30-2015 was validated using three different validation systems (containing different land-cover details) using 44 043 validation samples. The validation results indicated that the GLC_FCS30-2015 achieved an overall accuracy of 82.5 % and a kappa coefficient of 0.784 for the level-0 validation system (9 basic land-cover types), an overall accuracy of 71.4 % and kappa coefficient of 0.686 for the UN-LCCS (United Nations Land Cover Classification System) level-1 system (16 LCCS land-cover types), and an overall accuracy of 68.7 % and kappa coefficient of 0.662 for the UN-LCCS level-2 system (24 fine land-cover types). The comparisons against other land-cover products (CCI_LC, MCD12Q1, FROM_GLC, and GlobeLand30) indicated that GLC_FCS30-2015 provides more spatial details than CCI_LC-2015 and MCD12Q1-2015 and a greater diversity of land-cover types than FROM_GLC-2015 and GlobeLand30-2010. They also showed that GLC_FCS30-2015 achieved the best overall accuracy of 82.5 % against FROM_GLC-2015 of 59.1 % and GlobeLand30-2010 of 75.9 %. Therefore, it is concluded that the GLC_FCS30-2015 product is the first global land-cover dataset that provides a fine classification system (containing 16 global LCCS land-cover types as well as 14 detailed and regional land-cover types) with high classification accuracy at 30 m. The GLC_FCS30-2015 global land-cover products produced in this paper are free access at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3986872 (Liu et al., 2020).
[20]
尹振良, 冯起, 王凌阁, 等. 2000—2019年中国西北地区植被覆盖变化及其影响因子[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(4): 11-21.
摘要
中国西北地区土地荒漠化问题严重,生态环境脆弱。厘清该地区植被覆盖时空变化特征及影响因子,对生态环境保护具有重要意义。基于MOD13A3数据,通过最大值合成法处理获得2000—2019年归一化差值植被指数(Normalized Difference Vegetation Index,NDVI)时序数据,采用趋势分析、Hurst指数法及地理探测器对研究区植被覆盖的时空变化特征及影响因子进行分析。结果表明:(1)2000—2019年,研究区植被覆盖整体呈增长趋势,NDVI年增长速率为0.0027(P&lt;0.05),均值为0.252。空间分区年增长速率有差异,黄河流域片区(0.0062)&gt;半干旱草原片区(0.0026)&gt;内陆干旱片区(0.0018)。(2)研究区植被覆盖呈增长趋势的面积占55.77%,退化区域占3.76%,增长的土地利用类型以耕、林、草地为主。植被覆盖变化趋势具有持续性的区域面积占总面积的31.87%,其中持续性改善面积(17.04%)大于持续性退化面积(1.27%),黄河流域片区增长情况及持续性增长情况最优。(3)影响植被覆盖空间分布的主要因子按影响力依次为降水、气温、日照、相对湿度,但对各分区的影响程度略有差异。黄河流域片区、内陆干旱片区空间分布受降水影响最大,半干旱草原区受日照影响最大。(4)研究区植被覆盖变化以自然因子与人类活动共同驱动为主,自然因子对植被生长的促进作用大于人类活动,且自然因子对植被覆盖变化的贡献率更高。本研究结果可为评估气候变化背景下西北地区生态环境变化提供参考。
(YIN Zhen-liang, FENG Qi, WANG Ling-ge, et al. Vegetation Coverage Change and Its Influencing Factors across the Northwest Region of China during 2000-2019[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(4): 11-21.) (in Chinese)

The problem of land desertification in northwest region of China is serious and the ecological environment is severe. It is of great significance to clarify the spatio-temporal variation characteristics and driving factors of vegetation cover in this area for ecological environment protection. In this study, MOD13A3 products in this area were used as the data source to obtain the NDVI sequence set from 2000 to 2019 through the maximum value synthesis method. Trend analysis, anomaly analysis, Hurst index, geographic detector, correlation analysis and residue analysis were used to analyze the spatiotemporal variation characteristics and impact factors of vegetation cover in the study area. The results showed that :(1) In recent 20 years, the vegetation coverage in the study area showed an overall growth trend, with an increase rate of 0.0027·a-1 and an average NDVI of 0.252. However, the growth rate of the Yellow River basin area (0.0062·a-1) is higher than that of the semi-arid grassland area (0.0026·a-1) and inland arid area (0.0018·a-1). (2) The vegetation coverage in the study area is on the rise, accounting for 55.77% of the total area, while the degraded area accounts for 3.76% of the total area. The increased land use types were mainly tillage, forest and grassland. The area with sustainable change trend of vegetation cover accounted for 31.87% of the total area, the sustainable improvement (17.04%) was greater than the sustainable degradation (1.27%), and the growth and sustainable growth of the Yellow River basin area were the best. (3) The main contributing factors that affect the spatial distribution of vegetation cover are precipitation, temperature, sunshine and relative humidity in order of influence, but the influence degree of each sub-region is slightly different. The spatial distribution of arid areas in the Yellow River basin and inland is most affected by precipitation, and the semi-arid grassland is most affected by sunshine. (4) Vegetation cover changes is mainly driven by natural factors and human activities, and natural factors on the growth of vegetation role in promoting are greater than human activity, and natural factors on vegetation cover change in the rate of contribution are higher. The results of this study can provide reference for assessing the ecological environment change under the background of climate change in northwest China.

[21]
陈沛源, 俞巧, 李金文, 等. 1957—2016年泾河干流径流量变化趋势分析[J]. 人民黄河, 2022, 44(8):22-27.
(CHEN Pei-yuan, YU Qiao, LI Jin-wen, et al. Changes of Runoff in the Jinghe River Basin in 1957-2016[J]. Yellow River, 2022, 44(8): 22-27.) (in Chinese)
[22]
刘畅, 任小丽, 张黎, 等. 三江源国家公园NPP长时序时空变化多模型集成分析[J]. 地理学报, 2024, 79(9):2356-2371.
摘要
三江源国家公园位于青藏高原腹地,拥有独特气候和丰富物种基因,在生态系统中具有特殊地位。然而,气候变化和人类活动的影响使其面临生态挑战。准确监测三江源国家公园植被净初级生产力(NPP)的时空变化对于促进生态环境的保护和改善至关重要。模型模拟是陆地生态系统研究的重要方法,但模拟结果存在不确定性。多模型集成技术能够综合不同模型的优点,提高NPP模拟的准确性,为研究NPP长时序变化提供思路,同时为环境治理提供科学支持。本文应用多模型集成分析方法,结合4种生态系统过程模型CLM、DALEC、CEVSA和GLOPEM-CEVSA,分析三江源国家公园2000—2018年NPP的时空变化,并探讨气候因子对NPP变化的影响。结果表明:① 2000—2018年三江源国家公园年均NPP为251.17 gC m<sup>-2</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>,澜沧江源园区最大(267.24 gC m<sup>-2</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>),长江源园区最小(121.88 gC m<sup>-2 </sup>a<sup>-1</sup>),黄河源园区居中(198.81 gC m<sup>-2</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>),NPP呈现自东南向西北递减的空间分布。② 2000—2018年三江源平均NPP为222.00~298.02 gC m<sup>-2</sup> a<sup>-1</sup>,年际变化呈显著增加趋势,增速为9.8 gC m<sup>-2</sup> 10a<sup>-1</sup>。③ 气候因子对三江源NPP的影响存在区域差异性,长江源园区和黄河源园区主要受到气温和辐射的影响,澜沧江源园区还受降水的显著影响。本文研究结果将为三江源国家公园生态保护成效评估和科学管理提供技术支撑与决策依据。
(LIU Chang, REN Xiao-li, ZHANG Li, et al. Spatio-temporal Variation of Net Primary Productivity in Three-river-source National Park Using a Multi-model Integration Method[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(9): 2356-2371.) (in Chinese)

The Three-River-Source National Park, located in the hinterland of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, possesses unique climate and abundant genetic species. However, this region is facing serious ecological problems due to climate change and human activities. Accurate monitoring of spatiotemporal variations in net primary productivity (NPP) in the Three-River-Source region is crucial for promoting ecological conservation and environment improvement. Model simulation is an important approach in terrestrial ecosystem research, but it inherently remains uncertain. Multi-model integration techniques can enhance the accuracy of NPP simulation and provide a better estimation of NPP variations for environmental governance. In this study, we used four process-based ecosystem models (i.e., CLM, DALEC, CEVSA, and GLOPEM-CEVSA) and a multi-model integration analysis method to examine the spatiotemporal changes in NPP in the Three-River-Source National Park from 2000 to 2018 and to investigate the effect of climatic factors on NPP variations. The results show that NPP exhibited a decreasing trend from southeast to northwest, with an average annual NPP of 251.17 gC m-2 a-1 during 2000-2018. Ecosystems in the Lancang River Source Park had the highest NPP (267.24 gC m-2 a-1), followed by the Yellow River Source Park (198.81 gC m-2 a-1) and Yangtze River Source Park (121.88 gC m-2 a-1. The average NPP in the Three-River-Source region ranged from 222.00 to 298.02 gC m-2 a-1 and had a significant increasing trend with the rate of 9.8 gC m-2 10a-1. The attributions of NPP variation to climatic factors were far different among regions. It was primarily affected by temperature and radiation in the Yangtze River Source Park and Yellow River Source Park, but was also significantly influenced by precipitation in the Lancang River Source Park. The findings of this study could provide technical support and decision-making basis for assessing the effectiveness of ecological conservation and ecological management in the Three-River-Source National Park.

[23]
段艺芳, 任志远, 孙艺杰. 陕北黄土高原植被生态系统水分利用效率气候时滞效应[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3408-3419.
(DUAN Yi-fang, REN Zhi-yuan, SUN Yi-jie. Time-lay Effects of Climate on Water Use Efficiency in the Loess Plateau of Northern Shaanxi[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 3408-3419.) (in Chinese)
[24]
WU D, ZHAO X, LIANG S, et al. Time-lag Effects of Global Vegetation Responses to Climate Change[J]. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21(9): 3520-3531.
Climate conditions significantly affect vegetation growth in terrestrial ecosystems. Due to the spatial heterogeneity of ecosystems, the vegetation responses to climate vary considerably with the diverse spatial patterns and the time-lag effects, which are the most important mechanism of climate-vegetation interactive effects. Extensive studies focused on large-scale vegetation-climate interactions use the simultaneous meteorological and vegetation indicators to develop models; however, the time-lag effects are less considered, which tends to increase uncertainty. In this study, we aim to quantitatively determine the time-lag effects of global vegetation responses to different climatic factors using the GIMMS3g NDVI time series and the CRU temperature, precipitation, and solar radiation datasets. First, this study analyzed the time-lag effects of global vegetation responses to different climatic factors. Then, a multiple linear regression model and partial correlation model were established to statistically analyze the roles of different climatic factors on vegetation responses, from which the primary climate-driving factors for different vegetation types were determined. The results showed that (i) both the time-lag effects of the vegetation responses and the major climate-driving factors that significantly affect vegetation growth varied significantly at the global scale, which was related to the diverse vegetation and climate characteristics; (ii) regarding the time-lag effects, the climatic factors explained 64% variation of the global vegetation growth, which was 11% relatively higher than the model ignoring the time-lag effects; (iii) for the area with a significant change trend (for the period 1982-2008) in the global GIMMS3g NDVI (P < 0.05), the primary driving factor was temperature; and (iv) at the regional scale, the variation in vegetation growth was also related to human activities and natural disturbances. Considering the time-lag effects is quite important for better predicting and evaluating the vegetation dynamics under the background of global climate change. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[25]
黄葵, 卢毅敏, 魏征, 等. 土地利用和气候变化对海河流域蒸散发时空变化的影响[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21(12): 1888-1902.
摘要
蒸散发(ET)是水文能量循环和气候系统的关键环节,研究ET的时空变化特征及其响应土地利用和气候变化的驱动机制对于理清流域水资源和气候变化的关系具有重要的意义。本文基于MOD16/ET数据集定量分析了海河流域2000-2014年ET的时空变化特征,并结合时序气温降水数据和土地利用数据,采用相关分析方法定量探索了ET与气候因子的驱动力关系。结果表明:① 海河流域2000-2014年ET表现为较为显著的空间分布格局,呈现出北部和南部高、西北部和中东部低的分布特性。不同土地利用类型的多年ET呈林地>草地>耕地>其他类型的特征;② 2000-2014年海河流域年均ET波动范围为371.96~441.29 mm/a,多年ET的均值为398.69 mm/a,平均相对变化率为-0.41%,整体呈下降趋势;③ 多年月ET与气温和降水均呈单峰型周期性变化趋势,年内月ET呈单峰变化趋势;④ 春秋两季的ET与降水和气温的相关性明显高于其他季节,ET与气温和降水的平均相关系数是-0.17和0.37,表明降水对于ET的响应程度强于气温;⑤ 驱动分区结果表明海河流域ET受气候因子驱动的主要类型是降水驱动型和降水、气温共同驱动型;⑥ 海河流域耕地ET变化气候因子驱动模式主要是降水、气温共同驱动型;林地、草地的驱动模式主要气温驱动型和降水驱动型,其他土地利用类型的驱动模式主要是受其他因素驱动。该研究将对海河流域水资源开发管理和区域气候调节起到科学指导作用。
(HUANG Kui, LU Yi-min, WEI Zheng, et al. Effects of Land Use and Climate Change on Spatiotemporal Changes of Evapotranspiration in Haihe River Basin[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2019, 21(12): 1888-1902.) (in Chinese)
[26]
徐勇, 黄雯婷, 靖娟利, 等. 京津冀地区植被NDVI动态变化及其与气候因子的关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(5): 319-327.
(XU Yong, HUANG Wen-ting, JING Juan-li, et al. Dynamic Variation of Vegetation Cover and Its Relation with Climate Variables in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 40(5): 319-327.) (in Chinese)
[27]
杨艳丽, 孙艳玲, 王中良. 天津地区植被的时空变化及其影响因素分析[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 36(6):48-53.
(YANG Yan-li, SUN Yan-ling, WANG Zhong-liang. Analysis on the Spatio-temporal Variation of Vegetation and Its Influential Factors in Tianjin Area[J]. Journal of Tianjin Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 36(6):48-53.) (in Chinese)
[28]
魏民. 《天津市城市绿化条例》颁布实施可操作性强管理与处罚适度分离[J]. 城建监察, 2004(12):1.
(WEI Ming. The Promulgation and Implementation of the Tianjin Urban Greening Regulations:A Moderate Separation of Management and Punishment[J]. Urban Construction Supervision, 2004(12): 1.) (in Chinese)
[29]
徐大勇, 张涛, 孙贻超, 等. 基于NDVI的天津市滨海新区植被覆盖度变化及预测研究[J]. 生态经济, 2010, 26(12): 45-50.
(XU Da-yong, ZHANG Tao, SUN Yi-chao, et al. Analysis and Prediction of Vegetation Coverage Dynamic Change Based on NDVI in Tianjin Binhai New Area[J]. Ecological Economy, 2010, 26(12): 45-50.) (in Chinese)
[30]
李明财, 刘德义, 郭军. 天津地区各季植被NDVI年际动态及其对气候因子的响应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2009, 18(3):979-983.
(LI Ming-cai, LIU De-yi, GUO Jun. Interannual NDVI Variability in Different Seasons and Its Response to Climatic Variables in Tianjin Area[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2009, 18(3): 979-983.) (in Chinese)
[31]
王俊枝, 萨日盖, 窦银银, 等. 2000—2022年鄂尔多斯高原人类活动对植被覆盖变化的影响[J/OL]. 西安理工大学学报,(2024-06-20)[2024-10-15].
(WANG Jun-zhi, SA Ri-gai, DOU Yin-yin, et al. Effects of Human Activities on Vegetation Cover Change in the Ordos Plateau during 2000-2022[J/OL]. Journal of Xi’an University of Technology,(2024-06-20)[2024-10-15].) (in Chinese)
[32]
欧阳习军, 董晓华, 魏榕, 等. 青藏高原植被生长季NDVI时空变化及对气候因子的响应分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2023, 30(2): 220-229.
(OUYANG Xi-jun, DONG Xiao-hua, WEI Rong, et al. Analysis of Spatiotemporal Variation of NDVI in the Vegetation Growing Season and Responses to Climatic Factors in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 30(2): 220-229.) (in Chinese)

基金

中央引导地方项目(XZ202401YD0028)
西藏大学人才创新团队与实验室平台建设项目(2022ZDTD10)

编辑: 黄玲
PDF(8162 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/